What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

If you were starting an NFL team today, who would you choose first out (1 Viewer)

Who

  • Vinny Young

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tom Brady

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Take the QB that is on the winning team of next week's TITANS @ PATRIOTS game. :shrug:

Gotta say I was a bit disappoitned in VY's fantasy performance this year, as I took him in 1 league as decent value in the late middle rounds, but luckily I backed him up with Big Ben.

 
There is another thread right now about young QB talent and they don't get it either. When are people going to understand the the QB position is so much more about what's between the ears than "playmaking ability"; when? The NFL is a smart man's league, college football is an athlete's league (at QB). I'm just sayin'...
Preach it baby cause you are spot on.
 
When Eli Manning is "on", the only QBs better in the league are named Peyton and Tom. I have no idea if you can win a Super Bowl with Eli Manning. I DO know that when he is at his best, he is the 3rd or 4th (Romo) best QB in the league. It's easy to jump on Eli, but this is only his 3rd season starting. He's 26 years old and could easily play another 8-10 years at a high level. When McNabb is at his best, he is still an excellent QB. But I think his highest level of consistent play is behind him, while Eli's is just beginning.
You don't really believe what you wrote there, do you?There is no way in hell that Eli is the 3rd best QB in the NFL, even when he is "on". There are a number of QBs who are not only better than him when they are "on" (Roethlisberger, Romo, Favre, Hasselbeck, etc.), but are "on" much more frequently than Eli is.
 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady is one of the best QBs in the league, entering his prime really...Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady the best QB EVER, entering his prime really...

Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
Fixed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady one of the best QBs right now EVER, entering his prime really...

Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
Fixed
:towelwave: Sorry, you've got blinders on again.
 
One of the worst fishing trips I've ever seen.
It's not a fishing trip so much as I think he's asking in NFL terms over fantasy league terms. VY is still a guy with a TON of talent and will develop into a top Q. Don't tell me the ROY is dirt after a sophomore slump. You gotta believe he's still good (unless you are Merrill Hoge, of course).
I don't. :jawdrop: Signed Merrill Loke (I guess)
I don't either. People are quick to put all the blame on his WR's, but it's a 2-way street from the games I've watched. He's a mid-lower tier QB right now and I haven't seen anything he's done in the Pro's to make me think he's going to get anywhere near the top QB's in the league.
Then you just don't know football...
First of all, he's not even a mid tier QB. He's a bottom 11 QB in the NFL right now.And what has he shown? He can't read defenses, he's not accurate, he's not making plays with his feet and if he puts up another year like this they'll be drafting a new QB. At this point, he's a poor man's Kordell Stewart.

He has not improved on a single facet of his game in his 2nd year. And now that the NFL has film on him, he's performed well under his rookie year production.

Maybe you don't know as much about football as you think.
All this great wisdom from the genius that gives up Plaxico + Edge for Steve Smith and Betts?!? Wow, just wow...
 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady one of the best QBs right now EVER, entering his prime really...

Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
Fixed
:hifive: Sorry, you've got blinders on again.
:jawdrop:
 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady one of the best QBs right now EVER, entering his prime really...

Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
Fixed
:lmao: Sorry, you've got blinders on again.
:goodposting:
I disagree,and that is how I felt before this year, give me Brady over Montana or anyone else for that matter, best I've ever seen...
 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady one of the best QBs right now EVER, entering his prime really...

Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
Fixed
:lol: Sorry, you've got blinders on again.
:lmao:
I disagree,and that is how I felt before this year, give me Brady over Montana or anyone else for that matter, best I've ever seen...
I'm too young to have watched Montana, but my elder football fans always tell me that Montana was the best they ever saw play the game until Tom Brady came along :mellow: Although, my dad is convinced that Roger Staubach is the best QB to ever play the game of football.

 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady one of the best QBs right now EVER, entering his prime really...

Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
Fixed
:no: Sorry, you've got blinders on again.
:hot:
I disagree,and that is how I felt before this year, give me Brady over Montana or anyone else for that matter, best I've ever seen...
I'm too young to have watched Montana, but my elder football fans always tell me that Montana was the best they ever saw play the game until Tom Brady came along :shrug: Although, my dad is convinced that Roger Staubach is the best QB to ever play the game of football.
Brady has not faced a D the likes of the 85 & 86 Bears...Montana did and still won the Superbowl.
 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady one of the best QBs right now EVER, entering his prime really...

Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
Fixed
:no: Sorry, you've got blinders on again.
:thumbup:
I disagree,and that is how I felt before this year, give me Brady over Montana or anyone else for that matter, best I've ever seen...
I'm too young to have watched Montana, but my elder football fans always tell me that Montana was the best they ever saw play the game until Tom Brady came along :wall: Although, my dad is convinced that Roger Staubach is the best QB to ever play the game of football.
Brady has not faced a D the likes of the 85 & 86 Bears...Montana did and still won the Superbowl.
I have watched both quite a bit, and for my money, give me Brady any day of the week, and that's not a slap at Joe...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brady has not faced a D the likes of the 85 & 86 Bears...Montana did and still won the Superbowl.
In what reality did Montana's 49ers win the SB in 1985 and/or 1986? The 85 Bears went to Candlestick and smacked the defending champs around pretty good. Those 49er teams put up only 3 points in their one-and-done playoff performances against the Giants those years. I'm sure Brady could have matched 3 points.I will give you this, though: Montana's 2nd-half performance against the Eagles in Philly in 1989 is one of the all-time best performances by a QB. That Eagles D was stacked...on par with the 85 Bears. Montana was sacked something like 9 times. Yet with the 49ers down 28-10 in the 3rd quarter, Montana cut loose and tore into that D, eventually leading the 49ers to a 38-28 victory.
 
Vince Young is a joke.

Get serious. He can't even sniff Cutler's jock, let alone Brady.

And kudos to Young for setting an all-time record low 9 TD passes in a 16 game season. That's 30 years.

I'm sick and tired of hearing about his leadership skills. That's for Boy Scout Troups.

 
FavreCo said:
There is another thread right now about young QB talent and they don't get it either. When are people going to understand the the QB position is so much more about what's between the ears than "playmaking ability"; when? The NFL is a smart man's league, college football is an athlete's league (at QB). I'm just sayin'...
Preach it baby cause you are spot on.
None of the "playmaker" honks will ever get this.
 
Is this a serious question? I'd take Roethlisberger, Palmer, Anderson, Manning P, Manning E., Campbell, Romo, Delhomme, Garrard, Hasselbeck, Cutler, probably Russell, Leinart, Schaub, Brady, Brees, Garcia and I'd probably also take Favre (given that I'd get at least a full year out of him) over Vince Young.
This implies you'd take Eli Manning over McNabb. Wow
I would.
Is it the injuries? Because McNabb hasn't won a Super Bowl? Or do you just think he's done and a problem for the team he's on? I don't think Eli has more talent.
When Eli Manning is "on", the only QBs better in the league are named Peyton and Tom. I have no idea if you can win a Super Bowl with Eli Manning. I DO know that when he is at his best, he is the 3rd or 4th (Romo) best QB in the league. It's easy to jump on Eli, but this is only his 3rd season starting. He's 26 years old and could easily play another 8-10 years at a high level. When McNabb is at his best, he is still an excellent QB. But I think his highest level of consistent play is behind him, while Eli's is just beginning.
Ben is far better.
 
Is this a serious question? I'd take Roethlisberger, Palmer, Anderson, Manning P, Manning E., Campbell, Romo, Delhomme, Garrard, Hasselbeck, Cutler, probably Russell, Leinart, Schaub, Brady, Brees, Garcia and I'd probably also take Favre (given that I'd get at least a full year out of him) over Vince Young.
This implies you'd take Eli Manning over McNabb. Wow
I would.
Is it the injuries? Because McNabb hasn't won a Super Bowl? Or do you just think he's done and a problem for the team he's on? I don't think Eli has more talent.
When Eli Manning is "on", the only QBs better in the league are named Peyton and Tom. I have no idea if you can win a Super Bowl with Eli Manning. I DO know that when he is at his best, he is the 3rd or 4th (Romo) best QB in the league. It's easy to jump on Eli, but this is only his 3rd season starting. He's 26 years old and could easily play another 8-10 years at a high level. When McNabb is at his best, he is still an excellent QB. But I think his highest level of consistent play is behind him, while Eli's is just beginning.
Ben is far better.
No question about it
 
switz said:
Sheriff66 said:
switz said:
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
This is really a question??????Tom Brady one of the best QBs right now EVER, entering his prime really...

