What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

If Tom Brady wants to be the best Quarterback of all time, he needs to (1 Viewer)

This game is the most important of his career IMO.

If the Patriots win:

- he did it against the best defense in the league

- no cheating questions, balls will be filled to proper PSI, being watched like a hawk for anything improper.

- playing against another good offense with a clutch QB

Barring a terrible performance in which he's bailed out by his defense to win it, winning this Super Bowl cements as a top 5 QB all-time, erases any questions about his first 3 SB wins, makes a solid argument as the GOAT.
:goodposting:

Doesn't happen often, but I would tend to agree with you on most of that.

 
By the time we get to the stage where we are now with the other greats (so 20-50 years in the future), people will remember all the good things about Brady and all the bad stuff will fall by the wayside. That's generally what happens over time.
:bs: :lmao: Please name for me the "bad stuff" associated with Unitas, Starr, Montana, Marino that was swept away by the hands of time. I'll bet none of it has a tie to rules violations or game integrity.
Being widely regarded as the best QB ever until recently, while simultaneously QBing multiple teams that gamed the salary cap - egregiously.
There was no salary cap until the very last season Joe Montana played (with Kansas City).
but, egregiously, dude. egregiously.
Yeah, Carmen Policy was way ahead of the curve on gaming the cap. And if you want to say that in some way diminishes Steve Young's case, I'd buy in to a small degree. I don't think it diminishes the Niners' case as a franchise at all though. If anything, that's more like Belichick's manipulation of the player substitutions: within the rules, but ahead of the way everyone else is seeing the game.

The Niners had a huge advantage at GM almost every season for a while.
yeah, that organization was pretty excellent from top to bottom.

great management, an owner willing to spend the $$ needed to keep them competitive, supposedly genius coach, top defense, and top shelf players all over the roster.

and montana managed to get to 4 superbowls in 14 years --- that's also pretty excellent, but not best ever.

:lmao: :lmao: suggesting belichick running a couple unusual formations in a game is the equivalent of paying your team 27m while the competition is at 20 --- this is exactly the kind of trolling that ruins this board, and why you generally have to go to the idp forum for actual football discussion.

if goodell were to come the day after the sb with a press conference saying that the pats are so awesome they'll be given a special dispensation by the league going fwd to spend and extra 50m/yr if they choose, while the rest of the league remains cap locked, I guarantee you there wouldn't be a peep said about it on this board --- and that's simply because every salty troll on here would literally stroke out before they could type one word.

5 yrs from now, after their 6th consecutive sb win, I wonder if we'd credit brady, or his bulging payroll package.
How many FA's did the Niners sign on Montana's teams?

 
12punch said:
How many FA's did the Niners sign on Montana's teams?
how many players did they lose?

now make me a list of how many players have departed the patriots over the last 10 years
You answer my question and I'll answer yours.
you have zero intention of answering that question so gtfo

I doubt you could do it if you even put the effort in
You're really not smart enough to be in this conversation, Lawrence. Kindly shut up and leave while you can still convince yourself you have a tiny bit of dignity left. Don't make me humiliate this username into tucking its tail and scampering away weeping, too.

 
12punch said:
How many FA's did the Niners sign on Montana's teams?
how many players did they lose?

now make me a list of how many players have departed the patriots over the last 10 years
You answer my question and I'll answer yours.
you have zero intention of answering that question so gtfo

I doubt you could do it if you even put the effort in
Really?

I had every intention of answering both of your questions. Then you told me to GTFO.

Serious question, why even post if you're going to pull this kind of shenanigans? What a waste of time and energy.

 
This game is the most important of his career IMO.

If the Patriots win:

- he did it against the best defense in the league

- no cheating questions, balls will be filled to proper PSI, being watched like a hawk for anything improper.

- playing against another good offense with a clutch QB

Barring a terrible performance in which he's bailed out by his defense to win it, winning this Super Bowl cements as a top 5 QB all-time, erases any questions about his first 3 SB wins, makes a solid argument as the GOAT.
:goodposting:

Doesn't happen often, but I would tend to agree with you on most of that.
Disagree. The 2nd SB against NYG was his most important game. A chance to nullify the first loss to Peyton's less talented little bro. He couldn't do it. And being 0-2 against Eli in the SB is a big black mark against him.

I'd say this is the 2nd most important game for him though, for all the reasons stated above.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12punch said:
How many FA's did the Niners sign on Montana's teams?
how many players did they lose?

now make me a list of how many players have departed the patriots over the last 10 years
You answer my question and I'll answer yours.
you have zero intention of answering that question so gtfo

I doubt you could do it if you even put the effort in
Really? I had every intention of answering both of your questions. Then you told me to GTFO.

