Figure in the YAC and it's a wash. Nicks is not more of a downfield threat than Cruz.mebbe he gets a ton of yards after the catch?
1999 39 passes for 677 yards and eight touchdownsCruz should surpass this, but Hakim was no slouch. And you still can't argue that Cruz is getting the #2 CB at best and not having the safety rolling over to double him in 90% of the cases. Cruz is doing a great job...I wish Nicks would get more love, but each one opens room for the other.Az Hakim never had a season like this.You people ever hear of Az Hakim? He's a good WR, not great. He most often is covered by the 3rd man on the CB totem pole (or worse). Good for fantasy purposes in 2011, but let's not crown him a top WR for 2012 just yet...
Well said.In one league, I have nicks, dez, stevie, fitzgerald and santonio holmes...it has been frustrating owning all 5. Does that mean I will never own any of them again?? No, I understand you have to take the good with the bad as far as #1's go. There are going to be alot of games where burress outscores holmes, cruz/manningham beat out nicks, laurent robinson outscores dez (almost every game actually)...you get the picture. If this is the new trend, we will see #2 WRs drafted in the first 3 rounds over the #1 guy?? Doubtful.
I realize it's only one week, but have to feel a little better seeing Stevie Johnson do well against Revis with the Fitzpatrick/Spiller combo behind him. Eli/Ahmad (to a lesser extent, Jacobs) inspire more confidence than those twoyou guys realize its week 13 & whats looming in week 16?i think its purely the fact that there is absolutely zero threat from the running game. nicks is the best offensive player available to get the ball. defenses will shift towards him. you guys sound like you all never owned a wr1 before.
hakeem nicks goes as the running game goes. he was the prime beneficiary of the big play action bombs. victor cruz is doing much better than nicks, but i do think nicks is the better talent and when the giants wake up and have a running game going, that will be the time nicks will elevate back into elite categories
calm down
Not getting the best corner on the other team isn't a knock on his skills.9/238/3TDThat's what he's done in two games vs. Nnamdi this year. I don't care who is covering him, his separation skills are legit. Not saying he's elite by any means, but you don't have to be in the Giants offense.ETA: You would think the attention that Cruz is drawing would benefit Nicks, but it hasn't. Seems like Eli looks for Cruz any time he needs a big time completion.1999 39 passes for 677 yards and eight touchdownsCruz should surpass this, but Hakim was no slouch. And you still can't argue that Cruz is getting the #2 CB at best and not having the safety rolling over to double him in 90% of the cases. Cruz is doing a great job...I wish Nicks would get more love, but each one opens room for the other.Az Hakim never had a season like this.You people ever hear of Az Hakim? He's a good WR, not great. He most often is covered by the 3rd man on the CB totem pole (or worse). Good for fantasy purposes in 2011, but let's not crown him a top WR for 2012 just yet...
very good point but i could see cruz, J. Nelson, etc being drafted over suspect #1's like rice and Harvin.....In one league, I have nicks, dez, stevie, fitzgerald and santonio holmes...it has been frustrating owning all 5. Does that mean I will never own any of them again?? No, I understand you have to take the good with the bad as far as #1's go. There are going to be alot of games where burress outscores holmes, cruz/manningham beat out nicks, laurent robinson outscores dez (almost every game actually)...you get the picture. If this is the new trend, we will see #2 WRs drafted in the first 3 rounds over the #1 guy?? Doubtful.
I agree, however, what I meant was that you won't see cruz taken before nicks...nelson before jennings...d nelson before stevie...etc.very good point but i could see cruz, J. Nelson, etc being drafted over suspect #1's like rice and Harvin.....In one league, I have nicks, dez, stevie, fitzgerald and santonio holmes...it has been frustrating owning all 5. Does that mean I will never own any of them again?? No, I understand you have to take the good with the bad as far as #1's go. There are going to be alot of games where burress outscores holmes, cruz/manningham beat out nicks, laurent robinson outscores dez (almost every game actually)...you get the picture. If this is the new trend, we will see #2 WRs drafted in the first 3 rounds over the #1 guy?? Doubtful.
Yeah, he's a poor man's Gregg Jennings this year'Hank Mardukas said:I've been disappointed with Nicks this year, but it's still pretty nice to be able to plug him in and know the 10 pts will be there. Not many players you can say that for.