Vince Young is a decent QB, at best, who has a tremendous amount of room to grow yet...
Fixed
:mellow: Sorry, you've got blinders on again.
I think you've got blinders on. You lose all credibility when it comes to anything to do with the Patriots. He's one of the best right now :lmao: Right behind Manning, Favre, Romo and Roethlisberger. Can you explain how he is not one of the best ever? And I'd like to know who the clowns were who voted Young? Show your face and state your case. This is ridiculous.

 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
Brady still has plenty of years left. This is a no-brainer.
I think you are discounting Vinny's desire to win and his improvement in the upcoming seasons.
Yes he showed his desire to win in the last game when he quit on his teammates.Aniway they would have a better chance to win with Kerry Collins .All this to say Brady by 25 miles.
 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.

Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
Brady still has plenty of years left. This is a no-brainer.
I think you are discounting Vinny's desire to win and his improvement in the upcoming seasons.
Yes he showed his desire to win in the last game when he quit on his teammates.Aniway they would have a better chance to win with Kerry Collins .

All this to say Brady by 25 miles.
:goodposting: Agreed on Brady by 44,000 yards. (about the amount more he'll have than Young for their careers)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
pats3in4 said:
enfuego said:
Brady has not faced a D the likes of the 85 & 86 Bears...Montana did and still won the Superbowl.
In what reality did Montana's 49ers win the SB in 1985 and/or 1986? The 85 Bears went to Candlestick and smacked the defending champs around pretty good. Those 49er teams put up only 3 points in their one-and-done playoff performances against the Giants those years. I'm sure Brady could have matched 3 points.I will give you this, though: Montana's 2nd-half performance against the Eagles in Philly in 1989 is one of the all-time best performances by a QB. That Eagles D was stacked...on par with the 85 Bears. Montana was sacked something like 9 times. Yet with the 49ers down 28-10 in the 3rd quarter, Montana cut loose and tore into that D, eventually leading the 49ers to a 38-28 victory.
this is off thread topic but does anyone remember those extremely funny joe montana commercials he had after the win over the eagles next season? it had joe in his football pads and a shrink showing him ink blots-for every blot joe says 'Reggie White'. joe's head would also snap like he had teret's or a nervous tic when he said 'Reggie White'
 
If I was really hungry and needed someone to run across the street and get my lunch, I'd pick Young.

Playing in the NFL, I'd take Brady.

 
Sorry, but this poll is kinda stupid. Brady is already the greatest qb is NFL history. There really isnt an argument against this.....anyway, a better poll would be Brady in his prime or Montana in his prime. It's still Brady.

 
Sorry, but this poll is kinda stupid. Brady is already the greatest qb is NFL history. There really isnt an argument against this.....anyway, a better poll would be Brady in his prime or Montana in his prime. It's still Brady.
Ummm...no, he is not. He just had one of the greatest single years as a QB in NFL history, that is definately true. There's a HUGE difference between the two. Roger Maris was not one of the best home run hitters in history. Career-wise I wouldn't even say Brady is the best of the active QBs - I'd put Favre and Manning ahead of him (look at their career numbers compared to Brady's before arguing please).

That said, anyone voting for VY is either a relative of his, a Patriot hater or an alias of the OP. :thumbup:

 
Sorry, but this poll is kinda stupid. Brady is already the greatest qb is NFL history. There really isnt an argument against this.....anyway, a better poll would be Brady in his prime or Montana in his prime. It's still Brady.
Ummm...no, he is not. He just had one of the greatest single years as a QB in NFL history, that is definately true. There's a HUGE difference between the two. Roger Maris was not one of the best home run hitters in history. Career-wise I wouldn't even say Brady is the best of the active QBs - I'd put Favre and Manning ahead of him (look at their career numbers compared to Brady's before arguing please).

