Odd question for a WR who has never missed a game.....I think durability is still a question.
Top 10, no question....Odd question for a WR who has never missed a game.....I think durability is still a question.
Steve Smith perhaps. But I liken him to Marvin Harrison. A relatively small receiver who is super quick. And when he splits the defense, he is gone.If only he had the precision of Peyton throwing to him instead of McNabb (and Kolb). I dont think he is a sell high player either. He is here to stay. This offense is slowly ebbing toward this kid, and drifting away from Westbrook.Yes. A young Steve Smith there.
And you thought we would care?I see DJax in the 7-10 range next year.Whooohoo. Ok now thats 2 of my wr's i have both are getting top 10 hype.And to think i sometimes have to bench one of them.
I think that is about right. This kid looks like he is only going to get better and should be top 10 in dynasty going forward. If you get return yardage points he is top 10 now. With Celek and McCoy also there, that offense looks like it already has the next generation of weapons, too.And you thought we would care?I see DJax in the 7-10 range next year.Whooohoo. Ok now thats 2 of my wr's i have both are getting top 10 hype.And to think i sometimes have to bench one of them.
Wow, I'm kind of surprised by the overwhelming votes of yes DeSean is top-10. I have him right on the border of top-10 behind:
1.AJ
2.Fitz
3.Calvin
4.Wayne
5.Jennings
6.Moss
7.Smith
8.White
9.V-JAX
10.Colston
11.DeSean
12.Harvin
13.Boldin
14.Bowe
15.Holmes
So if seemingly everyone has DeSean in the top-10(or in many cases 7th or so) who do I have too high?
I wouldn't trade Jackson straight up for White in a dynasty league. Not a knock on White's talent. But White doesn't seem to be the breakaway threat that Jackson is.Wow, I'm kind of surprised by the overwhelming votes of yes DeSean is top-10. I have him right on the border of top-10 behind:1.AJ2.Fitz3.Calvin4.Wayne5.Jennings6.Moss7.Smith8.White9.V-JAX10.Colston11.DeSean12.Harvin13.Boldin14.Bowe15.HolmesSo if seemingly everyone has DeSean in the top-10(or in many cases 7th or so) who do I have too high?
Just looking quickly, I'd say I'd have him over Smith, VJax, and probably Colston.Wow, I'm kind of surprised by the overwhelming votes of yes DeSean is top-10. I have him right on the border of top-10 behind:1.AJ2.Fitz3.Calvin4.Wayne5.Jennings6.Moss7.Smith8.White9.V-JAX10.Colston11.DeSean12.Harvin13.Boldin14.Bowe15.HolmesSo if seemingly everyone has DeSean in the top-10(or in many cases 7th or so) who do I have too high?
DeSean Jackson over Smiff in dynasty? Wow. When last I checked, Steve Smith was 6 months younger than Reggie Wayne, still a stud, and STILL the only player I have ever seen triple-covered for an entire game. You think Delhomme's going to keep his value down? I'm not convinced (hasn't happened so far), but even if you're right... this is dynasty. The one thing you can count on is that talent always wins out. If Delhomme can't get the ball to Smiff, then Delhomme won't be under center, big contract or no big contract.Just looking quickly, I'd say I'd have him over Smith, VJax, and probably Colston.Wow, I'm kind of surprised by the overwhelming votes of yes DeSean is top-10. I have him right on the border of top-10 behind:1.AJ2.Fitz3.Calvin4.Wayne5.Jennings6.Moss7.Smith8.White9.V-JAX10.Colston11.DeSean12.Harvin13.Boldin14.Bowe15.HolmesSo if seemingly everyone has DeSean in the top-10(or in many cases 7th or so) who do I have too high?
Well, I didn't give it too much thought, so I wouldn't fight it to the death or anything, but yeah, I don't like Delhomme or the Panthers O as much. And I agree that talent wins out, but I think DeSean is really, really talented.DeSean Jackson over Smiff in dynasty? Wow. When last I checked, Steve Smith was 6 months younger than Reggie Wayne, still a stud, and STILL the only player I have ever seen triple-covered for an entire game. You think Delhomme's going to keep his value down? I'm not convinced (hasn't happened so far), but even if you're right... this is dynasty. The one thing you can count on is that talent always wins out. If Delhomme can't get the ball to Smiff, then Delhomme won't be under center, big contract or no big contract.
I can respect it, I was mostly just angling for your reasoning. Like I said... Steve Smith. The only man on the planet who has ever had a team say "screw it, our game plan this week is to just triple-cover Steve Smith all game long". IN THE PLAYOFFS, no less.Well, I didn't give it too much thought, so I wouldn't fight it to the death or anything, but yeah, I don't like Delhomme or the Panthers O as much. And I agree that talent wins out, but I think DeSean is really, really talented.DeSean Jackson over Smiff in dynasty? Wow. When last I checked, Steve Smith was 6 months younger than Reggie Wayne, still a stud, and STILL the only player I have ever seen triple-covered for an entire game. You think Delhomme's going to keep his value down? I'm not convinced (hasn't happened so far), but even if you're right... this is dynasty. The one thing you can count on is that talent always wins out. If Delhomme can't get the ball to Smiff, then Delhomme won't be under center, big contract or no big contract.
When he establishes himself as a legitimate talent and when Eli Manning demonstrates he can be productive for something more than a 4 game sample.His numbers look nice, but from what I've seen, no team in the league would pick Steve Smith over DeSean, Vincent, Marques, Roddy, etc. Long run, that matters.MAN....this other Steve Smith is Killin right now.when is he going to get some due respect in these ranking or do you still think its all a fluke?