What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Kiper's Mock Draft (1 Viewer)

wadegarrett

FFA Legend™
Mel Kiper's first round

1. Detroit: QB Matthew Stafford, Georgia

2. St. Louis: OT Andre Smith, Alabama

3. Kansas City: QB Mark Sanchez, USC

4. Seattle: WR Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech

5. Cleveland: LB Aaron Curry, Wake Forest

6. Cincinnati: OT Jason Smith, Baylor

7. Oakland: WR Jeremy Maclin, Missouri

8. Jacksonville: OT Eugene Monroe, Virginia

9. Green Bay: CB Malcolm Jenkins, Ohio State

10. San Francisco: DE/OLB Aaron Maybin, Penn State

11. Buffalo: TE Brandon Pettigrew, Oklahoma State

12. Denver: DT B.J. Raji, Boston College

13. Washington: DE Brian Orakpo, Texas

14. New Orleans: CB Vontae Davis, Illinois

15. Houston: DE Everette Brown, Florida State

16. San Diego: RB Knowshon Moreno, Georgia

17. N.Y. Jets: WR Percy Harvin, Florida

18. Chicago: DE Tyson Jackson, LSU

19. Tampa Bay: QB Josh Freeman, Kansas State

20. Detroit: LB Rey Maualuga, USC

21. Philadelphia: RB Chris "Beanie" Wells, Ohio State

22. Minnesota: WR Hakeem Nicks, North Carolina

23. New England: LB Brian Cushing, USC

24. Atlanta: DE/OLB Larry English, Northern Illinois

25. Miami: WR Darrius Heyward-Bey, Maryland

26. Baltimore: CB D.J. Moore, Vanderbilt

27. Indianapolis: DT Peria Jerry, Mississippi

28. Philadelphia: OT Michael Oher, Mississippi

29. N.Y. Giants: LB James Laurinaitis, Ohio State

30. Tennessee: DE Michael Johnson, Georgia Tech

31. Arizona: RB LeSean McCoy, Pittsburgh

32. Pittsburgh: C Alex Mack, California
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They have been showing it on the bottom of ESPN today, some others I saw

Bears - Tyson Jackson

Bucs - Josh Freeman

Eagles - Beanie Wells

Dolphins - Heyward Bey

 
I'd love for the 'Skins to get Raji at 1.13, but I'm just not thinking that's going to happen given the buzz he seems to be generating even this early.

 
I'd love for the 'Skins to get Raji at 1.13, but I'm just not thinking that's going to happen given the buzz he seems to be generating even this early.
I have Raji going to the Skins in my mock: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...p;#entry9839147That was 2 whole days ago and unfortunately I'd likely move him up in the next version with his Sr. day performances.
He's tailor made for the 49ers.
Likely where he'll go in my next mock along with Jason Smith going to the Jaguars (since I totally left him out).
 
If it goes down this way give Philly the best draft hands down getting Beanie and Oher.
As a Philly fan, I’d love those picks. Does anybody think Oher will fall that far? I though he would be mid first round at the latest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kiper has 5 WR's in the first round! :rolleyes:

4. Seattle: WR Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech 7. Oakland: WR Jeremy Maclin, Missouri 17. N.Y. Jets: WR Percy Harvin, Florida 22. Minnesota: WR Hakeem Nicks, North Carolina 25. Miami: WR Darrius Heyward-Bey, Maryland
Some interesting picks and teams. A mix of some decent immediate opportunity but with enormous questionmarks at QB.
 
