What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

If the Steelers win the Super Bowl (1 Viewer)

Does Tomlin pass Cowher and become the 2nd best coach in franchise history?

  • Yes (I'm a Steelers fan)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No (I'm a Steelers fan)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes (I'm not a Steelers fan)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No (I'm not a Steelers fan)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Cowher did more with less with more consistency than anyone I can think of. Tomlin who is solid in his own right, stepped into a great situation and capitalized, but the fact remains...he got handed the keys to a Ferrari.
:popcorn:People often say that about Roethlisberger, but it isn't really true. The Steelers were 7-11 in the 18 games prior to his being handed the starting job and went 15-1 the rest of that season. That's not a coincidence.If people are going to say that someone walked into a good situation, it's Tomlin to whom the statement more accurately applies. Not knocking him, he's done a terrific job and actually took them up a notch from where they were previously, but some of that also coincides with Roethlisberger's on-field maturation and the emergence of guys like Polamalu and Harrison. Tomlin's an excellent coach, and there are things I like even more about him than Cowher, but until he shows a sustained run of fielding a highly competitive team, I can't rank him above the Chin. Even if he does, he has the benefit of having a real QB to lead the way. The assortment of dog #### Cowher had to trot out there every Sunday for more than a decade reads like a who's who of all-time NFL QB stiffs. When Neil O'Donnell is easily the best QB you had for about 13 years, you know you've got some garbage guys out there. But, to his credit, Cowher almost always kept the team competitive, meaning they were rarely in a position to draft a really good QB. Maybe if they'd drafted Marino in '83, they'd have 10 Lombardis by now.
if we are going hypothetical, any other organization prolly would canned Cowher. So isn't it fair to say that given the patience of the steelers perhaps there are 15-20 coaches who could have ultimately had Cowhers success, but since most teams never allow a head coach to develop like that they lacked the opportunityyou gotta judge the man based on what he did
I am judging him based on what he did. He kept that team extremely competitive with nothing at the QB spot for a prolonged period of time. They drafted a halfway decent QB and went 15-1 and went to the AFCC the first season and won it all the next. Yes, they had a "SB hangover season" the year after, but so did last year's Steelers under Tomlin. If the Steelers win Sunday, it sets Tomlin up to surpass Cowher, but we cannot say he already has. What if the Steelers go 4-12 for the next 7 years and Tomlin is fired? Would you still think he's a better coach than Cowher? Of course not. So, we can't say that yet. If Tomlin continues to keep the team playing at a high level, with a hiccup here and there, for the next decade, then he will have surpassed Cowher. But he isn't there yet. And no, if Cowher called the Rooneys and said he wanted back in Pittsburgh, I wouldn't want them to fire Tomlin and re-hire Cowher. It's not about who's the better coach right now, it's about legacy, and Tomlin simply hasn't been around long enough to compare yet. I think he would tell you the same thing if you asked him.Actually, he'd say something like : "I'm not concerned with legacy... or looking back at my body of work, if you will, I'm concerned with winning football games. We're focused on the Green Bay Packers. Those guys present significant challenges, and it's going to be tough sledding out there. Such is life in the NFL... we're excited about the opportunity that's been laid in front of us. January football, our focus all year has been to collect that hardware, and we're going to spend all our time preparing to do just that. Questions?"
I think you are over valuing the chinfor the vast majority of his career he had very good teams that could not win in the playoffsAS far as passing rank in the league, rushing rank in the league, and total offense the numbers over his entire career are similar to Tomlin's. I cannot give Cowher a pass on the long span of good teams failing to win simply because he did not have Big Ben.He had GREAT rushing teams, GREAT defensive teams, and was for the most part a Regular Season forcehis QBs were enough to win 9 division titles in 15 years, and from that he got one super bowl winHe is a great coach, but in my min Tomlin is better.
 
What if he wins next year?

still not better? He still won;t have the 15 years in, still has Ben.

How many WOULD he have to win to be seen as better than Cowher? Or is it simply impossible.

