They had a couple guys in, Cunningham, James Starkes, I've heard nothing on it yet.I heard the Pats had Benny Cunningham in for a visit. Did anything ever materialize from that?
To date in the NFL, not at all. Good chance he wouldn't have even started in AZ in 2016. Hasn't shown much since breaking his leg his rookie season. Can't stay healthy and repeatedly beaten out.
He can't be worse than what the Pats trotted out there at guard this season.To date in the NFL, not at all. Good chance he wouldn't have even started in AZ in 2016. Hasn't shown much since breaking his leg his rookie season. Can't stay healthy and repeatedly beaten out.
Sure he can.He can't be worse than what the Pats trotted out there at guard this season.
So the Patriots give up a good young DE for a 1st round bust OG, about $5 mil in cap space, and a late second round pick. OTOH it was likely he would play in NE for one year and would leave for, at best, a 3rd round comp pick. It's possible that Dante Scarnecchia can coach Cooper up into a useful lineman. If he does, Cooper is likely to be too expensive to sign next year too.To date in the NFL, not at all. Good chance he wouldn't have even started in AZ in 2016. Hasn't shown much since breaking his leg his rookie season. Can't stay healthy and repeatedly beaten out.
Except the Pats backup for Jones (Jabaal Sheard) actually outplayed Jones much of last season. In fact, Sheard had more snaps than Chandler Jones in the playoffs. That should tell you something.So the Patriots give up a good young DE for a 1st round bust OG, about $5 mil in cap space, and a late second round pick. OTOH it was likely he would play in NE for one year and would leave for, at best, a 3rd round comp pick. It's possible that Dante Scarnecchia can coach Cooper up into a useful lineman. If he does, Cooper is likely to be too expensive to sign next year too.
There's a "long term benefit" argument for the trade from a Patriots viewpoint, but for 2016 it looks like a step backwards.
IMO the Patriots would be better off with both Sheard and Jones. I'm sure they'll make some moves to beef up the DL depth.Workhorse said:Except the Pats backup for Jones (Jabaal Sheard) actually outplayed Jones much of last season. In fact, Sheard had more snaps than Chandler Jones in the playoffs. That should tell you something.
Half wrong and right. 25%, not bad.They might sign Chris Long but I doubt it.
Pats certainly took a step backward for 2016 ... but they look beyond that.GordonGekko said:Jonathan Cooper is a throw in. Hope Pats fans can come to that realization without coming up in arms about it all. Jones got moved for what will be a very late 2nd round pick.
Cooper struggles to pick up the playbook and, at NFL game speed, has shown an alarming deterioration of his fundamentals. His hands are slow and poor. His balance, leverage concepts and footwork are atrocious at the NFL level. You cannot coach up balance. Younger players can push through with more athleticism, veterans when they lose a step, learn to chew up space with experience, technique and guile. That's where Cooper starts to look like a bad bet to a worse one, he's not showing the technique or basic concepts/fundamental core ability to one day shade for losing a step as most players do.
Centers have a vast amount of responsibility. That situation compounds when you are playing a young QB1 ( Garropolo for the first four games). That situation compounds again when you have a guard who isn't reliable. This isn't just about Cooper's limitations, its his total impact across the line. Lines are units, the weak link creates a tax situation for the other players, creating negative trade off situations.
Part of the equation is also the esteem that the Patriots front office ( i.e. Belichick) has in Jamie Collins. Which is a plus minus situation. Collins is a very good player, but he's not a player you game plan for as an opposing offense. Collins simply checks off all the laundry list of things that Belichick wants his linebackers to do without being told to do it.
IF this trade spurs anything, it shouldn't be about Chandler Jones, it should be about the bang up job that Steve Keim has done in Arizona the past few years. Belichick jettisoned the one edge player that other opposing offenses had to account for and game plan around. Given unit dependency, he's also hurt Collins, Hightower, Butler and all because Jones could set the edge for the Patriots.
Basic Walsh theory - The team that can consistently generate a pass rush in the 4th quarter is the team most likely to win and consistently win. Think about that. when most people think of the great Bill Walsh, they think offense, they think West Coast Offense, but Walsh never wavered from an elite pass rush being a priority in overall team success.
If Pats fans want to believe that Belichick didn't lose this trade, then so be it, but Steve Keim won it. The Patriots, esp taking on the completely shot Chris Long, are worse after the trade instead of better.
