What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

LaGarrette Blount (1 Viewer)

Premier said:
]Package him for a Roddy White and Chris Johnson type? Blount would be a throw in, in such a trade with relatively no value. We would basically be talking about a Adrian Peterson+Blount for Chris Johnson type trade, lol. Basically, Blount's value is no where near high enough to make any difference in such a trade. I have Blount in all my leagues as well, and regardless of your offensive line, it would be wise to use Blount in a "package deal" for the likes of CJ or Roddy, but that's just not going to happen. And if it did happen there would be talk of collusion.
I disagree with this. Depends on what type of league you play in maybe. But in my 16 team dynasty I could easily see Blount being the important part piece in a deal. Sure owners will be skeptical and they might want to see him do it again. The guy just went off for 120 yards and 2 TDs and all signs point to him being the starting RB of an NFL team. Watching him run, it certainly doesn't seem like he will be a fluke. At least not based on what he can do on the field. TB has no option but to run this guy at this point. Let's be honest; did he look like he can't be very productive on a regular basis? Was there some aspect of his game that signifies he will be on the WW in 3 weeks in most leagues? Not in my opinion. Which basically means you are deal with at least RB 2 value. You offer a good enough player along with Blount to a team that really needs 2 RB's and I think the other owner would definitely have to give it some thought. It might only take a little something more to make the deal work. Right now he is a huge bargaining chip, especially in larger leagues and keeper leagues. And Roddy White should be a lot easier to aquire than Chris Johnson. I think you give Blount and a low end WR2 or high WR3 after this week and you very well could get White.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not sure what to expect from him going forward but every time I watch him he looks like a man running with very bad intentions.

 
And let's also remember that Blount is averaging TWICE AS MANY yards per carry as the team's starting RB.
That's really not that uncommon when we're cherry-picking games. Pick a good 3rd down back, any one and that's been the case.3rd and 1 with eight in the box is what it is.

The D expecting run on first is what it is.

Some carries are simply harder to gain big yardage on than others.

Ironically, you could look at Blount's average in Tennessee this summer.

Apparently the NFL has an oops and they're not on the site anymore

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?sea...mp;d-447263-n=1

Suffice to say that being put in for some hardnosed tough carries didn't help his average yards per carry.

I'm not saying Blount is a third down back. I am merely pointing out how cherry-picking games isn't useful and that the situation a RB is put in (like facing a weak D) has a lot to do with it.

 
I am not sure what to expect from him going forward but every time I watch him he looks like a man running with very bad intentions.
Kinda reminds me of Brandon Jacobs back in the day. I hope his future is brighter than Jacobs' however. I think Blount may be playing with a chip on his shoulder because of the suspension/lower draft spot/lesser contract. I will be interested to see how he does at the end of his rookie contract/beginning of next contract..
 
And let's also remember that Blount is averaging TWICE AS MANY yards per carry as the team's starting RB.
That's really not that uncommon when we're cherry-picking games. Pick a good 3rd down back, any one and that's been the case.3rd and 1 with eight in the box is what it is.The D expecting run on first is what it is.Some carries are simply harder to gain big yardage on than others.
Maybe, but Blount isn't a 3rd down back. And he actually has more total rushing yards than Williams, not just a higher YPC.How many 3rd down backs have more rushing yards than the starting RB? (In 3 fewer games, no less!)
 
And let's also remember that Blount is averaging TWICE AS MANY yards per carry as the team's starting RB.
That's really not that uncommon when we're cherry-picking games. Pick a good 3rd down back, any one and that's been the case.3rd and 1 with eight in the box is what it is.The D expecting run on first is what it is.Some carries are simply harder to gain big yardage on than others.
Maybe, but Blount isn't a 3rd down back. And he actually has more total rushing yards than Williams, not just a higher YPC.How many 3rd down backs have more rushing yards than the starting RB? (In 3 fewer games, no less!)
Blount has played in 3 games and looked pretty good for a ROOKIE , how are we "cherry picking" anything here? It's not like he bombed last year, or for the first half of the season. I see a good, young, talented RB on a good young offense. Nothing to not like here. Will he be a flat out top 5 stud? Most likely not, but you don't need a top 5 stud at RB to win, you need consistency across the board. If Blount can get in there and consistently put up 70 yards and a TD ...he's money in the bank, especially if you drafted him (4th? 5th round rookie pick?)or pickup him up off the FA wire in a dynasty.
 
Kinda funny hearing some of the pessimists in this place nit-pick Blount.

This season an RB averaging a PPR stat line of 15-75 1TD / 2-25 rec. will get him near the top 10 of all RBs. Guy doesn't need to leap defenders for 30+ every game to be useful. He has a nice schedule ahead, he has GL, he can catch, his team uses him, he's killed his competition (Cadillac) in production. That's a lot more than many starting FF running backs can say. There's a lot going for him, even if he only gets 10-20 touches a game. Okay, maybe he won't start in your dinky 8-10 team leagues, but who cares ...He's still in some free agent pools! Can make a great flex, RB2 or RB1 if you're desperate. So give it a rest, we're not debating a top 5 draft picks.