Serious question, why even post if you're going to pull this kind of shenanigans? What a waste of time and energy.
He's the biggest troll on the site...and yet half his posts in the deflategate thread are calling everyone else a troll. He was even called out by a fellow Pats fan a few years ago for ruining the Shark Pool. Guy's a joke.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=650642&hl=%2Bwhat+%2Bhappened+%2Bto+%2Bthe+%2Bshark+%2Bpool

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12punch said:
How many FA's did the Niners sign on Montana's teams?
how many players did they lose?

now make me a list of how many players have departed the patriots over the last 10 years
You answer my question and I'll answer yours.
you have zero intention of answering that question so gtfo

I doubt you could do it if you even put the effort in
Really? I had every intention of answering both of your questions. Then you told me to GTFO.

Serious question, why even post if you're going to pull this kind of shenanigans? What a waste of time and energy.
He's the biggest troll on the site...and yet half his posts in the deflategate thread are calling everyone else a troll. He was even called out by a fellow Pats fan a few years ago for ruining the Shark Pool. Guy's a joke.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=650642&hl=%2Bwhat+%2Bhappened+%2Bto+%2Bthe+%2Bshark+%2Bpool
He's worse than anything Packer fans threw out there, despite one solid effort on their part

 
My opinion of Brady won't change based on the outcome of a single game either way. I have mad respect for Brady. One of the best ever? Sure. Arguing over which is better than the other is a waste of time and energy IMO. Unless there can be an agreed upon metric the exercise is pointless.

 
My opinion of Brady won't change based on the outcome of a single game either way. I have mad respect for Brady. One of the best ever? Sure. Arguing over which is better than the other is a waste of time and energy IMO. Unless there can be an agreed upon metric the exercise is pointless.
We are running out of metrics by which you can argue he's not the best ever.
 
My opinion of Brady won't change based on the outcome of a single game either way. I have mad respect for Brady. One of the best ever? Sure. Arguing over which is better than the other is a waste of time and energy IMO. Unless there can be an agreed upon metric the exercise is pointless.
We are running out of metrics by which you can argue he's not the best ever.
Do you think he has a realistic shot at the all time passing yardage and TD marks?

I'm not arguing that these are the end of discussion metrics, but for someone they certainly are.

 
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3
2000 BAL 5.8
1971 DAL 6
1969 KCC 6.7
1977 DAL 7.7
1986 NYG 7.7
1984 SFO 8.7
1989 SFO 8.7
1988 SFO 9.3
1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok

 
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3

2000 BAL 5.8

1971 DAL 6

1969 KCC 6.7

1977 DAL 7.7

1986 NYG 7.7

1984 SFO 8.7

1989 SFO 8.7

1988 SFO 9.3

1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok
Montana's career Super Bowl stats:

83/122 1142 11 TDs / 0 Interceptions

HTH

ETA: Tack on an extra 100 yards rushing and another 2 visits to the endzone.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3

2000 BAL 5.8

1971 DAL 6

1969 KCC 6.7

1977 DAL 7.7

1986 NYG 7.7

1984 SFO 8.7

1989 SFO 8.7

1988 SFO 9.3

1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok
Montana's career Super Bowl stats:

83/122 1142 11 TDs / 0 Interceptions

HTH

ETA: Tack on an extra 100 yards rushing and another 2 visits to the endzone.
On the flip side, Montana in the postseason in all other rounds of the playoffs . . .

12-7 record

377-612-4630

34 TD, 21 INT

89.2 QB rating (compared to 127.8 in SBs)

46 rushes, 209 rushing yards, 0 TD

No debating how great Joe was in the big game. And he still was very good in other playoff games, but the rest of his playoff numbers would not scream LEGENDARY like his SB stats do.

 
Somebody needs to reminds somebody else that the Salary Cap watered down the NFL. Add expansion to this as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Somebody needs to reminds somebody else that the Salary Cap watered down the NFL. Add expansion to this as well.
well, it certainly appeared to water down the niners team judging by their 1 conference game appearance in the 20 years after it was instituted.

