What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

JuSt CuZ They're My Sleepers! (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

JuSt CuZ

Footballguy
Footballguys most criticized thread is back!

For all the people who come here for football info, I hope these sleepers’ help. I will be the first to admit I had a horrific week 4 last week, but feel I will bounce back to Week 3 form for you in this week 5. For all the haters, I will avoid responding to you in this thread for the only reason that I want to keep this thread from getting locked.

So let’s get the talk started…

Quarterback – Kyle Orton – San Diego @ Denver

325 Yards and 2 TDs

I had a tough time debating between Orton and Painter this week, but when I was doing research on Painter, I noticed his face...that makes you wanna stop doing research on him. So I’m going Orton, as he has a healthy Lloyd, an emerging Decker, and a straight ahead runner that will cause the defense to stay honest. Orton has shown to be capable and has got a lot to prove, even with the coach’s support, so look for him to try to make a point. The Broncos have been taking a lot of shots down field and that is always nice, especially in leagues that award for long TDs. Orton is owned in about half the leagues, so he may be available, think about using him if you need bye week filler. Also...don’t be fooled by the Chargers pass D stats, they can be passed on as their stats are better than they actually are, remember McNabb was being McNabb week one with the 39 yards.

Running Back – Isaac Redman – Tennessee @ Pittsburgh

80 Yards, along with 6 Catches for 55 Yards and 1 TD

I love a running back that can give you three downs, and we had one gift wrapped on the wire this week, if you were fortunate enough to get him in Isaac Redman. Mendenhall is hurt, Moore is hurt, but more importantly...Big Ben is hurt...and that is gonna make them rely on the running game more than ever. Sucks for Mendy owners this week that he is not going to be the guy getting all the carries and catches, but Redman is, and the opportunity at touches that he is gonna get is reason enough to make him a RB2 this week. Tennessee has a good run D, but they are going to pass a lot to him to with screens to protect Ben. He may not be gold for the rest of the year, but he is gold this week for sure, as he has been the only guy showing some life in the running game so far this year.

Wide Receiver – Kevin Walter - Oakland @ Houston

6 receptions for 75 Yards and 1 TD

My thinking on this is more logic than really great player ability. With Andre being out, that changes the game plan for the defense drastically. They have no player to double cover any more, allowing for more in the box and the safety to stay home in the middle of the field to cover Daniels. Jacoby has shown he is not consistent and can’t catch, so that leaves the underneath guy…Mr. Walter. Walter normally catches a lot of passes when Andre is out, he just don’t get a bunch of yards. He got hurt early in week one and missed the week two game, so his stats this year are a little off as well. Walter made a great catch in the game against the Saints, so at least he can catch, and he will be the guy to catch a lot of quick passes this week. Foster is gonna be the guy dominating the world on this team now, so it’s really hard to expect anyone else getting TDs, but I think Walter gets one this week for reasons stated above.

Tight End – Jermaine Gresham – Cincinnati @ Jacksonville

5 receptions for 60 Yards and 1 TD

Gresham has been playing at a high level, and really didn’t do well in only one game so far, as he only had 2 catches for 8 yards against Denver. Dalton has shown great trust in this guy, and counts on him in the Red Zone as he already has 2 TDs. Jimmy Graham shredded this defense last week, granted that a better offense, but they are still vulnerable to the tight end. Gresham’s size makes him a match up nightmare at 6’5”, 260, and his ability to make the tough catches in the middle of the field solidifies his spot as the number two pass catcher on this team. His ability makes him valuable to a young QB who needs to dump it off a lot, and even more valuable to a team that needs a waiver wire tight end this week.

Kicker – Who cares, it’s a kicker...just make sure you start one.

Defense – Houston at home against Oakland.

3 sacks, 2 Turnovers, and 17 points allowed

Is there really any must start defense’s out there, other than Baltimore, Detroit, N.Y. Jets, and Green Bay? A lot of byes this week and Houston is owned in about 55% of leagues, so they may still be available on the wire after playing New Orleans and Pittsburgh the past couple weeks, but scoop them up. They are at home and should cause the Raiders to pass a lot since Houston has a high power offense, even with Andre out, I hope. The type of team that beats Houston is a pass first team, not a run first team. They get to the QB, have good backers, and they have a good secondary to create turnovers, so take a gamble on them this week as the Indy/KC game has danger written all over it with both defenses being god awful and this is an offensive league.

Hope these “Sleepers” help you out, but I’m prolly wrong. Enjoy Week 5 fellas, and good luck in your matchup!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back for more abuse.

