Junk in the trunk (1 Viewer)

[MooseCats]

But that picture posted above is absolutely disgusting. :X Nevermind her butt, her legs are as big as redwood trunks. I hope people are kidding if they think she is attractive.

Dude, did you happen to notice that her waste and upper body are teeny tiny? It is obvious she is not obese, she just has a big ###. If you see that and think "fat chick," you have been listening to Hollywood too much.

Personally, I think that is a GREAT booty!!!

 

[Vivian Darkbloom]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping.  I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal".  I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

C'mon Viv, you can do better.Of course its fat. So are jubblies...but that doesn't prevent guys from liking them bigger.The debate here isn't over the organic composition of the booty, but rather the colloquial definition of "fat" as undesirable...and in that colloquial definition of fat...this is NOT a fat ###.

Do better than what?People are actually living in a pretend world where asses grow to JLo-ish proportions without the accompanying cheese. Some guy actually hinted that he's seen lots of such arses in person. These things do not exist in nature. Asses are made of fat. When a woman's ### grows "I-like-big-butts-and-I-cannot-lie" big, whether you find it attractive or nor, it's going to be less than airbrush perfect.The argument I'll accept: So what?The one I won't: No way -- asses can be huge AND airbrush perfect. I see it all the time!

 

[Nigel]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping.  I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal".  I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

Well, whatever the junk is - fat, muscle, or a combo of the two - it doesn't necessarily have to render itself as what is commonly referred to as cottage cheese. It is possible for it to be a smooth, soft, bulbous mound of fleshy goodness - airbrush or not.

 

[Vivian Darkbloom]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping.  I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal".  I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

Well, whatever the junk is - fat, muscle, or a combo of the two - it doesn't necessarily have to render itself as what is commonly referred to as cottage cheese. It is possible for it to be a smooth, soft, bulbous mound of fleshy goodness - airbrush or not.

Are you people all dating sixteen year olds? That would explain this world of fat, perfect asses.

 

[bigbottom]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping.  I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal".  I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

The girl is not fat.

 

[NoVa]

for the most part- Viv's right. Admit it, guys. Most girls with big butts do not have prefectly firm and rotund booties.Hoever, I'v found that girls that say in great shape (soccer players come to mind) can have great, substantial behinds that are beautiful with little or minor imperfections.

 

[Idiot Boxer]

for the most part- Viv's right. Admit it, guys. Most girls with big butts do not have prefectly firm and rotund booties.Hoever, I'v found that girls that say in great shape (soccer players come to mind) can have great, substantial behinds that are beautiful with little or minor imperfections.

Firm? Perhaps not.Smooth? Certainly...there are many, and older than 18.

 

[Brodie8307]

Sure it's some fat, but there are muscles back there too. Muscles can be toned.

About Your Butt

 

[wadegarrett]

No

 

[shuke]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping.  I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal".  I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

Well, whatever the junk is - fat, muscle, or a combo of the two - it doesn't necessarily have to render itself as what is commonly referred to as cottage cheese. It is possible for it to be a smooth, soft, bulbous mound of fleshy goodness - airbrush or not.

Exactly.

 

[NoVa]

Sure it's some fat, but there are muscles back there too. Muscles can be toned.About Your Butt

Yeah, but then you wind upwith weight-lifter butt. That's what ladies liek to see on guys.Guys don't usually like to see taut buttocks made for thrusting on their chicks. (Unless they're into that sort of thing, NTTAWWT).

 

[urbanhack]

As long as it ain't cottage-cheesy - I love it. I would love to eat my breakfast off the booties of J-Lo or Beyonce.

Does not compute.The only way JLo and Beyonce sized rear ends go cottage cheese free is through the miracle of the airbrush.

You my friend, have a lot to learn about the bootay.

 

[Vivian Darkbloom]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping.  I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal".  I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

The girl is not fat.

