Sorry that you feel that way, but we're just getting a handle on what's happening to the professionals. I'm sure that there are those who didn't make it to the pro level that have been impacted. To think otherwise is... Anything that impacts an individual with such violence can't be healthy. Pretty simple. You choose to say at the HS level it's ok. What's that based on?I think the rewards far outweigh the risks. What percentage of people who played through high school have CTE or other major life-changing health problems?
I think the rewards far outweigh the risks. What percentage of people who played through high school have CTE or other major life-changing health problems?I played and loved the game. But I remember getting hit so hard that a wave of pain went thru my entire body (special teams are brutal). The science is proving that we weren't meant to absorb these kinds of impacts. "Shake it off" don't cut it anymore. Those of you letting your kids do this need to look at the facts. It isn't safe. Doesn't matter how much fun I had playing the game. The risks have to outweigh the rewards.
  I didn't get migraines until my senior year in HS.I played through high school and I suffer from regular migraines, memory loss, and depression. I also have had three major knee surgeries (two torn meniscus and a torn ACL).I think the rewards far outweigh the risks. What percentage of people who played through high school have CTE or other major life-changing health problems?
That is something that does need to be looked at. My son's soccer league doesn't allow headers.Has anybody mentioned there are more concussions in high school soccer than football
If it were about money I could not disagree, but it is not. I want something else, something primal.You're doing a disservice to your potential FrakenDW as his football income, even if maximized, would pale in comparison to creating a left handed pitching monster. Longer career, more guaranteed $$, less stress on most of the body, not likely to be dull by 50. Ovum of Randy Johnson's mom and baby batter from Steve Carlton's loins and **BOOM** the perfect creature!
Yep, Minnesota Youth Soccer and I believe US Soccer forbids headers until either U11 or U12. And like I mentioned earlier, I discourage my kids from heading but for the soft looping headers on goal for instance.That is something that does need to be looked at. My son's soccer league doesn't allow headers.
I think the rewards far outweigh the risks. What percentage of people who played through high school have CTE or other major life-changing health problems?I played and loved the game. But I remember getting hit so hard that a wave of pain went thru my entire body (special teams are brutal). The science is proving that we weren't meant to absorb these kinds of impacts. "Shake it off" don't cut it anymore. Those of you letting your kids do this need to look at the facts. It isn't safe. Doesn't matter how much fun I had playing the game. The risks have to outweigh the rewards.I didn't get migraines until my senior year in HS.
There's been no study to my knowledge of hs players who have played in the last 50 years and the effect on their brains in percentage terms.I think the rewards far outweigh the risks. What percentage of people who played through high school have CTE or other major life-changing health problems?
Have you witnessed as many repetitive blows to the head in soccer, baseball and basketball than you see in every single game of football?I know concussions are a significant concern, but I have witnessed as many, if not more, concussions the past few years in soccer, baseball and basketball than in football.
11-year study of multiple high school sports: football accounted for more than half of all concussionsHas anybody mentioned there are more concussions in high school soccer than football
Maybe he was including all the flops and fake injuries in soccer.
 Their insurance company will make that decision for them eventually.There is a point where the CTE-scare is real, particularly with teens and adults running into each other at full speed, but where is the data to indicate that it's a real issue for a kid that (for example) plays tackle football from 4th-6th grade and then quits? Not letting your kid experience tackle football at this age seems like an overreaction.
The problem comes when your son falls in love with the sport, gets good at it, and wants to continue to play through junior high and high school. That's the point where I think parents (and the kid) have tough decisions to make.
Just my completely amateur opinion, but there is no reason to play tackle football before high school as long as there are flag leagues available in your area. This is even more true if your goal is to be a WR.I played small college football and it basically helped pay for my college degree.
My son just turned 11 and his life goal right now is to play WR in the NFL (I was a WR). I'm kind of a dream big type of guy, so I've encouraged him and helped him work on his skills. That said, he has played in flag football leagues for 3 years, but we have kept him out of tackle football...until this Fall. We are getting his pads and helmet checked out on Thursday and then he will be introduced to the world of real football starting then.
I played WR & Safety in HS and then WR in college. The vast majority of my collisions came when I was in blocking as a TE. I can count on one hand the number of times I took a shot near the head as a WR at any level and am fairly certain I never got a concussion (did get one playing basketball, so I know what they are like). A player who truly plays on the outside will likely not see half as many collisions as the lineman, RB's, TE's and front 7 defenders. Not sure how I'd feel if he wanted to be a middle backer or fullback, I'd probably hold him back a little longer at least but he isn't built for that. He will be long and lean until he is old enough to get fat and out of shape like me.
tl:dr - Yes, my son is 11 and he will be playing tackle football this Fall.
