Interesting question from "no Huddle". W/ 4:00 to go to go (1 Viewer)

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

I think it was 1 score. Credit IIRC To "Tyler Ansell" who sent this to them.

I'm not sure what my answer is really, it might actually. It might actually be Tesus.

 

[PlasmaDogPlasma]

If there's one thing this board needs, it's more Tebow threads.

 

[Warrior]

Totally different offensive systems...if you're assuming they stick with their current systems, but have comparable talent blocking, at WR, at RB, etc...I'd have to go with Tebow. He's doing a lot more with a lot less on offense right now. I'd say that Romo has a HUGE HUGE advantage at WR, a slightly better running game (Murray + Choice vs McGahee), a comparable O-line, yet he hasn't shown nearly the ability to march down the field in the 4th quarter with 4:00 to go.

 

[Run It Up]

Having no poll makes it much easier to say literally anyone else not named Mark Sanchez, but out of those 3 I would take the Cowboys with Romo.

 

[glumpy]

I think a lot depends on the game score, and for the purpose of this question I'll assume that they are relatively the same for each scenario. Given a game score 30-36 I would tend to favor Romo, because he's got more weapons and defense doesn't seem to be an issue. Given a 10-17 score I would think Tebow because I do think he's more resourceful under pressure.

This question relates to me virtually every week when I'm deciding on my matchups, since those are my two QB's for the playoffs.

 

[LittlePhatty]

Given a game score 30-36 I would tend to favor Romo, because he's got more weapons and defense doesn't seem to be an issue. Given a 10-17 score I would think Tebow because I do think he's more resourceful under pressure.

You're not making any sense.

 

[BroadwayG]

I would rather have TJ Yates than Romo

 

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

I would rather have TJ Yates than Romo

On extra points tries I'd agree.

 

[Bankerguy]

Stupid thread.

 

[BassNBrew]

Given a game score 30-36 I would tend to favor Romo, because he's got more weapons and defense doesn't seem to be an issue. Given a 10-17 score I would think Tebow because I do think he's more resourceful under pressure.

You're not making any sense.

He's saying Romo will outproduced Tebow a higher percentage of the time against soft defenses. Against strong defenses he's saying that Tebow would produce more often than Romo.In others words, while Tebow's chances of success would improve against a soft defense, Romo's would improve more.

 

[cobalt_27]

Stupid thread.

Because Romo has been so damn clutch. I know this Cowboy fan would rather take my chances with Tebow down by 6 than i would Romo up by 6.

 

[jon_mx]

Tebow probably has more successful forth quarter come from behind wins in a lot fewer chances.

 

[Run It Up]

Tebow probably has more successful forth quarter come from behind wins in a lot fewer chances.

Lets take a very small portion of an already incredibly small sample size to make a broad sweeping generalization between two completely different players.The only thing that belongs in this thread is opinions, because there are no relevant statistics to support either side.

 

[Bankerguy]

Stupid thread.

Because Romo has been so damn clutch. I know this Cowboy fan would rather take my chances with Tebow down by 6 than i would Romo up by 6.

You are a donkey.