That said, anyone voting for VY is either a relative of his, a Patriot hater or an alias of the OP. ;)
Agreed, to a point. I would say he's in the discussion of all time greats, based on the eyball test. Project his career #s, and he'll be among the all time QBs. But to say at this point he's the best (evahhhh!!! ) is premature at best, blind homerism at worst.

FWIW, I was looking at Brady v. Manning at 7 years... Manning had better #s nearly across the board, but it wasn't by a wide margin. Something line 2500 + yds, 20 + TD, .6% + completion rate, about 300 + completions, but also 400 + attempts. The biggest percentage gap in career #s over 7 years was INT. Manning had ~ 120, Brady just 86.

I think the #s reflect the type of offense they've been asked to run during these years. Brady's early years wre on a great team and he was asked to manage the game and protect the ball. Manning's early years were on a great offensive team that had to outscore opponents to win. But watching both of these guys, and having watched Elway, Marino, Montana, et al. I think these guys are definitely in the all time discussion. I had Favre just below both Manning and Brady, but looking back at his #s, he has about 600+ yds, 15+ TD, lower comp%, and about 30+INT.

ETA: To stay on thread topic... ummm.. Brady would be my choice. VY might be a good NFL QB. Brady already is a great NFL QB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Right now, I would take Kordell Stewart over Vince Young, same player, different ages.

1 year of suffering is better than 5-10.

 
There are so many NFL QBs better than Vince Young...

Roethlisberger is what, one year older? And he already has a ring and has put up 3 seasons with an incredible QB rating in each, with his off year coming after a surgery and motorcycle accident?!

Gawd, I'm a Pats homer hardcore, but I must admit Roeth is friggin' awesome. Sorry to derail the thread, but looking at his stats on PFR is just awesome.

 
Sorry, but this poll is kinda stupid. Brady is already the greatest qb is NFL history. There really isnt an argument against this.....anyway, a better poll would be Brady in his prime or Montana in his prime. It's still Brady.
Ummm...no, he is not. He just had one of the greatest single years as a QB in NFL history, that is definately true. There's a HUGE difference between the two. Roger Maris was not one of the best home run hitters in history. Career-wise I wouldn't even say Brady is the best of the active QBs - I'd put Favre and Manning ahead of him (look at their career numbers compared to Brady's before arguing please).

That said, anyone voting for VY is either a relative of his, a Patriot hater or an alias of the OP. :goodposting:
Agreed, to a point. I would say he's in the discussion of all time greats, based on the eyball test. Project his career #s, and he'll be among the all time QBs. But to say at this point he's the best (evahhhh!!! ) is premature at best, blind homerism at worst.

FWIW, I was looking at Brady v. Manning at 7 years... Manning had better #s nearly across the board, but it wasn't by a wide margin. Something line 2500 + yds, 20 + TD, .6% + completion rate, about 300 + completions, but also 400 + attempts. The biggest percentage gap in career #s over 7 years was INT. Manning had ~ 120, Brady just 86.

I think the #s reflect the type of offense they've been asked to run during these years. Brady's early years wre on a great team and he was asked to manage the game and protect the ball. Manning's early years were on a great offensive team that had to outscore opponents to win. But watching both of these guys, and having watched Elway, Marino, Montana, et al. I think these guys are definitely in the all time discussion. I had Favre just below both Manning and Brady, but looking back at his #s, he has about 600+ yds, 15+ TD, lower comp%, and about 30+INT.

ETA: To stay on thread topic... ummm.. Brady would be my choice. VY might be a good NFL QB. Brady already is a great NFL QB.
Everyone has their opinions. No one is really wrong. But I cant see any argument that says Brady isnt already the best qb of all time. 3 Superbowls, en route to #4.

Best statistical season ever.

Undefeated season.

The other qb's in the discussion at this point are just compilers. Lets see where statistically Brady is in 8 years from now.

And he is still just entering his prime. The Patriots will be a very good team for at least a couple more years.

But Im not talking about end of career stats. Im saying right now he is the greatest ever. At the end of his career he'll have numbers like Favre, or likely better, but many more rings.

The only thing hard to believe about it is that its such a bold statement.

 
Vince Young is an up and coming talent in the league while Tom Brady is a talented older veteran.Who would you choose to start your NFL team with today?
Is this a joke? Vince Young will probably be out of the league before Brady retires.
 
