Kiddnets
Footballguy
Take it out of the tens of millions he "earned"Rodgers got pissed that he flew to NY on his own dime and was "fired" 20 seconds into the meeting with Glenn and Mougey. I love it.
Take it out of the tens of millions he "earned"Rodgers got pissed that he flew to NY on his own dime and was "fired" 20 seconds into the meeting with Glenn and Mougey. I love it.
Rodgers got pissed that he flew to NY on his own dime and was "fired" 20 seconds into the meeting with Glenn and Mougey. I love it.
Let’s not forget—he had 37.5 million reasons to want to stay on the field.Rodgers got pissed that he flew to NY on his own dime and was "fired" 20 seconds into the meeting with Glenn and Mougey. I love it.
That entire statement was self-serving BS.
So he told the Jets immediately he wanted to keep playing but now a month or so later doesn't know if he wants to keep playing?
He basically contradicted himself within the same statement and isn't smart enough to realize it.
Love how Aaron Glenn just shut him down. Fantastic.Rodgers got pissed that he flew to NY on his own dime and was "fired" 20 seconds into the meeting with Glenn and Mougey. I love it.
and he still could earn close to that if he wanted to.Let’s not forget—he had 37.5 million reasons to want to stay on the field.Rodgers got pissed that he flew to NY on his own dime and was "fired" 20 seconds into the meeting with Glenn and Mougey. I love it.
That entire statement was self-serving BS.
So he told the Jets immediately he wanted to keep playing but now a month or so later doesn't know if he wants to keep playing?
He basically contradicted himself within the same statement and isn't smart enough to realize it.
Glenn remining me of Parcells so far....Im really optimistic on himAaron Glenn is a high character person, not just in the way he behaves but also in what he values in the people around him. He isn't a passive aggressive coward who talks behind people's backs. Instead Glenn has the respect to handle things the right way. I'm not at all surprised this didn't resonate with Rodgers. Maybe he would have preferred it if Brick told Rodgers thru the NY media that he was being cut...
Rodgers tried to clown Glenn of course - nothing could ever be his faultAaron Glenn is a high character person, not just in the way he behaves but also in what he values in the people around him. He isn't a passive aggressive coward who talks behind people's backs. Instead Glenn has the respect to handle things the right way. I'm not at all surprised this didn't resonate with Rodgers. Maybe he would have preferred it if Brick told Rodgers thru the NY media that he was being cut...
I loved him here in Detroit. High character, leader of men, no nonsense approach, not going to put up with any distractions or other bull****. Going to build it the right way. You guys got the right guy imo.Aaron Glenn is a high character person, not just in the way he behaves but also in what he values in the people around him. He isn't a passive aggressive coward who talks behind people's backs. Instead Glenn has the respect to handle things the right way. I'm not at all surprised this didn't resonate with Rodgers. Maybe he would have preferred it if Brick told Rodgers thru the NY media that he was being cut...
You mean the manipulative master of semantics is being disingenuous???? No way....Rodgers tried to clown Glenn of course - nothing could ever be his fault afterall.Aaron Glenn is a high character person, not just in the way he behaves but also in what he values in the people around him. He isn't a passive aggressive coward who talks behind people's backs. Instead Glenn has the respect to handle things the right way. I'm not at all surprised this didn't resonate with Rodgers. Maybe he would have preferred it if Brick told Rodgers thru the NY media that he was being cut...
Anyone that thinks that it went down the exact way Rodgers said it did (20 seconds) is nuts.
This plus he looked bad last year. I'd much rather have Fields for a year. Aaron Glenn is trying to change the culture and doesn't need the distraction or drama that Rodgers brings.Of course the other version has already come out and it seems it didnt go down quite as Rodgers stated - shocker. This is a prime reason why even though he was the best win now option it just wasnt worth it anymore. I really like him as a QB but hes exhausting
Personally it would be Membou or trade down for me assuming none of the consensus top 3 fall. Please don't take a TE or RB with the number 7 pick. Warren is not Bowers and Jeanty is not Barkley. Even if they were it would be the same story as Barkley with the Giants. Great players, bad draft management that will lead to bad cap management before they could possibly help you win.Mocks have been mostly Membou and Warren - both Id be happy with - but I could def see these as smoke screens or easy to pivot to. Also with Membou stock rising he may go earlier -
Im pretty confident the top 3 are locked in but if any drop Id be thrilled to land Ward, Hunter or Abdul.