1. Detroit: QB Matthew Stafford, Georgia

2. St. Louis: OT Andre Smith, Alabama

3. Kansas City: QB Mark Sanchez, USC

4. Seattle: WR Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech

5. Cleveland: LB Aaron Curry, Wake Forest

6. Cincinnati: OT Jason Smith, Baylor

7. Oakland: WR Jeremy Maclin, Missouri

8. Jacksonville: OT Eugene Monroe, Virginia

9. Green Bay: CB Malcolm Jenkins, Ohio State

10. San Francisco: DE/OLB Aaron Maybin, Penn State

11. Buffalo: TE Brandon Pettigrew, Oklahoma State

12. Denver: DT B.J. Raji, Boston College

13. Washington: DE Brian Orakpo, Texas

14. New Orleans: CB Vontae Davis, Illinois

15. Houston: DE Everette Brown, Florida State

16. San Diego: RB Knowshon Moreno, Georgia

17. N.Y. Jets: WR Percy Harvin, Florida

18. Chicago: DE Tyson Jackson, LSU

19. Tampa Bay: QB Josh Freeman, Kansas State

20. Detroit: LB Rey Maualuga, USC

21. Philadelphia: RB Chris "Beanie" Wells, Ohio State

22. Minnesota: WR Hakeem Nicks, North Carolina

23. New England: LB Brian Cushing, USC

24. Atlanta: DE/OLB Larry English, Northern Illinois

25. Miami: WR Darrius Heyward-Bey, Maryland

26. Baltimore: CB D.J. Moore, Vanderbilt

27. Indianapolis: DT Peria Jerry, Mississippi

28. Philadelphia: OT Michael Oher, Mississippi

29. N.Y. Giants: LB James Laurinaitis, Ohio State

30. Tennessee: DE Michael Johnson, Georgia Tech

31. Arizona: RB LeSean McCoy, Pittsburgh

32. Pittsburgh: C Alex Mack, California

Link

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chachi said:
Ramblin Wreck said:
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Tim Brown?
Bingo. That was in 1988, 20 years ago. I'm not sure why everyone thinks the Raiders draft speed WRs in round 1.
What myth? Everyone knows they draft kickers in the first round. :headbang:
 
Shouldn't Minny address their QB issues before wasting a draft pick on the wide receiver position. I venture a guess if they had a decent QB; Berrian, Rice and Wade/ Allison would be pretty decent. Not to mention, "Vishee Swa" however you say his name at TE

 
Chachi said:
Ramblin Wreck said:
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Tim Brown?
Bingo. That was in 1988, 20 years ago. I'm not sure why everyone thinks the Raiders draft speed WRs in round 1.
Maybe not speed WR's, but they do like to draft speed anythings early. Al Davis loves speed. See: Fabian Washington.
 
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Not trying to pick on you, but I hate it when someone uses the excuse "because team A never drafts position B in round C".The only correlation any team's previous drafts have to the current draft is what players from those previous draft are still on their roster.I can see it now.Raiders on the clock...Scout 1: "Who do we have #1 on our on baord?"Scout 2: "Jeremy Maclin."Scout 1: "Let's take him, he the BPA and we really have a need at WR".Scout 2: "Sorry, can't do it; remember our draft history? We never take speed WRs in the first round."Scout 1: "Whaaaat! He's the best player out there at a position we need!"Scout 2: "Sorry, dems the rules."If you want to argue that Maclin doesn't fit their style of offense, or WRs not their greatest need, or there are better players on the board at that point, be my guest. However, it's silly to say a team won't take a certain position based on past draft history.
 
Chachi said:
Ramblin Wreck said:
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Tim Brown?
Bingo. That was in 1988, 20 years ago. I'm not sure why everyone thinks the Raiders draft speed WRs in round 1.
Maybe not speed WR's, but they do like to draft speed anythings early. Al Davis loves speed. See: Fabian Washington.
It appears Johnny Lee Higgins has the potential to develope into the deep threat that Al covets.
 
Raji doesn't get past Green Bay as they convert to a 3-4.
According to Kirwan, Raji and Peria Jerry will be great DT's for teams running a 4-3, not a 3-4. I was under the impression that Raji was tailor made for a 3-4 NT. :confused: Kirwan's Senior Bowl Notes
A 3-4 NT tends to be not just big but huge, and trades some quickness and athleticism for raw strength. He's not there to get upfield, he's there to hold his ground against C-G double teams and clog the middle. Raji's undersized for that, and his game is quickness and penetration, which is best used as either a 4-3 up-tackle or maybe a 3-4 DE.

