The bolded is the issue I think I'm having. Most people are speaking as if it's impossible for Hunt - one of the best RBs in the league - to cut into Chubb's fantasy value. It's not impossible in my opinion. I think that is more of a maybe Hunt will have a low impact on Chubb's value long term. And maybe Cleveland is using Hunt as a bargaining chip. You and the pundits could be right, but one of this is a foregone conclusion and competition for Chubb's job has intensified compared to where it was a week ago. I felt much better about owning Chubb prior to Hunt being there. For 2019, I think Hunt sits out a lot of it - though will be coming back at a critical time for fantasy owners and then you have uncertainty of a RBBC. Or what if say in week 10, Chubb get's hurt. The door is now open with Hunt as the replacement. Is it possible also that the Browns are concerned long-term about Chubb's knee holding up? I think that it's certainly possible. All this makes me want to use Chubb as a trading chip to get even better at RB. It's not selling low if you add him as part of a deal to say get Kamara, Elliot, Gurley etc. That's what I'm trying to do now.Chubb owner here..(fortunately he is my RB2 behind Kamara). Hunt will have low impact on Chubb's value long term, but he might be a nuisance for a few weeks....
Again, Hunt is a "bargaining chip" Clev is using. They might have him play 2-3 games RBBC before trade deadline and he goes off to build more draft picks!
I still see Chubb as Top 10
This is how I feel and essential what I'm trying to turn Chubb into. A more stable RB1 situation. If I can't do that, I'm happy to keep him but I'm not living in the bubble of denial that adding a very good RB means nothing to Chubb's value. I will feel better when Hunt is traded...I’m not a huge fan of uncertain situations. So I think that’s the biggest knock on Chubb now - the uncertainty of how Hunt will be used. And this is coming midway through the season most likely so by that time the waiver wire is already thinning out so it’s hard to adjust if he does indeed affect Chubb to a noticeable extent. And with him being a RB1 I would certainly put him at the back end of that designation now because I like my RB1 to be in a stable environment - things like at least a year in the current system (more obviously being more telling), no significant coaching changes, no additions in the backfield (including the QB), etc. I like stability with my 1’s and I’ll roll the dice on my 3’s and 4’s mostly but also my 2’s at times. I probably will not be taking Chubb at his current ADP because someone will draft him higher based on him not being affected at all by Hunt and I won’t do that.
What's this, now? Is this a Boltbacker-sponsored draft? Where was my invite?!Chubb fell to RB13 in the FBG Survivor draft that started this week (best ball ppr league). Before the Hunt signing I would have had him at RB6-7. RB13 seems like a steep decline for me. Interested in your thoughts.
He signed for one year, he’s not trade bait. He’s a cheap backup for the second half of the year.Birdie048 said:Chubb owner here..(fortunately he is my RB2 behind Kamara). Hunt will have low impact on Chubb's value long term, but he might be a nuisance for a few weeks....
Again, Hunt is a "bargaining chip" Clev is using. They might have him play 2-3 games RBBC before trade deadline and he goes off to build more draft picks!
I still see Chubb as Top 10
He’s signed for 1 year, but then he’ll be a RFA. Cle can tender him without much financial risk.He signed for one year, he’s not trade bait. He’s a cheap backup for the second half of the year.
Yes and why would the Browns let him go?He’s signed for 1 year, but then he’ll be a RFA. Cle can tender him without much financial risk.
Plenty of reasons; most of them involve them getting something of value in return.Yes and why would the Browns let him go?
It would take a massive haul at this point. Think if you would the Cleveland GM. Also I’m still thinking Chubb’s knee might be a concern for them long term.Plenty of reasons; most of them involve them getting something of value in return.
what trade?RB7 pre-trade, RB7 post-trade.
While that’s possible, you’d have to assume Hunts behavior might be a concern, too.It would take a massive haul at this point. Think if you would the Cleveland GM. Also I’m still thinking Chubb’s knee might be a concern for them long term.
Pre-Hunt, my bad.what trade?
Hunt will get some run at the end of the year, in dyno no impact at all.....redraft....considering I think Duke still gets some catches....he's a draft and then trade pre-playffos IMO, when does Hunt come in? can you cheaply handcuff in case of injury? Can you keep a roster spot open for Hunt all season? I might avoid in redraft.
