Tony Reali
Footballguy
Well I just traded him and my 1.11 pick for the 1.6 pick in a keeper league where I wouldn't have kept him anyway, so I hope he does badly
Great analysis here...thanks for your comment'Tony Reali said:Well I just traded him and my 1.11 pick for the 1.6 pick in a keeper league where I wouldn't have kept him anyway, so I hope he does badly
You're doing it wrong, n00b.'Tony Reali said:Well I just traded him and my 1.11 pick for the 1.6 pick in a keeper league where I wouldn't have kept him anyway, so I hope he does badly
No problem. Thinking of taking Mel Kiper's jobGreat analysis here...thanks for your comment'Tony Reali said:Well I just traded him and my 1.11 pick for the 1.6 pick in a keeper league where I wouldn't have kept him anyway, so I hope he does badly![]()
You're new, but FYI - wishing bad on players doesn't go over well. If you have info or insight, feel free to post like crazy. If you just jump in to tell us about your team or wish ill on players - go post it on twitter or your facebook page. TIA.FWIW, I think the only reason McGahee is getting the camp love is because he is the new toy (and he's new to they team/system - he NEEDS work to get familiar.) I would guess Moreno will get about 65-75% of the carries and most of the receptions, with McGahee brought in for a breather and occasional goal line/short yardage. I see a split similar to what you'll see in Chicago with Forte/MBIII. Situation is almost identical (although Forte's production has been a little better). In bothe cases you have a young guy, drafted by the team, who has been starting for the past couple years. The team has brought in an older vet with a little more size to take the pounding in short yardage situations and spell him occasionally. I see no reason McGahee is all of the sudden going to start getting 15 carries...or anywhere close. In an "average game" I see Moreno getting 16-20 carries and 4-6 catches, with Mcgahee toting the rock about 6-10 times. I don't see a big jump to Moreno's value (McGahee vulturing TDs will leech that) - but I don't see a big drop off either. Moreno will be a decent RB2, with weeks having borderline RB1 numbers (when he get's in the endzone). Obviously health is a concern - but for both. If either goes down, obviously the value of the other jumps.Well I just traded him and my 1.11 pick for the 1.6 pick in a keeper league where I wouldn't have kept him anyway, so I hope he does badly
I think there's a big difference in situations.Forte is a proven commodity in all facets of the game, with Barber brought in only for depth (and to replace the ineffective Chester Taylor). Plus, the coaching staff is intact, so they already know and like what they have in Forte.I see a split similar to what you'll see in Chicago with Forte/MBIII. Situation is almost identical (although Forte's production has been a little better). In bothe cases you have a young guy, drafted by the team, who has been starting for the past couple years. The team has brought in an older vet with a little more size to take the pounding in short yardage situations and spell him occasionally. I see no reason McGahee is all of the sudden going to start getting 15 carries...or anywhere close.
The problem with the bolded part is that the Broncos have a new coaching staff/system. So Moreno is JUST as new to them as McGahee. If anything, the fact that they inherited Moreno and went out and signed Willis means that Moreno NEEDS just as much work here.I have never been a Moreno fan dating back to his days at GA. Yes, he was productive there but I just didnt see the explosiveness, suddeness, or other factors needed for him to be anything more than an average NFL RB. He could prove me wrong and put up decent numbers when he was healthy last season but I still just don't see it.FWIW, I think the only reason McGahee is getting the camp love is because he is the new toy (and he's new to they team/system - he NEEDS work to get familiar.) I would guess Moreno will get about 65-75% of the carries and most of the receptions, with McGahee brought in for a breather and occasional goal line/short yardage.
I see a split similar to what you'll see in Chicago with Forte/MBIII. Situation is almost identical (although Forte's production has been a little better). In bothe cases you have a young guy, drafted by the team, who has been starting for the past couple years. The team has brought in an older vet with a little more size to take the pounding in short yardage situations and spell him occasionally. I see no reason McGahee is all of the sudden going to start getting 15 carries...or anywhere close.