Love the post even if I do not agree with some of it.

Orton and Redman are good calls.

Houston may get your sack prediction but I think Oakland racks up a good number of yards and points. Houston is not going to stop McFadden.

 
Like redman and Gresham this week. What do think about benching the Jets D for Houstons D? I really hate using a D against the Patriots as often you get negative points.

 
Like redman and Gresham this week. What do think about benching the Jets D for Houstons D? I really hate using a D against the Patriots as often you get negative points.
Thats the problem this week, lots of teams on bye and a Stud offense against a must start defense normally...but Brady is an exception, so a lot of people who own Jets d are benching them for someone else, no? Makes the wire thin for Ds this week.I mentioned the KC/Indy game, it looks good at first, but both teams are so horrible on defense it just dont look that appealing. It dont mean they won't perfrom as I was considering both those teams for sleepers...but I decided on starting Houston in a few leagues myself for the pure fact that they are at home with a decent D as it is against a Team that is just meh on offense, regardless of the Stud in McFadden.Just trying to minimize the risk.
 
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?

 
Are you going to throw another tantrum and have your thread locked if you miss on most of your sleepers yet again and get ridiculed?

 
Good job picking actual sleepers.
Yeah, this thread is going to be a little boring this week. :)I like the picks as well and will throw out a few more. Going a little deeper at TE, I think Casey could be a good pick at TE, mainly for the same reasons you list for Walter. At defense, I think Philly might finally put it together against Buffalo. Cincy rolled for 450+ yards last week. Philly should get off to a good start and that might prevent Buffalo from running all day. Philly's secondary has to eventually get it together. This might be the week.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?
Reasonably close to my predictions or better, I went 20% last week (1 for 5 as I only hit on Hass), so I need a good week to save face. But honestly I expect bad weeks and good weeks, its more about helping and throwing some opinion out there for people who dont get to take much time in researching sleepers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll make sure to consider these sleepers, all of which are rostered on other teams.
Well you must play in deep leagues. I am in 5 leagues where it's 12 teams and 18 man rosters and every single one of these guys is available in some of those leagues.It's useful to some people, if you're not helped and just have snarky comments then why did you post? Did your parents forget to send you to finishing school?
 
Thought I would renew my "fisticuffs" with you from the Andre Johnson injury thread...

QB Orton- not bad call but feel Sanchez will be equally as effective in a shooting match in NE. Mangold returning!

RB-Redman- Titans D pretty tough and o-line still sucks....how about Ingram against terrible run defense in CAR? Smelling breakout here at last as they also try to keep Cam off the field

WR-Walter- will draw Stanford Routt(negated Santonio Holmes last week) as the "z" reciever. Jacoby Jones played well in Andres absence last year and will be the "x" reciever

DEFENSE-HOU- not much of a sleeper well rostered....how about CINC V. JAX?

 
With two QBs on a bye (drafted Romo and McCoy :wall: ) I was able to pick up Orton of the WW and I'm rolling with him as my starter this week. I picked Redman off Waivers on Tues and am rolling with him in my 16 teamer. I think both have great sleeper potential and am starting both. Thanks for the post Cuz. Sometimes posts like this affirm who you're going to start, not just who you should pick off the waiver wire.

I'm not a believer in Walter this week. With AJ gone I think it's James Casey and Foster who get the extra targets. Casey's the guy that I'm betting will have a standout week. 7 rec 85 yds and a touch.

 
'JuSt CuZ said:
'3nOut said:
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?
Reasonably close to my predictions or better, I went 20% last week (1 for 5 as I only hit on Hass), so I need a good week to save face. But honestly I expect bad weeks and good weeks, its more about helping and throwing some opinion out there for people who dont get to take much time in researching sleepers.
Let's call it about 8%, because the majority of people correctly didn't consider a top 10 QB a 'sleeper'
 
'JuSt CuZ said:
'3nOut said:
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?
Reasonably close to my predictions or better, I went 20% last week (1 for 5 as I only hit on Hass), so I need a good week to save face. But honestly I expect bad weeks and good weeks, its more about helping and throwing some opinion out there for people who dont get to take much time in researching sleepers.
Let's call it about 8%, because the majority of people correctly didn't consider a top 10 QB a 'sleeper'
Again, a guy owned in 50% of leagues at time of prediction, and only started by 20% of leagues is a sleeper my friend no matter how much you believe he is not.
 
:thumbup:

Way to go out on a limb. Gresham has only had 60~ yards and a TD twice this year.

