krista4 said:---INTERLUDE – Pipes Of Peace (1983)---
We’re here, in the second of @Morton Muffley's Triad Of Teenage Torment.
Recording of the songs on this album stretched nearly three years, as several were leftovers from the Tug Of War sessions – unfortunately those that didn’t make the grade for Tug might have been better left on the cutting-room floor. We’ve previously discussed the atrocious title song in the Paul Statement Songs interlude earlier, and this record includes a song called “Tug Of Peace,” which I guess is a blend of “Tug Of War” and “Pipes Of Peace,” using lyrics from both. I originally mistyped “blend” as “bland,” and might have been better off keeping it that way. It is one of Paul’s worst songs.
Ok, as I mentioned, my process to create my Paul 100 was simply to look at Paul's track listings and assemble my favorites from memory. Tug of Peace was one of maybe 10-12 that when I read the track listing I said "I have no recollection of that song." For nearly ALL of the other 10 or songs I listened to at least the opening minute to re-acquaint myself. But knowing how much I dislike this period/record I did not do this with Tug of Peace.Against my better judgment I listened to this since I haven't much of anything better to do. What the hell? This is wack.
Also, isn't "tug of peace" what Bob Kraft got busted for?
Sorry, man. Your quote got cut off on my phone. This thread is doing weird things on my computer. This post just auto-posted halfway through. Huh. I'll try not to comment on typos, etc., as they cut off the good discussion going on here. It just looked funny to have a sentence and/or word fragment hanging there so obviously. I shouldn't have even called into question whether I was "pro-Muffley" or not, it's just what I was left with to read, that word fragment of "pro," that is.Morton Muffley said:No idea what this means but I endorse it unreservedly.
Nah, it wasn't your phone. His post was originally cut off with "pro"...before he edited it.Sorry, man. Your quote got cut off on my phone. This thread is doing weird things on my computer. This post just auto-posted halfway through. Huh. I'll try not to comment on typos, etc., as they cut off the good discussion going on here. It just looked funny to have a sentence and/or word fragment hanging there so obviously. I shouldn't have even called into question whether I was "pro-Muffley" or not, it's just what I was left with to read, that word fragment of "pro," that is.![]()
Can't follow what you're talking about here.You guys are prolific, for heaven's sake. I tune in and miss two pages replete with wisdom. Read wikkid's thoughts on John passing and can't deny having said the exact same thing when I was actually younger and having meant it. Now I'm not sure we can ever put the cat back in the bag of self-worship, but it sure would be nice to see it a little embarrassed of its own such obvious defecatory opening. (Cat anatomy talk for Mrs. R., who probably won't see this, but does think of cat's buttholes at interesting times.)
I'm worse than this. I have a song ON MY PAUL TOP 100 that every time I see the title, I think "what the hell is that?" It's just so generic I forget. Then I listen and think it's great, but it doesn't do enough to remind me, so the next time that I do the same thing. Getting old is neat.Ok, as I mentioned, my process to create my Paul 100 was simply to look at Paul's track listings and assemble my favorites from memory. Tug of Peace was one of maybe 10-12 that when I read the track listing I said "I have no recollection of that song." For nearly ALL of the other 10 or songs I listened to at least the opening minute to re-acquaint myself. But knowing how much I dislike this period/record I did not do this with Tug of Peace.
But with @Pip's Invitation above comment that HE had listened to it...and knowing @krista4 listened to EVERY song multiple times, I thought "how can I call myself Paul fan if I can't remember this song AND if I am reluctant to re-acquaint myself?" And so, I just clicked...
Immediately ALL of it came back to me! I heard the entire song run through my head before the opening stanza was complete. I want to go back to the @Morton Muffley of ten minutes ago. Seriously, why are you people doing this to me?
I'm wishing that consideration for others would once again return to being a primary object of one's being. In a convoluted way, I guess. I think the self has shown us our seamier underbelly. It's time to get back to the sturdier ground of decorum, decency, and thinking about communities and people. That this might have been a Beatles wish later on in life is cool, but somewhat ironic given their role as liberators (John would say messiahs) of all things involved with popular culture.Can't follow what you're talking about here.
Thanks. Easier to follow than cat buttholes. I agree about the seamier underbelly (or cat butthole, perhaps?) and decency and community. A lot of times when I see people mention these, though, they follow it with a plea for accepting all viewpoints, which I'm not signed on for, at least in terms of accepting racism and such (the "and such" can be the most troublesome line to draw for many, so let's leave it at racism).I'm wishing that consideration for others would once again return to being a primary object of one's being. In a convoluted way, I guess. I think the self has shown us our seamier underbelly. It's time to get back to the sturdier ground of decorum, decency, and thinking about communities and people. That this might have been a Beatles wish later on in life is cool, but somewhat ironic given their role as liberators (John would say messiahs) of all things involved with popular culture.