In an "average game" I see Moreno getting 16-20 carries and 4-6 catches, with Mcgahee toting the rock about 6-10 times. I don't see a big jump to Moreno's value (McGahee vulturing TDs will leech that) - but I don't see a big drop off either. Moreno will be a decent RB2, with weeks having borderline RB1 numbers (when he get's in the endzone).
Obviously health is a concern - but for both. If either goes down, obviously the value of the other jumps.
While I had this same thought since his drafting Adam Schefter was on ESPN today and he said the GM in Denver said after the NFL draft when they took Moreno that he had never seen a rb that talented since Emmitt Smith.Despite his 1st round pedigree, one key thing to remember about Moreno is a holdover from the McDaniel regime. Fox has shown that he's not overly confident in Moreno, to the point of looking at Deangelo and still getting a proven guy he liked in McGahee.
While Fox likes to rotate backs, it seems like it will take a McGahee injury or significant underperformance by Willis to give Moreno the lion's share of carries.
So you think he will have 288 carries & 80 receptions over the season? I think most Moreno owners would be thrilled with 200 carries & 40 receptions.In an "average game" I see Moreno getting 16-20 carries and 4-6 catches, with Mcgahee toting the rock about 6-10 times. I don't see a big jump to Moreno's value (McGahee vulturing TDs will leech that) - but I don't see a big drop off either. Moreno will be a decent RB2, with weeks having borderline RB1 numbers (when he get's in the endzone).
Obviously health is a concern - but for both. If either goes down, obviously the value of the other jumps.
First off, given the fact that I gave a range, 256 carries would be within said range (not necessarily 288). Also, given the fact that he averaged only 14 carries a game last year (which would pencil out to 224 in a season) - I don't think the average Moreno owner would be "thrilled" with a measily 200 carries - especially since he carried 247 times his rookie season. The fact that the coaching staff did not bring a legitimate threat to his playing time (and brought in McGahee fairly late in the process), I think it is fairly conservative to predict 10 more rushes than his rookie season - especially given the health qualifier I laid out in the final sentence.Also, I think the current coaching regime will run the ball more than McDaniels did (Denver was in the bottom 5 in rushing attempts last year). If you presume, as I do, that Moreno is the primary back, those extra 2-3 rushes per game will more than likely be by him. I think 240-270 carries is well within reason. So yes, my average game range still stands - even if you want conservatively put him nearer to the bottom of the range.So you think he will have 288 carries & 80 receptions over the season? I think most Moreno owners would be thrilled with 200 carries & 40 receptions.In an "average game" I see Moreno getting 16-20 carries and 4-6 catches, with Mcgahee toting the rock about 6-10 times. I don't see a big jump to Moreno's value (McGahee vulturing TDs will leech that) - but I don't see a big drop off either. Moreno will be a decent RB2, with weeks having borderline RB1 numbers (when he get's in the endzone).
Obviously health is a concern - but for both. If either goes down, obviously the value of the other jumps.
Are you sure that's what Schefter said. I can see if a GM said they believed Moreno "reminded" them of Emmitt but for anyone paid to evaluate football players to say that coming out of college they believe Moreno was more "talented" than Marshall Faulk, Ricky Williams, Ladanian Tomlinson, Adrian Peterson, Ronnie Brown, Cadillac Williams, Reggie Bush, McFadden, or any number of other RBs is just plain outrageous.While I had this same thought since his drafting Adam Schefter was on ESPN today and he said the GM in Denver said after the NFL draft when they took Moreno that he had never seen a rb that talented since Emmitt Smith.Despite his 1st round pedigree, one key thing to remember about Moreno is a holdover from the McDaniel regime. Fox has shown that he's not overly confident in Moreno, to the point of looking at Deangelo and still getting a proven guy he liked in McGahee.
