This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
http://www.packersnews.com/article/20121205/PKR0101/121205039?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Also said Alex Green will be "leaned on" and he had his "best game of the year last week" were also quotes from the McCarthy presser, dont want to forget those. I know you have an agenda is looks from your post, but Grant is not the guy.
He doesn't have an agenda, he's just reporting on the topic. No one truly gives a #### about this backfield, the fantasy implications are miniscule so odds of bias are pretty low as well.To be clear it's not because I have faith in Green's talent that I think he will succeed, it's because I believe in fantasy karma. So many people have #### on Green in this thread that I think it's pretty much guaranteed he puts up points this week. There's a bit more to my logic than that, but that's the crux of it.
He doesn't have an agenda, he's just reporting on the topic. No one truly gives a #### about this backfield, the fantasy implications are miniscule so odds of bias are pretty low as well.To be clear it's not because I have faith in Green's talent that I think he will succeed, it's because I believe in fantasy karma. So many people have #### on Green in this thread that I think it's pretty much guaranteed he puts up points this week. There's a bit more to my logic than that, but that's the crux of it.
And somebody just said you were a good poster. You're leaning on "Fantasy Karma"...got it. Please make sure Alex Green knows about some nerd thread in the "shark pool" of a fantasy football message board, will ya?Oh, and tell the guys that will be tackling him, too, k?
I know it may be a bit tough to infer over the internet, but I'm clearly joking. I think you were just inadvertently trolled very hard lol.ETA: Also.."nerd thread"..what?He doesn't have an agenda, he's just reporting on the topic. No one truly gives a #### about this backfield, the fantasy implications are miniscule so odds of bias are pretty low as well.To be clear it's not because I have faith in Green's talent that I think he will succeed, it's because I believe in fantasy karma. So many people have #### on Green in this thread that I think it's pretty much guaranteed he puts up points this week. There's a bit more to my logic than that, but that's the crux of it.
Probly should email Aaron Rodgers also. HTH.
THAT, is the backtrack you came up with?I know it may be a bit tough to infer over the internet, but I'm clearly joking. I think you were just inadvertently trolled very hard lol.ETA: Also.."nerd thread"..what?He doesn't have an agenda, he's just reporting on the topic. No one truly gives a #### about this backfield, the fantasy implications are miniscule so odds of bias are pretty low as well.To be clear it's not because I have faith in Green's talent that I think he will succeed, it's because I believe in fantasy karma. So many people have #### on Green in this thread that I think it's pretty much guaranteed he puts up points this week. There's a bit more to my logic than that, but that's the crux of it.
Probly should email Aaron Rodgers also. HTH.
If you've ever paid attention to any of my posts, you'd know I would never rely on something as silly as "fantasy karma". I'm a stat fiend. Look, I'm not going to argue with you and try to prove I was joking. I'm really not sure why you put so much stock into the post or why you took it so seriously, but I'm not going to bite.THAT, is the backtrack you came up with?I know it may be a bit tough to infer over the internet, but I'm clearly joking. I think you were just inadvertently trolled very hard lol.ETA: Also.."nerd thread"..what?He doesn't have an agenda, he's just reporting on the topic. No one truly gives a #### about this backfield, the fantasy implications are miniscule so odds of bias are pretty low as well.To be clear it's not because I have faith in Green's talent that I think he will succeed, it's because I believe in fantasy karma. So many people have #### on Green in this thread that I think it's pretty much guaranteed he puts up points this week. There's a bit more to my logic than that, but that's the crux of it.
Probly should email Aaron Rodgers also. HTH.
An agenda to point out that Grant may actually get some work this Sunday.Nothing more.I don't think Green...despite McCarthy stating the obvious that he will be leaned on...is "the guy" either.I don't think anyone in that backfield is "the guy" or will do much to help a fantasy team except in extreme desperation.So...not sure what your issue is with me informing people that the coach feels a guy is expected to be available to him on Sunday.
You are making a play that a RB, who was cut in favor of Green and failed to get resigned by team until Week 14, is gonna come in a get a bunch of carries... yes an agenda. Do I need to put in all caps for it to be clearer?You seem to be pointing out all the goods for Grant, but nothing the coach said about Green, it could not be more obvious you have an agenda.'sho nuff said:
See previous post, yes he has an agenda. No one gives a #### about this backfield? You could not say a more uneducated statement. The fantasy implications are huge, its the dang playoffs, what world you live in?'SameSongNDance said:He doesn't have an agenda, he's just reporting on the topic. No one truly gives a #### about this backfield, the fantasy implications are miniscule so odds of bias are pretty low as well.To be clear it's not because I have faith in Green's talent that I think he will succeed, it's because I believe in fantasy karma. So many people have #### on Green in this thread that I think it's pretty much guaranteed he puts up points this week. There's a bit more to my logic than that, but that's the crux of it.'Phenix said:
A bunch of carries?I never stated anything close to Grant is a better option than Green.
If you actually have to rely on the GB backfield for your fantasy playoffs, you're in trouble.See previous post, yes he has an agenda. No one gives a #### about this backfield? You could not say a more uneducated statement. The fantasy implications are huge, its the dang playoffs, what world you live in?'SameSongNDance said:He doesn't have an agenda, he's just reporting on the topic. No one truly gives a #### about this backfield, the fantasy implications are miniscule so odds of bias are pretty low as well.To be clear it's not because I have faith in Green's talent that I think he will succeed, it's because I believe in fantasy karma. So many people have #### on Green in this thread that I think it's pretty much guaranteed he puts up points this week. There's a bit more to my logic than that, but that's the crux of it.'Phenix said:
Maybe, maybe not. What if you have Adrian Peterson in a PPR league and nothing else at RB? Suddenly, Alex Green looks pretty good and it's not like you need him to be a fantasy star. If you keep your expectations in check and use him primarily in PPR leagues I think Green can help fantasy teams going forward as long as he stays healthy. All depends on what you need.
It's possible, as I pointed out does have 4+ YPC in his last three games. Things change, it's possible he can contribute. The thing is, only a team already in pretty bad shape in going to ask for the services of Green this week. I can't imagine trusting anyone in this backfield for the first round of the playoffs unless I was forced to. I don't mind stashing him to see what happens but no way would I rely on him.
Trust in Green? No. But I do, at least, have hope. I picked up Green and I'm just hoping for somewhere near 80 total yds or a TD. Due to injuries, my other RBs are weak and won't be getting the 15 touches as I expect from Green. Touches = opportunity. Without the touches I don't care how good a RB is. Kendall Hunter agrees.
In theory I would agree but there's no way to know everyone's situation. It's entirely possible due to injuries, poor performance etc. that a good team could need Green this week. I'm in second place in my league and have been scrambling all season long for RB help behind Jamaal Charles. If I had gotten Green off WW this week he would've started for me. Give me a guy who can consistently get 8-10 points in PPR at the position (which Green has already proven he can do) and I'd take it.