That wasn't really directed at you, you were just the nearest convenient quotable post.That girl looks just dandy. All women with reasonable woman-shapes do. But she has a decent-sized rear, appears to be mostly lean and young and healthy otherwise, and lo and behold, the thighs have some cheese.I'm not arguing the aesthetic merits of this phenomenon. That girl looks great to me. Just refusing to cave into those who want it both ways, when it doesn't happen like that in nature. There are small, tight little asses, and there are bigger, fatter asses, and they're both super. But big, tight asses just don't happen.

 

[urbanhack]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping. I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal". I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

C'mon Viv, you can do better.Of course its fat. So are jubblies...but that doesn't prevent guys from liking them bigger.The debate here isn't over the organic composition of the booty, but rather the colloquial definition of "fat" as undesirable...and in that colloquial definition of fat...this is NOT a fat ###.

Do better than what?People are actually living in a pretend world where asses grow to JLo-ish proportions without the accompanying cheese. Some guy actually hinted that he's seen lots of such arses in person. These things do not exist in nature. Asses are made of fat. When a woman's ### grows "I-like-big-butts-and-I-cannot-lie" big, whether you find it attractive or nor, it's going to be less than airbrush perfect.The argument I'll accept: So what?The one I won't: No way -- asses can be huge AND airbrush perfect. I see it all the time!

Does Alge Crumpler's ### have cottage cheese? Doubt it

 

[Homer J Simpson]

I like tiny butts, and I'm not ashamed to admit it. The geek-chick in pic is cute and has a great upper body, but I couldn't date the tree trunks that have inhabited her lower half. I just couldn't.Now, throw six or twelve beers down my gullet and I'll happily become an assman...but it'll just be for the night. And probably once the next morning.

 

[Vivian Darkbloom]

Does Alge Crumpler's ### have cottage cheese? Doubt it

If your argument here is that you find Alge Crumpler's butt airbrush perfect, I'm politely bowing out.

 

[Homer J Simpson]

Does Alge Crumpler's ### have cottage cheese? Doubt it

Consider it added to my sig.

 

[urbanhack]

Does Alge Crumpler's ### have cottage cheese? Doubt it

If your argument here is that you find Alge Crumpler's butt airbrush perfect, I'm politely bowing out.

No.I'm just saying it is not uncommon to have junk in the trunk while remaining cottage cheese free.

 

[Vivian Darkbloom]

For the record, of the three chicks in the geekgrrl picture, the hottest one is the one with the best taste in literature.

 

[shuke]

I'm not arguing the aesthetic merits of this phenomenon. That girl looks great to me. Just refusing to cave into those who want it both ways, when it doesn't happen like that in nature. There are small, tight little asses, and there are bigger, fatter asses, and they're both super. But big, tight asses just don't happen.

I don't think anyone is arguing that they're "tight", just that not all have the cottage cheese appearance.

 

[scoobygang]

Does Alge Crumpler's ### have cottage cheese? Doubt it

If your argument here is that you find Alge Crumpler's butt airbrush perfect, I'm politely bowing out.

But it just got interesting?

 

[Brodie8307]

I like tiny butts, and I'm not ashamed to admit it. The geek-chick in pic is cute and has a great upper body, but I couldn't date the tree trunks that have inhabited her lower half. I just couldn't.Now, throw six or twelve beers down my gullet and I'll happily become an assman...but it'll just be for the night. And probably once the next morning.

Are you f'ing kidding me? Did you see her face? She's smokin!You couldn't date her and you need 6+ beers to tap it? You must be batting for the other team then.

 

[Men-in-Cleats]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping.  I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal".  I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

C'mon Viv, you can do better.Of course its fat. So are jubblies...but that doesn't prevent guys from liking them bigger.The debate here isn't over the organic composition of the booty, but rather the colloquial definition of "fat" as undesirable...and in that colloquial definition of fat...this is NOT a fat ###.

