teams could'nt stop Smith last year when they had him doubled or in some cases, tripled, so adding a WR with the abilities of Keyshawn can only help!!Colbert is quickly turning into another Peter Warrick, an overrated WR that never really made the leap to a full time starting player..I'm wondering what some of the "experts" on this board think about the keyshawn signing. Will this hurt Steve or take some of the double/triple teams away and help him?
With Keyshawn's blocking skills, will they attempt to run more than they already do?
I think Smith takes alittle bit of a hit. Keyshawn is going to catch 70 balls this year, he has every other year except when TB gave him the hook and his rookie year. Colbert only caught 25 last year. Smith was focused last year all game long, this year they have alot better options. I'm not saying Smith isn't going to be a top flight guy but I think he drops from about #4 to about #8.
I think it will have a great impact on the Carolina running game. With teams having to double Smith and a decent 2nd WR to account for now could have a huge impact on how many guys can be put in the box to stop the run.
Bump Panthers RB #1 up a spot.
I agree. Jake Delhomme is the new and improved Jeff Blake.I think Keyshawn's numbers take a hit, as Jake Delhomme throws to one, and only one, WR. Smith will get his, and Meshawn will complain about the lack of looks.
Really, since when? Everything I've seen shows that a competent WR at the #2 spot helps, not hurts, the #1 receiver. Most of the top receivers have atleast a decent WR on the other side.Obviously his overall #s are going to take hit. That's the general rule of thumb when your team gets a competent upgrade at the other WR spot. But he'll probably be more consistent next season - which is a plus.
Past statistical research attempts by various people have always led to the conclusion that a WR2's stats have no relationship to the stats of WR1.Really, since when? Everything I've seen shows that a competent WR at the #2 spot helps, not hurts, the #1 receiver. Most of the top receivers have atleast a decent WR on the other side.
Thus Smith's stats should be uneffected by what Keyshawn does? That's pretty much the contention then? His stats may decrease a bit just because 1600 yards is hard to maintain but it's not going to be because Carolina signed Keyshawn. If Smith's open, Delhomme will find him, just like last year. Keyshawn should help sustain drives with his ability to move the chains, resulting in more plays and thus more pass attempts. Carolina was near the bottom last year in that aspect.Past statistical research attempts by various people have always led to the conclusion that a WR2's stats have no relationship to the stats of WR1.Really, since when? Everything I've seen shows that a competent WR at the #2 spot helps, not hurts, the #1 receiver. Most of the top receivers have atleast a decent WR on the other side.
That was also Delhomme's first year as a starting QB and Carolina had the reigns on for the first half of the year.He's definately going to take a hit. It is amazing that Delhomme has been able to get the ball to a single wide receiver the last two years like he did. Producing the top fantasy receiver in both years. It will look more like it did when they had Muhammad and Smith both together as Keyshawn's skill set is nearly identicle to Muhammad's. Although Keyshawn is declining and Smith is rising. So Smith should have a slightly better year than he did 3 years ago.
Now if Foster goes down again, Smith could have another grand year. As their talent would dictate an emphasized passing game.
Except that statistics never tell the whole story. This is an extra unique situation that I wouldnt compare to any other past example.Thus Smith's stats should be uneffected by what Keyshawn does? That's pretty much the contention then? His stats may decrease a bit just because 1600 yards is hard to maintain but it's not going to be because Carolina signed Keyshawn. If Smith's open, Delhomme will find him, just like last year. Keyshawn should help sustain drives with his ability to move the chains, resulting in more plays and thus more pass attempts. Carolina was near the bottom last year in that aspect.Past statistical research attempts by various people have always led to the conclusion that a WR2's stats have no relationship to the stats of WR1.Really, since when? Everything I've seen shows that a competent WR at the #2 spot helps, not hurts, the #1 receiver. Most of the top receivers have atleast a decent WR on the other side.
