Jason Wood
Zoo York
I just listened back to the Andy presser from this morning and he said he can't guarantee that Kolb will be on the roster after the NFL trade deadline.

If I want an open field runner, I'll use McCoy or Desean or Maclin. I want a guy who can move in the pocket enough to throw for 300 yards a game. McNabb still has that. Vick has never had that before and even in these 2 games, I havent seen the ability in this new version.Yes, McNabb was the best QB in franchise history, but it was time for him to go. He was on plenty of good Eagles teams and couldn't get it done. Besides, how often was he nicked up? That was always my problem with him (aside from the groundballs that he had a tendency of throwing). It always seemed like it was one injury after another when you have plenty of other QB's in the league that can consistently put up 16 game seasons injury free. I think the term injury prone really does apply to McNabb.And to say that McNabb is better now than Vick is very debatable. If you watched the Detroit game, you'll see that Vick is very talented. He made plays that I don't think McNabb or Kolb could make. I know for a fact that Vick is better runner in open field than McNabb.The real reason I want to see what happens with Kolb is because we traded away the best QB in franchise history. A QB that is better than both Kolb or Vick right now. IF it was about winning now, then we should have kept McNabb. As for 07 Giants, Eli stepped it up in those last 6 games to become a good pocket passer to go with the defense. You can't tell me that he didn't play well in the Super bowl as well as the playoff run. He's gone back to being mediocre but during that run he was elite.Insein, you seem really bent on the idea that the Eagles should give Kolb time to struggle, learn, and eventually be a stud. But what if he's doesn't turn out to be good? What if after giving him all that money and wasting time developing him, he turns out to be just average?Vick, on the other hand, has shown that he can be a good player NOW. Don't worry about 5 years down the road. For all we know, Kafka could be a stud by then.That is where I disagree with you. If we had to suffer through 9 years of mess to build a team that won a super Bowl, I'd take it. Take the 07 Giants. They weren't that good for about 3 or 4 years. Pretty mediocre even but they turned it on and won a Bowl. I'd settle for that then building a perennial contender that always loses. If Vick does that for us this year, then I'll be happy. I just don't see that happening.
Also, your Giants 07 SB story....Eli wasn't great that year....the Giants defense was. Their defense is what got them to the SB.
Regarding Eli Manning, in 2007, he passed for about 3300 yards, threw 23 TD's and threw 20 interceptions. These really aren't great stats. I still stand by my statement that the defense is the main reason that the Giants won the SB that year.
at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
So glad we got that cleared up. I always wondered about you...For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
I wasn't comparing Vick to McNabb, so you can put your conclusion mat away. McNabb blows him out of the water as a QB.I was pointing out to the guy who said 'get used to .500 football with Vick as the QB, blah, blah, blah' that Vick hasn't been a .500 QB.That is all.Vick = 40-30 overall, 2-2 in playoffsMcNabb = 101-56 overall, 9-7 in playoffs![]()
Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
they're the worst fans in football because they have faith in what the coaches / management are doing and think the eagles are making the right move? that makes a whole lotta sense. they're the worst fans for being the definition of a fan... OK buddy.(FWIW i'm not an eagles fan, i just found this statement pretty ridiculous.)For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
Then you are extremely short sighted. a) They could have kept McNabb, traded Kolb and Vick and then drafted a QB for the future if they felt Kolb was not going to be IT.Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
well, mebbe they think michael vick gives the eagles a better chance to win nfl football games than kevin kolb? i dont get how you think ppl should commit to compounding mistakes.Welcome aboard. Here's my thing:hope thats a 3 man boat cause i need a place to sit tooYou and me both DHDeranged Hermit said:I like the Eagles, I really do (although they're not my favorite team). That being said, I really do believe the 75% of their fans are borderline mentally ######ed. McNabb is the best QB the team has EVER had, but he gets bashed more than he's praised. I told Philly fans this off-season "be careful what you wish for". Looking like I'm being proved right.I got EVISCERATED for saying we made a mistake trading McNabb and going with Kolb. Eviscerated. And now? Those same people are GIDDY we're opting for Vick after two games.
![]()
1) I get wanting McNabb out (I was in the minority on the other side obviously)
2) I get wanting McNabb to say (I was in that camp)
3) I get committing to Kolb and finding out what we have in him
4) I get starting Vick if Reid thinks he's better
5) I DON'T get how the same fans who praised the decision to part with McNabb can now cheer the decision to play Vick![]()
Weak.Then you are extremely short sighted. a) They could have kept McNabb, traded Kolb and Vick and then drafted a QB for the future if they felt Kolb was not going to be IT.Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
b) They could have kept Kolb. Traded McNabb and Vick. Signed a veteran backup like Bulger to guide Kolb through his early years. Once you determine after a full season whether Kolb is worth investing long term into, you go with it or you move on and draft a new QB to start with.
