What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Kevin Kolb on trading block? (1 Viewer)

I just listened back to the Andy presser from this morning and he said he can't guarantee that Kolb will be on the roster after the NFL trade deadline. :lmao:

 
That is where I disagree with you. If we had to suffer through 9 years of mess to build a team that won a super Bowl, I'd take it. Take the 07 Giants. They weren't that good for about 3 or 4 years. Pretty mediocre even but they turned it on and won a Bowl. I'd settle for that then building a perennial contender that always loses. If Vick does that for us this year, then I'll be happy. I just don't see that happening.
Insein, you seem really bent on the idea that the Eagles should give Kolb time to struggle, learn, and eventually be a stud. But what if he's doesn't turn out to be good? What if after giving him all that money and wasting time developing him, he turns out to be just average?Vick, on the other hand, has shown that he can be a good player NOW. Don't worry about 5 years down the road. For all we know, Kafka could be a stud by then.

Also, your Giants 07 SB story....Eli wasn't great that year....the Giants defense was. Their defense is what got them to the SB.
The real reason I want to see what happens with Kolb is because we traded away the best QB in franchise history. A QB that is better than both Kolb or Vick right now. IF it was about winning now, then we should have kept McNabb. As for 07 Giants, Eli stepped it up in those last 6 games to become a good pocket passer to go with the defense. You can't tell me that he didn't play well in the Super bowl as well as the playoff run. He's gone back to being mediocre but during that run he was elite.
Yes, McNabb was the best QB in franchise history, but it was time for him to go. He was on plenty of good Eagles teams and couldn't get it done. Besides, how often was he nicked up? That was always my problem with him (aside from the groundballs that he had a tendency of throwing). It always seemed like it was one injury after another when you have plenty of other QB's in the league that can consistently put up 16 game seasons injury free. I think the term injury prone really does apply to McNabb.And to say that McNabb is better now than Vick is very debatable. If you watched the Detroit game, you'll see that Vick is very talented. He made plays that I don't think McNabb or Kolb could make. I know for a fact that Vick is better runner in open field than McNabb.

Regarding Eli Manning, in 2007, he passed for about 3300 yards, threw 23 TD's and threw 20 interceptions. These really aren't great stats. I still stand by my statement that the defense is the main reason that the Giants won the SB that year.
If I want an open field runner, I'll use McCoy or Desean or Maclin. I want a guy who can move in the pocket enough to throw for 300 yards a game. McNabb still has that. Vick has never had that before and even in these 2 games, I havent seen the ability in this new version.
 
:mellow: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:goodposting: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:thumbup: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
So glad we got that cleared up. I always wondered about you...
 
Vick = 40-30 overall, 2-2 in playoffsMcNabb = 101-56 overall, 9-7 in playoffs :thumbup:
I wasn't comparing Vick to McNabb, so you can put your conclusion mat away. McNabb blows him out of the water as a QB.I was pointing out to the guy who said 'get used to .500 football with Vick as the QB, blah, blah, blah' that Vick hasn't been a .500 QB.That is all. :lmao:
 
:lmao: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:thumbup: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.
 
:lmao: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:bag: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
they're the worst fans in football because they have faith in what the coaches / management are doing and think the eagles are making the right move? that makes a whole lotta sense. they're the worst fans for being the definition of a fan... OK buddy.(FWIW i'm not an eagles fan, i just found this statement pretty ridiculous.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:bag: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.
Then you are extremely short sighted. a) They could have kept McNabb, traded Kolb and Vick and then drafted a QB for the future if they felt Kolb was not going to be IT.

b) They could have kept Kolb. Traded McNabb and Vick. Signed a veteran backup like Bulger to guide Kolb through his early years. Once you determine after a full season whether Kolb is worth investing long term into, you go with it or you move on and draft a new QB to start with.

Those are 2 infinitely better scenarios than:

c) Trade McNabb. Keep Kolb. Keep Vick. Declare Kolb the starter. Dump Kolb for Vick after 1 half of play. Go with a QB who has never proven to be a good passer in the league as your 1 year starter and setting back any progress on a guy you've been grooming for 4 years.