Saying that Young's 2nd year was a sophmores slump is a Titan fan/UT alums' way of ignoring the fact that NFL teams now have a decent amount of tape on Vince vs NFL opponents and can game plan to shut him down. Those that said talent wins in college but it takes brains to make it consistently in the NFL are right on.

Will be interesting to see how Vince's adjusts in in 3rd year.

 
Saying that Young's 2nd year was a sophmores slump is a Titan fan/UT alums' way of ignoring the fact that NFL teams now have a decent amount of tape on Vince vs NFL opponents and can game plan to shut him down. Those that said talent wins in college but it takes brains to make it consistently in the NFL are right on. Will be interesting to see how Vince's adjusts in in 3rd year.
Outside the context of this poll, discuss what VY's likely career path looks like ( ignore the Brady comparison )From what I saw in the progression of VY's development at UT, what he as able to accomplish as a rookie, and with a stable set of NFL caliber talent around him, I think he'll adjust pretty well. One flaw I saw this year from his play was what I think is an attempt to quell critics. He's been compared to Vick and Stewart, guys that are run first QBs. It looked to me ( in limited viewing ) that he was determined to become a pass-first QB, and hung in the pocket even when running lanes opened.What made him unbelievable in college was his instinctual playmaking. Seeing a seam open and taking it. Once that guy gets in the open field, he's pretty amazing. He shouldn't be run first, but he should have run more when it was there. That dual threat will open more passing lanes for him as defenses have to spy him.I expect to see Young progress as a QB in the next couple of years, to a decent to good NFL QB. I'd be surprised at both abject failure and at greatness. I'll look to revisit his prospects after the next couple of years play out.
 
Sorry, but this poll is kinda stupid. Brady is already the greatest qb is NFL history. There really isnt an argument against this.....anyway, a better poll would be Brady in his prime or Montana in his prime. It's still Brady.
Ummm...no, he is not. He just had one of the greatest single years as a QB in NFL history, that is definately true. There's a HUGE difference between the two. Roger Maris was not one of the best home run hitters in history. Career-wise I wouldn't even say Brady is the best of the active QBs - I'd put Favre and Manning ahead of him (look at their career numbers compared to Brady's before arguing please).

That said, anyone voting for VY is either a relative of his, a Patriot hater or an alias of the OP. :mellow:
Agreed, to a point. I would say he's in the discussion of all time greats, based on the eyball test. Project his career #s, and he'll be among the all time QBs. But to say at this point he's the best (evahhhh!!! ) is premature at best, blind homerism at worst.

FWIW, I was looking at Brady v. Manning at 7 years... Manning had better #s nearly across the board, but it wasn't by a wide margin. Something line 2500 + yds, 20 + TD, .6% + completion rate, about 300 + completions, but also 400 + attempts. The biggest percentage gap in career #s over 7 years was INT. Manning had ~ 120, Brady just 86.

I think the #s reflect the type of offense they've been asked to run during these years. Brady's early years wre on a great team and he was asked to manage the game and protect the ball. Manning's early years were on a great offensive team that had to outscore opponents to win. But watching both of these guys, and having watched Elway, Marino, Montana, et al. I think these guys are definitely in the all time discussion. I had Favre just below both Manning and Brady, but looking back at his #s, he has about 600+ yds, 15+ TD, lower comp%, and about 30+INT.

ETA: To stay on thread topic... ummm.. Brady would be my choice. VY might be a good NFL QB. Brady already is a great NFL QB.
Everyone has their opinions. No one is really wrong. But I cant see any argument that says Brady isnt already the best qb of all time. 3 Superbowls, en route to #4.

Best statistical season ever.

Undefeated season.

The other qb's in the discussion at this point are just compilers. Lets see where statistically Brady is in 8 years from now.

And he is still just entering his prime. The Patriots will be a very good team for at least a couple more years.

But Im not talking about end of career stats. Im saying right now he is the greatest ever. At the end of his career he'll have numbers like Favre, or likely better, but many more rings.

The only thing hard to believe about it is that its such a bold statement.
<inigo montoya>I do not think that means what you think it means!