 
Cowher did more with less with more consistency than anyone I can think of. Tomlin who is solid in his own right, stepped into a great situation and capitalized, but the fact remains...he got handed the keys to a Ferrari.
:goodposting:People often say that about Roethlisberger, but it isn't really true. The Steelers were 7-11 in the 18 games prior to his being handed the starting job and went 15-1 the rest of that season. That's not a coincidence.If people are going to say that someone walked into a good situation, it's Tomlin to whom the statement more accurately applies. Not knocking him, he's done a terrific job and actually took them up a notch from where they were previously, but some of that also coincides with Roethlisberger's on-field maturation and the emergence of guys like Polamalu and Harrison. Tomlin's an excellent coach, and there are things I like even more about him than Cowher, but until he shows a sustained run of fielding a highly competitive team, I can't rank him above the Chin. Even if he does, he has the benefit of having a real QB to lead the way. The assortment of dog #### Cowher had to trot out there every Sunday for more than a decade reads like a who's who of all-time NFL QB stiffs. When Neil O'Donnell is easily the best QB you had for about 13 years, you know you've got some garbage guys out there. But, to his credit, Cowher almost always kept the team competitive, meaning they were rarely in a position to draft a really good QB. Maybe if they'd drafted Marino in '83, they'd have 10 Lombardis by now.
if we are going hypothetical, any other organization prolly would canned Cowher. So isn't it fair to say that given the patience of the steelers perhaps there are 15-20 coaches who could have ultimately had Cowhers success, but since most teams never allow a head coach to develop like that they lacked the opportunityyou gotta judge the man based on what he did
I am judging him based on what he did. He kept that team extremely competitive with nothing at the QB spot for a prolonged period of time. They drafted a halfway decent QB and went 15-1 and went to the AFCC the first season and won it all the next. Yes, they had a "SB hangover season" the year after, but so did last year's Steelers under Tomlin. If the Steelers win Sunday, it sets Tomlin up to surpass Cowher, but we cannot say he already has. What if the Steelers go 4-12 for the next 7 years and Tomlin is fired? Would you still think he's a better coach than Cowher? Of course not. So, we can't say that yet. If Tomlin continues to keep the team playing at a high level, with a hiccup here and there, for the next decade, then he will have surpassed Cowher. But he isn't there yet. And no, if Cowher called the Rooneys and said he wanted back in Pittsburgh, I wouldn't want them to fire Tomlin and re-hire Cowher. It's not about who's the better coach right now, it's about legacy, and Tomlin simply hasn't been around long enough to compare yet. I think he would tell you the same thing if you asked him.Actually, he'd say something like : "I'm not concerned with legacy... or looking back at my body of work, if you will, I'm concerned with winning football games. We're focused on the Green Bay Packers. Those guys present significant challenges, and it's going to be tough sledding out there. Such is life in the NFL... we're excited about the opportunity that's been laid in front of us. January football, our focus all year has been to collect that hardware, and we're going to spend all our time preparing to do just that. Questions?"
I think you are over valuing the chinfor the vast majority of his career he had very good teams that could not win in the playoffsAS far as passing rank in the league, rushing rank in the league, and total offense the numbers over his entire career are similar to Tomlin's. I cannot give Cowher a pass on the long span of good teams failing to win simply because he did not have Big Ben.He had GREAT rushing teams, GREAT defensive teams, and was for the most part a Regular Season forcehis QBs were enough to win 9 division titles in 15 years, and from that he got one super bowl winHe is a great coach, but in my min Tomlin is better.
That's cool, and Tomlin MAY be better, I just can't say that definitively yet. The question initially asked was not "Is Tomlin a better coach than Cowher?", it was "Does Tomlin SURPASS Cowher." That insinuates legacy and an examination of the entire body of work (if you will) and Tomlin just doesn't have the years yet. But he's off to a better start, that's for sure. If they win next Sunday, he doesn't ever have to win it all again, just keep them competitive year in and year out for the next 10 or so years, and he will surpass Cowher.
 
What if he wins next year?

still not better? He still won;t have the 15 years in, still has Ben.

