gump
Footballguy
Well...since I'm not a numbers guru...I'll leave it to Football Outsiders and their DVOA (only '95 forward):1. Bucs D was #1 in 19991. Buffalo and Jacksonville had better defenses in 1999. Do you disagree?2. Since I mentioned 2002, and you mentioned 1999, is it safe to say that top 10 was a fair characterization for the other years I mentioned? Do you think defenses that are top 10 over a long stretch are typically among the best in NFL history? Or do you think a defense that is one of the top few defenses 2 times in a 4 year period is typically among the best in NFL history?"Top 10" is a good way to describe the '99 Bucs D...the one that held perhaps the best offense in NFL history to 11 points on the turf in the NFCC.They were above average.Fine, he was one of multiple leaders on a great defense. That doesn't change the substance of my post.I also think calling his Tampa Bay defense one of the greatest of all time is a stretch. They were the best defense in 2002, and they were a top 10 defense from roughly 1996 to 2005... but there are a lot of defenses in NFL history that were better.He's overrated because there are a lot of people out there like you who think he is HOF caliber. He didn't force or recover a lot of fumbles. He didn't sack the QB. He wasn't a great pass defender. He didn't even average 5 tackles per game. He was a great hitter. Period. That's it.Worst take of the day.He was a leader of one of the greatest defenses in NFL history. Obviously he did more than hit.
3. Please tell us where you think John Lynch's Tampa defenses rank in NFL history. Define it however you want - individual seasons, decades, whatever.
![]()
2. Good question...but Bucs were both, so shouldn't matter.
3. Individually, the Lynch-led 2002 was the best in the last 15 years. Overall, the Bucs had the most consistency over that time as well.
Add on to this that the Bucs had the longest streak of top 10 defenses in NFL history...I think it's safe to say that D will be viewed historically as one of the best.
Worst take of the day.He was a leader of one of the greatest defenses in NFL history. Obviously he did more than hit.
Worst take of the day.He was a leader of one of the greatest defenses in NFL history. Obviously he did more than hit.