I've owned Cruz since week 3. I also drafted Manningham with confidence. And I owned Nicks in 2009 and 2010 and still believe in his ability. In short, I've followed Manning and the NYG WRs over the past 3 years. Cruz is the real deal. I saw that in the 2010 preseason when as a rookie Cruz torched the Jets starters for 3 TD and 145 yards. (Note that Cruz's rare accomplishment was mostly underreported or dismissed by the press.) We've seen Cruz repeatedly catch the deep ball in 2011. We've seen Cruz successfully play the slot role. We've seen Cruz successfully play Manningham's role. We've seen Cruz beat single and double coverage against good defenders. Cruz has demonstrated impressive versatility as a WR.1999 39 passes for 677 yards and eight touchdownsCruz should surpass this, but Hakim was no slouch. And you still can't argue that Cruz is getting the #2 CB at best and not having the safety rolling over to double him in 90% of the cases.Az Hakim never had a season like this.You people ever hear of Az Hakim?
He's a good WR, not great. He most often is covered by the 3rd man on the CB totem pole (or worse). Good for fantasy purposes in 2011, but let's not crown him a top WR for 2012 just yet...
Cruz is doing a great job...I wish Nicks would get more love, but each one opens room for the other.
Can you see it now?I almost can't read these type of posts anymores. You guys act like you've never owned a #1 WR before. All the greats: Welker, Jennings, Calvin, Wayne when Manning was there, Fitz, insert every good WR you know; its all the same...when they come out and make defenses look silly for a few weeks, opponents double them and force the ball elsewhere. Everybody does it. NO WR just does what he wants for 17 straight weeks. Even the "impossible to understand how he does it" Steve Smith in Carolina, where there has been NO other reasonable threat for years and he gets double ALL THE TIME, has games where he just doesnt' produce.
So you guys are saying that a top 15 WR that caught something like 7 for 80+ last night is dragging your team down? You might want to checkt he mirror.
Speaking of Steve Smith, the FORMER GIANT, he was Victor Cruz not so long ago, catching 8-12 balls a game but it didn't hurt Nicks short or long term. Cruz is hot right now and he can play. But it might just change just as quickly as it arrived with him. He has all the looks in the world as being one of the most overdrafted players in next years draft, much like Manningham ended up being this year.
The differece right now is NOT Nicks. Its the Giants lack of a running game and injuries all over the team and especially the O-line. This team had, in the past, had the luxury of keeping its o-line together for a long time and now they are adjusting. Things will normalize and you will see again some great play action and some deep bombs to Nicks.
its truly amazing to me how people are ready to cast Nicks off. With 2 games agains the Cowboys, a game with the Packers and games with the redskins and Jets left, I can see him posting a monster stat line or two down the stretch. I'll look for some of you fellas in the Venting thread in a few weeks when you can't understand how you benched or dropped or traded Nicks and then can't phathom how he caught 8/165/2 against the Cowboys or Packers.
Yeah, extremely clearcould be one of the most rediculous posts I have seen here in a while.Look at the stats he put up last year even though he missed a few games. This year teams have keyed up on him, but that's because giants have zero run game, that will for sure change next yearNicks looks to me like a guy who gets by strictly on his god given talent. He's not a worker. He's not Larry Fitzgerald. He doesn't like to go over the middle, he doesn't work hard to get open when a play breaks down.
Very clear that Nicks is not going to be a top tier elite WR in this league.

Smith and Cruz are completely different receivers. Smith is a possession/slot receiver that was forced into a bigger role in his big year. Cruz is dynamic. Dynamic enough to hurt Nicks value. Nicks is an absolute stud and will still have games like today, but he won't get force fed by Eli like he was in 2010. I think they will sign Smith next year for the slot, and Cruz and Nicks on the outside. Get any semblance of a running game and this offense will rival GB's in 2012.Speaking of Steve Smith, the FORMER GIANT, he was Victor Cruz not so long ago, catching 8-12 balls a game but it didn't hurt Nicks short or long term. Cruz is hot right now and he can play. But it might just change just as quickly as it arrived with him. He has all the looks in the world as being one of the most overdrafted players in next years draft, much like Manningham ended up being this year.
They'd be potent but Eli Manning is not Aaron Rodgers and probably never will be.Smith and Cruz are completely different receivers. Smith is a possession/slot receiver that was forced into a bigger role in his big year. Cruz is dynamic. Dynamic enough to hurt Nicks value. Nicks is an absolute stud and will still have games like today, but he won't get force fed by Eli like he was in 2010. I think they will sign Smith next year for the slot, and Cruz and Nicks on the outside. Get any semblance of a running game and this offense will rival GB's in 2012.