 
Raji doesn't get past Green Bay as they convert to a 3-4.
According to Kirwan, Raji and Peria Jerry will be great DT's for teams running a 4-3, not a 3-4. I was under the impression that Raji was tailor made for a 3-4 NT. :confused: Kirwan's Senior Bowl Notes
A 3-4 NT tends to be not just big but huge, and trades some quickness and athleticism for raw strength. He's not there to get upfield, he's there to hold his ground against C-G double teams and clog the middle. Raji's undersized for that, and his game is quickness and penetration, which is best used as either a 4-3 up-tackle or maybe a 3-4 DE.
teeheehee
 
Raji doesn't get past Green Bay as they convert to a 3-4.
According to Kirwan, Raji and Peria Jerry will be great DT's for teams running a 4-3, not a 3-4. I was under the impression that Raji was tailor made for a 3-4 NT. :confused: Kirwan's Senior Bowl Notes
A 3-4 NT tends to be not just big but huge, and trades some quickness and athleticism for raw strength. He's not there to get upfield, he's there to hold his ground against C-G double teams and clog the middle. Raji's undersized for that, and his game is quickness and penetration, which is best used as either a 4-3 up-tackle or maybe a 3-4 DE.
I've been involved in this discussion already in another thread. I was under the same impression as you that a 3-4 NT was just a massive dude who took up blockers freeing up the LB's. I was to that was incorrect......that the best 3-4 NT's are not only huge, but also create a push and get upfield disrupting the backfield or the pocket.
 
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Not trying to pick on you, but I hate it when someone uses the excuse "because team A never drafts position B in round C".The only correlation any team's previous drafts have to the current draft is what players from those previous draft are still on their roster.I can see it now.Raiders on the clock...Scout 1: "Who do we have #1 on our on baord?"Scout 2: "Jeremy Maclin."Scout 1: "Let's take him, he the BPA and we really have a need at WR".Scout 2: "Sorry, can't do it; remember our draft history? We never take speed WRs in the first round."Scout 1: "Whaaaat! He's the best player out there at a position we need!"Scout 2: "Sorry, dems the rules."If you want to argue that Maclin doesn't fit their style of offense, or WRs not their greatest need, or there are better players on the board at that point, be my guest. However, it's silly to say a team won't take a certain position based on past draft history.
In most cases I would agree, but when it comes to the Raiders it's very relevant. Al Davis has been running that program for decades. If Al doesn't believe in drafting WR's high, there's a pretty good chance they won't draft a WR high.
 
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Not trying to pick on you, but I hate it when someone uses the excuse "because team A never drafts position B in round C".The only correlation any team's previous drafts have to the current draft is what players from those previous draft are still on their roster.I can see it now.Raiders on the clock...Scout 1: "Who do we have #1 on our on baord?"Scout 2: "Jeremy Maclin."Scout 1: "Let's take him, he the BPA and we really have a need at WR".Scout 2: "Sorry, can't do it; remember our draft history? We never take speed WRs in the first round."Scout 1: "Whaaaat! He's the best player out there at a position we need!"Scout 2: "Sorry, dems the rules."If you want to argue that Maclin doesn't fit their style of offense, or WRs not their greatest need, or there are better players on the board at that point, be my guest. However, it's silly to say a team won't take a certain position based on past draft history.
You are missing the boat on my point. I am not saying the Raiders WONT draft Maclin. I am refuting the myth that the Raiders always draft speedy WRs in Round 1. Could the Raiders take Maclin? Yes. Could they take a fast CB? Yes. Could they take a speedy DE? Yes. Could they take Percy Harvin? Yes.I think the Raiders will likely take either an OL or somebody who has Speed at some other position such as CB, DE or WR. You make it sound like I am making a Raider rule for drafting, this is 100% opposite of what I am doing, honestly how you twisted this with your scout 1/ scout 2 corny skit is beyond me.As for the Raiders I don't think they take Maclin, I have them taking Malcolm Jenkins, CB mainly because I think he's the better prospect and CB/WR are equal needs for the Raiders. I don't have Maclin going top 15.
 
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Not trying to pick on you, but I hate it when someone uses the excuse "because team A never drafts position B in round C".The only correlation any team's previous drafts have to the current draft is what players from those previous draft are still on their roster.

I can see it now.

Raiders on the clock...

Scout 1: "Who do we have #1 on our on baord?"

Scout 2: "Jeremy Maclin."

Scout 1: "Let's take him, he the BPA and we really have a need at WR".

Scout 2: "Sorry, can't do it; remember our draft history? We never take speed WRs in the first round."

Scout 1: "Whaaaat! He's the best player out there at a position we need!"