While Fox likes to rotate backs, it seems like it will take a McGahee injury or significant underperformance by Willis to give Moreno the lion's share of carries.
I believe Schefter on this due to his good ties in Denver.
That is exactly what he said. I rewinded it myself and listened to it twice. Word for word'VaTerp said:Are you sure that's what Schefter said. I can see if a GM said they believed Moreno "reminded" them of Emmitt but for anyone paid to evaluate football players to say that coming out of college they believe Moreno was more "talented" than Marshall Faulk, Ricky Williams, Ladanian Tomlinson, Adrian Peterson, Ronnie Brown, Cadillac Williams, Reggie Bush, McFadden, or any number of other RBs is just plain outrageous.'Blackjacks said:While I had this same thought since his drafting Adam Schefter was on ESPN today and he said the GM in Denver said after the NFL draft when they took Moreno that he had never seen a rb that talented since Emmitt Smith.'zamboni said:Despite his 1st round pedigree, one key thing to remember about Moreno is a holdover from the McDaniel regime. Fox has shown that he's not overly confident in Moreno, to the point of looking at Deangelo and still getting a proven guy he liked in McGahee.
While Fox likes to rotate backs, it seems like it will take a McGahee injury or significant underperformance by Willis to give Moreno the lion's share of carries.
I believe Schefter on this due to his good ties in Denver.
I'm not sure this is a new system. The offensive coordinator is a holdover from the past staff. Maybe somebody like Cecil can chime in here.'VaTerp said:The problem with the bolded part is that the Broncos have a new coaching staff/system. So Moreno is JUST as new to them as McGahee. If anything, the fact that they inherited Moreno and went out and signed Willis means that Moreno NEEDS just as much work here.I have never been a Moreno fan dating back to his days at GA. Yes, he was productive there but I just didnt see the explosiveness, suddeness, or other factors needed for him to be anything more than an average NFL RB. He could prove me wrong and put up decent numbers when he was healthy last season but I still just don't see it.'DoubleG said:FWIW, I think the only reason McGahee is getting the camp love is because he is the new toy (and he's new to they team/system - he NEEDS work to get familiar.) I would guess Moreno will get about 65-75% of the carries and most of the receptions, with McGahee brought in for a breather and occasional goal line/short yardage.
I see a split similar to what you'll see in Chicago with Forte/MBIII. Situation is almost identical (although Forte's production has been a little better). In bothe cases you have a young guy, drafted by the team, who has been starting for the past couple years. The team has brought in an older vet with a little more size to take the pounding in short yardage situations and spell him occasionally. I see no reason McGahee is all of the sudden going to start getting 15 carries...or anywhere close.
In an "average game" I see Moreno getting 16-20 carries and 4-6 catches, with Mcgahee toting the rock about 6-10 times. I don't see a big jump to Moreno's value (McGahee vulturing TDs will leech that) - but I don't see a big drop off either. Moreno will be a decent RB2, with weeks having borderline RB1 numbers (when he get's in the endzone).
Obviously health is a concern - but for both. If either goes down, obviously the value of the other jumps.
I am not the biggest McGahee fan either but am slowly warming up to the idea that he can put up a decent season in Denver this year. If you look at a 31 year old Buckhalter's production in 2009 he clearly outperformed Moreno in terms of ypc. Moreno is no longer a rookie and again the system and coaching are different but I could see it playing out similarly for Willis in Denver this year.
I likely won't have either on my teams this year but at this point I think McGahee provides the MUCH better value and has an outside shot to equal or outperform Moreno straight up IMO.