I expect his numbers to be an average of what he did 2003 and 2005. So 95 catches 1330 yards 9.5 TDs if MeShawn does not cut into them.MeShawn will be a good second option for Delhomme that was missing last year. However he is not as fast as Mushin and cannot streach the field the way Mushin did.He is however a reliable enough reciever that I could see him catching more than the 50 or so receptions that WR 2 has been getting in this offense with Delhomme. WR 3 is good for about 25 catches.Total average rushing attempts have been 470 over the past 4 years even with Rb injuries. If the Panthers do not add a significant Rb to compliment Foster then there may be more passing attempts than we have seen from this offense but I still would not expect a large change from thier low in 2004 which was still 422 rusing attempts the most going to Nick Goings:+--------------------------+-------------------------+ | Rushing | Receiving |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 2001 car | 15 | 4 43 10.8 0 | 10 154 15.4 0 || 2002 car | 15 | 1 -4 -4.0 0 | 54 872 16.1 3 || 2003 car | 16 | 11 42 3.8 0 | 88 1110 12.6 7 || 2004 car | 1 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 6 60 10.0 0 || 2005 car | 16 | 4 25 6.2 1 | 103 1563 15.2 12 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 63 | 20 106 5.3 1 | 261 3759 14.4 22 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
As has been pointed out MeShawn Johnson has not caught less than 70 balls in his career except when benched in Tampa for his behavior.I don't see the Panthers offense offering him the same opportunities as he has had in previous offenses though and so I would expect a compromise which will garner MeShawn Johnson 60 catches in this offense (and perhps a lot of complaints by him as pointed out by unlucky).That is 10 more catches than the WR 2 has been getting in this offense with Delhomme so this may be 10 less for Steve Smith.2006 Steve Smith 85 catches 1207 yards (using his career average) 8 TD (im taking one away because of MeShawns ability in the red zone.)+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Brandon Bennett | 8 | 6 17 2.8 1 | 0 0 0.0 0 || Stephen Davis | 2 | 24 92 3.8 0 | 2 32 16.0 0 || DeShaun Foster | 4 | 59 255 4.3 2 | 9 76 8.4 0 || Nick Goings | 16 | 217 821 3.8 6 | 45 394 8.8 1 || Joey Harris | 4 | 15 53 3.5 0 | 0 0 0.0 0 || Brad Hoover | 14 | 68 246 3.6 0 | 21 161 7.7 2 || Jamal Robertson | 5 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 0 0 0.0 0 || Rod Smart | 3 | 3 4 1.3 0 | 1 5 5.0 0 |+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
I don't think he'll put up the same numbers he did last year. Hard to duplicate a completely dominating performance like that.
But I do think having a competent reciever opposite from him will loosen up the coverage on him a bit. Key gets the dink and dunk chain movers, Smith still gets the big plays.
That would signal a downtick in the Panthers passing efficiency with Keyshawn on board, so I think your numbers are very low. They didn't let Delhomme throw the ball for the first 5 games of 2003 and Smith's numbers suffered. The final 11 games he averaged 80 yards a game or about 1300 yards for the season. Last year almost 1600 yards. He should be able to stretch the field more with Keyshawn working the underneath stuff, so I can't see his YPC dipping under 15.5. Also can't see his catches under 90, 100 last year and 88 in 2003 with a lame duck Delhomme for the first 5 games. That would put him at 1400 yards. Smith was never a big redzone target anyways so Keyshawn taking that role does little to effect his TD number. Key's never been much of a TD scorer in his own right anyways. Last 2 years the Panthers #1 WR has scored 16 and 13 TDs respectively. The #2 has gotten 5 and 4 TDs in those same years. Key's had 6 TDs in each of the past 2 years and hasn't had more than that in 6 years. So even if you take a couple additional TDs away from the #1 and give them to Keyshawn, making the #2 receiver a 6-7 TD scorer, you're still looking at 10-14 TDs for the #1 receiver. 90 catches 1400 yards and 11-12 TDs seems like a conservative estimate to me, given what's happened in the past and the belief that having Keyshawn on board will result in a few more pass attempts by Delhomme.Some good posts made assesing this situation allready.
I think Steve Smith hit a peak last year that will not be repeated by him again. Amazing considering he was just coming off an injury which might indicate he will be better another year removed from it. However I don't think so.