Do better than what?People are actually living in a pretend world where asses grow to JLo-ish proportions without the accompanying cheese. Some guy actually hinted that he's seen lots of such arses in person. These things do not exist in nature. Asses are made of fat. When a woman's ### grows "I-like-big-butts-and-I-cannot-lie" big, whether you find it attractive or nor, it's going to be less than airbrush perfect.The argument I'll accept: So what?The one I won't: No way -- asses can be huge AND airbrush perfect. I see it all the time!

Does Alge Crumpler's ### have cottage cheese? Doubt it

I personally have absolutely no interest in Alge Crumpler's ###. I might be in a minority here though.

 

[urbanhack]

Where did the pic go? Never got to see it. Please PM

 

[shuke]

Where did the pic go? Never got to see it. Please PM

About the third or fourth post in thread.

 

[GStrot]

Where did the pic go? Never got to see it. Please PM

Here, it is safe for work

 

[Homer J Simpson]

I like tiny butts, and I'm not ashamed to admit it. The geek-chick in pic is cute and has a great upper body, but I couldn't date the tree trunks that have inhabited her lower half. I just couldn't.Now, throw six or twelve beers down my gullet and I'll happily become an assman...but it'll just be for the night. And probably once the next morning.

Are you f'ing kidding me? Did you see her face? She's smokin!You couldn't date her and you need 6+ beers to tap it? You must be batting for the other team then.

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

 

[Nigel]

A girl I work with has what I consider very nice junk. Her's probably is cottage cheesy because she doesn't work out much, but she has a small waist and the shape of her rump is positively delicious. She just walked into my office and we talked for five minutes or so. I can't remember a word she said. This thread has me thinkin' bout nothin' but junk.

 

[Nigel]

I like tiny butts, and I'm not ashamed to admit it.  The geek-chick in pic is cute and has a great upper body, but I couldn't date the tree trunks that have inhabited her lower half.  I just couldn't.Now, throw six or twelve beers down my gullet and I'll happily become an assman...but it'll just be for the night.  And probably once the next morning.

Are you f'ing kidding me? Did you see her face? She's smokin!You couldn't date her and you need 6+ beers to tap it? You must be batting for the other team then.

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Sorry, but any woman's rump that is not, on its own, markedly different than that of a 10 yr. old boy get a big

 

[urbanhack]

Where did the pic go? Never got to see it. Please PM

Here, it is safe for work

 

[The Z Machine]

urb speaks the truth.Listen to this wise man.Big, beautiful booty can exist without cottage cheese. Find a chick that like to dance, and you'll likely find a chick with a substantial ###, and one that wants to get freaky as well.Big 'ol butt = super fun.

 

[The Z Machine]

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Yous a damn fool.

 

[Homer J Simpson]

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Yous a damn fool.

I completely agree, but it has nothing to do with my preferences for a chicks booty size. Can some other connisseurs of thin legs and perky bottom help me out here? The chubby-chasers are ganging up on me...and I have the fine round backside of a guinea basketball player. I'm getting a little nervous.

 

[J-Co]

I likes 'em tiny.  What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it.  But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Yous a damn fool.

I completely agree, but it has nothing to do with my preferences for a chicks booty size. Can some other connisseurs of thin legs and perky bottom help me out here? The chubby-chasers are ganging up on me...and I have the fine round backside of a guinea basketball player. I'm getting a little nervous.

They're a feisty bunch indeed. I got my head chewed off pretty good too.

 

[Homer J Simpson]

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Yous a damn fool.

I completely agree, but it has nothing to do with my preferences for a chicks booty size. Can some other connisseurs of thin legs and perky bottom help me out here? The chubby-chasers are ganging up on me...and I have the fine round backside of a guinea basketball player. I'm getting a little nervous.

They're a feisty bunch indeed. I got my head chewed off pretty good too.

I shoulda known better than to get invoved...:goodsamaritan:

 

[Grackle Squad]

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Yous a damn fool.

I completely agree, but it has nothing to do with my preferences for a chicks booty size. Can some other connisseurs of thin legs and perky bottom help me out here? The chubby-chasers are ganging up on me...and I have the fine round backside of a guinea basketball player. I'm getting a little nervous.

