What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

John K Galbraith was Wrong (1 Viewer)

Dread Pirate

Footballguy
For the dude with the following Galbraith quote in his signature line here at FBG forums;

"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."

John Kenneth Galbraith

IMO,

National Review’s December 1957 scathing review of Atlas Shrugged, Rand’s novel dramatizing selfishness as the ideal moral code, shows Galbraith was incorrect in his claim. As you may know, National Review is the trail-blazing conservative publication made famous by the father of conservatism, William F. Buckley, and they flat-out panned Atlas Shrugged. Add to that conservatives’ obsession with Christianity, a code that values the opposite of selfishness (self-sacrifice) as their basis for freedom and individual rights, and Galbraith is obviously angling for something else in that quote.

My view is that he aims to demagogue not only selfishness as a moral code but, also conservatives and the Christian right. I don’t care that he takes shots at conservative but, don't malign the best justification for freedom and individual rights. Selfishness, as depicted by Rand in her novels and as discussed in her non-fiction work, is the only ethics that is congruent with the politics of freedom and individual rights. Given this, at the very least I have to conclude Galbraith misunderstood the “American Way”. However, given he's considered a leader of modern liberalism, I suspect he was more antagonistic toward America, capitalism and the politics of freedom and knew exactly what he was attacking with that quote and why.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rand drastically underestimates the impact of social distinctions predicated upon wealth, especially inherited wealth.

 
Mike Vick is the biggest enemy of Antonio Brown owners. He's really killing the guy!! What he's done to Antonio Brown is criminal, he's basically an enemy of America at this point.

 
Useless trivia: the writer of that 1957 National Review article about Atlas Shrugged was none other than Whittaker Chambers, the same man who exposed Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy and made Richard Nixon famous.

JK Galbreath was a liberal economist, a Keynesian and a sort of forerunner of Paul Krugman. He was extremely perceptive about Anerican society post World War II and wrote extensively on that subject. I have no idea what point the OP is trying to make by invoking him, Ayn Rand, and Buckley.

 
Useless trivia: the writer of that 1957 National Review article about Atlas Shrugged was none other than Whittaker Chambers, the same man who exposed Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy and made Richard Nixon famous.

JK Galbreath was a liberal economist, a Keynesian and a sort of forerunner of Paul Krugman. He was extremely perceptive about Anerican society post World War II and wrote extensively on that subject. I have no idea what point the OP is trying to make by invoking him, Ayn Rand, and Buckley.
Did his fastball ever get over 3 digits?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Useless trivia: the writer of that 1957 National Review article about Atlas Shrugged was none other than Whittaker Chambers, the same man who exposed Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy and made Richard Nixon famous.

JK Galbreath was a liberal economist, a Keynesian and a sort of forerunner of Paul Krugman. He was extremely perceptive about Anerican society post World War II and wrote extensively on that subject. I have no idea what point the OP is trying to make by invoking him, Ayn Rand, and Buckley.
Did has fastball ever get over 3 digits?
and how far could he throw a Ritz cracker?

 
Useless trivia: the writer of that 1957 National Review article about Atlas Shrugged was none other than Whittaker Chambers, the same man who exposed Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy and made Richard Nixon famous.

JK Galbreath was a liberal economist, a Keynesian and a sort of forerunner of Paul Krugman. He was extremely perceptive about Anerican society post World War II and wrote extensively on that subject. I have no idea what point the OP is trying to make by invoking him, Ayn Rand, and Buckley.
big if true

 
Useless trivia: the writer of that 1957 National Review article about Atlas Shrugged was none other than Whittaker Chambers, the same man who exposed Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy and made Richard Nixon famous.

JK Galbreath was a liberal economist, a Keynesian and a sort of forerunner of Paul Krugman. He was extremely perceptive about Anerican society post World War II and wrote extensively on that subject. I have no idea what point the OP is trying to make by invoking him, Ayn Rand, and Buckley.
A liberal economist and a Keynesian? You overstate how perceptive he truly was. You have "no idea" the point the OP (me) was trying to make because you start with the premise that Galbraith was perceptive. In effect, I was saying the opposite regarding a specific quote he's known for.