Scout 2: "Sorry, dems the rules."

If you want to argue that Maclin doesn't fit their style of offense, or WRs not their greatest need, or there are better players on the board at that point, be my guest. However, it's silly to say a team won't take a certain position based on past draft history.
You are missing the boat on my point. I am not saying the Raiders WONT draft Maclin. I am refuting the myth that the Raiders always draft speedy WRs in Round 1. Could the Raiders take Maclin? Yes. Could they take a fast CB? Yes. Could they take a speedy DE? Yes. Could they take Percy Harvin? Yes.I think the Raiders will likely take either an OL or somebody who has Speed at some other position such as CB, DE or WR.

You make it sound like I am making a Raider rule for drafting, this is 100% opposite of what I am doing, honestly how you twisted this with your scout 1/ scout 2 corny skit is beyond me.

As for the Raiders I don't think they take Maclin, I have them taking Malcolm Jenkins, CB mainly because I think he's the better prospect and CB/WR are equal needs for the Raiders. I don't have Maclin going top 15.
But Jenkins probably won't time very well in the 40. :lmao:
 
Raji doesn't get past Green Bay as they convert to a 3-4.
According to Kirwan, Raji and Peria Jerry will be great DT's for teams running a 4-3, not a 3-4. I was under the impression that Raji was tailor made for a 3-4 NT. :confused: Kirwan's Senior Bowl Notes
A 3-4 NT tends to be not just big but huge, and trades some quickness and athleticism for raw strength. He's not there to get upfield, he's there to hold his ground against C-G double teams and clog the middle. Raji's undersized for that, and his game is quickness and penetration, which is best used as either a 4-3 up-tackle or maybe a 3-4 DE.
I've been involved in this discussion already in another thread. I was under the same impression as you that a 3-4 NT was just a massive dude who took up blockers freeing up the LB's. I was to that was incorrect......that the best 3-4 NT's are not only huge, but also create a push and get upfield disrupting the backfield or the pocket.
Obviously if they can do both, that's excellent. The thing is, 3-4 NT's wear down very quickly and lose that quickness, much more so than if they were playing in a 4-3 as an up tackle. Raji, now that I've checked his measurables, is larger than I thought he was, so maybe he could be a 3-4 NT, but I think his talents would be wasted in that role.
 
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Not trying to pick on you, but I hate it when someone uses the excuse "because team A never drafts position B in round C".The only correlation any team's previous drafts have to the current draft is what players from those previous draft are still on their roster.

I can see it now.

Raiders on the clock...

Scout 1: "Who do we have #1 on our on baord?"

Scout 2: "Jeremy Maclin."

Scout 1: "Let's take him, he the BPA and we really have a need at WR".

Scout 2: "Sorry, can't do it; remember our draft history? We never take speed WRs in the first round."

Scout 1: "Whaaaat! He's the best player out there at a position we need!"

Scout 2: "Sorry, dems the rules."

If you want to argue that Maclin doesn't fit their style of offense, or WRs not their greatest need, or there are better players on the board at that point, be my guest. However, it's silly to say a team won't take a certain position based on past draft history.
You are missing the boat on my point. I am not saying the Raiders WONT draft Maclin. I am refuting the myth that the Raiders always draft speedy WRs in Round 1. Could the Raiders take Maclin? Yes. Could they take a fast CB? Yes. Could they take a speedy DE? Yes. Could they take Percy Harvin? Yes.I think the Raiders will likely take either an OL or somebody who has Speed at some other position such as CB, DE or WR.

You make it sound like I am making a Raider rule for drafting, this is 100% opposite of what I am doing, honestly how you twisted this with your scout 1/ scout 2 corny skit is beyond me.

As for the Raiders I don't think they take Maclin, I have them taking Malcolm Jenkins, CB mainly because I think he's the better prospect and CB/WR are equal needs for the Raiders. I don't have Maclin going top 15.
Good job, I didn't realize there was that myth. Thanks for bringing it to our attention and refuting it. But, just reading this thread, you brought up their previous drafts.