I expect his numbers to be an average of what he did 2003 and 2005. So 95 catches 1330 yards 9.5 TDs if MeShawn does not cut into them.MeShawn will be a good second option for Delhomme that was missing last year. However he is not as fast as Mushin and cannot streach the field the way Mushin did.+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Rushing | Receiving |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| 2001 car | 15 | 4 43 10.8 0 | 10 154 15.4 0 |
| 2002 car | 15 | 1 -4 -4.0 0 | 54 872 16.1 3 |
| 2003 car | 16 | 11 42 3.8 0 | 88 1110 12.6 7 |
| 2004 car | 1 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 6 60 10.0 0 |
| 2005 car | 16 | 4 25 6.2 1 | 103 1563 15.2 12 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 63 | 20 106 5.3 1 | 261 3759 14.4 22 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
He is however a reliable enough reciever that I could see him catching more than the 50 or so receptions that WR 2 has been getting in this offense with Delhomme. WR 3 is good for about 25 catches.
Total average rushing attempts have been 470 over the past 4 years even with Rb injuries. If the Panthers do not add a significant Rb to compliment Foster then there may be more passing attempts than we have seen from this offense but I still would not expect a large change from thier low in 2004 which was still 422 rusing attempts the most going to Nick Goings:
As has been pointed out MeShawn Johnson has not caught less than 70 balls in his career except when benched in Tampa for his behavior.I don't see the Panthers offense offering him the same opportunities as he has had in previous offenses though and so I would expect a compromise which will garner MeShawn Johnson 60 catches in this offense (and perhps a lot of complaints by him as pointed out by unlucky).+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Brandon Bennett | 8 | 6 17 2.8 1 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| Stephen Davis | 2 | 24 92 3.8 0 | 2 32 16.0 0 |
| DeShaun Foster | 4 | 59 255 4.3 2 | 9 76 8.4 0 |
| Nick Goings | 16 | 217 821 3.8 6 | 45 394 8.8 1 |
| Joey Harris | 4 | 15 53 3.5 0 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| Brad Hoover | 14 | 68 246 3.6 0 | 21 161 7.7 2 |
| Jamal Robertson | 5 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| Rod Smart | 3 | 3 4 1.3 0 | 1 5 5.0 0 |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
That is 10 more catches than the WR 2 has been getting in this offense with Delhomme so this may be 10 less for Steve Smith.
2006 Steve Smith 85 catches 1207 yards (using his career average) 8 TD (im taking one away because of MeShawns ability in the red zone.)
I hope everyone is listening to this guy...DREW CARTER has NO VALUE.Drew Carter has like 9 career catches. How can you say he's better? Based on one catch vs Seattle in a playoffs game?
Colbert had a solid Rookie season and then fell off last year.
Anyone beside S.Smith has little value in this passing game. Delhomme has tunnel vision. Now with Keyshawn there too, Colbert value drops to late/deep sleeper and Drew Carter has no value at all.
Hate to beat a dead horse so I'll bow out of this thread now, but only 3 of Smith's 13 TDs were short yardage, ie 10 yards or less. Most were longer than 20 yards. They didn't look to him much near the endzone anyways, that's not his game. And again Keyshawn hasn't scored more than 6 Tds in 6 years, he's not a big TD scorer, that's been the knock on him for awhile. Proehl had 4 last year and Colbert 5 the year before. I'm not seeing much difference as far as TD stealing.In my opinion if Keyshawn takes some of the red zone looks away from Smith then you have to downgrade Smith.
Slow? The guy is the fastest player on our ####### team dude. I'll give you that he doesn't have good hands, but he can improve that. Not sure what being horrible in practice has to do with anything, when he got into the games he was getting open alot.Drew Carter's production last season if estimated over a 16 games schedule would've given him over 600 yards and 5 TDs on the season. He's going to be the #3 receiver next season, mark my words.He's slow, has no hands, and was horrible in practice last year. Add up the variables and the only conclusion is...