Out of the rest -
Campbell - def need OL and he hs been mocked at the top but could fall due to small arm syndrome - he would have to play RT which may give the team pause but hes a blue chip and id be ok with him
Jeanty - Ive seen this mentioned along with dealing Breece - not a fan. Dont recall a team winning it all by drafting a top 10 RB recently - thats more if the team is already set. Extending Breece would probably be just under $10M per yr while paying Jeanty as a top 10 pick would be around 6.5M - Id rather stick with Breece
Mason Graham - one of the few Def picks Id be ok with - tired of seeing teams run all over the D. Q and Mason would be a darn good inside tandem.
Tet McMillan - huge hole as #2 WR - would be a very nice weapon and tandem with GWill for yrs - Id be ok with it.
Sanders - do they go QB if he falls to them - gotta trust the regime and if they can get a possible future franchise QB at #7 without giving up the farm its worth the shot even though I have concerns
Banks - been seeing him slowly rise and he has common roots with Glen. He could end up being the best OL in draft but valuer wise I would want them to drop a few spots if possible
If they drop more than 2-3 spots not sure who they would be targeting and im not as familar but besides Graham Im pushing for any offensive help. If they insist on continuing to hire Defensive specialist coaches they need to trust them to win on scheme/coaching - they shouldnt need all these 1st rders on D. O has been terrible for a decade - if they go O 1st 3 picks it would go a long way to rebuild to respectable.
I'm a firm no on either. If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years.I don’t think they’ll even have a chance to draft Jeanty - he’s going to Jacksonville or Las Vegas.
I like Warren but think they’d have to trade back for it to make sense to take him - I won’t be that upset if they take him at 7 though.
problem is they need interest in a team trading up as well which sometimes doesnt happen - I agree #7 is a bit high for both but if they rate a player that high then im ok with it.I'm a firm no on either. If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years.I don’t think they’ll even have a chance to draft Jeanty - he’s going to Jacksonville or Las Vegas.
I like Warren but think they’d have to trade back for it to make sense to take him - I won’t be that upset if they take him at 7 though.
Unless they are good.If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years
I'm a firm no on either. If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years.I don’t think they’ll even have a chance to draft Jeanty - he’s going to Jacksonville or Las Vegas.
I like Warren but think they’d have to trade back for it to make sense to take him - I won’t be that upset if they take him at 7 though.
Fans are insufferable, but I was more talking about the beat writers and those on social media that monetize their coverage of the Jets. The same ones that are now talking about Warren being a tantalizing prospect will absolutely kill Mougey for the pick in a few years and rightfully call it a misuse of draft assets despite them advocating for it now.I'm a firm no on either. If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years.I don’t think they’ll even have a chance to draft Jeanty - he’s going to Jacksonville or Las Vegas.
I like Warren but think they’d have to trade back for it to make sense to take him - I won’t be that upset if they take him at 7 though.
3-4 years? They're doing it now. Jet Nation is completely unreadable with all of the negativity. It began when Mougey was believed to be the guy and got worse in free agency.
What you wrote is true though, but it will be no matter what he does. The narratives are already pre-written depending on whom Mougey takes.
That is a good point about trading down. It's easy for me to say they should trade down and collect a king's ransom for the pick but if no one else wants to give you much for it then their hands are tied. I definitely won't be too optimistic if the pick is Warren though.problem is they need interest in a team trading up as well which sometimes doesnt happen - I agree #7 is a bit high for both but if they rate a player that high then im ok with it.I'm a firm no on either. If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years.I don’t think they’ll even have a chance to draft Jeanty - he’s going to Jacksonville or Las Vegas.
I like Warren but think they’d have to trade back for it to make sense to take him - I won’t be that upset if they take him at 7 though.