 
Raji doesn't get past Green Bay as they convert to a 3-4.
According to Kirwan, Raji and Peria Jerry will be great DT's for teams running a 4-3, not a 3-4. I was under the impression that Raji was tailor made for a 3-4 NT. :thumbdown: Kirwan's Senior Bowl Notes
A 3-4 NT tends to be not just big but huge, and trades some quickness and athleticism for raw strength. He's not there to get upfield, he's there to hold his ground against C-G double teams and clog the middle. Raji's undersized for that, and his game is quickness and penetration, which is best used as either a 4-3 up-tackle or maybe a 3-4 DE.
I've been involved in this discussion already in another thread. I was under the same impression as you that a 3-4 NT was just a massive dude who took up blockers freeing up the LB's. I was to that was incorrect......that the best 3-4 NT's are not only huge, but also create a push and get upfield disrupting the backfield or the pocket.
Obviously if they can do both, that's excellent. The thing is, 3-4 NT's wear down very quickly and lose that quickness, much more so than if they were playing in a 4-3 as an up tackle. Raji, now that I've checked his measurables, is larger than I thought he was, so maybe he could be a 3-4 NT, but I think his talents would be wasted in that role.
It depends on the 3-4 scheme thats played. In a "Parcells" 3-4, or a 2-gap system, a big lug who can drop to 1 knee and eat up at least 2 blockers is the proto-type NT. Think Tony Siragusa for this role. Ted Washington.

In contrast, right now, Wade Phillips is running a 1-gap 3-4. Its the NT's job to penetrate through 1 gap. He's not normally trying to tie up blockers. Jay Ratliff, all 295 pounds of him, is a darn good NT in this scheme. He penetrates rather effectively (witness his 8 sacks this year). It should be noted that Wade has had the big lugs in the past at NT (Jamal Williams and Ted Washington). Wade will alter his scheme to fit the players.

But the bottom line is that the type of 3-4 scheme will impact whether a guy has the physical makeup for the NT role. There are 2-gap schemes that are best run with a sumo at NT. And there are 1-gap schemes that do better with quicker, penetrating guys.

 
Shouldn't Minny address their QB issues before wasting a draft pick on the wide receiver position. I venture a guess if they had a decent QB; Berrian, Rice and Wade/ Allison would be pretty decent. Not to mention, "Vishee Swa" however you say his name at TE
Should they do that by reaching for a QB in the first that doesn't have first round talent?
 
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Not trying to pick on you, but I hate it when someone uses the excuse "because team A never drafts position B in round C".The only correlation any team's previous drafts have to the current draft is what players from those previous draft are still on their roster.I can see it now.Raiders on the clock...Scout 1: "Who do we have #1 on our on baord?"Scout 2: "Jeremy Maclin."Scout 1: "Let's take him, he the BPA and we really have a need at WR".Scout 2: "Sorry, can't do it; remember our draft history? We never take speed WRs in the first round."Scout 1: "Whaaaat! He's the best player out there at a position we need!"Scout 2: "Sorry, dems the rules."If you want to argue that Maclin doesn't fit their style of offense, or WRs not their greatest need, or there are better players on the board at that point, be my guest. However, it's silly to say a team won't take a certain position based on past draft history.
You are missing the boat on my point. I am not saying the Raiders WONT draft Maclin. I am refuting the myth that the Raiders always draft speedy WRs in Round 1. Could the Raiders take Maclin? Yes. Could they take a fast CB? Yes. Could they take a speedy DE? Yes. Could they take Percy Harvin? Yes.I think the Raiders will likely take either an OL or somebody who has Speed at some other position such as CB, DE or WR. You make it sound like I am making a Raider rule for drafting, this is 100% opposite of what I am doing, honestly how you twisted this with your scout 1/ scout 2 corny skit is beyond me.As for the Raiders I don't think they take Maclin, I have them taking Malcolm Jenkins, CB mainly because I think he's the better prospect and CB/WR are equal needs for the Raiders. I don't have Maclin going top 15.
You're the one starting with the myth. I only said it wouldn't be surprising if they drafted Maclin that high since a) they have a need at WR, b) AD loves the speedy 'workout warriors' and c), they don't exactly shy away from taking a player higher than their perceived draft stock if they really like him.
 
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Not trying to pick on you, but I hate it when someone uses the excuse "because team A never drafts position B in round C".The only correlation any team's previous drafts have to the current draft is what players from those previous draft are still on their roster.

I can see it now.

Raiders on the clock...