 
Deranged Hermit said:
I like the Eagles, I really do (although they're not my favorite team). That being said, I really do believe the 75% of their fans are borderline mentally ######ed. McNabb is the best QB the team has EVER had, but he gets bashed more than he's praised. I told Philly fans this off-season "be careful what you wish for". Looking like I'm being proved right.
You and me both DH :yes: I got EVISCERATED for saying we made a mistake trading McNabb and going with Kolb. Eviscerated. And now? Those same people are GIDDY we're opting for Vick after two games. :wall:
hope thats a 3 man boat cause i need a place to sit too
Welcome aboard. Here's my thing:

1) I get wanting McNabb out (I was in the minority on the other side obviously)

2) I get wanting McNabb to say (I was in that camp)

3) I get committing to Kolb and finding out what we have in him

4) I get starting Vick if Reid thinks he's better

5) I DON'T get how the same fans who praised the decision to part with McNabb can now cheer the decision to play Vick :thumbup:
well, mebbe they think michael vick gives the eagles a better chance to win nfl football games than kevin kolb? i dont get how you think ppl should commit to compounding mistakes.
 
:wall: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:thumbup: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.
Then you are extremely short sighted. a) They could have kept McNabb, traded Kolb and Vick and then drafted a QB for the future if they felt Kolb was not going to be IT.

b) They could have kept Kolb. Traded McNabb and Vick. Signed a veteran backup like Bulger to guide Kolb through his early years. Once you determine after a full season whether Kolb is worth investing long term into, you go with it or you move on and draft a new QB to start with.

Those are 2 infinitely better scenarios than:

c) Trade McNabb. Keep Kolb. Keep Vick. Declare Kolb the starter. Dump Kolb for Vick after 1 half of play. Go with a QB who has never proven to be a good passer in the league as your 1 year starter and setting back any progress on a guy you've been grooming for 4 years.
Weak.

Option A is no good. Vick had little to no trade value entering this season. If a team wanted Vick they could have signed him last year.

Option B- Again no good because Vick had no trade value.

Option C- Get trade value for both Mcnabb and Kolb while keeping the one QB who had little to no trade value but is probably the best QB of the 3 for the current makeup of this team while at the same time getting about 4 years younger at the position from last year. Win, win, win.

 
does anyone know the specifics of the contract situations for kolb and mcnabb?

kolb is only getting paid 12.2m over 2 yrs. thats pretty cheap for a starting caliber qb and actually a pretty small investment to see if the guy is a worthwhile franchise qb.

now, its also my understanding that mcnabb was gonna be a free agent after this season, and likely to command a large contract for an aging qb.

i dunno, it seems like the decision to eschew mcnabb for kolb was in part financial. they didnt want to commit top dollar to a qb entering his twilight. they were able to get some valuable draft picks for him. and they can pay kolb an low end starters salary over just 2 yrs before making a bigger commitment to him.

now, they have concluded that vick gives them a better chance to win nfl football games so he gets to play qb. it doesnt look as bad as ppl are making it out to be. just bc they may have misvalued kolb and mcnabb in april, doesnt mean they should be stubborn at the expense of winning.

 
I'm with Jason and the other Eagles fans in that boat who didn't like seeing McNabb get traded. I could live with it because there'd been ongoing tension for awhile regarding McNabb and whether he should stay. So a fresh page for team and McNabb didn't seem terrible.

But this whole turn of events makes me sad as a fan because it sure doesn't look like the organization knows what they are doing. It is not that I am such a huge Kolb fan, but the trade sure made it seem like the Eagles are. And if that is so, how do you bench a guy after he played less than a half of one game since you made the call. And, if you then go and trade him, but kind of depth is left for the team at QB?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:thumbup: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
they're the worst fans in football because they have faith in what the coaches / management are doing and think the eagles are making the right move? that makes a whole lotta sense. they're the worst fans for being the definition of a fan... OK buddy.(FWIW i'm not an eagles fan, i just found this statement pretty ridiculous.)
Let's not pretend Eagles fans loved McNabb while he was there but said in Reid we trust! when the team decided to go in another direction. They were happy to be rid of him.
 
per Jeff MaClane, Phily beat reporter:

Source: No truth to Kolb/Browns report

It seems the Kevin Kolb draft rumors have begun circulating.