Texans are the 8th ranked D in both my leagues. SuPeR sLeEpEr!

 
'JuSt CuZ said:
'3nOut said:
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?
Reasonably close to my predictions or better, I went 20% last week (1 for 5 as I only hit on Hass), so I need a good week to save face. But honestly I expect bad weeks and good weeks, its more about helping and throwing some opinion out there for people who dont get to take much time in researching sleepers.
Let's call it about 8%, because the majority of people correctly didn't consider a top 10 QB a 'sleeper'
Again, a guy owned in 50% of leagues at time of prediction, and only started by 20% of leagues is a sleeper my friend no matter how much you believe he is not.
Here's the problem. You're the one believing he was. Others? They knew he wasn't.
 
More great stuff. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, this is some of the best weekly member-generated content in the pool. It can only be enhanced by more constructive input and less debate over what constitutes a sleeper. Nice job, jUsT Cuz!

 
'JuSt CuZ said:
'3nOut said:
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?
Reasonably close to my predictions or better, I went 20% last week (1 for 5 as I only hit on Hass), so I need a good week to save face. But honestly I expect bad weeks and good weeks, its more about helping and throwing some opinion out there for people who dont get to take much time in researching sleepers.
Let's call it about 8%, because the majority of people correctly didn't consider a top 10 QB a 'sleeper'
Again, a guy owned in 50% of leagues at time of prediction, and only started by 20% of leagues is a sleeper my friend no matter how much you believe he is not.
I understand you're trying to make a name for yourself with the sleeper shtick. That's fine. But you've handled it in a horrendous manner. Take a look at MoP - he attracts a fair number of trolls but he usually does a solid job of taking it in stride. He makes some misses. He usually rolls with the ridicule. But one thing he's good at is explaining his reasoning and taking suggestions to improve his weekly threads. You have a much lower hit rate than you'll admit. Picking a guy who was projected to finish as a near top 10 qb as one of your sleepers is silly. I do hope you improve these threads but from what I've seen you're hovering at LHUCKS levels. And even LHUCKS is attempting to turn over a new leaf. Admit to your many misses and try figuring out how to improve things moving forward. And stop fighting the folks who rightfully criticize you. I hope you actually make these into decent threads but so far you've been nothing more than a mediocre and ignorant troll.
 
Strongly considering picking up Orton for a start this week over Fitzpatrick. I am worried that the Philly secondary starts living up to its billing.

 
One of these days Antonio Brown is going to go off.

Also: Damian Williams eventually shows up, when.... I have no idea.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
More great stuff. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, this is some of the best weekly member-generated content in the pool. It can only be enhanced by more constructive input and less debate over what constitutes a sleeper. Nice job, jUsT Cuz!
:goodposting:
 
'JuSt CuZ said:
'3nOut said:
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?
Reasonably close to my predictions or better, I went 20% last week (1 for 5 as I only hit on Hass), so I need a good week to save face. But honestly I expect bad weeks and good weeks, its more about helping and throwing some opinion out there for people who dont get to take much time in researching sleepers.
Let's call it about 8%, because the majority of people correctly didn't consider a top 10 QB a 'sleeper'
Again, a guy owned in 50% of leagues at time of prediction, and only started by 20% of leagues is a sleeper my friend no matter how much you believe he is not.
I understand you're trying to make a name for yourself with the sleeper shtick. That's fine. But you've handled it in a horrendous manner. Take a look at MoP - he attracts a fair number of trolls but he usually does a solid job of taking it in stride. He makes some misses. He usually rolls with the ridicule. But one thing he's good at is explaining his reasoning and taking suggestions to improve his weekly threads. You have a much lower hit rate than you'll admit. Picking a guy who was projected to finish as a near top 10 qb as one of your sleepers is silly. I do hope you improve these threads but from what I've seen you're hovering at LHUCKS levels. And even LHUCKS is attempting to turn over a new leaf. Admit to your many misses and try figuring out how to improve things moving forward. And stop fighting the folks who rightfully criticize you. I hope you actually make these into decent threads but so far you've been nothing more than a mediocre and ignorant troll.
Did you say the bolded with a straight face my friend?I'm sorry, where are your weekly threads that you put time and effort into, I would love to read them?

A person who has been here for a little over a year and already has 10,000 posts is calling me, who lives on here everyday since 2007 and has only 2500 posts, a troll. Define irony?

I'll simply say most of your posts are in the FFA, 9,000 or so of your almsot 11,000 posts.