Winner winnerWell, from what I’m seeing Chubb is overvalued - maybe significantly - and Hunt is undervalued - maybe significantly, but nothing new there. Seems odd to me, but perception is reality.
Considering that this is a PPR format and Nick Chubb finished as RB 17 last year in this format, you may have been over valuing Chubb even without the Browns signing Kareem Hunt, which I do not think has much impact on Chubbs value.Chubb fell to RB13 in the FBG Survivor draft that started this week (best ball ppr league). Before the Hunt signing I would have had him at RB6-7. RB13 seems like a steep decline for me. Interested in your thoughts.
This is the crux of the disconnect, right here. In today's NFL it's effectively impossible to post a top-7 full-PPR fantasy finish without catching at least 40-50 passes, no matter how much of a bellcow you are on 1st / 2nd down.There are obviously several reasons to expect Chubb to finish higher in 2019 than he did last season, I am not sure that would get Chubb to RB 7 unless he caught a lot of passes, which I am not sure he will with Duke Johnson available for that purpose.
Drafted at rb12 in the second fbg leagueChubb fell to RB13 in the FBG Survivor draft that started this week (best ball ppr league). Before the Hunt signing I would have had him at RB6-7. RB13 seems like a steep decline for me. Interested in your thoughts.
Yeah the projection I made was good because of Chubbs high TD rate in the 10 game sample.This is the crux of the disconnect, right here. In today's NFL it's effectively impossible to post a top-7 full-PPR fantasy finish without catching at least 40-50 passes, no matter how much of a bellcow you are on 1st / 2nd down.
It's not just Duke that Chubb has to siphon volume from, either, as Landry was targeted 149 times last year out of the slot. Chubb could be the second coming of Alvin Kamara as a pass-catcher and I'd still struggle to see how he gets the ~80 targets he would need with these two in the mix.
The biggest reason for optimism is that the Browns have a new coaching staff - yes, Kitchens is still around, but Monken will be writing the offensive game plans, and there's no reason to assume things will be at all like 2018. Perhaps he decides to funnel a bunch of Landry's targets to the backfield instead. Maybe he decides Chubb's a better scheme fit than Duke and writes Johnson's old role out of the offense. Anything could happen, but on balance it's more likely that Chubb's role in the pass game increases than decreases ... so while I agree that RB7 pre-Hunt was ambitious, there was at least a path to getting there.
Post-Hunt, though, I think the ~RB13 spot where Bass got him is about as high as I'd feel comfortable going on him.
FWIW, Chubb only caught 20 balls last year, not 29. Tough to argue there isn't at least some room to the upside from that. As for reasons why, well, the best reason I've got is that it's difficult to script an effective offense with 3 backs getting substantial snap counts. The places where it was tried (PHI, SEA, DET, BAL pre-Jackson) were basically a who's who of offenses that couldn't get out of their own way. And once Hunt's back on the active roster, Duke's almost certainly the odd man out.Biabreakable said:While I could see Chubb catching more passes than 29 I dont see reasons why he will.
As far as the scoring Adrian Petersons 2k rushing season still wasnt enough to be the top RB. They need to catch a lot of balls too.
I was actually wrong as Peterson caught 40 balls in 2012 and several important RB got hurt that year as well.FWIW, Chubb only caught 20 balls last year, not 29. Tough to argue there isn't at least some room to the upside from that. As for reasons why, well, the best reason I've got is that it's difficult to script an effective offense with 3 backs getting substantial snap counts. The places where it was tried (PHI, SEA, DET, BAL pre-Jackson) were basically a who's who of offenses that couldn't get out of their own way. And once Hunt's back on the active roster, Duke's almost certainly the odd man out.
And your last sentence seems to be saying exactly the same thing my first couple of sentences did so I think we're in agreement there.
This is how I pretty much feelMaybe I am missing something, but I just see this thread as way too optimistic for Chubb. A 6 game suspension may or may not happen, but I think Hunt can reasonably argue that he's already missed 5 games without pay due to this incident.
I think people are deluding themselves if they believe Hunt will be a bit player once he comes back. He's legitimately a very good RB in his own right, and we really have no idea what Monken & Kitchens will decide to do with both as of yet.
Also seems pretty doubtful they would take a young stud RB that they can control for 2 years VERY cheaply and use him as trade bait. Cleveland looks like the best team in the AFC North to me, and I don't think they'll be trading away young difference making players anytime soon.