The first: A report that the Cleveland Browns contacted the Eagles Tuesday night about acquiring the now-backup quarterback to Michael Vick.

Not true "whatsoever," said a source close to the situation.

Earlier Wednesday morning, Eagles coach Andy Reid could not defintively say that Kolb would not be traded by the Oct. 19 trade deadline.

However, asked if he would listed to trade offers for the 26-year-old, Reid said, "No, I want Kevin Kolb on this football team."

A day earlier, Reid said that Kolb had not asked for a trade. Kolb was asked Wednesday about the possibility of playing for another team.

"Right now I'm focused on, 'I have to be this way,'" Reid said. "I have to focus on, 'What if I have to go in against Jacksonville.'"

He did seem to leave the door open for a career change with this answer to a question about Reid's loyalty:

"So far to this point he's done what's best for my career," Kolb said. "I trust him and I think this will work out the way it's supposed to."

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-eag...wns_report.html

 
For those that think Vick is the answer because of his great record in Atlanta. You are forgetting a major key to his success in Atlanta - running the ball. Similiar to V Young right now in Tennessee, running lanes open up for him or the RB because the defense has to take away one or the other quite often. Unless there is a RB I don't know about in Philly and Reid is going to start calling closer to 50/50 split on the run/passes - Vick is not going to have the same success as he had in Atlanta unless his passing accuracy has improved dramatically.

 
Trading Kolb would be a big mistake. Fine, let Vick take the season, trade him at the end of the season, focus on the O-line this offseason, and let Kolb take us to the promised land. :-)

 
For those that think Vick is the answer because of his great record in Atlanta. You are forgetting a major key to his success in Atlanta - running the ball. Similiar to V Young right now in Tennessee, running lanes open up for him or the RB because the defense has to take away one or the other quite often. Unless there is a RB I don't know about in Philly and Reid is going to start calling closer to 50/50 split on the run/passes - Vick is not going to have the same success as he had in Atlanta unless his passing accuracy has improved dramatically.
Well, there is this guy McCoy on the team that is averaging 6.7 ypc and has 4 TD's in two games. Vick this year is completing 64% of his passes with a 105.5 QB rating - prior to that his career comp% was 54%.

I don't think Atlanta is relevant. The question is whether Vick can do in the next 14 games what he has done in the first 6 quarters for the Eagles.

 
I just listened back to the Andy presser from this morning and he said he can't guarantee that Kolb will be on the roster after the NFL trade deadline. :goodposting:
I saw the presser too. To be fair that's not all that he said. And he was contradictory (chalk it up to coach speak and gamesmanship/tarding etc). [the following quotes are paraphrases as best I can remember from the presser]He was asked is Kolb guaranteed to be here next year, and he said "I can't guarantee anything this is the NFL things move quickly"Then in 2 follow ups on the topic in response to 'will you look at offers given for kevin kolb" he said 'no I wasnt kevin kolb on this football yteam"so who knows what is going on...
 
:lmao: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:shrug: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.
Then you are extremely short sighted. a) They could have kept McNabb, traded Kolb and Vick and then drafted a QB for the future if they felt Kolb was not going to be IT.

b) They could have kept Kolb. Traded McNabb and Vick. Signed a veteran backup like Bulger to guide Kolb through his early years. Once you determine after a full season whether Kolb is worth investing long term into, you go with it or you move on and draft a new QB to start with.