I agree. There is a fine line between community acceptance and relativism, as you implicitly point out, and even things like what constitute racism are difficult to define and standards often confusing to maintain or adhere to.Thanks. Easier to follow than cat buttholes. I agree about the seamier underbelly (or cat butthole, perhaps?) and decency and community. A lot of times when I see people mention these, though, they follow it with a plea for accepting all viewpoints, which I'm not signed on for, at least in terms of accepting racism and such (the "and such" can be the most troublesome line to draw for many, so let's leave it at racism).
I'm in agreement with the bold. I'll save the Buckley for when I've had less booze trying to steel myself for Give My Regards To Broad Street (the steeling hasn't worked). I'm sure I'd read it back when I was devoted to his thoughts in college (far past that now) but don't remember. At the very least I'd want to revisit when we get to Imagine.I agree. There is a fine line between community acceptance and relativism, as you implicitly point out, and even things like what constitute racism are difficult to define and standards often confusing to maintain or adhere to.
Relativism has been scorned by thinkers left and right, so this isn't really sociopolitical, but anti-relativistic. I had friends coming out of college who were generally relativists, or had professors they admired that were. This always befuddled me. I thought the good was something we could try to define and achieve, even if we fail, often spectacularly. But there are those that would argue that the first step towards tyranny is trying to define the good and codify it into law.
To bring this back to the Beatles and John, it's been pointed out that "Imagine" is sort of a relativistic song. Nothing to die for? What to live for then, they ask? And so on goes the argument. I think William F. Buckley once immortalized the song in a column. I'll try and find it and link to it and see if it holds water today. I read it. Not sure what he means by the chorus being too subversive for a family paper. Color me shuked. But certainly one need not strain with too much difficulty to hear the strains of relativism there.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1990/10/17/no-yoko-i-cant-imagine/adf7c43b-bcaa-4331-8893-9405c1c940f8/
I have told my actuaries to do their thing.Mea culpa. I mentioned early in the thread (maybe the first post?) that I would have two albums from which I'd selected every track for my list: the first two records on All Things Must Pass (which are generally counted as the "real" tracks since those on album three are fragments, jams, demos, etc.) and another. But as I went to write up John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band, I realized I did not, as I'd thought, have all tracks from that one on my list. All Things Must Pass retains the sole title. Adjust your cheatsheets accordingly.
If it’s Medicine Jar, go for it.How high can I rank a Paul song that doesn't have Paul on lead vocal? Morton?
Hmmm. My list already has different rules than yours as I only considered songs on which Paul has writing credit AND sings lead. As such, covers are excluded, Medicine Jar would not pass EITHER criteria (Veronica with Costello is excluded from my list...as is Wings of a Nightingale given to the Everly Bothers). But you make up whatever rules YOU want AND feel free to break 'em. On the latter, ask yourself "what would John do?" and there you will have your answer.How high can I rank a Paul song that doesn't have Paul on lead vocal? Morton?
Its your list and as such you can do what you want.How high can I rank a Paul song that doesn't have Paul on lead vocal? Morton?
Oh yes, we’ll have very different top 100s. I wouldn’t consider Veronica, but I see a Wings song without Paul on lead differently, since it was his band. If he wrote a song and played/sang on it with Wings, then I considered it even if he’s not lead vocal.Hmmm. My list already has different rules than yours as I only considered songs on which Paul has writing credit AND sings lead. As such, covers are excluded, Medicine Jar would not pass EITHER criteria (Veronica with Costello is excluded from my list...as is Wings of a Nightingale given to the Everly Bothers). But you make up whatever rules YOU want AND feel free to break 'em. On the latter, ask yourself "what would John do?" and there you will have your answer.
I've just caught up on the last three days and it is quite the rollercoaster of emotion. I expected the "Spies Like Us" hate, but the pineapple was unexpected. Reading the writeup about Double Fantasy and Milk and Honey coalesced that my favorite John solo work comes from this late period in his life, which brings me happiness, but then seeing Mark David Chapman's fat face brings me right on down. Seeing the promise of a live blog of GMRTBS excites, but then not actually getting it deflates. Seeing that Paul actually released a song entitled "Tug of Peace" and didn't follow it up with a song called "Pipes of War" is incredibly demoralizing. But, when all hope is lost, I am energized by discussion of cat's buttholes. John's trip to Bermuda has nothing on this thread.
at all of it, but especially “Pipes of War.”Paul has written so many songs that I am surprised he hasn't come up with Pipes of War yet. Or anything about cats' buttholes.![]()
![]()
at all of it, but especially “Pipes of War.”
This explained the timing of many of my Neil posts (and a few in this thread).I’m currently stuck under a cat and can’t get to my computer.
He has both. I'm sure of it. The guy writes ~527 songs a day.Paul has written so many songs that I am surprised he hasn't come up with Pipes of War yet. Or anything about cats' buttholes.
This explained the timing of many of my Neil posts (and a few in this thread).
