Lost me on this one... (still laughing about user name NOCHEESE){Syrus} said:happiest dude in the world right now is mike jenkins
You must not be a true Giants fan....because if you were you wouldn't be lost on that one.Lost me on this one... (still laughing about user name NOCHEESE){Syrus} said:happiest dude in the world right now is mike jenkins
Really?i sat pierre thomas because i expected jacobs to play.*is an idiot*
Lost me on this one... (still laughing about user name NOCHEESE){Syrus} said:happiest dude in the world right now is mike jenkins
Ooof.i sat pierre thomas because i expected jacobs to play.*is an idiot*
I am concerned aabout the game plan after what happened last week. I hope it was very windy so they couldn't throw and the iggles stacked the box against the run. Without being on the field or at the game you just can't know for sure. If that is the case then maybe this week the wind won't be a factor in Dallas and they can pound the ball while keeping the defense honest with the pass game.I think Ward has the stuff to be a #1 rb on most teams and he has a great O-line. I think he is a safe play for 10 points minimum with decent upside. I thnk last week was his worst week all year....can't do that twice right?So how do we like Ward this week?
Explain it to your opponent, maybe he'll let you switch.i sat pierre thomas because i expected jacobs to play.*is an idiot*
In the first Giant/Cowboy game, in the 4th quarter, Jacobs was running towards the endzone with the ball. Rookie CB Jenkins ran towards Jacobs but pulled up hitting him at about the 5 yard line. Jacobs scored with ease. Lets just say that Jenkins caught a whole lot of grief from Cowboy fans and media about not wanting to try to tackle Jacobs.Lost me on this one...{Syrus} said:happiest dude in the world right now is mike jenkins
{Syrus} said:happiest dude in the world right now is mike jenkins
Umm it was Derrick WardIn the first Giant/Cowboy game, in the 4th quarter, Jacobs was running towards the endzone with the ball. Rookie CB Jenkins ran towards Jacobs but pulled up hitting him at about the 5 yard line. Jacobs scored with ease. Lets just say that Jenkins caught a whole lot of grief from Cowboy fans and media about not wanting to try to tackle Jacobs.Lost me on this one...{Syrus} said:happiest dude in the world right now is mike jenkins
I played pierre thomas because I was worried jacobs wouldn't play*was freaking lucky this time*i sat pierre thomas because i expected jacobs to play.*is an idiot*
Give yourself more credit. You were smart. That was the right decision, ten times outta ten. You can't risk a ZERO, especially in Week 15.Well done.I played pierre thomas because I was worried jacobs wouldn't play*was freaking lucky this time*i sat pierre thomas because i expected jacobs to play.*is an idiot*
I honestly think Jacobs being out is more a bump for Bradshaw than Ward. Ward may get a few more goal line carries though.Ward has already been getting quite a few touches. Nearly as many as Jacobs actually when you count receptions. Now I think Ward takes over Jacobs role but but Bradshaw takes over Ward's old role.Derrick Ward....YOU'RE TIME IS NOW!!!!!!!!!!
Ward should get about 25/115/1 and 4/25/1 rec stats..they're going to heavily rely on the running game, now that Hixon is dinged up, and as a result,So how do we like Ward this week?
dont necessarily disagree with you. but, if Dallas can control the ball, and thats a BIG IF, i dont see the g-mens backs having much in the way of stats. the Dallas D has been very dominate against the run and getting a good pass rush, since Wade started calling the D.now i'm not ready to say this D is going to shut down the g-mens offense, but this isnt the same matchup as it might have been earlier in the season.Ward should get about 25/115/1 and 4/25/1 rec stats..they're going to heavily rely on the running game, now that Hixon is dinged up, and as a result,So how do we like Ward this week?
Toomer should have a monster game..
Ward and Bradshaw are both going to see a lot of action ..