How many WOULD he have to win to be seen as better than Cowher? Or is it simply impossible.
Read what I'm writing. I said it earlier in the thread too... if they win Sunday, he would never have to win another one. He would simply need to maintain the standard for performance that's been established over the last 40 or so years for a while (10 years or so) and he will eventually surpass Cowher.It's impossible for him to "surpass" Cowher this year or next. Cowher has, IIRC, 170 wins in the NFL. That counts for something. The 9 division titles in 15 years counts for something. It's not ONLY about winning it all, even though that's the attitude that's pervaded American sports. Ask Lions or Browns fans how happy they would be to have a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi. There are fans of about 20 NFL teams that would fairly cream their jeans for a run like that, and at least 25 that would "take" it.

 
I think some people are underestimating the job that Tomlin did this year.
I'll see that, and raise you: "uhhh ... we're gonna unleash hell in December" from last year ... losing to the Browns/Raiders/Chiefs? Not exacrly a "murderer's row", ya know? So, if he gets credit for this year, he also gets major heat for last year's debacle. 'Nuff said. I like the "keys to a Ferrari" analogy ... I still see this as a team/franchise with Cowher's stamp on it. IMO, Tomlin is nowhere near Cowher's class.
Where did I say anything about last year?
 
What if he wins next year?

still not better? He still won;t have the 15 years in, still has Ben.

How many WOULD he have to win to be seen as better than Cowher? Or is it simply impossible.
Read what I'm writing. I said it earlier in the thread too... if they win Sunday, he would never have to win another one. He would simply need to maintain the standard for performance that's been established over the last 40 or so years for a while (10 years or so) and he will eventually surpass Cowher.It's impossible for him to "surpass" Cowher this year or next. Cowher has, IIRC, 170 wins in the NFL. That counts for something. The 9 division titles in 15 years counts for something. It's not ONLY about winning it all, even though that's the attitude that's pervaded American sports. Ask Lions or Browns fans how happy they would be to have a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi. There are fans of about 20 NFL teams that would fairly cream their jeans for a run like that, and at least 25 that would "take" it.
okso win 2 and stay great for 14 years

win 3 and stay great for X years

win 4 and stay great for X

you are overvaluing longevity

the patience the organization showed Cowher should reflect well on them, but does not make him better

and while i agree that most fans would LOVE

a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi.

i think most would prefer 3 division titles, 2 conference titles, and 2 lombardis in 4 years

don't judge the steelers based on what browns fans would be happy with, your franchise is better than that

 
first 4 seasons

cowher 3 divison titles 1-3 in the post season

tomlin 3 division titles, 2 conference titles, at least one super bowl 5-1

:toilet:

and EG, there's a game at :sj: for ya

 
What if he wins next year?

still not better? He still won;t have the 15 years in, still has Ben.

How many WOULD he have to win to be seen as better than Cowher? Or is it simply impossible.
Read what I'm writing. I said it earlier in the thread too... if they win Sunday, he would never have to win another one. He would simply need to maintain the standard for performance that's been established over the last 40 or so years for a while (10 years or so) and he will eventually surpass Cowher.It's impossible for him to "surpass" Cowher this year or next. Cowher has, IIRC, 170 wins in the NFL. That counts for something. The 9 division titles in 15 years counts for something. It's not ONLY about winning it all, even though that's the attitude that's pervaded American sports. Ask Lions or Browns fans how happy they would be to have a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi. There are fans of about 20 NFL teams that would fairly cream their jeans for a run like that, and at least 25 that would "take" it.
okso win 2 and stay great for 14 years

win 3 and stay great for X years

win 4 and stay great for X

you are overvaluing longevity

the patience the organization showed Cowher should reflect well on them, but does not make him better

and while i agree that most fans would LOVE

a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi.