You're right. The offensive coordinator was retained from last year and apparently worked with Fox before. I also found the quote from Schefter that a NFL GM told him Moreno was the best back he'd seen coming out of college since Emmitt. I still find that amazing.Regardless, I'm just not a Moreno believer. Time will tell and I certainly could be wrong but I see a very very average back both NFL and FF wise.I'm not sure this is a new system. The offensive coordinator is a holdover from the past staff. Maybe somebody like Cecil can chime in here.'VaTerp said:The problem with the bolded part is that the Broncos have a new coaching staff/system. So Moreno is JUST as new to them as McGahee. If anything, the fact that they inherited Moreno and went out and signed Willis means that Moreno NEEDS just as much work here.I have never been a Moreno fan dating back to his days at GA. Yes, he was productive there but I just didnt see the explosiveness, suddeness, or other factors needed for him to be anything more than an average NFL RB. He could prove me wrong and put up decent numbers when he was healthy last season but I still just don't see it.'DoubleG said:FWIW, I think the only reason McGahee is getting the camp love is because he is the new toy (and he's new to they team/system - he NEEDS work to get familiar.) I would guess Moreno will get about 65-75% of the carries and most of the receptions, with McGahee brought in for a breather and occasional goal line/short yardage.
I see a split similar to what you'll see in Chicago with Forte/MBIII. Situation is almost identical (although Forte's production has been a little better). In bothe cases you have a young guy, drafted by the team, who has been starting for the past couple years. The team has brought in an older vet with a little more size to take the pounding in short yardage situations and spell him occasionally. I see no reason McGahee is all of the sudden going to start getting 15 carries...or anywhere close.
In an "average game" I see Moreno getting 16-20 carries and 4-6 catches, with Mcgahee toting the rock about 6-10 times. I don't see a big jump to Moreno's value (McGahee vulturing TDs will leech that) - but I don't see a big drop off either. Moreno will be a decent RB2, with weeks having borderline RB1 numbers (when he get's in the endzone).
Obviously health is a concern - but for both. If either goes down, obviously the value of the other jumps.
I am not the biggest McGahee fan either but am slowly warming up to the idea that he can put up a decent season in Denver this year. If you look at a 31 year old Buckhalter's production in 2009 he clearly outperformed Moreno in terms of ypc. Moreno is no longer a rookie and again the system and coaching are different but I could see it playing out similarly for Willis in Denver this year.
I likely won't have either on my teams this year but at this point I think McGahee provides the MUCH better value and has an outside shot to equal or outperform Moreno straight up IMO.
Maybe they like Jeremiah Johnson?This seems like a situation where the team spoke loudly to us with what they did, or more clearly what they didn't do. They went after DeAngelo hard, telling us they like DeAngelo more then Knowshon. They didn't go after Bradshaw, Snelling, Benson, or McClain. Further, they didn't pay for restricted guys like Tolbert, Bush, or the Law Firm. They didn't draft anyone. I'll take all of that as a vote of confidence from the franchise. They spoke clearly with their money that they felt Knowshon was going to be enough with a complimentary back. (Mcgahee). If they thought Knowshon wasn't going to be able to do it they would have pushed harder for one of the guys above to go with McGahee. Now, number of carries will be up in the air, but McGahee hasn't been "amazing" for his career. He's talented, but a 4.0 yards per rush 29 year old who hasn't had more then 170 carries in the last 3 seasons that Baltimore let go. Do we really think they would have let him go if he was just about to be reborn as a top RB? To me, its clear. McGahee is worth about 100 to 150 carries, and this is a make or break year for Knowshon. The only way he doesn't get 240+ carries is if he can't do it. I think the Panthers organization is telling us they believe he can. I'll take their word for it.