That's where you guys in the skinny crackho camp are so wrong. Nobody is talking anything about "chubby" girls. The girl with green hair is so "non-chubby" that it's riduculous. It's called "thick". There is a difference. While you and your group will never understand this, "thick" is a perfectly acceptable delicacy when it comes to the backside. "Chubby" is something completely different.Bottom line, if you are not attracted to the girl with green hair's apple bottom, you might be gay.

 

[Homer J Simpson]

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Yous a damn fool.

I completely agree, but it has nothing to do with my preferences for a chicks booty size. Can some other connisseurs of thin legs and perky bottom help me out here? The chubby-chasers are ganging up on me...and I have the fine round backside of a guinea basketball player. I'm getting a little nervous.

That's where you guys in the skinny crackho camp are so wrong. Nobody is talking anything about "chubby" girls. The girl with green hair is so "non-chubby" that it's riduculous. It's called "thick". There is a difference. While you and your group will never understand this, "thick" is a perfectly acceptable delicacy when it comes to the backside. "Chubby" is something completely different.Bottom line, if you are not attracted to the girl with green hair's apple bottom, you might be gay.

I don't dig on thick, either.

 

[Grackle Squad]

you might be gay.

I don't dig on thick, either.

 

[Homer J Simpson]

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Yous a damn fool.

I completely agree, but it has nothing to do with my preferences for a chicks booty size. Can some other connisseurs of thin legs and perky bottom help me out here? The chubby-chasers are ganging up on me...and I have the fine round backside of a guinea basketball player. I'm getting a little nervous.

That's where you guys in the skinny crackho camp are so wrong. Nobody is talking anything about "chubby" girls. The girl with green hair is so "non-chubby" that it's riduculous. It's called "thick". There is a difference. While you and your group will never understand this, "thick" is a perfectly acceptable delicacy when it comes to the backside. "Chubby" is something completely different.Bottom line, if you are not attracted to the girl with green hair's apple bottom, you might be gay.

I don't dig on thick, either.

And I agree that the green-haired geek is no chubster, but the fact of the matter is that I dig petite, thin, small-arsed girls. So to say that I'm wrong or #### is just stupid...it's a matter of personal preference.So take your tons-of-fun girls and go home.

 

[shuke]

Hate it [ 20 ]   [14.81%] Don't mind a little [ 29 ]   [21.48%] Like a little [ 38 ]   [28.15%] Like more than a little [ 26 ]   [19.26%] Like A LOT [ 22 ]   [16.30%]

I honestly didn't expect this type of distribution. You guys realize the options are for how much junk you like, not how much you like junk. Right?

 

[Kilgore Trout]

Where did the pic go? Never got to see it. Please PM

Here, it is safe for work

Would have been better with this pic: Nice Rump

 

[bigbottom]

Where did the pic go?  Never got to see it.  Please PM

Here, it is safe for work

Would have been better with this pic: Nice Rump

 

[Harpua]

is this too much junk?

pic

 

[Men-in-Cleats]

I like tiny butts, and I'm not ashamed to admit it.  The geek-chick in pic is cute and has a great upper body, but I couldn't date the tree trunks that have inhabited her lower half.  I just couldn't.Now, throw six or twelve beers down my gullet and I'll happily become an assman...but it'll just be for the night.  And probably once the next morning.

Are you f'ing kidding me? Did you see her face? She's smokin!You couldn't date her and you need 6+ beers to tap it? You must be batting for the other team then.

I likes 'em tiny. What can I say?And I wouldn't NEED the beers to tap her, but odds are I'd have them in me anyway, so I figured I'd mention it. But as far as dating her...I couldn't do it unless she was ridiculously cool, and even then, my eye would consistently wander to the tiny-bottomed babes of the world.