</inigo montoya>

Calling Manning or Favre a compiler at this point is truly laugable. He is almost universally accepted as the best or second best QB playing right now, and I'm not trying to make a case for either spot. Favre was 4th in passing yards and 6th in QB rating, while leading his team to the #2 seed in the playoffs.

Compilers are players like Keenan McCardell. 20 years of good, but not great stats that accumulate over years to get near some alltime greats.

Favre already has passed everyone, and is still playing at the top of the game. Manning has only 10 years in, and is beginning to approach the all time greats. FWIW, the #s comparisons I gave above were based on each QB's stats through their first 7 full seasons ( I discounted Favre's 1st year of only 2 starts, and Brady played in one game in 2000 ) Its an apples to apples comparison.

You can hold true to your GOAT claim on Brady, but ( and I'm a Pats fan, BTW ) I will withhold judgement on such claims until the entier body of work is complete.

Here's one thought for you to ponder... If Brady stopped playing after this year, and let his #s stand for themselves now, how long do you thing your argument that he was the GOAT would hold up?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, but this poll is kinda stupid. Brady is already the greatest qb is NFL history. There really isnt an argument against this.....anyway, a better poll would be Brady in his prime or Montana in his prime. It's still Brady.
Ummm...no, he is not. He just had one of the greatest single years as a QB in NFL history, that is definately true. There's a HUGE difference between the two. Roger Maris was not one of the best home run hitters in history. Career-wise I wouldn't even say Brady is the best of the active QBs - I'd put Favre and Manning ahead of him (look at their career numbers compared to Brady's before arguing please).

That said, anyone voting for VY is either a relative of his, a Patriot hater or an alias of the OP. :goodposting:
Agreed, to a point. I would say he's in the discussion of all time greats, based on the eyball test. Project his career #s, and he'll be among the all time QBs. But to say at this point he's the best (evahhhh!!! ) is premature at best, blind homerism at worst.

FWIW, I was looking at Brady v. Manning at 7 years... Manning had better #s nearly across the board, but it wasn't by a wide margin. Something line 2500 + yds, 20 + TD, .6% + completion rate, about 300 + completions, but also 400 + attempts. The biggest percentage gap in career #s over 7 years was INT. Manning had ~ 120, Brady just 86.

I think the #s reflect the type of offense they've been asked to run during these years. Brady's early years wre on a great team and he was asked to manage the game and protect the ball. Manning's early years were on a great offensive team that had to outscore opponents to win. But watching both of these guys, and having watched Elway, Marino, Montana, et al. I think these guys are definitely in the all time discussion. I had Favre just below both Manning and Brady, but looking back at his #s, he has about 600+ yds, 15+ TD, lower comp%, and about 30+INT.

ETA: To stay on thread topic... ummm.. Brady would be my choice. VY might be a good NFL QB. Brady already is a great NFL QB.
Everyone has their opinions. No one is really wrong. But I cant see any argument that says Brady isnt already the best qb of all time. 3 Superbowls, en route to #4.

Best statistical season ever.

Undefeated season.

The other qb's in the discussion at this point are just compilers. Lets see where statistically Brady is in 8 years from now.

And he is still just entering his prime. The Patriots will be a very good team for at least a couple more years.

But Im not talking about end of career stats. Im saying right now he is the greatest ever. At the end of his career he'll have numbers like Favre, or likely better, but many more rings.

The only thing hard to believe about it is that its such a bold statement.
<inigo montoya>I do not think that means what you think it means!

</inigo montoya>

Calling Manning or Favre a compiler at this point is truly laugable. He is almost universally accepted as the best or second best QB playing right now, and I'm not trying to make a case for either spot. Favre was 4th in passing yards and 6th in QB rating, while leading his team to the #2 seed in the playoffs.

Compilers are players like Keenan McCardell. 20 years of good, but not great stats that accumulate over years to get near some alltime greats.

Favre already has passed everyone, and is still playing at the top of the game. Manning has only 10 years in, and is beginning to approach the all time greats. FWIW, the #s comparisons I gave above were based on each QB's stats through their first 7 full seasons ( I discounted Favre's 1st year of only 2 starts, and Brady played in one game in 2000 ) Its an apples to apples comparison.

You can hold true to your GOAT claim on Brady, but ( and I'm a Pats fan, BTW ) I will withhold judgement on such claims until the entier body of work is complete.