Those are 2 infinitely better scenarios than:
c) Trade McNabb. Keep Kolb. Keep Vick. Declare Kolb the starter. Dump Kolb for Vick after 1 half of play. Go with a QB who has never proven to be a good passer in the league as your 1 year starter and setting back any progress on a guy you've been grooming for 4 years.
Might be other sites with this info but if you go to Rotoworld and look up the player there is a section providing pretty in depth contract details. It's free.does anyone know the specifics of the contract situations for kolb and mcnabb?
Let's not pretend Eagles fans loved McNabb while he was there but said in Reid we trust! when the team decided to go in another direction. They were happy to be rid of him.they're the worst fans in football because they have faith in what the coaches / management are doing and think the eagles are making the right move? that makes a whole lotta sense. they're the worst fans for being the definition of a fan... OK buddy.(FWIW i'm not an eagles fan, i just found this statement pretty ridiculous.)For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
Vick is a UFA after this season.Trading Kolb would be a big mistake. Fine, let Vick take the season, trade him at the end of the season, focus on the O-line this offseason, and let Kolb take us to the promised land.![]()
Well, there is this guy McCoy on the team that is averaging 6.7 ypc and has 4 TD's in two games. Vick this year is completing 64% of his passes with a 105.5 QB rating - prior to that his career comp% was 54%.For those that think Vick is the answer because of his great record in Atlanta. You are forgetting a major key to his success in Atlanta - running the ball. Similiar to V Young right now in Tennessee, running lanes open up for him or the RB because the defense has to take away one or the other quite often. Unless there is a RB I don't know about in Philly and Reid is going to start calling closer to 50/50 split on the run/passes - Vick is not going to have the same success as he had in Atlanta unless his passing accuracy has improved dramatically.
I saw the presser too. To be fair that's not all that he said. And he was contradictory (chalk it up to coach speak and gamesmanship/tarding etc). [the following quotes are paraphrases as best I can remember from the presser]He was asked is Kolb guaranteed to be here next year, and he said "I can't guarantee anything this is the NFL things move quickly"Then in 2 follow ups on the topic in response to 'will you look at offers given for kevin kolb" he said 'no I wasnt kevin kolb on this football yteam"so who knows what is going on...I just listened back to the Andy presser from this morning and he said he can't guarantee that Kolb will be on the roster after the NFL trade deadline.![]()
Then you are extremely short sighted. a) They could have kept McNabb, traded Kolb and Vick and then drafted a QB for the future if they felt Kolb was not going to be IT.Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
b) They could have kept Kolb. Traded McNabb and Vick. Signed a veteran backup like Bulger to guide Kolb through his early years. Once you determine after a full season whether Kolb is worth investing long term into, you go with it or you move on and draft a new QB to start with.
Those are 2 infinitely better scenarios than:
c) Trade McNabb. Keep Kolb. Keep Vick. Declare Kolb the starter. Dump Kolb for Vick after 1 half of play. Go with a QB who has never proven to be a good passer in the league as your 1 year starter and setting back any progress on a guy you've been grooming for 4 years.
+1does anyone know the specifics of the contract situations for kolb and mcnabb?kolb is only getting paid 12.2m over 2 yrs. thats pretty cheap for a starting caliber qb and actually a pretty small investment to see if the guy is a worthwhile franchise qb. now, its also my understanding that mcnabb was gonna be a free agent after this season, and likely to command a large contract for an aging qb.i dunno, it seems like the decision to eschew mcnabb for kolb was in part financial. they didnt want to commit top dollar to a qb entering his twilight. they were able to get some valuable draft picks for him. and they can pay kolb an low end starters salary over just 2 yrs before making a bigger commitment to him.now, they have concluded that vick gives them a better chance to win nfl football games so he gets to play qb. it doesnt look as bad as ppl are making it out to be. just bc they may have misvalued kolb and mcnabb in april, doesnt mean they should be stubborn at the expense of winning.
You're looking at this the wrong way. Kolb is no longer an asset to the Eagles. He is a huge anvil of lost $$$. If they keep Kolb, he will cost them $12m! to sit on their bench behind Vick, who is a former pro-bowler and only getting $5m. If Kolb is not starting he is costing them huge $$ for nothing. The Eagles transfer Kobe to someone else they would be dancing in the streets! 1st rounder, lol. They would probably take a bag of chips and a diet coke if they could.Deranged Hermit said:I know for a fact that CLE and PHI discussed a trade for Kolb this offseason, so there's definitely interest with CLE. I really doubt Philly is looking to trade him now unless we're talking about a 1st and 2nd round pick.