Saquon was good for the Giants and it was still a bad use of the pick. That's exactly what it would be here for the Jets at 7.Unless they are good.If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years
Saquon was good for the Giants and it was still a bad use of the pick. That's exactly what it would be here for the Jets at 7.Unless they are good.If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years
Top 10 picks should definitely be a "premium position" - QB, WR, DL, T, CB - we went through this with Jamal Adams. Picked a safety at #6 and while he was all pro early it still was not considered a premium position and taken way too high. Mahomes was taken at #10 at Jets passed to work on Hackenberg who never played a snap in a game. Luckily Seatltle bailed them out on Adams with that haul.Saquon was good for the Giants and it was still a bad use of the pick. That's exactly what it would be here for the Jets at 7.Unless they are good.If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years
I was thinking more about Warren with that statement - since the Jets are desperate for pass catchers, if Warren does contribute, no one will call it a bad pick. Personally I will not be upset if it happens - but get that trading back to do so would be ideal (but as pointed out that's not always available).
The Jets, that are a borderline playoff team at best (yeah I said it again) - should not be taking a RB at 7 (when it's already a position of strength). That would make me lose some faith in this new regime already.
Pitts had a 1000 yard rookie season just like Bowers. How much better off would the Falcons have been taking any number of guys at more valuable positions? (Sewell, Chase, Waddle, Surtain, Parsons) I am a fan of Warren and the way he plays, but he's had 1 year of elite production and TEs that produce enough to be impactful difference makers in the NFL are few and far between. I personally see a far greater chance that Warren is a "good TE" and still not worth the 7th pick than there is that he's the next Travis Kelce, Gronk, Tony Gonzalez, Antonio Gates, etc... and a reason the Jets turn this thing around. If they draft him I hope I'm wrong, but I won't be counting on it.Saquon was good for the Giants and it was still a bad use of the pick. That's exactly what it would be here for the Jets at 7.Unless they are good.If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years
I was thinking more about Warren with that statement - since the Jets are desperate for pass catchers, if Warren does contribute, no one will call it a bad pick. Personally I will not be upset if it happens - but get that trading back to do so would be ideal (but as pointed out that's not always available).
The Jets, that are a borderline playoff team at best (yeah I said it again) - should not be taking a RB at 7 (when it's already a position of strength). That would make me lose some faith in this new regime already.
I’d prefer o-line, and I’d much prefer a trade down before taking Warren, but if they do take him at 7, I’d imagine they would be planning on utilizing his versatility and he’d be a big part of the offense that needs weapons.Pitts had a 1000 yard rookie season just like Bowers. How much better off would the Falcons have been taking any number of guys at more valuable positions? (Sewell, Chase, Waddle, Surtain, Parsons) I am a fan of Warren and the way he plays, but he's had 1 year of elite production and TEs that produce enough to be impactful difference makers in the NFL are few and far between. I personally see a far greater chance that Warren is a "good TE" and still not worth the 7th pick than there is that he's the next Travis Kelce, Gronk, Tony Gonzalez, Antonio Gates, etc... and a reason the Jets turn this thing around. If they draft him I hope I'm wrong, but I won't be counting on it.Saquon was good for the Giants and it was still a bad use of the pick. That's exactly what it would be here for the Jets at 7.Unless they are good.If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years
I was thinking more about Warren with that statement - since the Jets are desperate for pass catchers, if Warren does contribute, no one will call it a bad pick. Personally I will not be upset if it happens - but get that trading back to do so would be ideal (but as pointed out that's not always available).
The Jets, that are a borderline playoff team at best (yeah I said it again) - should not be taking a RB at 7 (when it's already a position of strength). That would make me lose some faith in this new regime already.
Some famous Jet 1st rd TEs - Johnny Mitchell, Kyle Brady - with the entire arena clamoring for Warren Sapp. and Anthony Becht. Not greatI’d prefer o-line, and I’d much prefer a trade down before taking Warren, but if they do take him at 7, I’d imagine they would be planning on utilizing his versatility and he’d be a big part of the offense that needs weapons.Pitts had a 1000 yard rookie season just like Bowers. How much better off would the Falcons have been taking any number of guys at more valuable positions? (Sewell, Chase, Waddle, Surtain, Parsons) I am a fan of Warren and the way he plays, but he's had 1 year of elite production and TEs that produce enough to be impactful difference makers in the NFL are few and far between. I personally see a far greater chance that Warren is a "good TE" and still not worth the 7th pick than there is that he's the next Travis Kelce, Gronk, Tony Gonzalez, Antonio Gates, etc... and a reason the Jets turn this thing around. If they draft him I hope I'm wrong, but I won't be counting on it.Saquon was good for the Giants and it was still a bad use of the pick. That's exactly what it would be here for the Jets at 7.Unless they are good.If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years
I was thinking more about Warren with that statement - since the Jets are desperate for pass catchers, if Warren does contribute, no one will call it a bad pick. Personally I will not be upset if it happens - but get that trading back to do so would be ideal (but as pointed out that's not always available).