i think most would prefer 3 division titles, 2 conference titles, and 2 lombardis in 4 years

don't judge the steelers based on what browns fans would be happy with, your franchise is better than that
If it's your opinion that I'm overvaluing longevity, that's cool. I don't believe I am. I started a thread a while ago (not sure if you've seen it) about the Steelers' "lack of suckitude" in my lifetime. To me, that's important as well, maybe it isn't to you. If the Steelers win it all this year, then go 5-11 next year, 3-13 in 2012, and 2-14 in 2013 and Tomlin is canned after that, would you say he was a better coach than Cowher because he won 2 Super Bowls in 4 years?If so, than we just philosophically disagree. If not, then wouldn't you say it's fair to say we need to wait a little while longer to determine if Cowher has been "surpassed" or not? Cowher no longer coaches the Steelers so to say he's been "surpassed", as worded in the OP, is a permanent thing. Tomlin can't surpass him and then fall back behind him again. At least that's how I'm interpreting it, and why my stance is what it is.

 
first 4 seasons cowher 3 divison titles 1-3 in the post seasontomlin 3 division titles, 2 conference titles, at least one super bowl 5-1:toilet:and EG, there's a game at :sj: for ya
Ooof. Forgot about that. Heading over, thanks for the heads up. I think we're looking at this discussion from two different interpretations of "surpass" and that's where the disconnect it.
 
What if he wins next year?

still not better? He still won;t have the 15 years in, still has Ben.

How many WOULD he have to win to be seen as better than Cowher? Or is it simply impossible.
Read what I'm writing. I said it earlier in the thread too... if they win Sunday, he would never have to win another one. He would simply need to maintain the standard for performance that's been established over the last 40 or so years for a while (10 years or so) and he will eventually surpass Cowher.It's impossible for him to "surpass" Cowher this year or next. Cowher has, IIRC, 170 wins in the NFL. That counts for something. The 9 division titles in 15 years counts for something. It's not ONLY about winning it all, even though that's the attitude that's pervaded American sports. Ask Lions or Browns fans how happy they would be to have a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi. There are fans of about 20 NFL teams that would fairly cream their jeans for a run like that, and at least 25 that would "take" it.
okso win 2 and stay great for 14 years

win 3 and stay great for X years

win 4 and stay great for X

you are overvaluing longevity

the patience the organization showed Cowher should reflect well on them, but does not make him better

and while i agree that most fans would LOVE

a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi.

i think most would prefer 3 division titles, 2 conference titles, and 2 lombardis in 4 years

don't judge the steelers based on what browns fans would be happy with, your franchise is better than that
If it's your opinion that I'm overvaluing longevity, that's cool. I don't believe I am. I started a thread a while ago (not sure if you've seen it) about the Steelers' "lack of suckitude" in my lifetime. To me, that's important as well, maybe it isn't to you. If the Steelers win it all this year, then go 5-11 next year, 3-13 in 2012, and 2-14 in 2013 and Tomlin is canned after that, would you say he was a better coach than Cowher because he won 2 Super Bowls in 4 years?If so, than we just philosophically disagree. If not, then wouldn't you say it's fair to say we need to wait a little while longer to determine if Cowher has been "surpassed" or not? Cowher no longer coaches the Steelers so to say he's been "surpassed", as worded in the OP, is a permanent thing. Tomlin can't surpass him and then fall back behind him again. At least that's how I'm interpreting it, and why my stance is what it is.
sure he couldwell, not if both are dead, but short of that, these things are flexible

I'd actually contend when Cowher comes back if he sucks somewhere else THAT would lower his overall legacy and would also lower his place in the hearts and minds of Steelers fans

 
What if he wins next year?

still not better? He still won;t have the 15 years in, still has Ben.

How many WOULD he have to win to be seen as better than Cowher? Or is it simply impossible.
Read what I'm writing. I said it earlier in the thread too... if they win Sunday, he would never have to win another one. He would simply need to maintain the standard for performance that's been established over the last 40 or so years for a while (10 years or so) and he will eventually surpass Cowher.It's impossible for him to "surpass" Cowher this year or next. Cowher has, IIRC, 170 wins in the NFL. That counts for something. The 9 division titles in 15 years counts for something. It's not ONLY about winning it all, even though that's the attitude that's pervaded American sports. Ask Lions or Browns fans how happy they would be to have a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi. There are fans of about 20 NFL teams that would fairly cream their jeans for a run like that, and at least 25 that would "take" it.
okso win 2 and stay great for 14 years

win 3 and stay great for X years

win 4 and stay great for X

you are overvaluing longevity

the patience the organization showed Cowher should reflect well on them, but does not make him better

and while i agree that most fans would LOVE

a 15 year run where they won the division 9 times, made it to the conference title game 5 times, played in 2 Super Bowls and won "only" 1 Lombardi.