They would not take less than a second rounder for him. $5m for a backup is not cheap but they had no hesitancy in paying that to keep Vick so they've already shown they are willing to pay a backup good money. As for a team trying to acquire Kolb his salary is a lot less than what you would have to pay a first round pick plus he's already been groomed. I have no idea if the Eagles will trade Kolb but if they do I don't think it's going to be to get out of paying his salary in a non cap year. Rolling with Kafka as your backup would probably make them uneasy. My guess is if Kolb gets traded it won't be anytime soon but close to the deadline. That way the Eagles get a few weeks preview with Vick to make absolute certain he's the direction they want to go, protect them from a Vick injury for a few additional weeks, and lastly if they decide they want to go with Vick long term they might be able to work out a contract extension with Vick before getting rid of Kolb. With regards to Vicks contract extension I think they can get a bargain for him if they give him some guaranteed money now. He's 30 and was apparently broke after his prison time. He's made up some money the last few years but is not even close to the financial position he was once in. With a possible lockout next year if Vick did not get guaranteed money in hand now he might not get any money until 2012 at which point he would negotiating a contract at the age of 32.You're looking at this the wrong way. Kolb is no longer an asset to the Eagles. He is a huge anvil of lost $$$. If they keep Kolb, he will cost them $12m! to sit on their bench behind Vick, who is a former pro-bowler and only getting $5m. If Kolb is not starting he is costing them huge $$ for nothing. The Eagles transfer Kobe to someone else they would be dancing in the streets! 1st rounder, lol. They would probably take a bag of chips and a diet coke if they could.Deranged Hermit said:I know for a fact that CLE and PHI discussed a trade for Kolb this offseason, so there's definitely interest with CLE. I really doubt Philly is looking to trade him now unless we're talking about a 1st and 2nd round pick.
I throw bulls eyes Some of you folks might want to do a search on my posts.Vick belongs in Philly, Kold doesn't. Kolb's going to be traded.
That's funny, because the first thing out of most Giants fans, Skins fans, and Boys fans the last few year after a loss to Philly has been : "You guys STILL have never won the one the counts that most." I would gladly trade a few bad years for one ring.Liquid Tension said:I don't agree with this. getting deep in the playoffs and having competitive teams all the time does matter. Some may differ, but I would rather have 10 years of making the playoffs and a few championship games and maybe a SB loss than 9 years of watching a crappy team who doesn't make the playoffs, but then one year wins the SB. 9 years of misery for 1 great year? I would rather enjoy my team for 10 good yearsInsein said:We must have different views of success.I don't think they really care how they look in all of this. I think they're doing this crazy thing where they make decisions based on what they think makes them a better football team. They've been doing that for a while. And, while they haven't won a SB, they've been one of the most successful franchises the last 10 years.Super Bowl = Success
Everything else is window dressing. We haven't had Success in 50 years.
This is true. It's a mystery to me how ESPN keeps Sal Pal in its employ. He so horribly bastardized Philadelphia sports (particularly the Eagles) for so long that the teams finally wised up and started treating him in kind.Whatever Sal Pal reports about the Eagles, believe the opposite.He is persona non grata with the front office, and some folks there deliberately feed him bad info. If Sal Pal says the Eagles are trying to trade Kolb, it means the Eagles are not trying to trade Kolb.
Need a cruise ship. We were on opposing sides with McNabb...but understood each other. The Vick love right now makes no sense at all.this boat is crowdedAs for #5 that's simple. This is Philadelphia after allWelcome aboard. Here's my thing:1) I get wanting McNabb out (I was in the minority on the other side obviously)2) I get wanting McNabb to say (I was in that camp)3) I get committing to Kolb and finding out what we have in him4) I get starting Vick if Reid thinks he's better5) I DON'T get how the same fans who praised the decision to part with McNabb can now cheer the decision to play Vickhope thats a 3 man boat cause i need a place to sit tooYou and me both DHDeranged Hermit said:I like the Eagles, I really do (although they're not my favorite team). That being said, I really do believe the 75% of their fans are borderline mentally ######ed. McNabb is the best QB the team has EVER had, but he gets bashed more than he's praised. I told Philly fans this off-season "be careful what you wish for". Looking like I'm being proved right.I got EVISCERATED for saying we made a mistake trading McNabb and going with Kolb. Eviscerated. And now? Those same people are GIDDY we're opting for Vick after two games.