Go pick him up! And if you haven't ... :lol:

 
So you agree with the main point of my post (that expecting Blount to propel your team to a championship is too much) and my approximate quantitative expectations ("RB2 numbers"/"low-RB2 numbers") and yet I'm being too pessimistic? I don't get it.The factors I brought up all matter; how much they matter depends in part on your league scoring (PPR vs. standard) and format (dynasty vs. redraft.) I'm not sure how even mentioning the C-word is pessimism; character issues influence fantasy performance all the time. Question: Does Tampa Bay's 10th place ranking in ypc (4.2) count Josh Freeman's 7.0 per carry? From my back-of-the napkin numbers, it appears that it does.
You can reach an accurate conclusion via bad analysis. That's what (it seems, IMO) like you did.Blount has been the more effective RB than Caddy this year, and to suggest that Caddy will get carries because he is a "respected veteran," is bad analysis.To suggest that Blount's character is a negative is bad analysis; he hasn't had a single issue since he joined the Bucs.You ask "Does Tampa Bay's 10th place ranking in ypc count Josh Freeman's 7.0 per carry?" I'm going to guess that it does, because those are the official NFL rankings, so I'd imagine they include all the rushes for TB runners. However, if you want to break down the stats, you should break them down equally. I would think that Williams' 84 carries for a 2.5 YPC average negatively impacts TBs team YPC more so than Freeman's 25 carries positively impacts it, wouldn't you?
 
Kinda funny hearing some of the pessimists in this place nit-pick Blount.

This season an RB averaging a PPR stat line of 15-75 1TD / 2-25 rec. will get him near the top 10 of all RBs. Guy doesn't need to leap defenders for 30+ every game to be useful. He has a nice schedule ahead, he has GL, he can catch, his team uses him, he's killed his competition (Cadillac) in production. That's a lot more than many starting FF running backs can say. There's a lot going for him, even if he only gets 10-20 touches a game. Okay, maybe he won't start in your dinky 8-10 team leagues, but who cares ...He's still in some free agent pools! Can make a great flex, RB2 or RB1 if you're desperate. So give it a rest, we're not debating a top 5 draft picks.

Go pick him up! And if you haven't ... :thumbup:
check this out from before this weekends game....this is why he will continue to get the rock for the forseeable future.....LeGarrette Blount's physical style of running energizes Tampa Bay Buccaneers

By Rick Stroud, Times Staff Writer

In Print: Thursday, October 28, 2010

Tampabay.com link

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bucs rookie running back LeGarrette Blount tries to elude the grasp of Rams linebacker Bryan Kehl during the second half on Sunday, when he rushed for 66 of his 72 yards.

TAMPA — The impact of LeGarrette Blount's bowl-you-over, punishing running style can't be calculated only by yards rushed. The true measurement is how teammates respond to the way the 6-foot, 247-pound tailback strews tacklers across the field like broken beads of a necklace.

In his first extended playing time of the season, Blount did more than rush 11 times for 72 yards (66 in the second half) against the Rams on Sunday. He lifted the offensive line, which has struggled to run block, and ignited defensive players on the sideline. It's the kind of physical runner the Bucs say they have been missing since Mike Alstott last played in 2006.

"You can feel the excitement on the field, the offensive line, everybody on the sideline jumping around," Blount said. "It's just exciting when you break off a big run after you've broken a tackle or two. When you get back to the sideline, those guys just tell you, 'Keep running hard. Keep running downhill. They're scared to tackle you.' That just inspires me to run even harder the next time I get the ball."

Guard Davin Joseph said the steady diet of eight and nine defenders close to the line of scrimmage has contributed to the ineffectiveness of starter Cadillac Williams, who has averaged 2.5 yards per carry.

Prior to Blount's appearance in the second half against the Rams, Tampa Bay's offense was looking for a spark. By getting on the edges, where he can truck over defensive backs who are 75 pounds lighter, Blount set the tone for an offense that rallied from a 17-3 deficit to win 18-17.

"It lifts the offensive line, the tight ends, the quarterback. Everybody gets up for that type of stuff," Joseph said. "With football being football, you love to see the physical play added to our offense, and we are loving it right now. We're definitely going to be able to benefit from that in the long run. Being able to get him on one guy and knowing that he can make him miss … we're going to gain some yardage on it.

"We try to do that every week, and now we're getting to do some more downhill stuff with him in the game. And it's really going to diversify our offense."

For all the elaborate schemes and chess matches between coordinators, football still is one opponent trying to force its will on another through physical brutality.