ETA - I didn't play organized football of any kind until I was in 8th grade.
This is actually a pretty astute comment, and true. Machismo also is more accepted in the underclass, an attitude that plays a large role in these sports.The future players of football will be the under class like boxing has always been. People who will risk health for $$$$ success.
When I was growing up, most head injuries in soccer came from headers but not in the act of heading the ball. They came from either elbows to the head or head to head contact.Yep, Minnesota Youth Soccer and I believe US Soccer forbids headers until either U11 or U12. And like I mentioned earlier, I discourage my kids from heading but for the soft looping headers on goal for instance.
I get that.Just my completely amateur opinion, but there is no reason to play tackle football before high school as long as there are flag leagues available in your area. This is even more true if your goal is to be a WR.
A good friend of mine is a high school coach. He was the head coach for three years, and wanted very much to switch their youth program to flag through 8th grade, but knew he wasn't going to be around long enough to make the change. I really think that is the direction youth programs need to go to.
The problem with football (not necessarily unique to football though) is that an individual player playing with proper technique cannot insulate himself from the dangerous contact from other players.I get that.
However, the youth leagues now pound proper blocking and tackling techniques into the players from the beginning. No dropping the head but see what you block/tackle. Use your shoulders, get your head to the side and wrap up. There is always going to be risk in every sport and football is making a concerted effort to decrease the risk moving forward.
Also, I ref college & HS football and we are being told to err on the side of safety and eliminate the big hits from the game. Blindside blocks where a player gets wiped out are illegal at every level now as is any big hit involving the head of either player.
Between better training and changes to the way the game is played, I think the next wave of players will see a dramatic decrease in brain injuries. I'm honestly not afraid to allow my son the opportunity to play tackle football because the odds of him getting hurt playing football aren't that much greater than other sports. In my personal experience, I received worse injuries in basketball and baseball than I ever did in football. Sports have risk. If I saw my son dropping his head and trying to pound people with his helmet, I'd pull him out of it....but as long as he uses good technique, football is a great team game and he'll love it like I did.
Teaching proper technique and enforcing proper technique are two different things. Targeting is now an automatic DQ in college and HS football where as it used to get a high five and make the highlight reel. Things are vastly different and it is fleshing out at the lower levels.The problem with football (not necessarily unique to football though) is that an individual player playing with proper technique cannot insulate himself from the dangerous contact from other players.
I grew up playing in the 80s, and I can remember almost every coach I had teaching proper technique as far as tackling even back then. While there is more of an emphasis in training, it isn't like no one knew how to tackle with your head up previously. I also get that refs are given directive to enforce rules to reduce the number of big hits. Here's the thing, it only takes one of those hits on your kid to make the difference. See my post above about the concussions to my kid. One was due to what I consider an idiot coach (you don't get to choose your coaches in high school), and the other to an illegal hit that was called in the game. The penalty, unfortunately, does not undo the damage caused by the hit.
Throw on top of that the lower the level of play, the lower the quality of coach and ref you are going to get on average, which reduces the safety a good coach and consistent referring offers to the kids playing.
All that said, football was my favorite sport to play. There is nothing like a Friday night on the sideline. I just wish there was a magic bullet to ensure safety. Sadly, there isn't and everyone on the field is at risk on every play potentially.
Can we please stop with the "there's risk in everything" red herring? It's starting to sound like Motorcycle Guy, Anti-Seat-Belt Guy, Pit Bull Guy, etc.However, the youth leagues now pound proper blocking and tackling techniques into the players from the beginning. No dropping the head but see what you block/tackle. Use your shoulders, get your head to the side and wrap up. There is always going to be risk in every sport and football is making a concerted effort to decrease the risk moving forward.
It's factual though.Can we please stop with the "there's risk in everything" red herring? It's starting to sound like Motorcycle Guy, Anti-Seat-Belt Guy, Pit Bull Guy, etc.
Of course it's factual. Just like it's factual that some people have been killed by seat belts or small dogs.It's factual though.Can we please stop with the "there's risk in everything" red herring? It's starting to sound like Motorcycle Guy, Anti-Seat-Belt Guy, Pit Bull Guy, etc.
The CTE issues in the NFL are horrifying. And it is sure to cause some discomfort, at a minimum, for those of us that watch the NFL and care at all about the fate of the people who play the game. But extrapolating the results of studies of NFL players to HS or even youth football strikes me as a bit of a stretch. More than a bit, actually.
Head injuries like concussions need to be handled very carefully, but it isn't like they only occur in football. They occur in all contact sports and even in sports that aren't really contact sports (soccer, baseball, basketball).
This smacks of false equivalency to me.Of course it's factual. Just like it's factual that some people have been killed by seat belts or small dogs.