Those are 2 infinitely better scenarios than:

c) Trade McNabb. Keep Kolb. Keep Vick. Declare Kolb the starter. Dump Kolb for Vick after 1 half of play. Go with a QB who has never proven to be a good passer in the league as your 1 year starter and setting back any progress on a guy you've been grooming for 4 years.
:lmao: silly iggles

scenario C is pretty awesome. Why the need to thrust Kolb in the spotlight now? Money? it's not your money, and there's no cap this year (something that obviously played into the Eagles gameplan this year, as I doubt a team could feasibly carry that much $$ in QB cap and field a decent team) I know In my leagues I have pretty solid backups, and just beause I have good backups doesn't make me want to trade away my talent for nothing. And the market for Vick was pretty bad, he wasn't gonna bring much in a trade (though he's easily worth 5-10x what he was then in 'trade value').

Sorry all the iggles fanboys are gonna have to shelve their Kevin Kolb FATHEADS.

 
does anyone know the specifics of the contract situations for kolb and mcnabb?kolb is only getting paid 12.2m over 2 yrs. thats pretty cheap for a starting caliber qb and actually a pretty small investment to see if the guy is a worthwhile franchise qb. now, its also my understanding that mcnabb was gonna be a free agent after this season, and likely to command a large contract for an aging qb.i dunno, it seems like the decision to eschew mcnabb for kolb was in part financial. they didnt want to commit top dollar to a qb entering his twilight. they were able to get some valuable draft picks for him. and they can pay kolb an low end starters salary over just 2 yrs before making a bigger commitment to him.now, they have concluded that vick gives them a better chance to win nfl football games so he gets to play qb. it doesnt look as bad as ppl are making it out to be. just bc they may have misvalued kolb and mcnabb in april, doesnt mean they should be stubborn at the expense of winning.
+1
 
Deranged Hermit said:
I know for a fact that CLE and PHI discussed a trade for Kolb this offseason, so there's definitely interest with CLE. I really doubt Philly is looking to trade him now unless we're talking about a 1st and 2nd round pick.
You're looking at this the wrong way. Kolb is no longer an asset to the Eagles. He is a huge anvil of lost $$$. If they keep Kolb, he will cost them $12m! to sit on their bench behind Vick, who is a former pro-bowler and only getting $5m. If Kolb is not starting he is costing them huge $$ for nothing. The Eagles transfer Kobe to someone else they would be dancing in the streets! 1st rounder, lol. They would probably take a bag of chips and a diet coke if they could.
 
Deranged Hermit said:
I know for a fact that CLE and PHI discussed a trade for Kolb this offseason, so there's definitely interest with CLE. I really doubt Philly is looking to trade him now unless we're talking about a 1st and 2nd round pick.
You're looking at this the wrong way. Kolb is no longer an asset to the Eagles. He is a huge anvil of lost $$$. If they keep Kolb, he will cost them $12m! to sit on their bench behind Vick, who is a former pro-bowler and only getting $5m. If Kolb is not starting he is costing them huge $$ for nothing. The Eagles transfer Kobe to someone else they would be dancing in the streets! 1st rounder, lol. They would probably take a bag of chips and a diet coke if they could.
They would not take less than a second rounder for him. $5m for a backup is not cheap but they had no hesitancy in paying that to keep Vick so they've already shown they are willing to pay a backup good money. As for a team trying to acquire Kolb his salary is a lot less than what you would have to pay a first round pick plus he's already been groomed. I have no idea if the Eagles will trade Kolb but if they do I don't think it's going to be to get out of paying his salary in a non cap year. Rolling with Kafka as your backup would probably make them uneasy. My guess is if Kolb gets traded it won't be anytime soon but close to the deadline. That way the Eagles get a few weeks preview with Vick to make absolute certain he's the direction they want to go, protect them from a Vick injury for a few additional weeks, and lastly if they decide they want to go with Vick long term they might be able to work out a contract extension with Vick before getting rid of Kolb. With regards to Vicks contract extension I think they can get a bargain for him if they give him some guaranteed money now. He's 30 and was apparently broke after his prison time. He's made up some money the last few years but is not even close to the financial position he was once in. With a possible lockout next year if Vick did not get guaranteed money in hand now he might not get any money until 2012 at which point he would negotiating a contract at the age of 32.
 