How do you figure that? He likely won't have the season he did last year but with Keyshawn on the other side he's at least going to have less coverage all over him. He should have a 1300 yard 8-10 TD type season.Smith will be drafted as a top 3 WR but will only perform like a top 12 WR.
Yeah, He's a shoo-in for 80-1200-10. His value only went up with Keyshawn coming to town.I hope everyone is listening to this guy...DREW CARTER has NO VALUE.Drew Carter has like 9 career catches. How can you say he's better? Based on one catch vs Seattle in a playoffs game?
Colbert had a solid Rookie season and then fell off last year.
Anyone beside S.Smith has little value in this passing game. Delhomme has tunnel vision. Now with Keyshawn there too, Colbert value drops to late/deep sleeper and Drew Carter has no value at all.
DREW CARTER has NO VALUE.
DREW CARTER has NO VALUE.
Are you guys in my leagues paying attention?
Just in case you missed it...
DREW CARTER has NO VALUE.
He's slow, has no hands, and was horrible in practice last year. Add up the variables and the only conclusion is...
DREW CARTER has NO VALUE.
Slow? The guy is the fastest player on our ####### team dude. I'll give you that he doesn't have good hands, but he can improve that. Not sure what being horrible in practice has to do with anything, when he got into the games he was getting open alot.Drew Carter's production last season if estimated over a 16 games schedule would've given him over 600 yards and 5 TDs on the season. He's going to be the #3 receiver next season, mark my words.He's slow, has no hands, and was horrible in practice last year. Add up the variables and the only conclusion is...
Well I always look more on the low end when projecting a baseline. From there I factor the players potential for upside/downside and end up with a variable expectation. Your average YPC is higher than Smith has ever posted. He could reach or exceed this but I don't see any reason to expect that he will. I used his career average of 14.4 YPC. With the high number of catches expected I don't see any reason to expect an increase in YPC honestly.That would signal a downtick in the Panthers passing efficiency with Keyshawn on board, so I think your numbers are very low. They didn't let Delhomme throw the ball for the first 5 games of 2003 and Smith's numbers suffered. The final 11 games he averaged 80 yards a game or about 1300 yards for the season. Last year almost 1600 yards. He should be able to stretch the field more with Keyshawn working the underneath stuff, so I can't see his YPC dipping under 15.5. Also can't see his catches under 90, 100 last year and 88 in 2003 with a lame duck Delhomme for the first 5 games. That would put him at 1400 yards. Smith was never a big redzone target anyways so Keyshawn taking that role does little to effect his TD number. Key's never been much of a TD scorer in his own right anyways. Last 2 years the Panthers #1 WR has scored 16 and 13 TDs respectively. The #2 has gotten 5 and 4 TDs in those same years. Key's had 6 TDs in each of the past 2 years and hasn't had more than that in 6 years. So even if you take a couple additional TDs away from the #1 and give them to Keyshawn, making the #2 receiver a 6-7 TD scorer, you're still looking at 10-14 TDs for the #1 receiver. 90 catches 1400 yards and 11-12 TDs seems like a conservative estimate to me, given what's happened in the past and the belief that having Keyshawn on board will result in a few more pass attempts by Delhomme.Some good posts made assesing this situation allready.
I think Steve Smith hit a peak last year that will not be repeated by him again. Amazing considering he was just coming off an injury which might indicate he will be better another year removed from it. However I don't think so.
I expect his numbers to be an average of what he did 2003 and 2005. So 95 catches 1330 yards 9.5 TDs if MeShawn does not cut into them.MeShawn will be a good second option for Delhomme that was missing last year. However he is not as fast as Mushin and cannot streach the field the way Mushin did.+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Rushing | Receiving |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| 2001 car | 15 | 4 43 10.8 0 | 10 154 15.4 0 |
| 2002 car | 15 | 1 -4 -4.0 0 | 54 872 16.1 3 |
| 2003 car | 16 | 11 42 3.8 0 | 88 1110 12.6 7 |
| 2004 car | 1 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 6 60 10.0 0 |
| 2005 car | 16 | 4 25 6.2 1 | 103 1563 15.2 12 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 63 | 20 106 5.3 1 | 261 3759 14.4 22 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
He is however a reliable enough reciever that I could see him catching more than the 50 or so receptions that WR 2 has been getting in this offense with Delhomme. WR 3 is good for about 25 catches.
