the cap number @RB is WAAYYY better than it was last year(Lewis $6M+$3M for Taylor in '05)...they certainly have the money to grab a QB nowYou got to be joking! Cruel one if so!
I think they plan on running 650x this year.Now if they can just get a QB!!!!
Need a RT first.I think they plan on running 650x this year.Now if they can just get a QB!!!!
Right side of O-line is horridNeed a RT first.I think they plan on running 650x this year.Now if they can just get a QB!!!!
beat writer from CarrolCountyTimes will be on shortly---possibly more info w/himstill nothing on line, including the 1570 AM webpage.
thanksbeat writer fron CarrolCountyTimes will be on shortly---possibly more info w/himstill nothing on line, including the 1570 AM webpage.
My local paper.beat writer fron CarrolCountyTimes will be on shortly---possibly more info w/him
Just run left Ogden and Militalo are among the best combo in the NFL Surprising, but Denver will probably just draft a RB again.Right side of O-line is horridNeed a RT first.I think they plan on running 650x this year.Now if they can just get a QB!!!!
Mine, too. In fact, the sports editor is a charter member of my ff league.My local paper.beat writer fron CarrolCountyTimes will be on shortly---possibly more info w/him
Also, please refrain from ever using Quick in any sentance talking about Jamal LewisNot unless Jamal signed with the NBACould it be a quick sign and trade?
I disagree. HE could be used as a fullback, but that's not what he was last season. they want someone to come in there in case Jamal performs next year like he did this year.Mike Anderson is still considered a fullback, last I checked.
I'm in the same boat--he sold his house here, and were very little if any talks for the longest timethen, a 2 yr offer hit the table from the team yesterday, which I thought have been enough for him to say 'no way' regardless what a counter might have been--I'm still waiting to hear Aaron Wilsons' take on this, as his job is to follow the team 24/7Wow, strange
After hearing Jamal on Sirius NFL radio a couple of weeks ago, I never wouldve thought this was even a possibility
No.Please see numerous other threads on this.does this mean Bell is the guy in Denver?
No. Anderson doesnt change the pace and doesnt have any better hands than Lewis. Although he is probably a better blocker. Anderson is cheaper than Taylor and a lot older. They could involve Anderson as a fullback or for short yardage but he looks mostly like the backup. This doesnt look like RBBC. Lewis is at his best when he gets the ball 25 times and the Ravens are well aware of that.Is this officially a RBBC again, just replacing Taylor with Anderson?
Put an offer out to trade Anderson away right after his signing... now that lewis has signed you can guess how that one went...Woke up this morning upset I traded Mike Anderson for FWP early last season. Now... maybe not so much.
You've got to be @(&@#(&!! kidding me.NFL Network's Adam Shefter reports J-Lew signed for three years and close to $25 million. No word yet on signing bonus/guaranteed money.
This makes me cry. Probably a good assessment though. Shanahan just does not seem sold on Bell. Frankly I'm a little surprised. I know Bell got off on the wrong foot by shooting off his mouth and then breaking his finger his rookie year, yet at the end of that campaign he shut his moth, ran productively, and even ran through a seperated shoulder to show his toughness.No.does this mean Bell is the guy in Denver?
That is off the charts bad!! WOW!!! I was thinking 3 yrs, 12-14 million. Almost double that? I would think the guaranteed $ is around $6-$7 million, so maybe it's not as bad as it looksNFL Network's Adam Shefter reports J-Lew signed for three years and close to $25 million. No word yet on signing bonus/guaranteed money.
LEWIS CONTRACT REALLY A ONE-YEAR DEAL A league source tells us that the three-year deal to which running back Jamal Lewis has agreed in Baltimore is really a one-year deal, given the presence of a sizeable option bonus due in 2007.As a practical matter, then, it's a one-year, $6 million deal. He gets $5 million to sign and a $1 million base salary for 2006.Absent a monster year, we're told that the team won't be picking up the option for 2007 and 2008.