![]()
![]()
YES! That's exactly what they should do. Where in the world did this idea come from that teams should only start young relatively unproven QB's on bad teams? In my mind, THAT's the ridiculous time to start them. Kolb fits the profile of a championship team QB (accurate pocket QB), Vick does not (inacurate scrambler who relies on his legs too much).Insein, you seem really bent on the idea that the Eagles should give Kolb time to struggle, learn, and eventually be a stud. But what if he's doesn't turn out to be good? What if after giving him all that money and wasting time developing him, he turns out to be just average?Vick, on the other hand, has shown that he can be a good player NOW. Don't worry about 5 years down the road. For all we know, Kafka could be a stud by then.That is where I disagree with you. If we had to suffer through 9 years of mess to build a team that won a super Bowl, I'd take it. Take the 07 Giants. They weren't that good for about 3 or 4 years. Pretty mediocre even but they turned it on and won a Bowl. I'd settle for that then building a perennial contender that always loses. If Vick does that for us this year, then I'll be happy. I just don't see that happening.Liquid Tension said:I don't agree with this. getting deep in the playoffs and having competitive teams all the time does matter. Some may differ, but I would rather have 10 years of making the playoffs and a few championship games and maybe a SB loss than 9 years of watching a crappy team who doesn't make the playoffs, but then one year wins the SB. 9 years of misery for 1 great year? I would rather enjoy my team for 10 good yearsInsein said:![]()
Super Bowl = Success
Everything else is window dressing. We haven't had Success in 50 years.
Also, your Giants 07 SB story....Eli wasn't great that year....the Giants defense was. Their defense is what got them to the SB.
EXACTLY!That's why I was never in favor of trading McNabb in the first place. The argument FOR trading him was that he could "only get us so far" meaning not a Super Bowl title. His division titles, Pro Bowls, 5 NFC Championship games and 9 playoff wins weren't enough for us anymore. So it was time for a change to see if we had the chance to be great in a year or two with Kolb running the show. Yet, 2 games into this season, that entire plan is out the door for a guy who had done markedly less in his career than McNabb "WHEN IT COUNTS."The real reason I want to see what happens with Kolb is because we traded away the best QB in franchise history. A QB that is better than both Kolb or Vick right now. IF it was about winning now, then we should have kept McNabb. As for 07 Giants, Eli stepped it up in those last 6 games to become a good pocket passer to go with the defense. You can't tell me that he didn't play well in the Super bowl as well as the playoff run. He's gone back to being mediocre but during that run he was elite.Insein, you seem really bent on the idea that the Eagles should give Kolb time to struggle, learn, and eventually be a stud. But what if he's doesn't turn out to be good? What if after giving him all that money and wasting time developing him, he turns out to be just average?Vick, on the other hand, has shown that he can be a good player NOW. Don't worry about 5 years down the road. For all we know, Kafka could be a stud by then.That is where I disagree with you. If we had to suffer through 9 years of mess to build a team that won a super Bowl, I'd take it. Take the 07 Giants. They weren't that good for about 3 or 4 years. Pretty mediocre even but they turned it on and won a Bowl. I'd settle for that then building a perennial contender that always loses. If Vick does that for us this year, then I'll be happy. I just don't see that happening.
Also, your Giants 07 SB story....Eli wasn't great that year....the Giants defense was. Their defense is what got them to the SB.
I don't want to go off on a tangent, but good QB's (which Eli is...not great) look mediocre when a guy breaks clean on 80% of the passes. the Giant OL is horrific.getting back to the Eagles; it was a very bad idea to get rid of McNabb IMO; he was always under appreciated by the Philly "fans"...I guess the same people who booed Mike Schmidt, but Vick is a better QB than Kolb IMO. Even when Vick wasn't too accurate, there was a very good reason why the running attack with Vick is so good and that is he simply tires out the defensive line. That being said, to keep Vick fresh, i would have another QB to give Vick a rest once in awhile and have that QB run some very specific plays that they work on each week. It is impossible for Vick not to get exhausted after awhile and I would give him a blow just like a RB who had a big gain.The real reason I want to see what happens with Kolb is because we traded away the best QB in franchise history. A QB that is better than both Kolb or Vick right now. IF it was about winning now, then we should have kept McNabb. As for 07 Giants, Eli stepped it up in those last 6 games to become a good pocket passer to go with the defense. You can't tell me that he didn't play well in the Super bowl as well as the playoff run. He's gone back to being mediocre but during that run he was elite.Insein, you seem really bent on the idea that the Eagles should give Kolb time to struggle, learn, and eventually be a stud. But what if he's doesn't turn out to be good? What if after giving him all that money and wasting time developing him, he turns out to be just average?Vick, on the other hand, has shown that he can be a good player NOW. Don't worry about 5 years down the road. For all we know, Kafka could be a stud by then. Also, your Giants 07 SB story....Eli wasn't great that year....the Giants defense was. Their defense is what got them to the SB.That is where I disagree with you. If we had to suffer through 9 years of mess to build a team that won a super Bowl, I'd take it. Take the 07 Giants. They weren't that good for about 3 or 4 years. Pretty mediocre even but they turned it on and won a Bowl. I'd settle for that then building a perennial contender that always loses. If Vick does that for us this year, then I'll be happy. I just don't see that happening.