Congrats!Sundog said:I played pierre thomas because I was worried jacobs wouldn't play*was freaking lucky this time*i sat pierre thomas because i expected jacobs to play.*is an idiot*
fixedhappiest dude in the world right now is mike jenkins H.K.
maybe, but i doubt it. the giants are looking ahead to next week. and dont forget the internal problems in NY before they went on their run. coughlin had lost that team. obviously they recovered and the rest is history. all i'm sayin is never count a team out. especially one as talented as the Cowboys.intangibles are key in this game ...dallas is a mess internally and will have a massive collapes this weekend...start ALL giants with confidence
Yes, the Giants are definately looking past the Cowboys this week. They really don't care much about this game at all. It's not like the Cowboys are rivals or annything. A win really doesn't make a difference - especially if Carolina loses to Denver. They might as well not show up for the game as apathetic as thhey are right now.maybe, but i doubt it. the giants are looking ahead to next week. and dont forget the internal problems in NY before they went on their run. coughlin had lost that team. obviously they recovered and the rest is history. all i'm sayin is never count a team out. especially one as talented as the Cowboys.intangibles are key in this game ...dallas is a mess internally and will have a massive collapes this weekend...start ALL giants with confidence
the eagles were said to have almost no chance of beating the giants in NY last week...yet because of the outside distractions leading up to that game the eagles won that game decidely...why would you think that the cowboys are exempt from such a distraction ? T.O is up to his old tricks and he has brought down more than one team in his career pulling this crap....have you been following the reports ?maybe, but i doubt it. the giants are looking ahead to next week. and dont forget the internal problems in NY before they went on their run. coughlin had lost that team. obviously they recovered and the rest is history. all i'm sayin is never count a team out. especially one as talented as the Cowboys.intangibles are key in this game ...dallas is a mess internally and will have a massive collapes this weekend...start ALL giants with confidence
this is not trueyou've been misleading people about the Giants run game all week.please stopgradin123 said:The Giants pattern has been simple. Jacobs gets the majority of the carries on the first two drives then Ward gets the third drive.
this is not trueyou've been misleading people about the Giants run game all week.please stopgradin123 said:The Giants pattern has been simple. Jacobs gets the majority of the carries on the first two drives then Ward gets the third drive.
Correct. He's right again and you all keep getting sucked in.fixedhappiest dude in the world right now is mike jenkins H.K.
Want to bet? I watch almost every Giants game and that has been the pattern to start the game. How have i been misleading people exactly?this is not trueyou've been misleading people about the Giants run game all week.please stopgradin123 said:The Giants pattern has been simple. Jacobs gets the majority of the carries on the first two drives then Ward gets the third drive.
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/playbyplay?g...p;override=trueNYG vs Philythis is not trueyou've been misleading people about the Giants run game all week.gradin123 said:The Giants pattern has been simple. Jacobs gets the majority of the carries on the first two drives then Ward gets the third drive.
please stop
that is whom garnerred stats on plays not whom was in the gamethat is one week and not a patternhttp://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/playbyplay?g...p;override=trueNYG vs Philythis is not trueyou've been misleading people about the Giants run game all week.gradin123 said:The Giants pattern has been simple. Jacobs gets the majority of the carries on the first two drives then Ward gets the third drive.
please stop
Drive 1
New York Giants at 15:00
1-10-NYG 28 (14:54) 27-B.Jacobs right end to NYG 34 for 6 yards (56-A.Jordan).
2-4-NYG 34 (14:21) (Shotgun) PENALTY on PHI-75-J.Parker, Neutral Zone Infraction, 5 yards, enforced at NYG 34 - No Play.
1-10-NYG 39 (14:07) 27-B.Jacobs left tackle to NYG 42 for 3 yards (56-A.Jordan, 27-Q.Mikell).
2-7-NYG 42 (13:31) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass short middle to 12-S.Smith to NYG 48 for 6 yards (27-Q.Mikell, 55-S.Bradley). PENALTY on PHI-55-S.Bradley, Face Mask (15 Yards), 15 yards, enforced at NYG 48.