Whatever Sal Pal reports about the Eagles, believe the opposite.

He is persona non grata with the front office, and some folks there deliberately feed him bad info.

If Sal Pal says the Eagles are trying to trade Kolb, it means the Eagles are not trying to trade Kolb.

 
Liquid Tension said:
Insein said:
I don't think they really care how they look in all of this. I think they're doing this crazy thing where they make decisions based on what they think makes them a better football team. They've been doing that for a while. And, while they haven't won a SB, they've been one of the most successful franchises the last 10 years.
We must have different views of success.
:thumbup: Super Bowl = Success

Everything else is window dressing. We haven't had Success in 50 years.
I don't agree with this. getting deep in the playoffs and having competitive teams all the time does matter. Some may differ, but I would rather have 10 years of making the playoffs and a few championship games and maybe a SB loss than 9 years of watching a crappy team who doesn't make the playoffs, but then one year wins the SB. 9 years of misery for 1 great year? I would rather enjoy my team for 10 good years
That's funny, because the first thing out of most Giants fans, Skins fans, and Boys fans the last few year after a loss to Philly has been : "You guys STILL have never won the one the counts that most." I would gladly trade a few bad years for one ring.
 
Whatever Sal Pal reports about the Eagles, believe the opposite.He is persona non grata with the front office, and some folks there deliberately feed him bad info. If Sal Pal says the Eagles are trying to trade Kolb, it means the Eagles are not trying to trade Kolb.
This is true. It's a mystery to me how ESPN keeps Sal Pal in its employ. He so horribly bastardized Philadelphia sports (particularly the Eagles) for so long that the teams finally wised up and started treating him in kind.
 
Deranged Hermit said:
I like the Eagles, I really do (although they're not my favorite team). That being said, I really do believe the 75% of their fans are borderline mentally ######ed. McNabb is the best QB the team has EVER had, but he gets bashed more than he's praised. I told Philly fans this off-season "be careful what you wish for". Looking like I'm being proved right.
You and me both DH :lmao:I got EVISCERATED for saying we made a mistake trading McNabb and going with Kolb. Eviscerated. And now? Those same people are GIDDY we're opting for Vick after two games. :wub:
hope thats a 3 man boat cause i need a place to sit too
Welcome aboard. Here's my thing:1) I get wanting McNabb out (I was in the minority on the other side obviously)2) I get wanting McNabb to say (I was in that camp)3) I get committing to Kolb and finding out what we have in him4) I get starting Vick if Reid thinks he's better5) I DON'T get how the same fans who praised the decision to part with McNabb can now cheer the decision to play Vick :thumbup:
this boat is crowdedAs for #5 that's simple. This is Philadelphia after all
Need a cruise ship. We were on opposing sides with McNabb...but understood each other. The Vick love right now makes no sense at all.
 
Liquid Tension said:
Insein said:
:no:

Super Bowl = Success

Everything else is window dressing. We haven't had Success in 50 years.
I don't agree with this. getting deep in the playoffs and having competitive teams all the time does matter. Some may differ, but I would rather have 10 years of making the playoffs and a few championship games and maybe a SB loss than 9 years of watching a crappy team who doesn't make the playoffs, but then one year wins the SB. 9 years of misery for 1 great year? I would rather enjoy my team for 10 good years
That is where I disagree with you. If we had to suffer through 9 years of mess to build a team that won a super Bowl, I'd take it. Take the 07 Giants. They weren't that good for about 3 or 4 years. Pretty mediocre even but they turned it on and won a Bowl. I'd settle for that then building a perennial contender that always loses. If Vick does that for us this year, then I'll be happy. I just don't see that happening.
Insein, you seem really bent on the idea that the Eagles should give Kolb time to struggle, learn, and eventually be a stud. But what if he's doesn't turn out to be good? What if after giving him all that money and wasting time developing him, he turns out to be just average?Vick, on the other hand, has shown that he can be a good player NOW. Don't worry about 5 years down the road. For all we know, Kafka could be a stud by then.