Sorry, but any woman's rump that is not, on its own, markedly different than that of a 10 yr. old boy get a big

Nobody said they were into stick figures. You can have a gal with a thinner, more athletic body that still has curves. I prefer a more athletic figure and if she looks great in her workout gear then I'm with the program. I don't make hard and fast rules though. I've seen really thin gals that I find terribly sexy and I've seen gals with a little more meat on their bones that are equally sexy. You guys don't seem to be able to see that there is a wide range here and are not arguing about extremes. The gal in the picture with the booty is certainly not overweight and is quite attractive but I can see how her figure might not be someone's preference and personally, I found the gal in the middle to have a more attractive figure. That said, I'd definitely get busy with either of them.

 

[Brodie8307]

is this too much junk?

pic

Note.. gotta cut and paste.Nice tushie. Want to touch the hiney!

 

[Mr. Pickles]

I get a little bit amused at how a lot of people's standards for what is attractive, as far as what's considered too fat, seem to be slipping.  I think it has a lot to do with how Americans are becoming more and more obese in general and so being moderately or slightly overweight is becoming more "normal".  I can only guess but I suspect that overseas this isn't the case as much.

You seem to be in the wrong thread. We are not talking about fat chicks. We are talking about chicks with fat booties. If you don't know the difference then just vote "hate it" and move on.

I understand the distinction. Celebs like J-Lo are not the norm. Most of the time, junk in the trunk means a girl's at least a little bit overweight. For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

No. She's not. And yes. She's hot.

JLo has a fat ###. That girl has a fat ###. I'm not judging fat asses -- in fact, I think they're just delightful. But the only options for what's back there are fat, bone, and muscle. And big round gobs of flesh hanging off the back sides of women just aren't bone or muscle. They're fat-deposits. It's just how it works. That's women for you.If you like 'em bigger, groove on, people. But don't pretend it isn't what it is.In the rather extreme case of chemically-built Olympic sprinter chicks, yes, you guys may have a point. That's not what's going on with JLo and her ilk, though, no matter how many Hollywood fitness gurus she keeps in tow.

C'mon Viv, you can do better.Of course its fat. So are jubblies...but that doesn't prevent guys from liking them bigger.The debate here isn't over the organic composition of the booty, but rather the colloquial definition of "fat" as undesirable...and in that colloquial definition of fat...this is NOT a fat ###.

Do better than what?People are actually living in a pretend world where asses grow to JLo-ish proportions without the accompanying cheese. Some guy actually hinted that he's seen lots of such arses in person. These things do not exist in nature. Asses are made of fat. When a woman's ### grows "I-like-big-butts-and-I-cannot-lie" big, whether you find it attractive or nor, it's going to be less than airbrush perfect.The argument I'll accept: So what?The one I won't: No way -- asses can be huge AND airbrush perfect. I see it all the time!

Does Alge Crumpler's ### have cottage cheese? Doubt it

You would know best, Mrs. Ham.

 

[Bull Dozier]

Hate it [ 20 ]   [14.81%] Don't mind a little [ 29 ]   [21.48%] Like a little [ 38 ]   [28.15%] Like more than a little [ 26 ]   [19.26%] Like A LOT [ 22 ]   [16.30%]

I honestly didn't expect this type of distribution. You guys realize the options are for how much junk you like, not how much you like junk. Right?

The problem is that what is one man's "little bit of junk" is another man's "lot of junk," even just considering those who like junk. Realistically, we should have had pictures to go with each level of junk we're voting for.

 

[Apes with Guns]

I like front junk, and or a waddle on the ladies. A nice padded fupa can be like a mini-trampoline. Get some air on the back thrust.

 

[NorvilleBarnes]

For the record, the girl in that pic is fat any way you cut it.

I disagree.Yea, her legs are thick. But I don't know if it's "fat".

I'm now convinced that a cross-section of her thigh must be some sort of weird oval shape.She looks normal/hot from the side, but thick/wide from behind.Also Radars pants don't match his shirt.

 

[Nigel]

I like front junk, and or a waddle on the ladies. A nice padded fupa can be like a mini-trampoline. Get some air on the back thrust.

you mean a football-penis? yes, those are sexy.