It's certainly reasonable that they had or have a lot of confidence in someone else on the roster. Considering Moreno seems to get first team carries over JJ I would lean that way. This could be off base, and I know Cecil isn't a fan, but in general it seems the best advice is to not only watch the players, but watch what the team does. Seems to me the Broncos actions speak volumes.Maybe they like Jeremiah Johnson?This seems like a situation where the team spoke loudly to us with what they did, or more clearly what they didn't do. They went after DeAngelo hard, telling us they like DeAngelo more then Knowshon. They didn't go after Bradshaw, Snelling, Benson, or McClain. Further, they didn't pay for restricted guys like Tolbert, Bush, or the Law Firm. They didn't draft anyone. I'll take all of that as a vote of confidence from the franchise. They spoke clearly with their money that they felt Knowshon was going to be enough with a complimentary back. (Mcgahee). If they thought Knowshon wasn't going to be able to do it they would have pushed harder for one of the guys above to go with McGahee. Now, number of carries will be up in the air, but McGahee hasn't been "amazing" for his career. He's talented, but a 4.0 yards per rush 29 year old who hasn't had more then 170 carries in the last 3 seasons that Baltimore let go. Do we really think they would have let him go if he was just about to be reborn as a top RB? To me, its clear. McGahee is worth about 100 to 150 carries, and this is a make or break year for Knowshon. The only way he doesn't get 240+ carries is if he can't do it. I think the Panthers organization is telling us they believe he can. I'll take their word for it.
What are the odds that someone else is the starter before the season is over and it's not because of injury?It's certainly reasonable that they had or have a lot of confidence in someone else on the roster. Considering Moreno seems to get first team carries over JJ I would lean that way. This could be off base, and I know Cecil isn't a fan, but in general it seems the best advice is to not only watch the players, but watch what the team does. Seems to me the Broncos actions speak volumes.Maybe they like Jeremiah Johnson?This seems like a situation where the team spoke loudly to us with what they did, or more clearly what they didn't do. They went after DeAngelo hard, telling us they like DeAngelo more then Knowshon. They didn't go after Bradshaw, Snelling, Benson, or McClain. Further, they didn't pay for restricted guys like Tolbert, Bush, or the Law Firm. They didn't draft anyone. I'll take all of that as a vote of confidence from the franchise. They spoke clearly with their money that they felt Knowshon was going to be enough with a complimentary back. (Mcgahee). If they thought Knowshon wasn't going to be able to do it they would have pushed harder for one of the guys above to go with McGahee. Now, number of carries will be up in the air, but McGahee hasn't been "amazing" for his career. He's talented, but a 4.0 yards per rush 29 year old who hasn't had more then 170 carries in the last 3 seasons that Baltimore let go. Do we really think they would have let him go if he was just about to be reborn as a top RB? To me, its clear. McGahee is worth about 100 to 150 carries, and this is a make or break year for Knowshon. The only way he doesn't get 240+ carries is if he can't do it. I think the Panthers organization is telling us they believe he can. I'll take their word for it.
Restricted players rarely leave their teams. The Broncos would have had to give up a 1st and 3rd for Bush, that clearly isn't going to happen. Otherwise all the RBs had major ?s about them. Bradshaw has had multiple foot and ankle surgeries, Benson legal issues and McClain is probably ~ in running talent as McGahee. Further next year is currently slated to be one of the best FA RB classes ever. All we learned is Moreno will get a shot, but how much of one is still a ?This seems like a situation where the team spoke loudly to us with what they did, or more clearly what they didn't do. They went after DeAngelo hard, telling us they like DeAngelo more then Knowshon. They didn't go after Bradshaw, Snelling, Benson, or McClain. Further, they didn't pay for restricted guys like Tolbert, Bush, or the Law Firm. They didn't draft anyone. I'll take all of that as a vote of confidence from the franchise. They spoke clearly with their money that they felt Knowshon was going to be enough with a complimentary back. (Mcgahee). If they thought Knowshon wasn't going to be able to do it they would have pushed harder for one of the guys above to go with McGahee. Now, number of carries will be up in the air, but McGahee hasn't been "amazing" for his career. He's talented, but a 4.0 yards per rush 29 year old who hasn't had more then 170 carries in the last 3 seasons that Baltimore let go. Do we really think they would have let him go if he was just about to be reborn as a top RB? To me, its clear. McGahee is worth about 100 to 150 carries, and this is a make or break year for Knowshon. The only way he doesn't get 240+ carries is if he can't do it. I think the Panthers organization is telling us they believe he can. I'll take their word for it.