That's why they would need a running game, Rodgers doesn't need one. Eli is improving though.They'd be potent but Eli Manning is not Aaron Rodgers and probably never will be.Smith and Cruz are completely different receivers. Smith is a possession/slot receiver that was forced into a bigger role in his big year. Cruz is dynamic. Dynamic enough to hurt Nicks value. Nicks is an absolute stud and will still have games like today, but he won't get force fed by Eli like he was in 2010. I think they will sign Smith next year for the slot, and Cruz and Nicks on the outside. Get any semblance of a running game and this offense will rival GB's in 2012.
Unless Eli learns how to run for 4 first downs a game as Rodgers routinely does, he will never be near the threat that these Packers are.Smith and Cruz are completely different receivers. Smith is a possession/slot receiver that was forced into a bigger role in his big year. Cruz is dynamic. Dynamic enough to hurt Nicks value. Nicks is an absolute stud and will still have games like today, but he won't get force fed by Eli like he was in 2010. I think they will sign Smith next year for the slot, and Cruz and Nicks on the outside. Get any semblance of a running game and this offense will rival GB's in 2012.Speaking of Steve Smith, the FORMER GIANT, he was Victor Cruz not so long ago, catching 8-12 balls a game but it didn't hurt Nicks short or long term. Cruz is hot right now and he can play. But it might just change just as quickly as it arrived with him. He has all the looks in the world as being one of the most overdrafted players in next years draft, much like Manningham ended up being this year.
im only talking redraft. but i think the answer is obvious this year. just look at the statsso you will take cruz over nicks next yr? id imagine you will for the next 3 weeks but just in case?you guys realize its week 13 & whats looming in week 16?i think its purely the fact that there is absolutely zero threat from the running game. nicks is the best offensive player available to get the ball. defenses will shift towards him. you guys sound like you all never owned a wr1 before. hakeem nicks goes as the running game goes. he was the prime beneficiary of the big play action bombs. victor cruz is doing much better than nicks, but i do think nicks is the better talent and when the giants wake up and have a running game going, that will be the time nicks will elevate back into elite categoriescalm down![]()

they both seem like wr1s to me'cvnpoka said:im only talking redraft. but i think the answer is obvious this year. just look at the statsso you will take cruz over nicks next yr? id imagine you will for the next 3 weeks but just in case?you guys realize its week 13 & whats looming in week 16?i think its purely the fact that there is absolutely zero threat from the running game. nicks is the best offensive player available to get the ball. defenses will shift towards him. you guys sound like you all never owned a wr1 before. hakeem nicks goes as the running game goes. he was the prime beneficiary of the big play action bombs. victor cruz is doing much better than nicks, but i do think nicks is the better talent and when the giants wake up and have a running game going, that will be the time nicks will elevate back into elite categoriescalm down![]()
![]()
I agree that Cruz will likely be overrated next year.When I see a lot of fluky, long scoring plays, they often don't happen the next year.We'll see.I'm hoping every defense in the league thinks Cruz is the WR 1 so Nicks gets the crappy CB2 on him with no safety help. He will go crazy and as good as you think Cruz is when he gets the weakest defender on him every play, Nicks will be even better with that kind of coverage. Granted he still needs to stop dropping passes, but I would love to see teams make it a point to stop Cruz and give Nicks some room.
Is part of one game all it takes?I think the argument that Nicks is covered by the number one cornerback can finally be laid to rest.
An entire season? Total fantasy points between Nicks and Cruz aren't even close.Is part of one game all it takes?I think the argument that Nicks is covered by the number one cornerback can finally be laid to rest.
Are you arguing that Nicks isn't covered by the #1 cornerback or that Cruz has scored way more fantasy points?An entire season? Total fantasy points between Nicks and Cruz aren't even close.Is part of one game all it takes?I think the argument that Nicks is covered by the number one cornerback can finally be laid to rest.
The reason Nicks hasn't played as well as Cruz isn't because Niicks was covered by the top corner.Are you arguing that Nicks isn't covered by the #1 cornerback or that Cruz has scored way more fantasy points?An entire season? Total fantasy points between Nicks and Cruz aren't even close.Is part of one game all it takes?I think the argument that Nicks is covered by the number one cornerback can finally be laid to rest.