Here's one thought for you to ponder... If Brady stopped playing after this year, and let his #s stand for themselves now, how long do you thing your argument that he was the GOAT would hold up?
I don't think you're a Pats fan.
 
Sorry, but this poll is kinda stupid. Brady is already the greatest qb is NFL history. There really isnt an argument against this.....anyway, a better poll would be Brady in his prime or Montana in his prime. It's still Brady.
Ummm...no, he is not. He just had one of the greatest single years as a QB in NFL history, that is definately true. There's a HUGE difference between the two. Roger Maris was not one of the best home run hitters in history. Career-wise I wouldn't even say Brady is the best of the active QBs - I'd put Favre and Manning ahead of him (look at their career numbers compared to Brady's before arguing please).

That said, anyone voting for VY is either a relative of his, a Patriot hater or an alias of the OP. :rolleyes:
Agreed, to a point. I would say he's in the discussion of all time greats, based on the eyball test. Project his career #s, and he'll be among the all time QBs. But to say at this point he's the best (evahhhh!!! ) is premature at best, blind homerism at worst.

FWIW, I was looking at Brady v. Manning at 7 years... Manning had better #s nearly across the board, but it wasn't by a wide margin. Something line 2500 + yds, 20 + TD, .6% + completion rate, about 300 + completions, but also 400 + attempts. The biggest percentage gap in career #s over 7 years was INT. Manning had ~ 120, Brady just 86.

I think the #s reflect the type of offense they've been asked to run during these years. Brady's early years wre on a great team and he was asked to manage the game and protect the ball. Manning's early years were on a great offensive team that had to outscore opponents to win. But watching both of these guys, and having watched Elway, Marino, Montana, et al. I think these guys are definitely in the all time discussion. I had Favre just below both Manning and Brady, but looking back at his #s, he has about 600+ yds, 15+ TD, lower comp%, and about 30+INT.

ETA: To stay on thread topic... ummm.. Brady would be my choice. VY might be a good NFL QB. Brady already is a great NFL QB.
Everyone has their opinions. No one is really wrong. But I cant see any argument that says Brady isnt already the best qb of all time. 3 Superbowls, en route to #4.

Best statistical season ever.

Undefeated season.

The other qb's in the discussion at this point are just compilers. Lets see where statistically Brady is in 8 years from now.

And he is still just entering his prime. The Patriots will be a very good team for at least a couple more years.

But Im not talking about end of career stats. Im saying right now he is the greatest ever. At the end of his career he'll have numbers like Favre, or likely better, but many more rings.

The only thing hard to believe about it is that its such a bold statement.
<inigo montoya>I do not think that means what you think it means!

</inigo montoya>

Calling Manning or Favre a compiler at this point is truly laugable. He is almost universally accepted as the best or second best QB playing right now, and I'm not trying to make a case for either spot. Favre was 4th in passing yards and 6th in QB rating, while leading his team to the #2 seed in the playoffs.

Compilers are players like Keenan McCardell. 20 years of good, but not great stats that accumulate over years to get near some alltime greats.

Favre already has passed everyone, and is still playing at the top of the game. Manning has only 10 years in, and is beginning to approach the all time greats. FWIW, the #s comparisons I gave above were based on each QB's stats through their first 7 full seasons ( I discounted Favre's 1st year of only 2 starts, and Brady played in one game in 2000 ) Its an apples to apples comparison.

You can hold true to your GOAT claim on Brady, but ( and I'm a Pats fan, BTW ) I will withhold judgement on such claims until the entier body of work is complete.

Here's one thought for you to ponder... If Brady stopped playing after this year, and let his #s stand for themselves now, how long do you thing your argument that he was the GOAT would hold up?
I don't think you're a Pats fan.
Really? Why not, exactly?
 
this is the silliest question i've ever seen posed.

a better question might be

phillip rivers or VY?

eli manning or VY?

jamarcus russell or VY?

kellen clemens or VY?

 
If you were starting an NFL team today, who would you choose first out, Vinny Young or Brady?
I might take Young over Brady, but it'd be close...ETA, oops, I thought you meant Quinn. Didn't make sense as a question otherwise...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top