 
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3

2000 BAL 5.8

1971 DAL 6

1969 KCC 6.7

1977 DAL 7.7

1986 NYG 7.7

1984 SFO 8.7

1989 SFO 8.7

1988 SFO 9.3

1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok
Montana's career Super Bowl stats:

83/122 1142 11 TDs / 0 Interceptions

HTH

ETA: Tack on an extra 100 yards rushing and another 2 visits to the endzone.
yeah, it really makes you wonder........

montana got drafted by one of the freest spending owners in history, with one of the greatest coaches in history, one of the greatest defenses in history, and throwing to the greatest receiver in history --- just think of the damage that guy might have done if he could've willed that team of misfits to more than 4 sb appearances in 14 years.

 
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3

2000 BAL 5.8

1971 DAL 6

1969 KCC 6.7

1977 DAL 7.7

1986 NYG 7.7

1984 SFO 8.7

1989 SFO 8.7

1988 SFO 9.3

1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok
Montana's career Super Bowl stats:

83/122 1142 11 TDs / 0 Interceptions

HTH

ETA: Tack on an extra 100 yards rushing and another 2 visits to the endzone.
yeah, it really makes you wonder........

montana got drafted by one of the freest spending owners in history, with one of the greatest coaches in history, one of the greatest defenses in history, and throwing to the greatest receiver in history --- just think of the damage that guy might have done if he could've willed that team of misfits to more than 4 sb appearances in 14 years.
Rice was drafted in 1985.

 
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3

2000 BAL 5.8

1971 DAL 6

1969 KCC 6.7

1977 DAL 7.7

1986 NYG 7.7

1984 SFO 8.7

1989 SFO 8.7

1988 SFO 9.3

1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok
Montana's career Super Bowl stats:

83/122 1142 11 TDs / 0 Interceptions

HTH

ETA: Tack on an extra 100 yards rushing and another 2 visits to the endzone.
yeah, it really makes you wonder........

montana got drafted by one of the freest spending owners in history, with one of the greatest coaches in history, one of the greatest defenses in history, and throwing to the greatest receiver in history --- just think of the damage that guy might have done if he could've willed that team of misfits to more than 4 sb appearances in 14 years.
Rice was drafted in 1985.
thx for the nitpick, but that was commentary on his time with the niners, not just the single year he was drafted.

I believe their careers overlapped somewhat

 
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3

2000 BAL 5.8

1971 DAL 6

1969 KCC 6.7

1977 DAL 7.7

1986 NYG 7.7

1984 SFO 8.7

1989 SFO 8.7

1988 SFO 9.3

1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok
Montana's career Super Bowl stats:

83/122 1142 11 TDs / 0 Interceptions

HTH

ETA: Tack on an extra 100 yards rushing and another 2 visits to the endzone.
yeah, it really makes you wonder........

montana got drafted by one of the freest spending owners in history, with one of the greatest coaches in history, one of the greatest defenses in history, and throwing to the greatest receiver in history --- just think of the damage that guy might have done if he could've willed that team of misfits to more than 4 sb appearances in 14 years.
Rice was drafted in 1985.
thx for the nitpick, but that was commentary on his time with the niners, not just the single year he was drafted.

I believe their careers overlapped somewhat
Yeah, nitpicking something qualitative really doesn't help your specious meme here.

 
He does not need to do anything. It's an argument which will always go on and we'll never reach a consensus. All you can do is insert yourself in the discussion, which he's already done.

 
I think it's so tough when a great qb is tied to an innovated coach like BB or Walsh. It's hard to say what is due to coaching or what is due to great qb play.

You see this more in college where you see extraordinary qb play out of players but it is a result of coaching and scheme.

For me, being able to perform at that level despite consistent coaching is what impresses me.

For me this is why I believe manning is the best. He went to a Super Bowl with 3 different coaches on 2 different teams. In his case you can't argue if it was coaching or scheme.

Same could be said for Kurt warner too to some extent. Who I feel is highly underrated when talked about all time best. Even though I don't think he is manning montana Brady good.

 
I think it's so tough when a great qb is tied to an innovated coach like BB or Walsh. It's hard to say what is due to coaching or what is due to great qb play.

You see this more in college where you see extraordinary qb play out of players but it is a result of coaching and scheme.

For me, being able to perform at that level despite consistent coaching is what impresses me.

For me this is why I believe manning is the best. He went to a Super Bowl with 3 different coaches on 2 different teams. In his case you can't argue if it was coaching or scheme.

Same could be said for Kurt warner too to some extent. Who I feel is highly underrated when talked about all time best. Even though I don't think he is manning montana Brady good.
Manning played in the same offense his entire nfl career. He didn't change offensive coordinators for his entire colts career and Denver let him dictate the offense once he arrived. He also enjoyed extremely low turnover at the receiver and tight end positions as harrison and wayne played their entire careers in indy, and edgerrin, pollard and Clark all played the primes of their careers there as well. brady has had head coaching consistency, but he's changed offensive coordinators repeatedly, with wholesale changes to their offensive scheme, tempo and weapons, and has broken in new starting receivers every year of his career.