Scout 1: "Who do we have #1 on our on baord?"

Scout 2: "Jeremy Maclin."

Scout 1: "Let's take him, he the BPA and we really have a need at WR".

Scout 2: "Sorry, can't do it; remember our draft history? We never take speed WRs in the first round."

Scout 1: "Whaaaat! He's the best player out there at a position we need!"

Scout 2: "Sorry, dems the rules."

If you want to argue that Maclin doesn't fit their style of offense, or WRs not their greatest need, or there are better players on the board at that point, be my guest. However, it's silly to say a team won't take a certain position based on past draft history.
You are missing the boat on my point. I am not saying the Raiders WONT draft Maclin. I am refuting the myth that the Raiders always draft speedy WRs in Round 1. Could the Raiders take Maclin? Yes. Could they take a fast CB? Yes. Could they take a speedy DE? Yes. Could they take Percy Harvin? Yes.I think the Raiders will likely take either an OL or somebody who has Speed at some other position such as CB, DE or WR.

You make it sound like I am making a Raider rule for drafting, this is 100% opposite of what I am doing, honestly how you twisted this with your scout 1/ scout 2 corny skit is beyond me.

As for the Raiders I don't think they take Maclin, I have them taking Malcolm Jenkins, CB mainly because I think he's the better prospect and CB/WR are equal needs for the Raiders. I don't have Maclin going top 15.
You're the one starting with the myth. I only said it wouldn't be surprising if they drafted Maclin that high since a) they have a need at WR, b) AD loves the speedy 'workout warriors' and c), they don't exactly shy away from taking a player higher than their perceived draft stock if they really like him.
I don't think so.My comments weren't really direct at you in particular. It is a myth that I have seen played out over at Walters, Draft Countdown, Footballs Future, FFToday & Fantasy Sharks to just start the list. If you think I'm just making this up, go right ahead, no skin off my backside.
 
Chachi said:
Maclin to Oak would not be surprising at all.
When is the last time the Raiders drafted a WR in round 1?I know the answer, I'm just trying to dispell a myth.
Not trying to pick on you, but I hate it when someone uses the excuse "because team A never drafts position B in round C".The only correlation any team's previous drafts have to the current draft is what players from those previous draft are still on their roster.

I can see it now.

Raiders on the clock...

Scout 1: "Who do we have #1 on our on baord?"

Scout 2: "Jeremy Maclin."

Scout 1: "Let's take him, he the BPA and we really have a need at WR".

Scout 2: "Sorry, can't do it; remember our draft history? We never take speed WRs in the first round."

Scout 1: "Whaaaat! He's the best player out there at a position we need!"

Scout 2: "Sorry, dems the rules."

If you want to argue that Maclin doesn't fit their style of offense, or WRs not their greatest need, or there are better players on the board at that point, be my guest. However, it's silly to say a team won't take a certain position based on past draft history.
You are missing the boat on my point. I am not saying the Raiders WONT draft Maclin. I am refuting the myth that the Raiders always draft speedy WRs in Round 1. Could the Raiders take Maclin? Yes. Could they take a fast CB? Yes. Could they take a speedy DE? Yes. Could they take Percy Harvin? Yes.I think the Raiders will likely take either an OL or somebody who has Speed at some other position such as CB, DE or WR.

You make it sound like I am making a Raider rule for drafting, this is 100% opposite of what I am doing, honestly how you twisted this with your scout 1/ scout 2 corny skit is beyond me.

As for the Raiders I don't think they take Maclin, I have them taking Malcolm Jenkins, CB mainly because I think he's the better prospect and CB/WR are equal needs for the Raiders. I don't have Maclin going top 15.
You're the one starting with the myth. I only said it wouldn't be surprising if they drafted Maclin that high since a) they have a need at WR, b) AD loves the speedy 'workout warriors' and c), they don't exactly shy away from taking a player higher than their perceived draft stock if they really like him.
I don't think so.My comments weren't really direct at you in particular. It is a myth that I have seen played out over at Walters, Draft Countdown, Footballs Future, FFToday & Fantasy Sharks to just start the list. If you think I'm just making this up, go right ahead, no skin off my backside.
I think you brought it up here that there's a myth that they always draft speedy WRs in round 1, no?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top