You have some good points but this is very short-termed thinking...there is a reason BB has kept this team as a title contender for over 15 years...one of them is he moves players a year early rather than a year late...I don't think there's a Patriot fan who says losing Jones won't hurt them this year (or saying this is a bad move by the Cards)...it has the potential to sting a little unless Grissom and/or Flowers develop quickly...that being said Jones was not coming back and I would be shocked if he is not vastly overpaid next offseason...while he is very good he does disappear and I don't see him being worth what the market will pay him...as for Collins I think you are selling him very short...he is a three down athletic freak...you say he checks off the laundry list like it's a bad thing but why wouldn't BB want a LB that does everything his defense requires...look at BB's titles whether it is with the Pats and Giants and I don't think it's a fluke that every single ring was won with a high-quality LB unit...these type of moves are par for the course with the Pats...not everyone of them is a winner but it is this philosophy that has put them on a run that just isn't supposed to happen in the salary-cap era...GordonGekko said:Jonathan Cooper is a throw in. Hope Pats fans can come to that realization without coming up in arms about it all. Jones got moved for what will be a very late 2nd round pick.
Cooper struggles to pick up the playbook and, at NFL game speed, has shown an alarming deterioration of his fundamentals. His hands are slow and poor. His balance, leverage concepts and footwork are atrocious at the NFL level. You cannot coach up balance. Younger players can push through with more athleticism, veterans when they lose a step, learn to chew up space with experience, technique and guile. That's where Cooper starts to look like a bad bet to a worse one, he's not showing the technique or basic concepts/fundamental core ability to one day shade for losing a step as most players do.
Centers have a vast amount of responsibility. That situation compounds when you are playing a young QB1 ( Garropolo for the first four games). That situation compounds again when you have a guard who isn't reliable. This isn't just about Cooper's limitations, its his total impact across the line. Lines are units, the weak link creates a tax situation for the other players, creating negative trade off situations.
Part of the equation is also the esteem that the Patriots front office ( i.e. Belichick) has in Jamie Collins. Which is a plus minus situation. Collins is a very good player, but he's not a player you game plan for as an opposing offense. Collins simply checks off all the laundry list of things that Belichick wants his linebackers to do without being told to do it.
IF this trade spurs anything, it shouldn't be about Chandler Jones, it should be about the bang up job that Steve Keim has done in Arizona the past few years. Belichick jettisoned the one edge player that other opposing offenses had to account for and game plan around. Given unit dependency, he's also hurt Collins, Hightower, Butler and all because Jones could set the edge for the Patriots.
Basic Walsh theory - The team that can consistently generate a pass rush in the 4th quarter is the team most likely to win and consistently win. Think about that. when most people think of the great Bill Walsh, they think offense, they think West Coast Offense, but Walsh never wavered from an elite pass rush being a priority in overall team success.
If Pats fans want to believe that Belichick didn't lose this trade, then so be it, but Steve Keim won it. The Patriots, esp taking on the completely shot Chris Long, are worse after the trade instead of better.
Well I guess there is a first time for everything.GordonGekko said:Jonathan Cooper is a throw in. Hope Pats fans can come to that realization without coming up in arms about it all. Jones got moved for what will be a very late 2nd round pick.
Cooper struggles to pick up the playbook and, at NFL game speed, has shown an alarming deterioration of his fundamentals. His hands are slow and poor. His balance, leverage concepts and footwork are atrocious at the NFL level. You cannot coach up balance. Younger players can push through with more athleticism, veterans when they lose a step, learn to chew up space with experience, technique and guile. That's where Cooper starts to look like a bad bet to a worse one, he's not showing the technique or basic concepts/fundamental core ability to one day shade for losing a step as most players do.
Centers have a vast amount of responsibility. That situation compounds when you are playing a young QB1 ( Garropolo for the first four games). That situation compounds again when you have a guard who isn't reliable. This isn't just about Cooper's limitations, its his total impact across the line. Lines are units, the weak link creates a tax situation for the other players, creating negative trade off situations.
Part of the equation is also the esteem that the Patriots front office ( i.e. Belichick) has in Jamie Collins. Which is a plus minus situation. Collins is a very good player, but he's not a player you game plan for as an opposing offense. Collins simply checks off all the laundry list of things that Belichick wants his linebackers to do without being told to do it.
IF this trade spurs anything, it shouldn't be about Chandler Jones, it should be about the bang up job that Steve Keim has done in Arizona the past few years. Belichick jettisoned the one edge player that other opposing offenses had to account for and game plan around. Given unit dependency, he's also hurt Collins, Hightower, Butler and all because Jones could set the edge for the Patriots.
