These are the same two guys I'm considering sitting over JJ Nelson. I'm having a hard time coming up with a rationale for one vs. the other.packersfan said:In over Garcon and Robby Anderson with A.J. Green doubtful/out this week. Need the upside play and went Nelson over Anderson with weather looking like it could be an issue tomorrow night. Plus the last time Floyd was out and Nelson got No. 2 WR snaps he put up 8-79-2 so hoping for a similar type of role this week.
Might be a horse apiece with Nelson and Anderson and I might hate myself tomorrow night depending on what Anderson does. Weather issues is what led me to Nelson plus what he did last time Floyd was out. But it's a real close call there for me.These are the same two guys I'm considering sitting over JJ Nelson. I'm having a hard time coming up with a rationale for one vs. the other.
Good point on Reed and Garcon. I just posted a tweet posted on Bloom's page that indicated Reed is looking a lot better this week. I have Reed as well so if I'm starting Reed and that's working against Garcon I'm not sure putting all my eggs in the WASH basket makes sense.Might be a horse apiece with Nelson and Anderson and I might hate myself tomorrow night depending on what Anderson does. Weather issues is what led me to Nelson plus what he did last time Floyd was out. But it's a real close call there for me.
One thing about Garcon - he's been damn good lately and matchup is superb but when Reed's healthy Garcon's targets dip a bit and it looks like Reed might be healthier this week than he was last week. I still think Garcon's a really good WR3, especially in PPR, but maybe the upside isn't quite as high if Reed's healthier this week. Just a little something to consider for those debating on Garcon.
Yup. Anderson is definitely worth a shot. If weather wasn't a possible issue I probably would go with him. Also in my league we get bonus points for length of TDs. That could work for both guys but seems to be working more for Nelson lately. I also like the Saints' matchup little bit more. But yeah it's really really close. Like I said before I might end up hating myself for this tomorrow night.Good point on Reed and Garcon. I just posted a tweet posted on Bloom's page that indicated Reed is looking a lot better this week. I have Reed as well so if I'm starting Reed and that's working against Garcon I'm not sure putting all my eggs in the WASH basket makes sense.
Anderson is tempting though. Nelson is going to share with DJ, Fitz, and Gresham. Anderson's target share is comparable to Mike Evans the last two weeks. Granted, he has a crappier QB throwing to him vs. Palmer for JJ.
Just watched NYC weather:Yup. Anderson is definitely worth a shot. If weather wasn't a possible issue I probably would go with him. Also in my league we get bonus points for length of TDs. That could work for both guys but seems to be working more for Nelson lately. I also like the Saints' matchup little bit more. But yeah it's really really close. Like I said before I might end up hating myself for this tomorrow night.
I'm in a similar situation trying to decide between JJ, R. Anderson, and Garcon. Right now I'm leaning R. Anderson. Right now Anderson seem's like lightning in a bottle as he's in a groove with Petty and getting peppered with targets. Miami D is burnable as well.Trying to decide between the trio of JJ, Robby Anderson, and Landry in a PPR. I had Graham Thursday night but my opponent had Rawls, so that was a wash.
Just not sure what to think about Landry with Matt Moore at QB. Part of me thinks I should avoid it entirely, but another part thinks that a possession WR running short and intermediate routes may be targeted heavily with a backup QB in. Of course Anderson and Petty appear to have a bromance, and JJ is the boom-bust play in a primo matchup with no weather to worry about.
I know this isn't the start-sit advice thread but since we're talking about starting Nelson, I'd appreciate any opinions on these three.
He's absolutely a boom-or-bust play. If you're comparing to someone like Anderson I'd say Anderson is safer especially with the massive targets he's been getting the last two games. However, and this is potentially huge, in the game where Floyd didn't play and Nelson played as the No. 2 WR (which is what should happen this week), Nelson got 12 targets. So the perceived target edge for Anderson may be neutralized this week. Nelson's matchup is also terrific, especially with Breaux now out. I also like how Nelson is closer to someone like Tyreek Hill and Taylor Gabriel in skill set so he can score as both a runner and receiver as we've seen so he can be used in diverse ways offensively. Arians is real creative with how he's using Nelson and I doubt that will change now.Read thru Nelson's game logs, there are a lot of stinkers in there. Are we sure this guy is any good, especially at his size?