The Jets, that are a borderline playoff team at best (yeah I said it again) - should not be taking a RB at 7 (when it's already a position of strength). That would make me lose some faith in this new regime already.
I surely see your points though - and I don’t think they actually will take him at 7. While it may seem silly, the franchise’s past failures of taking TEs too early may just make the new regime think twice before adding to that list.
Definitely some all time blown picks - two of my faves:Obviously we all hate the standard "Jets draft blunders" video that they roll out every year.
But it is objectively hilarious. Can't deny it
Trying to just trust the new regime
Definitely some all time blown picks - two of my faves:Obviously we all hate the standard "Jets draft blunders" video that they roll out every year.
But it is objectively hilarious. Can't deny it
NYJ select "fullback"....."oh no!!"...."Roger Vick
the entire arena chanting for Warren Sapp and they go with Kyle Brady after picking a TE in the 1st rd 2 yrs prior
Lets be serious tho - all teams could have a video of blown picks like this - only difference is it is "fun" to kick the Jets. Also their fans over the top reactions make good video - but lets stop acting most other teams havent blown several similar picks over the years
Like itMembou it is
The oline looks good on paper and I expect the team to run a lot next year.Josina Anderson said that her source told her that there was no way the Jets would take a TE that high.
Live look at MougeyMembou it is
They definitely have one of the worst WR groups in the league right now. I’m not sure what the plan is there. Hope they can find help in the draft.Now gotta find some pass catchers. It's a BAD group right now after Garrett
Membou hit the spot. Conor Hughes is usually pretty solid, but I think he’s getting ahead of himself here:
going off the top of my head i can roll out dwayne robertson, mike haight, dave cadigan, jeff lageman, johnny mitchell, qb qb qb, every second rounder ever. lame jones of course. blair thomas. lol so many.Some famous Jet 1st rd TEs - Johnny Mitchell, Kyle Brady - with the entire arena clamoring for Warren Sapp. and Anthony Becht. Not greatI’d prefer o-line, and I’d much prefer a trade down before taking Warren, but if they do take him at 7, I’d imagine they would be planning on utilizing his versatility and he’d be a big part of the offense that needs weapons.Pitts had a 1000 yard rookie season just like Bowers. How much better off would the Falcons have been taking any number of guys at more valuable positions? (Sewell, Chase, Waddle, Surtain, Parsons) I am a fan of Warren and the way he plays, but he's had 1 year of elite production and TEs that produce enough to be impactful difference makers in the NFL are few and far between. I personally see a far greater chance that Warren is a "good TE" and still not worth the 7th pick than there is that he's the next Travis Kelce, Gronk, Tony Gonzalez, Antonio Gates, etc... and a reason the Jets turn this thing around. If they draft him I hope I'm wrong, but I won't be counting on it.Saquon was good for the Giants and it was still a bad use of the pick. That's exactly what it would be here for the Jets at 7.Unless they are good.If they pick one of them at 7 it will 100% be part of the story when people are calling for Mougey's head in 3-4 years
I was thinking more about Warren with that statement - since the Jets are desperate for pass catchers, if Warren does contribute, no one will call it a bad pick. Personally I will not be upset if it happens - but get that trading back to do so would be ideal (but as pointed out that's not always available).
The Jets, that are a borderline playoff team at best (yeah I said it again) - should not be taking a RB at 7 (when it's already a position of strength). That would make me lose some faith in this new regime already.
I surely see your points though - and I don’t think they actually will take him at 7. While it may seem silly, the franchise’s past failures of taking TEs too early may just make the new regime think twice before adding to that list.