This seems like a situation where the team spoke loudly to us with what they did, or more clearly what they didn't do. They went after DeAngelo hard, telling us they like DeAngelo more then Knowshon. They didn't go after Bradshaw, Snelling, Benson, or McClain. Further, they didn't pay for restricted guys like Tolbert, Bush, or the Law Firm. They didn't draft anyone. I'll take all of that as a vote of confidence from the franchise. They spoke clearly with their money that they felt Knowshon was going to be enough with a complimentary back. (Mcgahee). If they thought Knowshon wasn't going to be able to do it they would have pushed harder for one of the guys above to go with McGahee. Now, number of carries will be up in the air, but McGahee hasn't been "amazing" for his career. He's talented, but a 4.0 yards per rush 29 year old who hasn't had more then 170 carries in the last 3 seasons that Baltimore let go. Do we really think they would have let him go if he was just about to be reborn as a top RB? To me, its clear. McGahee is worth about 100 to 150 carries, and this is a make or break year for Knowshon. The only way he doesn't get 240+ carries is if he can't do it. I think the Panthers organization is telling us they believe he can. I'll take their word for it.
he certainly has put in a lot of work but we also have to take a lot of this with a grain of salt.You have to realize what they are looking at.If you have been to the first days of training camps, you know that a lot of these times, these are segments and are not even in pads and making contact, etc. Its not like every day he is watching a full scrimmage. lots of guys look one way in helmets and t-shirts and another on the field.And, I don't know how it is in Denver, but I can remember being at camps with a few other teams and thinking guys I KNEW were great looking ho hum. Michael Turner always looked better than LT in camp. That wasn't a sign of their relative talent level I don't think. I think it was more like, either LT knew he didn't have to make a statement in camp or the coaches might have even said "don't be silly out there in PRACTICE". On the other hand, when you are the new guy to the team or the non-starter, you are trying to impress teammates and coaches. You probably do have a bigger sense of urgency. And in Moreno's case, he knows that he has come out the first two years in camp trying to play like a dynamo and he's tweaked hammys and such. So maybe he has learned when and where to put in that extra gear. Honestly, I'm not there to make my own eyeball take on it, but I can certainly see it being plausible that there's more to it than just what one person reports as being good or not. Jeremiah Johnson is a perfect example. The last two years, all you ever heard about from people reporting in was how GREAT JJ looked in camp...yet he has been released multiple times...by Fox once. So, to me its a grain of salt and you can get great insight from hard working people like Cecil but you can't just assume that the person sending in the tweet is the decision maker also.Cecil has been there every day and has done tremendous work in scouting out the RB situation - I wouldn't overlook his positive views on McGahee and lukewarm assessment of Moreno.
When it comes to Denver RB's I really trust Cecil. He was right on a few years ago about Mike Anderson which gave a bunch of us a huge advantage over persons not following the situation. Fox said before the season that the RB position was the number 1 priority. I take that as a lack of faith in Moreno. I think Fox will go by what he sees on the field as he has no dog in the fight with Moreno. He didn't draft him. That was the old regime.he certainly has put in a lot of work but we also have to take a lot of this with a grain of salt.You have to realize what they are looking at.If you have been to the first days of training camps, you know that a lot of these times, these are segments and are not even in pads and making contact, etc. Its not like every day he is watching a full scrimmage. lots of guys look one way in helmets and t-shirts and another on the field.And, I don't know how it is in Denver, but I can remember being at camps with a few other teams and thinking guys I KNEW were great looking ho hum. Michael Turner always looked better than LT in camp. That wasn't a sign of their relative talent level I don't think. I think it was more like, either LT knew he didn't have to make a statement in camp or the coaches might have even said "don't be silly out there in PRACTICE". On the other hand, when you are the new guy to the team or the non-starter, you are trying to impress teammates and coaches. You probably do have a bigger sense of urgency. And in Moreno's case, he knows that he has come out the first two years in camp trying to play like a dynamo and he's tweaked hammys and such. So maybe he has learned when and where to put in that extra gear. Honestly, I'm not there to make my own eyeball take on it, but I can certainly see it being plausible that there's more to it than just what one person reports as being good or not. Jeremiah Johnson is a perfect example. The last two years, all you ever heard about from people reporting in was how GREAT JJ looked in camp...yet he has been released multiple times...by Fox once. So, to me its a grain of salt and you can get great insight from hard working people like Cecil but you can't just assume that the person sending in the tweet is the decision maker also.Cecil has been there every day and has done tremendous work in scouting out the RB situation - I wouldn't overlook his positive views on McGahee and lukewarm assessment of Moreno.