Week 8 he was in for 65 of Arizonas 71 snaps that wek.Just read this morning that in weeks 13 and 14 M. Floyd's snap rates were 99% and 92% respectively while JJ Nelson's were 45% and 31% these last two games. That opens up a ton of snaps for JJ Nelson.
It's also my understanding that in week 8, when JJ Nelson last blew up, this same thing took place -- Floyd out, Nelson snap rate jumped big time.
Can anyone confirm?
This is important because he's had several 1 or 2 catch games and my assumption is these games align with Floyd being active with high snap rates and JJ with the opposite.
If this is confirmed, I think I may lean towards Nelson now (lord help me). I just read that the Jets o-line is seriously banged up so the risk of total offensive disaster is higher with R. Anderson, not to mention he's playing with a rookie QB (and potentially in iffy weather).
Yup. Just looked at the game logs. This game is the outlier and it coincides with Floyd being banged up with a hamstring injury.Week 8 he was in for 65 of Arizonas 71 snaps that wek.
One point on the game where Floyd was out and Nelson outperformed...if I remember correctly that was against CAR back when they were healthy on D. They shut down D. Johnson on the ground big time (although I believe he caught a ton of passes). This may have forced Palmer to the air more than normal.Brown's snaps are down because the team is managing his sickle cell condition. His role isn't likely to change the rest of the season even with Floyd gone.
Gresham has become more of a factor lately but again no Floyd means a massive increase in snaps for somebody at WR and with Brown being physically limited that somebody is almost certainly going to be Nelson. I've been citing the no-Floyd game all along as one the primary reasons why I am starting him. He put up 8-79-2 that week with 12 targets. Whether we'll see that type of target number tomorrow is uncertain but I think the one thing that can be predicted is Arians will find a way to dial up some big plays of some kind for Nelson. He's been doing that consistently lately and they've been working so I don't know why he'd stop doing that this week vs. a defense that's prone to giving up big plays in the secondary nearly all season long.
I'm in the same boat. Don't want to hijack the thread but I'm having a hard time trying to decide what to do with Landry myself. I love Nelson's potential this week but he burned me once this year already. I can't help but like his big play potential though. I'm in a full pt ppr league so sitting Landry might not be the best choice but would anyone out there play Nelson overI'm in a similar situation trying to decide between JJ, R. Anderson, and Garcon. Right now I'm leaning R. Anderson. Right now Anderson seem's like lightning in a bottle as he's in a groove with Petty and getting peppered with targets. Miami D is burnable as well.
JJ is a similar boom/bust option and with an even better QB, but I hate that he has so many 2 target games. His floor seems lower than Anderson's while they both may have similar ceilings.
Garcon is a more stable option. Higher floor. Probably get 4-5 receptions, but may not get a TD with so many mouths to feed in Washington.
That's my rationale at 7 AM EST. This could change several times in the next few hours as I over analyze the situation.
Haha right? Thanks for holding them out Bengals and Falcons.Well, that was an easy decision!
Similar ppr spot here myself. My wr group includes Edelman, Adams, Inman, Thielan, JJ Nelson and Rishard Matthews. FWIW, I am boldly currently going with Inman, Thielan and JJ Nelson in my lineup. I am playing against a better team in my semi-final and feel I need to swing for upside. Weather and Denver D makes me feel Edelman and Adams have low ceilings this week. I feel Inman, Thielan and Nelson are all in good weather spots and playing in games where script, opportunity and matchups all look good. I may totally look back in hindsight and kick myself for not playing regular starters Edelman/Adams, but right now, I'm shying away.I'm in the same boat. Don't want to hijack the thread but I'm having a hard time trying to decide what to do with Landry myself. I love Nelson's potential this week but he burned me once this year already. I can't help but like his big play potential though. I'm in a full pt ppr league so sitting Landry might not be the best choice but would anyone out there play Nelson over
Edelman vs tough Denver D
Adams in Chi with a 0 degree temp and a banged up Rodgers
Landry with Matt Moore
Inman who might come crashing back to earth any game now.