The real football people around here know what type of poster you are.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So far, so good. Just keep IGNORING the goofy hate nonsense. I'd tell them to get a hobby, but I suspect this is it.

:thumbup:

 
So far, so good. Just keep IGNORING the goofy hate nonsense. I'd tell them to get a hobby, but I suspect this is it.

:thumbup:
Lots of tools in this thread and surprisingly the op isn't one of them. If you don't like the thread just stay out...it's simple really.Nice list JuStCuz I really like the Redman and Gresham calls. I'm hoping Gresham will soon join the "nonsleeper" list as he has all the tools to be a very good TE for a long time.

Ignore the haters.

 
So far, so good. Just keep IGNORING the goofy hate nonsense. I'd tell them to get a hobby, but I suspect this is it.

:thumbup:
Lots of tools in this thread and surprisingly the op isn't one of them. If you don't like the thread just stay out...it's simple really.Nice list JuStCuz I really like the Redman and Gresham calls. I'm hoping Gresham will soon join the "nonsleeper" list as he has all the tools to be a very good TE for a long time.

Ignore the haters.
Thank you guys. :thumbup:
 
More great stuff. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, this is some of the best weekly member-generated content in the pool. It can only be enhanced by more constructive input and less debate over what constitutes a sleeper. Nice job, jUsT Cuz!
It's really not. The majority of these players are already on team's rosters; I discount owned %s because it takes into consideration a ton of work/guppy leagues where guys like TO and Moss are still on rosters.Nearly every player the OP picks in his weekly "sleeper" thread is either coming off a hot game and playing a weak D, or are taking over for a struggling or injured player.He's welcome to make these posts and if it helps others make tough roster decisions, good for everyone. However, most of these calls are basic ranking upgrades that are factored into nearly every nickel and dime FF website out there.
 
'JuSt CuZ said:
'3nOut said:
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?
Reasonably close to my predictions or better, I went 20% last week (1 for 5 as I only hit on Hass), so I need a good week to save face. But honestly I expect bad weeks and good weeks, its more about helping and throwing some opinion out there for people who dont get to take much time in researching sleepers.
Let's call it about 8%, because the majority of people correctly didn't consider a top 10 QB a 'sleeper'
Again, a guy owned in 50% of leagues at time of prediction, and only started by 20% of leagues is a sleeper my friend no matter how much you believe he is not.
I understand you're trying to make a name for yourself with the sleeper shtick. That's fine. But you've handled it in a horrendous manner. Take a look at MoP - he attracts a fair number of trolls but he usually does a solid job of taking it in stride. He makes some misses. He usually rolls with the ridicule. But one thing he's good at is explaining his reasoning and taking suggestions to improve his weekly threads. You have a much lower hit rate than you'll admit. Picking a guy who was projected to finish as a near top 10 qb as one of your sleepers is silly. I do hope you improve these threads but from what I've seen you're hovering at LHUCKS levels. And even LHUCKS is attempting to turn over a new leaf. Admit to your many misses and try figuring out how to improve things moving forward. And stop fighting the folks who rightfully criticize you. I hope you actually make these into decent threads but so far you've been nothing more than a mediocre and ignorant troll.
Did you say the bolded with a straight face my friend?I'm sorry, where are your weekly threads that you put time and effort into, I would love to read them?

A person who has been here for a little over a year and already has 10,000 posts is calling me who lives on here everyday since 2007 has only 2500 posts. Define irony.

I'll simply say most of your posts are in the FFA, 9,000 or so of your almsot 11,000 posts.

The real football people around here know what type of poster you are.
I highly recommend you follow in MoP's footsteps. He's constantly improved his columns and has used to criticisms to improve his weekly thread. Instead you seem more intent on shouting your "SLEEPERS!" then refusing to discuss how to improve your picks moving forward. Your prior 'sleepers' have consisted of guys who are in no way actual sleepers. I do spend most of my time having fun in the ffa. When I do wander over here I know there are some posters who value my input. I'm not trying to say I'm an expert on all things NFL related so it's absurd for you to bring up that counter point. When I DO make a serious post I'm more than willing to discuss things and take criticisms on my process. Because it's not the picks that are as important (especially when you have a questionable hit rate) but it's the process you used to come to your conclusions. I know a great deal about SF. If you have a question about the Niners I'll be happy to give my input. Or you can continue to deflect. Some people like mindless drivel so congratulations - your thread has a small built in audience. If that's the niche you're going for then congratulations - you've found your wheelhouse. This should fit in nicely with your shock jock job.