Also, your Giants 07 SB story....Eli wasn't great that year....the Giants defense was. Their defense is what got them to the SB.
YES! That's exactly what they should do. Where in the world did this idea come from that teams should only start young relatively unproven QB's on bad teams? In my mind, THAT's the ridiculous time to start them. Kolb fits the profile of a championship team QB (accurate pocket QB), Vick does not (inacurate scrambler who relies on his legs too much).
 
That is where I disagree with you. If we had to suffer through 9 years of mess to build a team that won a super Bowl, I'd take it. Take the 07 Giants. They weren't that good for about 3 or 4 years. Pretty mediocre even but they turned it on and won a Bowl. I'd settle for that then building a perennial contender that always loses. If Vick does that for us this year, then I'll be happy. I just don't see that happening.
Insein, you seem really bent on the idea that the Eagles should give Kolb time to struggle, learn, and eventually be a stud. But what if he's doesn't turn out to be good? What if after giving him all that money and wasting time developing him, he turns out to be just average?Vick, on the other hand, has shown that he can be a good player NOW. Don't worry about 5 years down the road. For all we know, Kafka could be a stud by then.

Also, your Giants 07 SB story....Eli wasn't great that year....the Giants defense was. Their defense is what got them to the SB.
The real reason I want to see what happens with Kolb is because we traded away the best QB in franchise history. A QB that is better than both Kolb or Vick right now. IF it was about winning now, then we should have kept McNabb. As for 07 Giants, Eli stepped it up in those last 6 games to become a good pocket passer to go with the defense. You can't tell me that he didn't play well in the Super bowl as well as the playoff run. He's gone back to being mediocre but during that run he was elite.
EXACTLY!That's why I was never in favor of trading McNabb in the first place. The argument FOR trading him was that he could "only get us so far" meaning not a Super Bowl title. His division titles, Pro Bowls, 5 NFC Championship games and 9 playoff wins weren't enough for us anymore. So it was time for a change to see if we had the chance to be great in a year or two with Kolb running the show. Yet, 2 games into this season, that entire plan is out the door for a guy who had done markedly less in his career than McNabb "WHEN IT COUNTS."
:no: (Although I favored the McNabb trade.)
 
That is where I disagree with you. If we had to suffer through 9 years of mess to build a team that won a super Bowl, I'd take it. Take the 07 Giants. They weren't that good for about 3 or 4 years. Pretty mediocre even but they turned it on and won a Bowl. I'd settle for that then building a perennial contender that always loses. If Vick does that for us this year, then I'll be happy. I just don't see that happening.
Insein, you seem really bent on the idea that the Eagles should give Kolb time to struggle, learn, and eventually be a stud. But what if he's doesn't turn out to be good? What if after giving him all that money and wasting time developing him, he turns out to be just average?Vick, on the other hand, has shown that he can be a good player NOW. Don't worry about 5 years down the road. For all we know, Kafka could be a stud by then. Also, your Giants 07 SB story....Eli wasn't great that year....the Giants defense was. Their defense is what got them to the SB.
The real reason I want to see what happens with Kolb is because we traded away the best QB in franchise history. A QB that is better than both Kolb or Vick right now. IF it was about winning now, then we should have kept McNabb. As for 07 Giants, Eli stepped it up in those last 6 games to become a good pocket passer to go with the defense. You can't tell me that he didn't play well in the Super bowl as well as the playoff run. He's gone back to being mediocre but during that run he was elite.
I don't want to go off on a tangent, but good QB's (which Eli is...not great) look mediocre when a guy breaks clean on 80% of the passes. the Giant OL is horrific.getting back to the Eagles; it was a very bad idea to get rid of McNabb IMO; he was always under appreciated by the Philly "fans"...I guess the same people who booed Mike Schmidt, but Vick is a better QB than Kolb IMO. Even when Vick wasn't too accurate, there was a very good reason why the running attack with Vick is so good and that is he simply tires out the defensive line. That being said, to keep Vick fresh, i would have another QB to give Vick a rest once in awhile and have that QB run some very specific plays that they work on each week. It is impossible for Vick not to get exhausted after awhile and I would give him a blow just like a RB who had a big gain.
 