That's why Alstott's 12-year career in Tampa Bay is so celebrated. His career average was 3.7 yards, yet he ran with such power and leverage that other backs benefited from the carnage he inflicted on the way to 5,088 yards and 58 touchdowns.

"We were kind of in a lull last week, and I really think we won because of LeGarrette and the way he came out and ran the ball," Bucs fullback Earnest Graham said. "You really kind of force your will. It's kind of a show of force. Everybody starts to play and want to make plays, and that's what he brought to the table last week."

Beginning Sunday at Arizona, Blount should offer more demonstrations as he splits carries with Williams. Claimed off waivers from the Titans at the start of the season, the former Oregon star said he is familiar with only about 40 percent of the Bucs offense, which is why Williams has been used more in the passing game.

Coach Raheem Morris knows what a big back such as Blount can do to demoralize a defense.

"It's like a slam dunk in a basketball game," Morris said. "It just brings a little momentum. It creates a little more drive. It keeps the defense on the sideline while you run the ball on them and take a little life out of them. When you can do that, it's big time.

"It certainly changes the people tackling him; how they tackle, when they want to tackle them. It wears down a team. It does some really positive things for your team. We've been on the other end of that sometimes."

Rick Stroud can be reached at stroud@sptimes.com.

 
So you agree with the main point of my post (that expecting Blount to propel your team to a championship is too much) and my approximate quantitative expectations ("RB2 numbers"/"low-RB2 numbers") and yet I'm being too pessimistic? I don't get it.

The factors I brought up all matter; how much they matter depends in part on your league scoring (PPR vs. standard) and format (dynasty vs. redraft.) I'm not sure how even mentioning the C-word is pessimism; character issues influence fantasy performance all the time.

Question: Does Tampa Bay's 10th place ranking in ypc (4.2) count Josh Freeman's 7.0 per carry? From my back-of-the napkin numbers, it appears that it does.
You can reach an accurate conclusion via bad analysis. That's what (it seems, IMO) like you did.Blount has been the more effective RB than Caddy this year, and to suggest that Caddy will get carries because he is a "respected veteran," is bad analysis.

To suggest that Blount's character is a negative is bad analysis; he hasn't had a single issue since he joined the Bucs.

You ask "Does Tampa Bay's 10th place ranking in ypc count Josh Freeman's 7.0 per carry?" I'm going to guess that it does, because those are the official NFL rankings, so I'd imagine they include all the rushes for TB runners.

However, if you want to break down the stats, you should break them down equally. I would think that Williams' 84 carries for a 2.5 YPC average negatively impacts TBs team YPC more so than Freeman's 25 carries positively impacts it, wouldn't you?
I wasn't suggesting that Freeman's rushes should be removed because they are outliers, I was pointing out that they are much less relevant because he plays a completely different position. When assessing the strength of a team's rushing offense as a factor affecting a RBs potential production, it makes a heck of a lot more sense to seek out data on carries by other Tampa Bay running backs than Tampa Bay quarterbacks. Is it possible that the existing TB running back data is less useful because Blount is ten times better than Caddy/Graham/Huggins? Sure, it's possible.I'm not sure how an absence of any incidents in the less than sixty days Blount has been with the Buccaneers proves your argument that "To suggest that Blount's character is a negative is bad analysis." Character matters- usually very little, sometimes a lot.

I'm done with this thread, however. I like the guy, I hope he succeeds, and I will lead the parade in his honour if he does indeed propel us all to championships.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Air Stich said:
Premier said:
Faine (allegedly) comes back next week, which moves Zuttah back to his natural center position.

Trueblood sucks and may have lost his job to Lee, so they may be back to full strength next week.
Faine is the starting center. Zuttah has been playing center and will move back to guard when (if) Faine comes back healthy. The problem is, Zuttah has been playing a lot better at C then he was at guard. Make no mistake, TBs offensive line is not a pro when evaluating Blount. The one good thing I'll say about the line is that Caddy has proven to be completely ineffective rushing behind it. Blount is the only chance TB has to establish the run.I'm not trying to rain on Blount's parade. I have him in every league I play and I believe in his talent. His value is WAY up now and I don't think it's a mistake to trade him if you can get a top RB or WR. There's no way I'd take 2 lesser players for him, but if you can package him for a Roddy White or Chris Johnson type, I'd make it happen.
Package him for a Roddy White and Chris Johnson type? Blount would be a throw in, in such a trade with relatively no value. We would basically be talking about a Adrian Peterson+Blount for Chris Johnson type trade, lol. Basically, Blount's value is no where near high enough to make any difference in such a trade. I have Blount in all my leagues as well, and regardless of your offensive line, it would be wise to use Blount in a "package deal" for the likes of CJ or Roddy, but that's just not going to happen. And if it did happen there would be talk of collusion.
All players have value in a trade. I hear people say this at times that the guy is just a "throw in," but those guys have value. You may be planning on dumping him the minute the trade is done, but in that case the "throw in" player is helping you upgrade a position and create a roster spot to get a guy off waivers that you want.In this case, however, Blount in no way qualifies as a throw in player. He has a legitimate shot to put up decent numbers on a regular basis. Will he be Chris Johnson, Arian Foster or Adrian Peterson? I think not, but I think he will finish as a top 25 RB and that gives him value in my world.