I've watched every Giants game and I think your partly right -- there is also the fact that Cruz has been absolutely lights out and has frankly outplayed Nicks for much of the season. Nicks has had concentration lapses and has dropped several TDs, which is strange because he hasn't really done that before. But Nicks is going to be undervalued going into next year, I think he'll have a nice bounce back season.The reason Nicks hasn't played as well as Cruz isn't because Niicks was covered by the top corner.Are you arguing that Nicks isn't covered by the #1 cornerback or that Cruz has scored way more fantasy points?An entire season? Total fantasy points between Nicks and Cruz aren't even close.Is part of one game all it takes?I think the argument that Nicks is covered by the number one cornerback can finally be laid to rest.
Wait...Did I just see Cruz beat a double coverage? Whey would they double him if they can double the more dangerous Nicks?The reason Nicks hasn't played as well as Cruz isn't because Niicks was covered by the top corner.Are you arguing that Nicks isn't covered by the #1 cornerback or that Cruz has scored way more fantasy points?An entire season? Total fantasy points between Nicks and Cruz aren't even close.Is part of one game all it takes?I think the argument that Nicks is covered by the number one cornerback can finally be laid to rest.
I think Nicks is an elite talent; however, Cruz being there may affect Nick's production - Nicks just doesn't see quite as many targets, so I can't knock someone for dropping Nicks a few spots. I do think things will even out a bit next year with Nicks performing as well or better than Cruz.Interesting that in order to build Cruz up, many feel that they need to tear Nicks down. Can't they both be elite WR's (if you believe that Cruz is one)?What has changed between this year and last for Nicks, other than TD grabs? Nothing. If you ranked him as a top-5 or top-10 dynasty WR and move him down after this season, I think you're kind of missing the point of dynasty. He still has that talent. Cruz being talented and a threat to take it to the house at any time does nothing to Nicks' talent.
He has almost identical targets per game as last year. Giants are built to throw now. I don't think his targets will suffer much with Cruz on the team(since they haven't so far).As you pointed out, the only real difference between this year and last with Nicks is the lack of TDs(and slight downgrade in his catch%). Cruz being on the team doesn't change his value in the slightest in my mind. He was productive a year ago with Smith/Manningham playing opposite him and scoring well. He was productive the year prior, as a rookie, playing with busted toes and sharing looks with 2-3 other guys. He's generally been productive this year with Cruz going nuts opposite him and dealing with leg issues most of the year, etc. etc. etc. As long as the Giants continue with their current scheme on offense Nicks is going to be just fine. He's talented and he's heavily targeted in an offense that throws a lot. Even if Cruz maintains his level of play, that in no way automatically precludes Nicks from improving on his 2011 production.Bottom line: If Nicks had caught half the TDs he's dropped this year we wouldn't be hearing half the b#@$ing that's been going on about him. That's pretty much the only significant difference between is '10 and his '11.Nicks just doesn't see quite as many targets
Exactly. Cruz is proving to be an excellent and exciting WR for the Giants. But it doesn't have any effect on Nicks' talent, and shouldn't negatively impact his opportunities. He's still a top-5 dynasty WR in my book.He has almost identical targets per game as last year. Giants are built to throw now. I don't think his targets will suffer much with Cruz on the team(since they haven't so far).As you pointed out, the only real difference between this year and last with Nicks is the lack of TDs(and slight downgrade in his catch%). Cruz being on the team doesn't change his value in the slightest in my mind. He was productive a year ago with Smith/Manningham playing opposite him and scoring well. He was productive the year prior, as a rookie, playing with busted toes and sharing looks with 2-3 other guys. He's generally been productive this year with Cruz going nuts opposite him and dealing with leg issues most of the year, etc. etc. etc. As long as the Giants continue with their current scheme on offense Nicks is going to be just fine. He's talented and he's heavily targeted in an offense that throws a lot. Even if Cruz maintains his level of play, that in no way automatically precludes Nicks from improving on his 2011 production.Bottom line: If Nicks had caught half the TDs he's dropped this year we wouldn't be hearing half the b#@$ing that's been going on about him. That's pretty much the only significant difference between is '10 and his '11.Nicks just doesn't see quite as many targets
Nicks!!!Cruz!!!
I hope that this proves to be a popular decision. I think Nicks will have a huge bounce back year, as Cruz rightfully draws more and more coverage away from him. I think Cruz will get his, but will become less consistent. This will be a tough season to follow up, honestly.Oh, and I'd like to throw in that this gives some merit to paying attention to preseason games. I remember watching Cruz carve up the Jets (possibly) in preseason before getting injured last year.I think Nicks & Cruz are both WR1s next year. Id take Cruz before Nicks but Nicks is a heck of a consolation prize.