Lewis is big and strong enough to block, but he has never been much of a blocker - one reason he doesn't play much in third downs or passing situations. MA is a decent blocker so my guess would be that he will have a presence on third down and in short yardage situations - including goal line.Potentially, Anderson could get some third down looks due to his strong blocking and respectable hands. I think we'll Lewis playing a lot more third downs than he has the past couple years. Lewis can catch, is big enough to block, and isnt slow. Taylor didnt take too many carries away until after Lewis got hurt a couple years ago. Lewis kept Priest Holmes mostly on the bench. The Ravens could also easily add a small back in the draft. Allthough rookies dont often take over on third downs right away.
If true, I wonder if this really rules out the Ravens taking a back on the first day of the draft?PFT...
LEWIS CONTRACT REALLY A ONE-YEAR DEAL
A league source tells us that the three-year deal to which running back Jamal Lewis has agreed in Baltimore is really a one-year deal, given the presence of a sizeable option bonus due in 2007.
As a practical matter, then, it's a one-year, $6 million deal. He gets $5 million to sign and a $1 million base salary for 2006.
Absent a monster year, we're told that the team won't be picking up the option for 2007 and 2008.
If true, I wonder if this really rules out the Ravens taking a back on the first day of the draft?PFT...
LEWIS CONTRACT REALLY A ONE-YEAR DEAL
A league source tells us that the three-year deal to which running back Jamal Lewis has agreed in Baltimore is really a one-year deal, given the presence of a sizeable option bonus due in 2007.
As a practical matter, then, it's a one-year, $6 million deal. He gets $5 million to sign and a $1 million base salary for 2006.
Absent a monster year, we're told that the team won't be picking up the option for 2007 and 2008.
Well then, the last time you checked must have been the 2003 season... because that was the last time Mike Anderson was a fullback.Mike Anderson is still considered a fullback, last I checked.
Alas, I was beaten to the punch.I wouldn't jump off of a bridge just yet if I owned Anderson in a dynasty league. His value is definitely drastically reduced, but if Jamal Lewis continues to suck as much as he sucked last year, I think the door is open for Anderson to win the start. I don't know, I don't know how Baltimore's front office works, if they're one of those teams that start the best players, or if they're one of those teams that start the players they pay the most. Judging from the results of the Taylor/Lewis combo last season, and the fact that Lewis kept starting, I suppose they're more likely the latter. In that case, Mike Anderson owners, go ahead and feel free to jump off of a bridge after all.No.Please see numerous other threads on this.does this mean Bell is the guy in Denver?
The impression that I got last season was that Shanahan really likes Bell, and thinks he's a huge weapon, but didn't believe that Bell was capable of handling the load (and from all evidence that was available, Bell *wasn't* capable. His ypc dropped through the floor after a ton of carries). I also feel like Bell *was* given every chance to become "the man", he just kept wearing down later in games. Then again, I also heard rumors earlier this offseason that Denver was possibly shopping Bell, so that sort of shoots holes in my "Shanahan really likes Bell" theory.Shanahan just does not seem sold on Bell. Frankly I'm a little surprised. I know Bell got off on the wrong foot by shooting off his mouth and then breaking his finger his rookie year, yet at the end of that campaign he shut his moth, ran productively, and even ran through a seperated shoulder to show his toughness.
Last year he had god numbers when oportunity presented itself. Yes yardage variance per carry was a concern with him going negative yardage a few times too often, but he seemed to be going in the right direction. I just don't see why he does not get a chance to be the man before being relegated to 3rd down duty. Still, it seems fairly clear that has indeed happened.
As a Bell owner I'm disappointed. I guess the best thing to do is to sit on him now and wait for opportunity to come around the corner. One thing is certain in the
NFL,backs go down and opportunity comes around, so I wait.
yr 2 has a $5M bonus and $5M salary, which allows the parties to rework the deal IF Jamal is healthythe effect is:If true, I wonder if this really rules out the Ravens taking a back on the first day of the draft?PFT...
LEWIS CONTRACT REALLY A ONE-YEAR DEAL
A league source tells us that the three-year deal to which running back Jamal Lewis has agreed in Baltimore is really a one-year deal, given the presence of a sizeable option bonus due in 2007.
As a practical matter, then, it's a one-year, $6 million deal. He gets $5 million to sign and a $1 million base salary for 2006.
Absent a monster year, we're told that the team won't be picking up the option for 2007 and 2008.