Anybody know how George's 40 times compare to Peterson's?
I would guess Peterson is faster, but am not sure by how much.
Just found this at Wikipedia...
Peterson is 6'2" about 225 pounds, 40 time reported between 4:35-4:45 [citation needed] and is often compared to Eric Dickerson.
I personally think he looks more like George than Dickerson when he runs the ball. If he indeed runs a 4.35 he's definitely faster than George.
I think he runs "heavier" than Dickerson. He may be better compared to Jamal Lewis, who IMHO had more breakaway speed than did George but also ran (and runs) physically like Peterson. Obviously, Peterson is not as stocky as Lewis, but I'm simply comparing running style.Here's another thought: how would you compare him to Steven Jackson?
I keep thinking of George because of his height and upright running style...George was faster than people realize.Peterson is more physical than Dickerson but Dickerson has such a unique, gliding style I don't thinks its a perfect match.
Jackson doesn't run as upright.
Lewis is a pretty good comparison although I doubt AP will be as physical as Lewis is in the NFL.
Chris Brown definitely isn't as physical, but has a similar skillset IMHO.
There really doesn't seem to be too many comparisons because there aren't a lot of 6'2" RBs with AP's skills. It will be interesting to see how he fares at the next level. I think he's a lock to be a solid player, but not the great player some might expect.
I personally believe Lynch has more upside.