Go ahead and continue to attack folks who criticize you for your misses or your inability until now to actually pick sleepers for your sleepers column. It's clear I made a mistake in taking you off my ignore list.

 
'JuSt CuZ said:
'3nOut said:
Whats your criteria for being right or wrong? And what is your season record on your predictions?
Reasonably close to my predictions or better, I went 20% last week (1 for 5 as I only hit on Hass), so I need a good week to save face. But honestly I expect bad weeks and good weeks, its more about helping and throwing some opinion out there for people who dont get to take much time in researching sleepers.
Let's call it about 8%, because the majority of people correctly didn't consider a top 10 QB a 'sleeper'
Again, a guy owned in 50% of leagues at time of prediction, and only started by 20% of leagues is a sleeper my friend no matter how much you believe he is not.
I understand you're trying to make a name for yourself with the sleeper shtick. That's fine. But you've handled it in a horrendous manner. Take a look at MoP - he attracts a fair number of trolls but he usually does a solid job of taking it in stride. He makes some misses. He usually rolls with the ridicule. But one thing he's good at is explaining his reasoning and taking suggestions to improve his weekly threads. You have a much lower hit rate than you'll admit. Picking a guy who was projected to finish as a near top 10 qb as one of your sleepers is silly. I do hope you improve these threads but from what I've seen you're hovering at LHUCKS levels. And even LHUCKS is attempting to turn over a new leaf. Admit to your many misses and try figuring out how to improve things moving forward. And stop fighting the folks who rightfully criticize you. I hope you actually make these into decent threads but so far you've been nothing more than a mediocre and ignorant troll.
Did you say the bolded with a straight face my friend?I'm sorry, where are your weekly threads that you put time and effort into, I would love to read them?

A person who has been here for a little over a year and already has 10,000 posts is calling me who lives on here everyday since 2007 has only 2500 posts. Define irony.

I'll simply say most of your posts are in the FFA, 9,000 or so of your almsot 11,000 posts.

The real football people around here know what type of poster you are.
I highly recommend you follow in MoP's footsteps. He's constantly improved his columns and has used to criticisms to improve his weekly thread. Instead you seem more intent on shouting your "SLEEPERS!" then refusing to discuss how to improve your picks moving forward. Your prior 'sleepers' have consisted of guys who are in no way actual sleepers. I do spend most of my time having fun in the ffa. When I do wander over here I know there are some posters who value my input. I'm not trying to say I'm an expert on all things NFL related so it's absurd for you to bring up that counter point. When I DO make a serious post I'm more than willing to discuss things and take criticisms on my process. Because it's not the picks that are as important (especially when you have a questionable hit rate) but it's the process you used to come to your conclusions. I know a great deal about SF. If you have a question about the Niners I'll be happy to give my input. Or you can continue to deflect. Some people like mindless drivel so congratulations - your thread has a small built in audience. If that's the niche you're going for then congratulations - you've found your wheelhouse. This should fit in nicely with your shock jock job.

Go ahead and continue to attack folks who criticize you for your misses or your inability until now to actually pick sleepers for your sleepers column. It's clear I made a mistake in taking you off my ignore list.
:goodposting: I amazed I'm going to say this, but this is the truth. We have actually found someone who could improve themselves by acting more like MOP.

With that, I think I'm done for the day.

 
I'm as much a Just Cuz hater as anyone else but it seems like many of you are attacking him simply on his reputation alone. If you don't like this thread, stay out. Others find it useful. A shame that it gets locked every week.

 
I'm as much a Just Cuz hater as anyone else but it seems like many of you are attacking him simply on his reputation alone. If you don't like this thread, stay out. Others find it useful. A shame that it gets locked every week.
:goodposting: Is it that obvious? lolETA: With that, I can let it be, since at least one other person noticed...I dont expect you to like me or everything I post, but thank you for being objective and understanding what is really going on with the same 3 haters in every weeks thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Redman & Gresham. I think they are both in for servicable days and are certainly worthly of starting during this first bye week.

For defenses I like Tennessee and Cincy. Pittsburgh is a mess right not. With that offensive line and with Big Ben already hobbled the Titans are playing well enough on defense to give the Steelers problems. Cincy is the #1 defense statistically playing a rookie QB in Gabbert. I think Jax is pretty one-dimensional with MJD and think the Bengals defense continues their steller play.