 
Nonsense and foolish argument (devine intervention). If Brady had the talent Manning had around him he would've thrown for 6000/60 this year, easy. The coach is not throwing the ball let alone getting into discussions about a pass heavy offense or run heavy etc...

Brady just needs to DO HIS JOB!!!!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3

2000 BAL 5.8

1971 DAL 6

1969 KCC 6.7

1977 DAL 7.7

1986 NYG 7.7

1984 SFO 8.7

1989 SFO 8.7

1988 SFO 9.3

1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok
Montana's career Super Bowl stats:

83/122 1142 11 TDs / 0 Interceptions

HTH

ETA: Tack on an extra 100 yards rushing and another 2 visits to the endzone.
yeah, it really makes you wonder........

montana got drafted by one of the freest spending owners in history, with one of the greatest coaches in history, one of the greatest defenses in history, and throwing to the greatest receiver in history --- just think of the damage that guy might have done if he could've willed that team of misfits to more than 4 sb appearances in 14 years. 4 SB wins
Rice was drafted in 1985.
thx for the nitpick, but that was commentary on his time with the niners, not just the single year he was drafted.

I believe their careers overlapped somewhat
Not really a nitpick since half of his Super Bowl wins were without Jerry Rice :shrug:

You can ignore the facts all you want, it doesn't change them.

 
I didn't know d Thomas was better than moss and e sanders was better than welker in his prime.

Brady was younger and had better weapons and still didn't put up the same numbers.

Let's add to that one of the best offensive lines made up of early round draft picks.

 
Don't forget the old you can't touch the quarterback due to the Brady rule.

If Montana, Marino, Fouts, insert many many quarterbacks name here didn't have to worry about getting creamed five full seconds after they threw the ball, they would've obliterated the record books more than they already did.

 
Don't forget the old you can't touch the quarterback due to the Brady rule.

If Montana, Marino, Fouts, insert many many quarterbacks name here didn't have to worry about getting creamed five full seconds after they threw the ball, they would've obliterated the record books more than they already did.
don't you have some mobbin you need to attend to?

 
Devine Intervention said:
I didn't know d Thomas was better than moss and e sanders was better than welker in his prime.

Brady was younger and had better weapons and still didn't put up the same numbers.

Let's add to that one of the best offensive lines made up of early round draft picks.
in his first year ever playing with moss and Welker - when moss was considered washed up and Welker was a relative nobody who was traded within the division - Brady set multiple all time nfl records including breaking manning's best season with multiple hall of famers (harrison, wayne, edge, maybe even Clark). Manning deserves incredible respect for setting and then breaking some of the same records, but the fact that brady did it in his first and only season with truly elite talent kind of renders the single season accomplishments angle moot.

 
12punch said:
here's an interesting stat yudkin posted

Here are the 10 best PPG allowed in the post season for all SB winners . . .

1985 CHI 3.3

2000 BAL 5.8

1971 DAL 6

1969 KCC 6.7

1977 DAL 7.7

1986 NYG 7.7

1984 SFO 8.7

1989 SFO 8.7

1988 SFO 9.3

1970 BAL 10

but it was joe montana that won 4 sb

ok
So, you're what......20?

 
Even if he's only the second best of all time (and that is arguable), he had a hell of a season this year and played extremely well, despite the 2 picks, in the Superbowl throwing a record-setting number of completions and leading his team back from a 10 point deficit late in the game. Couldn't believe the look in his eyes in the second half -- incredibly intensity.

 
Even with 4 rings now, I don't think he's quite "the best ever". Probably top 2-3. He's certainly the Most Accomplished though.

 
I think it's so tough when a great qb is tied to an innovated coach like BB or Walsh. It's hard to say what is due to coaching or what is due to great qb play.

You see this more in college where you see extraordinary qb play out of players but it is a result of coaching and scheme.

For me, being able to perform at that level despite consistent coaching is what impresses me.

For me this is why I believe manning is the best. He went to a Super Bowl with 3 different coaches on 2 different teams. In his case you can't argue if it was coaching or scheme.

Same could be said for Kurt warner too to some extent. Who I feel is highly underrated when talked about all time best. Even though I don't think he is manning montana Brady good.
Manning is not even remotely close to this conversation any more.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top