Not just compared to the Shark Pool or the Assistant Coach Forum -- but compared to the rest of the United States. What's your verdict?
It is only representative of those who participate in this particular poll, no way to determine if actually reflects the actual percentages of those who read or participate in the threads.Left 2:1
That's obvious
It's called dialectic, good point, though I think the change in format might lead to a change in content.I think the FFA leans more logic than inherited wisdom, which sounds stupid, but we love our extensions by analogy and rigorous logical arguments. Which makes sense.
I'd say the FFA leans left because of that sort of belief in logical dialectic. Think Hegel and Marx and Plato rather than Aristotle and Burke.
I'd say I'm also neither left nor right, but sort of a weird hybrid of both though it's clear I side with the right out a sense of libertarian/right fusionism.
Yeah, that was redundant. I just wanted to be clear what I was saying. Dialectic is also called logic, etc.It's called dialectic, good point, though I think the change in format might lead to a change in content.
I think you started with the right idea but came to the wrong conclusion. In real life you've got people who are far left, people who are far right, and a whole lot of people somewhere in the middle. Most of those in the middle probably don't vote in primaries. And in the FFA it's likely the same, the far left and far right end up dominating the political threads, but that doesn't mean the vast middle doesn't exist here as well. The FFA is just like the US (or at least the 30-50 year old white male part of the US).I voted other, I think the FFA is similar to primary voters in each party. Those on the left are pretty far left and those on the right are pretty far right. Compared to the rest of the United States, the FFA is more conservative and more liberal.
ExactlyI think you started with the right idea but came to the wrong conclusion. In real life you've got people who are far left, people who are far right, and a whole lot of people somewhere in the middle. Most of those in the middle probably don't vote in primaries. And in the FFA it's likely the same, the far left and far right end up dominating the political threads, but that doesn't mean the vast middle doesn't exist here as well. The FFA is just like the US (or at least the 30-50 year old white male part of the US).
I think this is generally accurate. But I also think that the FFA is overwhelmingly uncomfortable with the nation being in a military situation where it is not the most powerful participant by a wide margin. The FFA is also mostly opposed to health care systems favored by our friends in western Europe, despite their pragmatic benefits, because people (who aren't represented here) will game the system.We are centrist on a lot of issues, and overwhelmingly liberal on others. I can't think of a single conservative position that has as much widespread support in the FFA as, like, gay marriage or marijuana legalization.
I would guess that depends on definitions. The left/right dichotomy is somewhat confusing to me. The old guard fiscally conservative/restrained government right has been overtaken outside the FAA by the older guard, and now new again guard of fundamentalist evangelicals supplemented by xenophobes. The schisms on the left are, to me, more amorphous, but we seem to have an increasing percentage that would never ask what they can do for their country, but would ask what their country can do for them
Libertarian leaning folks, a fair percentage around here, are difficult to align in today's linear and dichotomous discussion. I would guess that on most traditional scales the FFA votes slightly to the right while leaning left on many issues, not being represented by as many evangelicals as are out in the electorate. This is partly a function of the demographically skewed population here, tending towards higher education.
I do believe that the left tends to be more vocal here in the last few years. They are more prodigious in their posting.
I told you that you should have seen that thread before it was cleaned up (i.e., before a bunch of super horrible posts were deleted).Some pointed me to Teddy Kennedy where the right acted similarly, but browsing that thread produced nothing even close.
Maybe. But the thread I seen about his death was about a bunch of people expecting bad posts including Tim, and then Tim later saying he was pleasantly surprised there weren't any of those kind of posts. Perhaps you were recalling a different thread when Teddy was ill.I told you that you should have seen that thread before it was cleaned up (i.e., before a bunch of super horrible posts were deleted).