YES! That's exactly what they should do. Where in the world did this idea come from that teams should only start young relatively unproven QB's on bad teams? In my mind, THAT's the ridiculous time to start them. Kolb fits the profile of a championship team QB (accurate pocket QB), Vick does not (inacurate scrambler who relies on his legs too much).
Kolb may fit your description of an accurate pocket QB, but until he learns how to not worry so much about the defense coming to sack him and focus on completing his passes, he'll NEVER be any good to any team. It's like he gets anxious and scared of getting hit so he loses focus.I still think that Andy and company have seen Kolb struggle enough that he might not turn into the franchise stud QB that they first envisioned him to be.
 
:lmao: at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
:lmao: What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.
Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.
Then you are extremely short sighted. a) They could have kept McNabb, traded Kolb and Vick and then drafted a QB for the future if they felt Kolb was not going to be IT.

b) They could have kept Kolb. Traded McNabb and Vick. Signed a veteran backup like Bulger to guide Kolb through his early years. Once you determine after a full season whether Kolb is worth investing long term into, you go with it or you move on and draft a new QB to start with.

Those are 2 infinitely better scenarios than:

c) Trade McNabb. Keep Kolb. Keep Vick. Declare Kolb the starter. Dump Kolb for Vick after 1 half of play. Go with a QB who has never proven to be a good passer in the league as your 1 year starter and setting back any progress on a guy you've been grooming for 4 years.
C is a better option than B. Assume the first game plays out the same with Kolb getting hurt. Now imagine Bulger coming in. Do you see him being able to dowhat Vick did in rallying the team? Not Likely. Could you imagine Bulger getting knocked out of the game the same way Kolb did? Most definitely.

Okay, so assume the Eagles got routed by GB, but Bulger survived to play in week 2. Do you see him having the type of performance Vick did? Not likely. Do you see McCoy having as great a day without the defense having to worry about what the QB is doing every play? Not likely. Odds are with Bulger starting that game, the Eagles lose to the Lions.

Okay, now the Eagles are 0-2, and you have to bring back Kevin Kolb to start with the offensive line not in a good place. Sure you may find out just what you have with Kolb at QB, but you could also be dooming him the way Houston doomed David Carr by not having a good offensive line for him to develop behind.

You assume that because Vick has never proven to be a good passer, that he never can be a good passer. I think because of his current performance and his physical gifts you have to find out if he can be a good passer against quality defenses. He may turn out to be the same old Michael Vick. But if he has changed and has actually dedicated himself to studying film and working to get better (things he said he did not do with Atlanta), then he is the guy you probably want to try to sign to a 4 year deal. Believe me, all the other NFC East teams would much rather game plan against Kevin Kolb than a smarter, more accurate, Michael Vick.

 
The talk is they will honor his contract and he is still the future in Philly. If a trade does come, it will not be during this season for sure. However lots of promises are made and broken pretty regular in the NFL. Seems that Philly is on the excessive side of the average.

 
The talk is they will honor his contract and he is still the future in Philly. If a trade does come, it will not be during this season for sure. However lots of promises are made and broken pretty regular in the NFL. Seems that Philly is on the excessive side of the average.
How's your bud handling it? Did he get the sense Andy wasn't behind him from the start?
 
So what do you do with Kolb? If a trade isn't looking likely, is he even worth rostering?
Yes. He's one Mike Vick injury/bad start/dead dog away from being a viable fantasy starter.
If you have small rosters then okay cut him. But if you can afford to roster him you need to do it. I think he'll have the job back by week 10. Or Vick will play so well we'll know by week 6 to cut him then.But cutting Kolb after Vick has one great game against the Lions is foolish.
 
McNabb dealt. Kolb bombs in his 1st start as franchise QB, is benched & then dealt. Vick then bombs.

Philly left with no franchise QB. How likely is it?

---------------

Count me in the crowd that Vick won't last taking as many hits as he has through ~6 quarters of action.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top