Steel Town
Footballguy
I get the feeling that Childress is looking to limit ADP's carries to around 15 per game. This leaves plenty on the table for Chester. I think both are a strong play against the 9ers.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
If you own both ADP and Chester, you must play both of them (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Ministry of Pain
- Start date
Bobcat10
Footballguy
This was a pretty good call.
I still defend my play (the safer play imo) because making this call is still a circumstance issue. They netted about the same:
SJax and Lewis = 44
Minny tandem = 46
SJax + Peterson was the best play and who I would have started if not for Peterson coming off of injury (sucks because I'm neck and neck with one other team for total points $$$).
I still defend my play (the safer play imo) because making this call is still a circumstance issue. They netted about the same:
SJax and Lewis = 44
Minny tandem = 46
SJax + Peterson was the best play and who I would have started if not for Peterson coming off of injury (sucks because I'm neck and neck with one other team for total points $$$).
packersfan
Footballguy
I agree both are good plays this week. However, it's hard to say if there's a limit to the number of carries Peterson will get. The Vikings had such a huge lead against Detroit that Peterson wasn't needed in the fourth quarter so that impacted his production in that game. If the Vikings have another enormous lead then I agree Childress will look to protect Peterson. But if the game is close, I'm not sure Childress can afford to do that if Peterson is physically able to contribute. And there's no reason to think he's physically limited in any way. He sure didn't look it against the Lions.
OU#1
Footballguy
I don't agree sorry. He'll limit him only if it's a blowout. If the game is close then 25 carries isn't out of the question. If the game is a blowout then the odds are that ADP already went off.Regardless you saw what ADP can do with 15 carries in a game. You also saw what Chester can do with 14 carries (versus the same D)...
Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
Taylor has to go back to the (fantasy) bench this week unless you absolutely have no better option.
Edit for full disclosure: I own both of them, and started both of them last week. I'm starting Freddy T. instead of Chester T. this time around.
Edit for full disclosure: I own both of them, and started both of them last week. I'm starting Freddy T. instead of Chester T. this time around.
Last edited by a moderator:
Bobcat10
Footballguy
I agree with this statement this week.
packersfan
Footballguy
I still like him as a RB3 in PPR leagues. And he could deliver in standard scoring leagues as well. I can see him getting 10-15 carries and 3-5 receptions, decent shot at another TD. I think the Vikings control this one and that means plenty of rushing attempts for both Peterson and Taylor.
Ministry of Pain
Footballguy
Thank youWhere you been hiding brother?
Away from the Pats fans and Pats haters. That and a crappy team in Carolina.This place used to be filled with analysis and threads like this one. Not so much any more. I open this up last weekend out of curiosity and left completely convinced that you stumbled upon something brilliant. When the haters came out flaming you and your stats with nothing to back up their position I was further sold.
Similar threads