Total average rushing attempts have been 470 over the past 4 years even with Rb injuries. If the Panthers do not add a significant Rb to compliment Foster then there may be more passing attempts than we have seen from this offense but I still would not expect a large change from thier low in 2004 which was still 422 rusing attempts the most going to Nick Goings:
As has been pointed out MeShawn Johnson has not caught less than 70 balls in his career except when benched in Tampa for his behavior.I don't see the Panthers offense offering him the same opportunities as he has had in previous offenses though and so I would expect a compromise which will garner MeShawn Johnson 60 catches in this offense (and perhps a lot of complaints by him as pointed out by unlucky).+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Brandon Bennett | 8 | 6 17 2.8 1 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| Stephen Davis | 2 | 24 92 3.8 0 | 2 32 16.0 0 |
| DeShaun Foster | 4 | 59 255 4.3 2 | 9 76 8.4 0 |
| Nick Goings | 16 | 217 821 3.8 6 | 45 394 8.8 1 |
| Joey Harris | 4 | 15 53 3.5 0 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| Brad Hoover | 14 | 68 246 3.6 0 | 21 161 7.7 2 |
| Jamal Robertson | 5 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| Rod Smart | 3 | 3 4 1.3 0 | 1 5 5.0 0 |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
That is 10 more catches than the WR 2 has been getting in this offense with Delhomme so this may be 10 less for Steve Smith.
2006 Steve Smith 85 catches 1207 yards (using his career average) 8 TD (im taking one away because of MeShawns ability in the red zone.)
Replace Moose with Keyshawn and I think this could come very close to what we'll see from Smith/Johnson in 2006. I think Smith will top 90 receptions (90-95) and reach double-digit TDs but the breakdown is pretty close to where I would project them.As stated earlier, most of Smith's TDs came on big plays so adding Keyshawn in the Red Zone won't affect Smith there. And given how many of Smith's TDs came on big plays it stands to reason those plays will remain in the playbook and won't be affected by Keyshawn's arrival. For example, the quick hitch route the Panthers love to throw to Smith where Delhomme takes a step back fires out to Smith who then is given the ability to use his athletic ability to make a big play. And he makes a lot of them on that route alone.2003:
Steve Smith - 88 receptions 1105 yards 7 TDs
Moose - 54 receptions 837 yards 3 TDs
I think Steve Smith's TD's go downI don't think he'll put up the same numbers he did last year. Hard to duplicate a completely dominating performance like that.
But I do think having a competent reciever opposite from him will loosen up the coverage on him a bit. Key gets the dink and dunk chain movers, Smith still gets the big plays.His numbers will go down, but not because of Keyshaun. Just the law of averages.
I think his statements were tongue in cheek.Slow? The guy is the fastest player on our ####### team dude. I'll give you that he doesn't have good hands, but he can improve that. Not sure what being horrible in practice has to do with anything, when he got into the games he was getting open alot.Drew Carter's production last season if estimated over a 16 games schedule would've given him over 600 yards and 5 TDs on the season. He's going to be the #3 receiver next season, mark my words.He's slow, has no hands, and was horrible in practice last year. Add up the variables and the only conclusion is...
he's been an iffy red zone target throughout his careerI think they just signed him for their run game that Fox loves so much. All the catches are gravyKeyshawn is going to be used in the red zone, and therefore you almost have to downgrade Smith a little.
This post has been edited by toxicbees: Today, 08:53 AM
very![]()
Just because there is no general formula for how a WR2 affects a WR1, that doesn't mean that there isn't a correlation. It just means that you have to look at each case individually and decide whether you think the WR2 will help, hurt, or make no difference.Past statistical research attempts by various people have always led to the conclusion that a WR2's stats have no relationship to the stats of WR1.Really, since when? Everything I've seen shows that a competent WR at the #2 spot helps, not hurts, the #1 receiver. Most of the top receivers have atleast a decent WR on the other side.