 
Useless trivia: the writer of that 1957 National Review article about Atlas Shrugged was none other than Whittaker Chambers, the same man who exposed Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy and made Richard Nixon famous.

JK Galbreath was a liberal economist, a Keynesian and a sort of forerunner of Paul Krugman. He was extremely perceptive about Anerican society post World War II and wrote extensively on that subject. I have no idea what point the OP is trying to make by invoking him, Ayn Rand, and Buckley.
A liberal economist and a Keynesian? You overstate how perceptive he truly was. You have "no idea" the point the OP (me) was trying to make because you start with the premise that Galbraith was perceptive. In effect, I was saying the opposite regarding a specific quote he's known for.
Actually no. I have no idea what point you were trying to make because I have no idea what point you were trying to make. I still don't.

I regard Galbreath as extremely perceptive, not because of his political or economic views, but because he wrote a book called The Affluent Society which is very highly regarded. Among other things, in that book he coined the phrase "conventional wisdom". I've only read passages (which I found illuminating) along with a condensed overview by William Manchester in The Glory and the Dream. But I've always meant to read the whole thing, as it is said to be an analysis of the 20th century in America equal to De Toqueville's analysis of the 19th.

 
are you the bread pirate from the underground internet because i thought you had to go to jail for making the underground internet bromigo how are you here talking about galbladders and other some such take that to the bank brohan

 
are you the bread pirate from the underground internet because i thought you had to go to jail for making the underground internet bromigo how are you here talking about galbladders and other some such take that to the bank brohan
Good point.

 
Useless trivia: the writer of that 1957 National Review article about Atlas Shrugged was none other than Whittaker Chambers, the same man who exposed Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy and made Richard Nixon famous.

JK Galbreath was a liberal economist, a Keynesian and a sort of forerunner of Paul Krugman. He was extremely perceptive about Anerican society post World War II and wrote extensively on that subject. I have no idea what point the OP is trying to make by invoking him, Ayn Rand, and Buckley.
A liberal economist and a Keynesian? You overstate how perceptive he truly was. You have "no idea" the point the OP (me) was trying to make because you start with the premise that Galbraith was perceptive. In effect, I was saying the opposite regarding a specific quote he's known for.
Actually no. I have no idea what point you were trying to make because I have no idea what point you were trying to make. I still don't.

I regard Galbreath as extremely perceptive, not because of his political or economic views, but because he wrote a book called The Affluent Society which is very highly regarded. Among other things, in that book he coined the phrase "conventional wisdom". I've only read passages (which I found illuminating) along with a condensed overview by William Manchester in The Glory and the Dream. But I've always meant to read the whole thing, as it is said to be an analysis of the 20th century in America equal to De Toqueville's analysis of the 19th.
:lmao: Jesus Tim, not your best work.

 
Useless trivia: the writer of that 1957 National Review article about Atlas Shrugged was none other than Whittaker Chambers, the same man who exposed Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy and made Richard Nixon famous.

JK Galbreath was a liberal economist, a Keynesian and a sort of forerunner of Paul Krugman. He was extremely perceptive about Anerican society post World War II and wrote extensively on that subject. I have no idea what point the OP is trying to make by invoking him, Ayn Rand, and Buckley.
none other!

 
are you the bread pirate from the underground internet because i thought you had to go to jail for making the underground internet bromigo how are you here talking about galbladders and other some such take that to the bank brohan
Agreed!

 
Did you guys know you can get breakfast at McDonalds all day now!?!

 
Add a little JPS and viola! We're down with DTT.

[SIZE=11pt]Human reality is its own surpassing toward what it lacks; it surpasses itself toward the particular being which it would be if it were what it is. Human reality is not something which exists first in order afterwards to lack this or that; it exists first as lack and in immediate, synthetic connection with what it lacks. Thus the pure event by which human reality rises as a presence in the world is apprehended by itself as its own lack. In its coming into existence human reality grasps itself as an incomplete being. It apprehends itself as being in so far as it is not, in the presence of the particular totality which it lacks and which it is in the form of not being it and which is what it is. Human reality is a perpetual surpassing toward a coincidence with itself which is never given.[/SIZE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top