Leaning Nelson over Inman or Landry right now.
My smarter half says stay with who got you here but the other half says Nelson might be a target monster, no Breux(sp) now, and no Floyd and Gresham with the Q designation and we get a bonus 5 pts for TD's over 50 yds.
It would be tough for me to sit Edelman and Adams. Edelman's been a target monster and Adams been catching TD's and getting yards. I was thinking of putting JJ in for Landry who I think is a crapshoot with Moore at QB but he could get peppered with targets tonight though. I think Inman is solid with both Benjamin and Williams still banged up a little. I'm sure whoever I leave out for JJ will blow up on my bench. I'll need to look into the match ups a little closer for Edelman and Adams and might sit one of them down. CBS says I'm a favorite to win but they're hardly ever right.Similar ppr spot here myself. My wr group includes Edelman, Adams, Inman, Thielan, JJ Nelson and Rishard Matthews. FWIW, I am boldly currently going with Inman, Thielan and JJ Nelson in my lineup. I am playing against a better team in my semi-final and feel I need to swing for upside. Weather and Denver D makes me feel Edelman and Adams have low ceilings this week. I feel Inman, Thielan and Nelson are all in good weather spots and playing in games where script, opportunity and matchups all look good. I may totally look back in hindsight and kick myself for not playing regular starters Edelman/Adams, but right now, I'm shying away.
Packers just signed a #3 emergency QB off their practice squad. Clearly Rodgers is nowhere close to 100% and staring at one of the coldest kickoffs in NFL history. This game screams Ty Montgomery to me. I worry Adams is a major letdown this week.conlilnew said:It would be tough for me to sit Edelman and Adams. Edelman's been a target monster and Adams been catching TD's and getting yards. I was thinking of putting JJ in for Landry who I think is a crapshoot with Moore at QB but he could get peppered with targets tonight though. I think Inman is solid with both Benjamin and Williams still banged up a little. I'm sure whoever I leave out for JJ will blow up on my bench. I'll need to look into the match ups a little closer for Edelman and Adams and might sit one of them down. CBS says I'm a favorite to win but they're hardly ever right.
I guess I'll definitely be starting Nelson now over Adams as I'll need the high upside because it looks like Landry will let me down tonight.Packers just signed a #3 emergency QB off their practice squad. Clearly Rodgers is nowhere close to 100% and staring at one of the coldest kickoffs in NFL history. This game screams Ty Montgomery to me. I worry Adams is a major letdown this week.
I wasn't feeling great about my choice early on tonight but Anderson didn't end up going off even after his big first-quarter TD so I'm still feeling really good about my Nelson choice. I think he can top what Anderson put up on in my league or at least the difference shouldn't be significant assuming he gets the No. 2 WR snaps as expected in a super plus matchup.Might be a horse apiece with Nelson and Anderson and I might hate myself tomorrow night depending on what Anderson does. Weather issues is what led me to Nelson plus what he did last time Floyd was out. But it's a real close call there for me.
Landry ended up being huge. Thanks Jets D. Now I have to decide if I'll still go with Nelson over Adams or Edelman.I guess I'll definitely be starting Nelson now over Adams as I'll need the high upside because it looks like Landry will let me down tonight.
Sat him for Lee, which fortunately only cost me a point. Question is whether he's startable next week. He actually had some good numbers in the first Seattle game. But I agree he's probably not the guy who will put up big numbers when defenses are focusing on him.Well, he certainly didn't hurt you if you started him. He could have had a monster day had he not dropped that bomb from Palmer. That was sure fire 2nd td.
One thing I've noticed now. Every time the spotlight is on him and he becomes focal point of the offense he seems to shrink. I don't think he's a guy who is ready to be a focal point of an offense. Yet.
I left both Adams and Edelman in and it cost me a trip to the Superbowl in my league. Adams 4 pts and Nelson 14 pts. I should have known Adams is an every other week hands of pure stone(dropped 2 TD's) performer. Sad thing was that I picked Nelson up this week to start him and then pu$$ied out.Landry ended up being huge. Thanks Jets D. Now I have to decide if I'll still go with Nelson over Adams or Edelman.