1-10-PHI 37 (13:03) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass short left to 89-K.Boss to PHI 32 for 5 yards (55-S.Bradley).
2-5-PHI 32 (12:27) 82-M.Manningham right end to PHI 44 for -12 yards (27-Q.Mikell). End around.
3-17-PHI 44 (11:29) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass short left to 83-S.Moss to PHI 31 for 13 yards (24-S.Brown).
4-4-PHI 31 (10:44) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short left to 87-D.Hixon (24-S.Brown).
Drive 2
New York Giants at 09:12
1-10-NYG 33 (9:12) 27-B.Jacobs left guard to NYG 35 for 2 yards (98-M.Patterson, 27-Q.Mikell).
2-8-NYG 35 (8:33) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short middle to 89-K.Boss (57-C.Gocong).
3-8-NYG 35 (8:26) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass short left to 87-D.Hixon to NYG 35 for no gain (24-S.Brown).
4-8-NYG 35 (8:00) 18-J.Feagles punts 40 yards to PHI 25, Center-51-Z.DeOssie. 10-D.Jackson to PHI 29 for 4 yards (22-R.Droughns).
Drive 3
New York Giants at 04:31
1-10-NYG 15 (4:31) 34-D.Ward right guard to NYG 24 for 9 yards 58-T.Cole, 95-V.Abiamiri).
2-1-NYG 24 (3:52) 34-D.Ward left end to NYG 23 for -1 yards(56-A.Jordan, 58-T.Cole).
3-2-NYG 23 (3:06) (Shotgun) 44-A.Bradshaw right end to NYG 24 for 1 yard (55-S.Bradley).
4-1-NYG 24 (2:34) 18-J.Feagles punts 43 yards to PHI 33, Center-51-Z.DeOssie. 10-D.Jackson to PHI 38 for 5 yards (55-D.Clark).
I do watch the games.On the first 2 drives. Jacobs is almost always the featured running back. On the 3rd drive Ward is almost always the featured. Btw, Ward is almost always the 3rd down and long back regardless of the drive.that is whom garnerred stats on plays not whom was in the game
that is one week and not a pattern
that is also one week in which the starting RB was hurting
watch the games
B. Jacobs has almost always been the featured back on the first 2 drives and Ward the featured back on the 3rd Drive. There have been some minor variations if there have been extremely short drives, however, the overall pattern of who is the featured back on the drive is undeniable and has been a pattern right since the get go.However, Ward almost always comes in on 3rd Down and Longs regardless of the drive.Looks like Derrick Ward got some carries on drive 2 in 2 games to me
seriously? OK, you asked so...
Have you had enough BRI , or are you hungry for more?
If you are going to call me out publicly Bri you better check your facts!
you are hedging here, as blackjack pointed out. Switching from 3rd drive to 3rd and long was smooth...notB. Jacobs has almost always been the featured back on the first 2 drives and Ward the featured back on the 3rd Drive. There have been some minor variations if there have been extremely short drives, however, the overall pattern of who is the featured back on the drive is undeniable and has been a pattern right since the get go.However, Ward almost always comes in on 3rd Down and Longs regardless of the drive.Looks like Derrick Ward got some carries on drive 2 in 2 games to me
quoting again for emphasis as re-posting game stats really doesn't prove or disprove anything but....I'll play along. It's just then we're going by who got targets, catches, or carries NOT who was in the game.that is whom garnerred stats on plays not whom was in the gamethat is one week and not a patternthat is also one week in which the starting RB was hurtingwatch the games
Are you serious? Ward and B.Jacobs are rarely and I mean Rarely, in the backfield at the same time. If one of them is getting "targets,catches,or carries" it is because they are in the game and not the other one.Derrick ward always plays on 3rd downs unless it is 3rd and inches. That is not hard to understand.quoting again for emphasis as re-posting game stats really doesn't prove or disprove anything but....I'll play along. It's just then we're going by who got targets, catches, or carries NOT who was in the game.