As a commissioner, I try to refrain from the vote so that the collective will of the league wins out without my interference. At least with generic things where I don't see a right or wrong answer for what would be in the best interest of the league.
This guy brings a polarizing rule change to the table for a year where picks have already changed hands. He casts his vote, but when the result ends up 6-6, he unilaterally decides that his vote matters more than anybody else. That is so wrong. 6-6 means that your proposed rule change didn't pass, unless the league bylaws previously established that this would be the case. In which case, shame on the league if they actually let the commish get away with such a rule. If no bylaws were previously established, you would have to assume it takes a majority vote to make any changes.
But this brings up an important point. It's important to have the leadership of a commish that can recognize when a league wide vote is even reasonable in the first place. I don't think this was reasonable for 2022. You have picks that have already changed hands, including the very commish pushing for the change. I do give him some credit for a reasonable point system that accounts for the missing and acquired picks, however it still doesn't make this something that should have even come to vote. The change most likely puts the team with two 1sts in the driver's seat to outbid everyone else for the top player in the 2022 draft (unless it ends up being two later picks). My guess is that there's most likely a team that looks like the worst team on paper. So if this guy goes on to have a 2-12 season, and is unable to acquire additional 1sts of his own, he now misses out on the top player of the draft despite having the worst team.
To put it another way, my dynasty league started as a 1QB league. I have Mahomes and haven't invested much in backup QBs. It amazes how many teams are loading their roster with four middling starting QBs in a 1QB league. It would be completely inappropriate for the commish of this league to allow a vote to suddenly turn the league into a start 2 QB league.. If the 8 teams with quality backups vote for it and the vote goes 8-4 for the change, it doesn't make such a change right. If you're in a dynasty league with no defined end point, and you really want to make a change that you think is for the better, you need to at least make something like this effective for something like 4-5 years out in the future, where teams have an opportunity to adjust and the years tend to wipe out any apparent advantage or disadvantage of the present. Luckily, my dynasty league is an empire league that ends when somebody wins the championship in consecutive years. In this case, I find any meaningful changes completely inappropriate. You wait until the current league ends, and make the change at the reset.
If the commish in this case wants to have this vote for 2023, that's probably okay. Picks haven't changed hands, and it's far enough away that the dregs of the league have a reasonable opportunity to build themselves up by that point. There's no clear bottom feeding team that looks to be getting screwed out of the top pick for 2023. But again, a 6-6 vote should never succeed in changing an established rule.
To the commissioner of this league:
https://youtu.be/VN29X2HCKpU