With all due respect to Cecil's opinion (and this not at all aimed at refuting him), I made the same assessment of Mike Anderson those years ago and added him to my teams too and I never set foot in Denver that year and read little on the Internet about it. And I can definitely see a defensive-minded coach who has a history of running the ball a lot saying "RB is the priority" but that is NOT the same as saying "I don't like what I have". Every coach in the league will say it takes more than 1 back these days when they interview but you see what happens when the bullets fly for real; teams use players to various degrees". And in this particular case, because of the lockout, Fox had never had a chance to train with Moreno before he said that so it certainly wasn't a statement based on assessment. It was, just a general statement that all coaches say. YOu could ask Leslie Fraizer and he would say "We have to have a great running game." That doesn't mean they are pushing Peterson out the door anytime soon.Again, I'm not trying to deminish the value of lots of information that Cecil and many people like him pipe in to us. I'm just saying that the opinion of one may not match the actions and viewpoints of the organization. These things are not in a vacuum. Even when Denver was saying they wanted to trade Orton, we quickly saw through their actions that many other factors played into that and, in the end, was not how it went.When it comes to Denver RB's I really trust Cecil. He was right on a few years ago about Mike Anderson which gave a bunch of us a huge advantage over persons not following the situation. Fox said before the season that the RB position was the number 1 priority. I take that as a lack of faith in Moreno. I think Fox will go by what he sees on the field as he has no dog in the fight with Moreno. He didn't draft him. That was the old regime.he certainly has put in a lot of work but we also have to take a lot of this with a grain of salt.You have to realize what they are looking at.If you have been to the first days of training camps, you know that a lot of these times, these are segments and are not even in pads and making contact, etc. Its not like every day he is watching a full scrimmage. lots of guys look one way in helmets and t-shirts and another on the field.And, I don't know how it is in Denver, but I can remember being at camps with a few other teams and thinking guys I KNEW were great looking ho hum. Michael Turner always looked better than LT in camp. That wasn't a sign of their relative talent level I don't think. I think it was more like, either LT knew he didn't have to make a statement in camp or the coaches might have even said "don't be silly out there in PRACTICE". On the other hand, when you are the new guy to the team or the non-starter, you are trying to impress teammates and coaches. You probably do have a bigger sense of urgency. And in Moreno's case, he knows that he has come out the first two years in camp trying to play like a dynamo and he's tweaked hammys and such. So maybe he has learned when and where to put in that extra gear. Honestly, I'm not there to make my own eyeball take on it, but I can certainly see it being plausible that there's more to it than just what one person reports as being good or not. Jeremiah Johnson is a perfect example. The last two years, all you ever heard about from people reporting in was how GREAT JJ looked in camp...yet he has been released multiple times...by Fox once. So, to me its a grain of salt and you can get great insight from hard working people like Cecil but you can't just assume that the person sending in the tweet is the decision maker also.Cecil has been there every day and has done tremendous work in scouting out the RB situation - I wouldn't overlook his positive views on McGahee and lukewarm assessment of Moreno.