It was a thing in old movies and cartoons. In old real life? No idea.---INTERLUDE – Kisses On The Bottom (2012)---
Ahhhhh, we’ve made it here, to Paul’s most unfortunately titled album (even worse than NEW). Paul says it’s a reference to lipstick prints on the bottom of a love letter, which was ever a thing?
the two most tried & true saws in my early days of internet arguing were "at heart, most Americans are conservative until their own are taken care of, then as liberal as they can afford to be" and "tis time to make tolerance a part of decency and, in turn, decency a part of tolerance". i fronted both axioms regularly in the first decade of this century. they're already both so obsolete to be considered quaint now, like spats & PostumI'm wishing that consideration for others would once again return to being a primary object of one's being. In a convoluted way, I guess. I think the self has shown us our seamier underbelly. It's time to get back to the sturdier ground of decorum, decency, and thinking about communities and people. That this might have been a Beatles wish later on in life is cool, but somewhat ironic given their role as liberators (John would say messiahs) of all things involved with popular culture.
This is good stuff. The older I get, the more I appreciate the heck out of songs like this. Maybe I should have clicked on the Spotify link though, because watching the video, I was too distracted by the guitarist who looked like Richard Harris constantly looking like he forgot where he left his Metamucil.230. Get Yourself Another Fool (Kisses On The Bottom, 2012) Spotify YouTube
(Paul #109)
Since, as explained above, I’m not a huge fan of this album, I’m only going to select one of the covers for inclusion on my list (the two originals are evaluated differently). I think this is the best of the standards, and if this is your jam, check out more of the record. The band is fabulous, and Paul means it when he’s singing. On this one, even though it’s my “best of the bunch,” I always find his vocal just a little bit ahead of where I want him, which is kind of distracting. Love the guitar part.
If interested in more, my second favorite is “The Inch Worm.”
Ringo Rama??? Seriously,Oops, I misremembered. Before we get to a cover, we have...Ringo!
231. Write One For Me (Ringo Rama, 2003) Spotify YouTube
(Ringo #19)
It’s our second song from Ringo’s well-received Ringo Rama, and shockingly it is not our last! On this one, there’s just one thing for me to say:
STICK WITH IT!!!
You’re going to start listening and think, “WTF this is just a typical nice Ringo pop song with mediocre vocal. WHY OH WHY am I listening?”
TRUST ME!!!
Something happens at 1:05 that makes it worth listening. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
I’m bopping my head around to it right now and very happy.
That is Joe Walsh. He always makes those faces.Maybe I should have clicked on the Spotify link though, because watching the video, I was too distracted by the guitarist who looked like Richard Harris constantly looking like he forgot where he left his Metamucil.
Something happens at 1:05 that makes it worth listening. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Oops, I misremembered. Before we get to a cover, we have...Ringo!
231. Write One For Me (Ringo Rama, 2003) Spotify YouTube
(Ringo #19)
It’s our second song from Ringo’s well-received Ringo Rama, and shockingly it is not our last! On this one, there’s just one thing for me to say:
STICK WITH IT!!!
You’re going to start listening and think, “WTF this is just a typical nice Ringo pop song with mediocre vocal. WHY OH WHY am I listening?”
TRUST ME!!!
Something happens at 1:05 that makes it worth listening. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
I’m bopping my head around to it right now and very happy.
Not my kind of music, but this song is well done. It's bluesier than this sort of thing tends to be, which suits Paul well.230. Get Yourself Another Fool (Kisses On The Bottom, 2012) Spotify YouTube
(Paul #109)
Since, as explained above, I’m not a huge fan of this album, I’m only going to select one of the covers for inclusion on my list (the two originals are evaluated differently). I think this is the best of the standards, and if this is your jam, check out more of the record. The band is fabulous, and Paul means it when he’s singing. On this one, even though it’s my “best of the bunch,” I always find his vocal just a little bit ahead of where I want him, which is kind of distracting. Love the guitar part.
If interested in more, my second favorite is “The Inch Worm.”
This song is usually performed with a grandiose, demonstrative vocal, so it's interesting to see a much different approach -- which was the right choice because big demonstrative vocals aren't Ringo's thing. It's a pleasant shuffle.229. Only You (And You Alone) (Goodnight Vienna, 1974) Spotify YouTube
(Ringo #18)
Ringo recorded this cover of the Buck Ram song (first recorded in 1954 by The Platters) as the suggestion of John, who played acoustic guitar and provided a guide vocal here, with Harry Nilsson on backing vocals. John’s version was also released in the Anthology series. This version was released as a single and hit #6 on the US charts. I don’t have it higher because I never much cared for the original version. My favorite part of this song is the hilariously sincere spoken-word part in the middle. An equally hilarious music video with Harry Nilsson was shot for this song.
Everyone involved must have partaken in Paul's best weed.An equally hilarious music video with Harry Nilsson was shot for this song.
I think I'm supposed to be ashamed that I didn't know that was Joe Walsh, but I choose not to be.That is Joe Walsh. He always makes those faces.
I wouldn't know, either.I think I'm supposed to be ashamed that I didn't know that was Joe Walsh, but I choose not to be.
He was in Ringo's birthday special! A lot!I wouldn't know, either.
dude ...how old are you???I think I'm supposed to be ashamed that I didn't know that was Joe Walsh, but I choose not to be.That is Joe Walsh. He always makes those faces.
They married sisters, so they are prettymuch family.He was in Ringo's birthday special! A lot!