i think most would prefer 3 division titles, 2 conference titles, and 2 lombardis in 4 years

don't judge the steelers based on what browns fans would be happy with, your franchise is better than that
If it's your opinion that I'm overvaluing longevity, that's cool. I don't believe I am. I started a thread a while ago (not sure if you've seen it) about the Steelers' "lack of suckitude" in my lifetime. To me, that's important as well, maybe it isn't to you. If the Steelers win it all this year, then go 5-11 next year, 3-13 in 2012, and 2-14 in 2013 and Tomlin is canned after that, would you say he was a better coach than Cowher because he won 2 Super Bowls in 4 years?If so, than we just philosophically disagree. If not, then wouldn't you say it's fair to say we need to wait a little while longer to determine if Cowher has been "surpassed" or not? Cowher no longer coaches the Steelers so to say he's been "surpassed", as worded in the OP, is a permanent thing. Tomlin can't surpass him and then fall back behind him again. At least that's how I'm interpreting it, and why my stance is what it is.
sure he couldwell, not if both are dead, but short of that, these things are flexible

I'd actually contend when Cowher comes back if he sucks somewhere else THAT would lower his overall legacy and would also lower his place in the hearts and minds of Steelers fans
He could come back, coach the Panthers, and go 0-16 5 years running and it does absolutely nothing vis-a-vis this discussion. We're talking about Tomlin surpassing Cowher among the ranks of STEELERS coaches, not whether or not he's a better coach. I think you're entirely misinterpreting the original post.
 
I have wondered, from time to time, whether Tomlin is a Barry Switzer of a George Seifert. He did inherit a solid situation.

My take, however, is that he held together a team that coud have been torn apart by Roethlisbergers off season conduct. He held them together first through four games with second and third string Q.B.'s and then through offensive line injuries. I am tending to think that he is the real deal.

In the end I think this question is about fairly fine lines of gradation between two top tier coaches. Neither should suffer from the comparison.

 
It's probably worth noting that Cowher never really "missed" on an opportunity to draft a franchise QB either, so the team didn't fail because he was too blind to the position's weakness to do anything about it.

During Cowher's tenure, there just weren't any 1st RD QB talents who happened to stay on the boards long enough for the Steelers to pick them.

The guys Bill "passed up" ended up being Jim Druckenmiller, Rex Grossman, Tony Banks, and guys like that.

Probably the only real opportunity he had to take a guy who slid a little bit further and then turned out to be great was with Drew Brees, but as a fan, I could hardly complain about taking Casey Hampton instead that year. And you certainly can't fault a personnel guy for missing on QB's from the later rounds that surprised everybody and turned out great. Even their own teams thought little enough of them to pass on them time and time again.

So yeah, Bill was kind of hamstrung by a lack of quality QB play during his time, but he ought to get some leeway in that he never really botched a chance to fix it (in the draft, anyway)...he simply never had a chance come up.

 
scrumptrulescent said:
PlasmaDogPlasma said:
Godsbrother said:
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
Refresh my memory was **** LeBeau the DC for superbowl XL
Yes although in truth Bill Cowher deserves much of the credit for the Steelers excellence on defense. LeBeau is credited with developing the zone blitz but at its core is the 3-4 defense which was brought to Pittsburgh by Cowher.
By people that have never heard of Dom Capers?
:shrug: Also, the answer to the question is Yes.
LeBeau has been in the league since day 1- well it seems that way. I highly doubt that credit is due to just Cowher or just Capers here. I liked how Lebeau did some things in Cincy. Near the end, he held those players accountable like no NFL coach has done in prob 20 years. Marvin came in and not surprisingly the players were unruly or undisciplined with all the arrests and junk. I don't recall who was at Pittsburgh when Lebeau was gone, but his influence was still all over that D. He's been huge for that franchise. I feel confident saying whomever created the zone blitz didn't do it without running the idea past Lebeau.