 
They need to lock out the posters that only come into these threads to bash people and point out the obvious. I'd prefer to see them banned as they provide nothing, period. It's to the point you cannot even read a thread without one of these clowns flaming someone. I suppose that makes me one now - I apologize CJ for jumping in your thread with this - just keep doing whatever you want to do and completely ignore the rage posters.

 
Maybe if these threads were not so obnoxiously titled they wouldn't draw so much ire? Maybe a simple "Week 5 Sleepers". No need for an exclamation mark or your name/handle. Everyone can see who the author is for each thread.

And seriously, wHAt iS tHe pOinT oF ThiS? The only result is instant loss of credibility in many people's eyes...

 
Good job picking real sleepers and guys who may be available or may be deep on people's benches and their owners aren't even thinking about them.

For the most part, you make reasonable arguments. My one beef is with the Orton recommendation. I don't know if Orton is a good play or not, but the argument you make is pretty weak because it is psychological. The idea that someone plays differently because "they have something to prove" I find very weak. Everyone has something to prove, every week, or pretty soon they lose their job in the NFL. Did he not have something to prove the weeks he did poorly? That being said, if Lloyd and Decker truly have been hurt and are now healthy, THAT might be a reason to give Orton a second look.

Here are the sort of things that would make good criteria for this sort of one week sleeper predictions:

1) Injury opportunity giving someone an unexpected chance for plays (as with Redman)

2) Injury to opposing D creating offensive opportunity

3) Injury situation for other players on offense, changing roles (as with Walter).

4) Weather affecting certain positions.

5) Likely change in team's offensive strategy (although tricky to predict with much certainty), that results in more opportunity for player.

6) Player's health improving

Not sure what else.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boy the number of constructive comments in this thread is unusually low. Would all the JuSt CuZ bashers go somewhere else to do it PLEASE.

That said CuZ - stop using ESPN owned figures to justify somebody on the list (yeah I told the same thing to some paid sites) - most of us don't play in ten team leagues

 
Let's talk Orton. I'm surprised to find out hes available in so many leagues. He finished QB16 last year with only 13 starts and he's sitting there at QB17 this year. I mean he's no stud but he's certainly an adequate backup. Even for a ten-team league I don't think I could name 20 guys I'd rather have. Is it the looming Tebow issue? Fox just acted like he did the whole world a really big favor by putting Tebow in for one play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good job picking real sleepers and guys who may be available or may be deep on people's benches and their owners aren't even thinking about them.

For the most part, you make reasonable arguments. My one beef is with the Orton recommendation. I don't know if Orton is a good play or not, but the argument you make is pretty weak because it is psychological. The idea that someone plays differently because "they have something to prove" I find very weak. Everyone has something to prove, every week, or pretty soon they lose their job in the NFL. Did he not have something to prove the weeks he did poorly? That being said, if Lloyd and Decker truly have been hurt and are now healthy, THAT might be a reason to give Orton a second look.

Here are the sort of things that would make good criteria for this sort of one week sleeper predictions:

1) Injury opportunity giving someone an unexpected chance for plays (as with Redman)

2) Injury to opposing D creating offensive opportunity

3) Injury situation for other players on offense, changing roles (as with Walter).

4) Weather affecting certain positions.

5) Likely change in team's offensive strategy (although tricky to predict with much certainty), that results in more opportunity for player.

6) Player's health improving

Not sure what else.
Good critique, serves a point of value.
Maybe if these threads were not so obnoxiously titled they wouldn't draw so much ire? Maybe a simple "Week 5 Sleepers". No need for an exclamation mark or your name/handle. Everyone can see who the author is for each thread.

And seriously, wHAt iS tHe pOinT oF ThiS? The only result is instant loss of credibility in many people's eyes...
Bad critique, shows obvious hate towards the OP and his opionion is obviously bias.See the difference in what helps give advice, and see what encourages people to hate and join the jumping on of pathetic hate...You know, like taking the type to talk about how a person types his display name. Seriously? thats what you bring to a football forum?

Whats even more odd is you guys actually take the time "To SpElL LiKe ThIs", and act as if it is how I type...when I have never actually ever typed like that in any post ever.

You guys can continue to bash me, but I thinks it is becoming obvious you have certain hate for me and it matters not what I type, you all just act like pathetic school girls and attack everything, like if a person who is owned in 50% of leagues are not sleepers. :rolleyes: You actually come on a Football forum and say that with a straight face, then have the nerve to say others, including myself, are trolls.

I said it in every single thread every single week, and it never gets a response from you haters...

Where are your write ups that provide something to the SP? I would love to read them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top