Come back to me when it gets to the point that no one is ever disqualified, or penalized in any way for an illegal hit.Teaching proper technique and enforcing proper technique are two different things. Targeting is now an automatic DQ in college and HS football where as it used to get a high five and make the highlight reel. Things are vastly different and it is fleshing out at the lower levels.
Idiot coaches who teach dangerous tactics are also being run out of town because schools are scared of being sued. Football is coached and played differently than it was even 10 years ago.
Yes there is a false equivalency. But it's not between football and small dogs; it's between football and other sports.This smacks of false equivalency to me.Of course it's factual. Just like it's factual that some people have been killed by seat belts or small dogs.
Certainly youth football poses a risk of concussions that is greater than the risk of death from a small dog. Just as certainly, playing football as a youth and perhaps through high school poses far less risk of long term debilitating brain trauma than doing those things, plus playing in college and in the NFL.
If you are talking about playing it from the time you are 8 years old until you are in your late 20s or 30s (NFL career), then that is absolutely factual.Yes there is a false equivalency. But it's not between football and small dogs; it's between football and other sports.
The risk of permanent brain damage from football is SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER than any other sport. Let's stop pretending that this isn't a fact. That's why the whole "there's risk everywhere" argument is such a red herring. Yes there is risk everywhere -- BUT NOT ALL RISK IS THE SAME. Just like not all dogs are the same, just like not all vehicles are the same, etc., etc.
I was comparing football to other sports played by the vast majority of high schools in America. But I'm fine with including hockey and rugby on the list of dangerous sports that cause parents to seriously consider whether to allow their children to participate.If you are talking about playing it from the time you are 8 years old until you are in your late 20s or 30s (NFL career), then that is absolutely factual.Yes there is a false equivalency. But it's not between football and small dogs; it's between football and other sports.
The risk of permanent brain damage from football is SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER than any other sport. Let's stop pretending that this isn't a fact. That's why the whole "there's risk everywhere" argument is such a red herring. Yes there is risk everywhere -- BUT NOT ALL RISK IS THE SAME. Just like not all dogs are the same, just like not all vehicles are the same, etc., etc.
If you are talking about playing as a youth and perhaps through high school, I think there is scant evidence of that.
CTE isn't solely caused by concussions, clearly, but if you look at the incidence of concussions in youth sports as a proxy for the danger of long term brain injuries, then football isn't even the riskiest sport. Rugby is far riskier and hockey appears to be riskier as well.
My wife has migraines. She never played football.I was comparing football to other sports played by the vast majority of high schools in America. But I'm fine with including hockey and rugby on the list of dangerous sports that cause parents to seriously consider whether to allow their children to participate.
As for scant evidence, we've got guys in this very thread who only played up to high school level and now suffer from migraines and other head issues. How many "played basketball or baseball through high school" guys can say the same?
Oh come on. A sport whose sole goal is to beat the crap out of the other guy in hopes of a knock out is a better choice than football?? I acknowledge the dangers of football, and as I said, I wouldn't hold it against anyone for choosing to not let their child participate, but I find this absurd.Hard no.
I think rugby and boxing (at an amateur level w/ headgear) are closer calls, but football is absurdly dangerous.
Do you realize the differences between amateur and professional boxing?Oh come on. A sport whose sole goal is to beat the crap out of the other guy in hopes of a knock out is a better choice than football?? I acknowledge the dangers of football, and as I said, I wouldn't hold it against anyone for choosing to not let their child participate, but I find this absurd.
There are risks involved with any sport.Oh come on. A sport whose sole goal is to beat the crap out of the other guy in hopes of a knock out is a better choice than football?? I acknowledge the dangers of football, and as I said, I wouldn't hold it against anyone for choosing to not let their child participate, but I find this absurd.
Yes. Do you realize the difference in youth football and the NFL?Do you realize the differences between amateur and professional boxing?
What are the chances that any of those injuries are going to cause short term memory loss, or depression, or suicidal thoughts, or....In my personal experience, I received worse injuries in basketball and baseball than I ever did in football.
Absolutely.Yes. Do you realize the difference in youth football and the NFL?
I guess now I should be arrested for child endangerment.Absolutely.
And saying its a "close call", that's having done 0 research on either rugby on amateur boxing, those are just two examples that I think might be on the borderline, or might be interesting to debate. Tackle football, youth or otherwise, is a pretty clear no-go unless you have no regard for your kid's safety or well-being.
The data I saw indicates that youth level rugby as about 8x the incidence of concussions that football does.Absolutely.
And saying its a "close call", that's having done 0 research on either rugby on amateur boxing, those are just two examples that I think might be on the borderline, or might be interesting to debate. Youth tackle football is a pretty clear no-go unless you have no regard for your kid's safety or well-being.