Shutout
Footballguy
Amen. Very worth it. Hopefully an encore next weekbeen waiting all year for this...and boy was it worth waiting for.Definitely the classic jamaal Charles performance that we were waiting for.
Amen. Very worth it. Hopefully an encore next weekbeen waiting all year for this...and boy was it worth waiting for.Definitely the classic jamaal Charles performance that we were waiting for.
Probably the "have Charles" thread cause I'm pretty sure everyone against him probably broke their iPads, phones, and laptops today.Is this the 'have' Jam Charles or were against Jam Charles thread?
And Edelman, PPR with yardage bonusesI'll see you and raise you playing against Charles and Foles.Tango said:Any thread for those who played against Charles and Alex Smith?
Add in Brown for my opponent too. The hits keep coming and Charles was my only good player so far. Currently down 30 but do have Calvin left. I'll need a huge game from him.Kleck said:My opponent is one of the not many. I'm still down 20+ in a league I went undefeated in and lead in total points. Foles, Sea DST and Bailey are a great Charles insurance plan this week.ldizzle said:Wow. Single handedly ended many seasons today
Stop.been waiting all year for this...and boy was it worth waiting for.Definitely the classic jamaal Charles performance that we were waiting for.
JesusWhat's amazing is that he had this incredible game on only 16 touches.
Every single person who's been eliminated by JC will have this thread cocked and ready to bump if he's nothing short of spectacular next week.I really hope this thread does not get bumped after next week's performance.
Wow- - I thought I had it bad with Edelman(35) and DeSean Jackson(37.5)to go with the Charles same 61.5 point whipping - condolencesScored 61.5 against me, along with 40 from Foles, 30 from Garcon, 30 from SEA D, and not even counting the other 60 points. #1 Seed out.
keeping him fresh for fantasy Super Bowl week. I like it.What's amazing is that he had this incredible game on only 16 touches.
Same hereScored 61.5 against me, along with 40 from Foles, 30 from Garcon, 30 from SEA D, and not even counting the other 60 points. #1 Seed out.
We'll see. Still have to get through this next week. Either way it's been a fun ride. He's carried 2 of my teams to the title game and at this point there's nothing I could possibly complain about. He's been consistent all year and money when it's counted.Many have said that a 1st round draft pick can't win you a title. I think Charles owners may disagree......Charles is going to win a lot of leagues for owners this year.
This.I'll see you and raise you playing against Charles and Foles.Tango said:Any thread for those who played against Charles and Alex Smith?
Survived going against Charles, onto the SB next week
If you took a moment to read the entire thread and the others about Charles, you would see that what we were discussing is the statment that we have broght up several times during the course of the year that, while Charles has been great this year, there is usually that one or two games a year where he will have a crazy big long score or two in a game and have a monster game.Stop.been waiting all year for this...and boy was it worth waiting for.Definitely the classic jamaal Charles performance that we were waiting for.
Been waiting all year for a 5 TD game, like it happens all the time you have grown to expect it?
Just so common, they grow on trees huh? Laughable.
From the above post you see how often it happens.
If it matters I own him in some leagues and played against him in others.
Those are the worst...especially in the playoffs.If it's any consolation to anybody, my JC team got spanked, even though it outscored every team in the league by a large margin except one.
Well, that's fine...I guiess they have the extra time on their hands.Every single person who's been eliminated by JC will have this thread cocked and ready to bump if he's nothing short of spectacular next week.I really hope this thread does not get bumped after next week's performance.
Probably having Charles and losing. Especially if it was because of Dan Bailey, a freaking K who put up like 30 points. Luckily I had Bailey riding the pine on my teams.Philosophy time: What's worse: Playing against Charles yesterday and losing like that or having Charles and losing despite that epic performance?
Eh, not really. In the case of my one team with Charles that lost, it was good enough to win it all, but it's just bad luck that Peyton, Decker, Cameron and Fred Jackson, all of whom had been great all year, all had average to bad weeks the same week. There is no way to predict that; it's just the way it goes sometimes.If you had Charles and still lost, you either ran into another hot team or you got next to nothing from the rest of your team. Scenario 1 can happen and there is nothing that you can do about it. Scenario 2 well that's all on you. For me, scenario 1 would hurt much more. If I fell victim to scenario 2, I would figure my team just wasn't good enough to win it all.
Easy. Losing because of a once in a decade performance is much harder to swallow. If you had Charles and lost, you didn't deserve to be in the finals in the first place.Philosophy time: What's worse: Playing against Charles yesterday and losing like that or having Charles and losing despite that epic performance?
Really? It's that simple? My 12-2 team is still the total points leader by over 150 pts, averaging over 150 pts a game all year long. It wasn't worthy because it lost to a 7-7 team that averaged 110 pts all season long and somehow pulls 180 out of its butt? I guess I'm not worthy.Easy. Losing because of a once in a decade performance is much harder to swallow. If you had Charles and lost, you didn't deserve to be in the finals in the first place.Philosophy time: What's worse: Playing against Charles yesterday and losing like that or having Charles and losing despite that epic performance?
I may lose with a team I had JCharles on if my 17.25 and J.tucker doesn't outduel Calvin......Really? It's that simple? My 12-2 team is still the total points leader by over 150 pts, averaging over 150 pts a game all year long. It wasn't worthy because it lost to a 7-7 team that averaged 110 pts all season long and somehow pulls 180 out of its butt? I guess I'm not worthy.Easy. Losing because of a once in a decade performance is much harder to swallow. If you had Charles and lost, you didn't deserve to be in the finals in the first place.Philosophy time: What's worse: Playing against Charles yesterday and losing like that or having Charles and losing despite that epic performance?
Stat correction a possibility??Lost 188.22 to 188.16 to the JC team.
1 less yard (65.4pts instead of 65.5) would have sent me to the finals. Damn you JC!