Basic Walsh theory - The team that can consistently generate a pass rush in the 4th quarter is the team most likely to win and consistently win. Think about that. when most people think of the great Bill Walsh, they think offense, they think West Coast Offense, but Walsh never wavered from an elite pass rush being a priority in overall team success.
If Pats fans want to believe that Belichick didn't lose this trade, then so be it, but Steve Keim won it. The Patriots, esp taking on the completely shot Chris Long, are worse after the trade instead of better.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-cardinals-make-big-trade/While there have been many trade rumors this offseason, today was our first one where the Patriots sent star defensive end Chandler Jones to the Arizona Cardinals in exchange for a 2nd round pick and guard Jonathan Cooper.
While many are going to point to Jones’ off the field issues this past year, Jones’ fate with the Patriots was likely sealed when they saw the contracts come in for Malik Jackson and Olivier Vernon in free agency. Jackson landed a $14.25 million contract off a 5.5 sack season while Vernon, who was generally the second pass rusher in Miami, scored $17 million a year. If those players are worth that it means Jones is worth close to $20 million a year.
That’s generally not a winning formula in the NFL and the Patriots have always avoided the big money game with their players. The Patriots see more value into turning those players into future draft capital and/or decent upside/low risk talent. They got both this year with a late 2nd rounder and Cooper, who has talent but has been inconsistent and injury prone. He also plays a far lower cost position if he does play well. While the Patriots do hold an option for him in 2017 don’t expect them to exercise that option as its well over $10 million and right now hes a $3 million player.
From the Cardinals side this trade is very intriguing. I felt last year based on moves that the Cardinals made that they were “all in” generally bypassing some long term logic for possible short term gain. They are one of the most leveraged teams in the NFL when it comes to deferring cap charges, in part because of their use of voidable contract years in some of their veteran players contracts. This move certainly plays into the win now mentality.
But where things get interesting for Arizona at this point is what is the long term plan. Right now I have the Cardinals with just 27 players under contract in 2017, 3rd least in the NFL. They only have around $93 million committed to the salary cap, which ranks in the top third of the NFL, but the free agent list is massive.
The players include Tyrann Mathieu, Chandler Jones, Michael Floyd, Calais Campbell, and Larry Fitzgerald. Those are three grade A contracts at the top, a pretty strong one for Campbell, and another tough decision on Fitzgerald who has the team over a barrel with a huge salary cap charge of $9.7 million if they don’t extend him. QB Carson Palmer is under contract through 2017.
Does Arizona wait until the season is over to evaluate things and then decide if they should be like Denver and pick and choose who they want to retain or go the ways of the Seahawks and sign a large number of mega contract players and hope that they can find a long term quarterback to make it work. Or do they just make the moves now to lock these players up? They can probably get more favorable terms by extending now, but if the team does poorly do they really want to be stuck with these players for the next three or four years? It’s a real difficult decision.
As for the cap impact of this trade in 2016 the Cardinals will take on a net total of $5.41 million in cap charges, while the Patriots will save that same amount. Cooper will leave behind $2.24 million in dead money on the Cardinals cap.
They could be looking to add a compensatory pick for him after this year.Really hope the Pats can talk Bennett into a 1 year extension and bump him up a little.
Split the difference, give him a bump, wrap him up another year. He'll be able to enter FA hot and 31, he'll be able to get a nice contract somewhere.
A lot of hoping in that sentiment.
This has Minkovich written all over it. He's so a guy that BB could turn into a big time contributor. He flashed great athletic ability at times and also was run over a lot. He struggled with injuries and a lot sea changes on the defense while he was there.Pats add Shea Mcclellin, DL/LB
19th overall pick in 2012, underperformed pretty much everywhere in Chicago. I like their odds to get something out of him.
Yeah McClellin was brought in to replace Urlacher, which was just a terrible fit for him.. They switched him between LB and DE a few times, in addition to the defense going from 4-3 to 3-4 to now back to 4-3 with Fox (I believe). Between that an injuries he just never was able to find a role.Yeah, hes being compared a lot to Jabaal Sheard. Just another one of those dudes everyone expected the Pats to draft, they end up going to another team where they don't fit the scheme then end up in NE for peanuts.
After Mcclellin was drafted at the 19, NE traded up to the 21 to grab Chandler Jones.
The Pats getting some depth courtesy of the Bears, Bostic, Mcclellin and Bennett.
Looked pretty good here. Easy to cherry pick plays.here is shea mccellin's bears career summed up in one pla