How long has the Steelers O-line coach been there? They have had the top C in the NFL for like 40 years or somesuch which is ridiculously great. They seem to always have a good to very good unit despite preseason expectations.

When's the last time the Steelers didn't have one of the better RBs in the NFL? If not top 10, a guy that had to be reckoned with?

I wonder about Cowher and all the bad press Plax used to get. Kordell Stewart was one of the most interesting and exciting quarterbacks for prob a year and a half. And Neil O'Donnell's career fizzled fast, but he was solid for a while there. Tomlin's had that third string runner playing QB and Charlie Batch, it's not like he has had Brady backing up Peyton.

I think the credit goes to Mr. Rooney really. An absolute ton goes to Tomlin and Cowher because (to me, not a Steelers fan but an NFL fan) they play Steeler football no matter what. Most teams sign a new coach and there's this whole transformation within the team with a new scheme and all these changes that are sometimes a bit much. Seems to me Tomlin and Cowher were smart enough to realize they had a good thing going. Cowher seemed to reinstill some after a poor time for the franchise, but it's classic Steeler's football.

Mr. Rooney (RIP) isn't around, but I totally believe it's still his system full of values he taught everyone that's going on there.

I don't care if it's Greg Lloyd, Kevin Greene, Polamalu, or Carnell Lake, they were all going to find a legal way to drive you into the ground and try to knock your helmet off. The Centers I mentioned above. Barry Foster, Jerome Bettis, Fast Willie, Mendenhall....mentioned them above too. There's a system here and the Steelers do it wonderfully.

I also get the feeling the fans expect that system. I mean if Drew Brees were there throwing for 5k yards, I'm not sure their fans would appreciate that. They'd probably be complaining they don't run enough. And if their D was ranked 32nd in the league, that DC would probably literally be run out of town with black and gold jerseys running behind the moving truck.

I don't think many coaches are wise enough to continue a good thing so I don't think many coaches could have done what Cowher and Tomlin have. I think the credit goes to ol' Rooney though and maybe Knoll.

 
He could come back, coach the Panthers, and go 0-16 5 years running and it does absolutely nothing vis-a-vis this discussion. We're talking about Tomlin surpassing Cowher among the ranks of STEELERS coaches, not whether or not he's a better coach. I think you're entirely misinterpreting the original post.
I disagreeif his overall legacy is diminished it will impact his steelers legacy
 
It's probably worth noting that Cowher never really "missed" on an opportunity to draft a franchise QB either, so the team didn't fail because he was too blind to the position's weakness to do anything about it.During Cowher's tenure, there just weren't any 1st RD QB talents who happened to stay on the boards long enough for the Steelers to pick them.The guys Bill "passed up" ended up being Jim Druckenmiller, Rex Grossman, Tony Banks, and guys like that.Probably the only real opportunity he had to take a guy who slid a little bit further and then turned out to be great was with Drew Brees, but as a fan, I could hardly complain about taking Casey Hampton instead that year. And you certainly can't fault a personnel guy for missing on QB's from the later rounds that surprised everybody and turned out great. Even their own teams thought little enough of them to pass on them time and time again.So yeah, Bill was kind of hamstrung by a lack of quality QB play during his time, but he ought to get some leeway in that he never really botched a chance to fix it (in the draft, anyway)...he simply never had a chance come up.
They passed on Chad Pennington!
 
He could come back, coach the Panthers, and go 0-16 5 years running and it does absolutely nothing vis-a-vis this discussion. We're talking about Tomlin surpassing Cowher among the ranks of STEELERS coaches, not whether or not he's a better coach. I think you're entirely misinterpreting the original post.
I disagreeif his overall legacy is diminished it will impact his steelers legacy
Why? Franco Harris' Steelers legacy isn't exactly diminished by his sad-sack final season in Seattle. Rod Woodson's Steelers legacy isn't tainted by the fact that he went to play for our arch-rivals. I doubt Patriots fans are going to factor in Belichick's tenure as coach of the Browns when his career is over. So why would Cowher's Steelers legacy be tarnished if he has little success elsewhere? Steeler fans don't care.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top