Kolb may fit your description of an accurate pocket QB, but until he learns how to not worry so much about the defense coming to sack him and focus on completing his passes, he'll NEVER be any good to any team. It's like he gets anxious and scared of getting hit so he loses focus.I still think that Andy and company have seen Kolb struggle enough that he might not turn into the franchise stud QB that they first envisioned him to be.YES! That's exactly what they should do. Where in the world did this idea come from that teams should only start young relatively unproven QB's on bad teams? In my mind, THAT's the ridiculous time to start them. Kolb fits the profile of a championship team QB (accurate pocket QB), Vick does not (inacurate scrambler who relies on his legs too much).
C is a better option than B. Assume the first game plays out the same with Kolb getting hurt. Now imagine Bulger coming in. Do you see him being able to dowhat Vick did in rallying the team? Not Likely. Could you imagine Bulger getting knocked out of the game the same way Kolb did? Most definitely.Then you are extremely short sighted. a) They could have kept McNabb, traded Kolb and Vick and then drafted a QB for the future if they felt Kolb was not going to be IT.Eagle fans are obnoxious but this is no time to gloat. I said earlier and I'll say again, this is outstanding news for the Eagles. They did not make a mistake trading Mcnabb. They got a second round pick and got younger at the QB position. Add in they probably get at least a #2 for Kolb and I don't see how things could have gone much better for the Eagles.For starters, many Eagles fans (admittedly not all - Wood, etc.) were giddy to have Kolb instead of McNabb. Now they're delighted to dump Kolb and run with Vick.This is part of the reason I can never root for this team. Perhaps the worst fans in football.at Philly fans. You guys have a well earned, and well deserved, reputation.
What does your statement have to do with Kolb? Just trying to start some ####?
b) They could have kept Kolb. Traded McNabb and Vick. Signed a veteran backup like Bulger to guide Kolb through his early years. Once you determine after a full season whether Kolb is worth investing long term into, you go with it or you move on and draft a new QB to start with.
Those are 2 infinitely better scenarios than:
c) Trade McNabb. Keep Kolb. Keep Vick. Declare Kolb the starter. Dump Kolb for Vick after 1 half of play. Go with a QB who has never proven to be a good passer in the league as your 1 year starter and setting back any progress on a guy you've been grooming for 4 years.
Andy Reid "said"= ZeroAndy Reid on the Herd this morning said he would not trade Kolb contrary to his presser yesterday.
Andy Reid "said"= ZeroAndy Reid on the Herd this morning said he would not trade Kolb contrary to his presser yesterday.
No. Anything out of Sal Pal's mouth about the Eagles definitely does not constitute "news."Is there any actual news in this thread?
No. Anything out of Sal Pal's mouth about the Eagles definitely does not constitute "news."Is there any actual news in this thread?
Yes. He's one Mike Vick injury/bad start/dead dog away from being a viable fantasy starter.So what do you do with Kolb? If a trade isn't looking likely, is he even worth rostering?
How's your bud handling it? Did he get the sense Andy wasn't behind him from the start?The talk is they will honor his contract and he is still the future in Philly. If a trade does come, it will not be during this season for sure. However lots of promises are made and broken pretty regular in the NFL. Seems that Philly is on the excessive side of the average.
If you have small rosters then okay cut him. But if you can afford to roster him you need to do it. I think he'll have the job back by week 10. Or Vick will play so well we'll know by week 6 to cut him then.But cutting Kolb after Vick has one great game against the Lions is foolish.Yes. He's one Mike Vick injury/bad start/dead dog away from being a viable fantasy starter.So what do you do with Kolb? If a trade isn't looking likely, is he even worth rostering?