 
Banger said:
LeGarrette Blount's physical style of running energizes Tampa Bay Buccaneers

By Rick Stroud, Times Staff Writer

In Print: Thursday, October 28, 2010

Tampabay.com link

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bucs rookie running back LeGarrette Blount tries to elude the grasp of Rams linebacker Bryan Kehl during the second half on Sunday, when he rushed for 66 of his 72 yards.

TAMPA — The impact of LeGarrette Blount's bowl-you-over, punishing running style can't be calculated only by yards rushed. The true measurement is how teammates respond to the way the 6-foot, 247-pound tailback strews tacklers across the field like broken beads of a necklace.

In his first extended playing time of the season, Blount did more than rush 11 times for 72 yards (66 in the second half) against the Rams on Sunday. He lifted the offensive line, which has struggled to run block, and ignited defensive players on the sideline. It's the kind of physical runner the Bucs say they have been missing since Mike Alstott last played in 2006.

"You can feel the excitement on the field, the offensive line, everybody on the sideline jumping around," Blount said. "It's just exciting when you break off a big run after you've broken a tackle or two. When you get back to the sideline, those guys just tell you, 'Keep running hard. Keep running downhill. They're scared to tackle you.' That just inspires me to run even harder the next time I get the ball."

Guard Davin Joseph said the steady diet of eight and nine defenders close to the line of scrimmage has contributed to the ineffectiveness of starter Cadillac Williams, who has averaged 2.5 yards per carry.

Prior to Blount's appearance in the second half against the Rams, Tampa Bay's offense was looking for a spark. By getting on the edges, where he can truck over defensive backs who are 75 pounds lighter, Blount set the tone for an offense that rallied from a 17-3 deficit to win 18-17.

"It lifts the offensive line, the tight ends, the quarterback. Everybody gets up for that type of stuff," Joseph said. "With football being football, you love to see the physical play added to our offense, and we are loving it right now. We're definitely going to be able to benefit from that in the long run. Being able to get him on one guy and knowing that he can make him miss … we're going to gain some yardage on it.

"We try to do that every week, and now we're getting to do some more downhill stuff with him in the game. And it's really going to diversify our offense."

For all the elaborate schemes and chess matches between coordinators, football still is one opponent trying to force its will on another through physical brutality.

That's why Alstott's 12-year career in Tampa Bay is so celebrated. His career average was 3.7 yards, yet he ran with such power and leverage that other backs benefited from the carnage he inflicted on the way to 5,088 yards and 58 touchdowns.

"We were kind of in a lull last week, and I really think we won because of LeGarrette and the way he came out and ran the ball," Bucs fullback Earnest Graham said. "You really kind of force your will. It's kind of a show of force. Everybody starts to play and want to make plays, and that's what he brought to the table last week."

Beginning Sunday at Arizona, Blount should offer more demonstrations as he splits carries with Williams. Claimed off waivers from the Titans at the start of the season, the former Oregon star said he is familiar with only about 40 percent of the Bucs offense, which is why Williams has been used more in the passing game.

Coach Raheem Morris knows what a big back such as Blount can do to demoralize a defense.

"It's like a slam dunk in a basketball game," Morris said. "It just brings a little momentum. It creates a little more drive. It keeps the defense on the sideline while you run the ball on them and take a little life out of them. When you can do that, it's big time.

"It certainly changes the people tackling him; how they tackle, when they want to tackle them. It wears down a team. It does some really positive things for your team. We've been on the other end of that sometimes."

Rick Stroud can be reached at stroud@sptimes.com.
Love this article. Thanks for posting it. :lmao:
 
If this is what he brings to the table he's going to be a #1 RB going forward. With Freeman, Williams and Blount, the future looks bright for the Buccos. I like the fact that he punches people. He's fired up and he brings the same intensity to the field. He may be the key to many fantasy championships this year.
Blount is the answer. I can feel that train picking up steam.
Cliffy nailed this one a while back. It's too bad he was banned from the boards.
 
Air Stich said:
Premier said:
Faine (allegedly) comes back next week, which moves Zuttah back to his natural center position.

Trueblood sucks and may have lost his job to Lee, so they may be back to full strength next week.
Faine is the starting center. Zuttah has been playing center and will move back to guard when (if) Faine comes back healthy. The problem is, Zuttah has been playing a lot better at C then he was at guard. Make no mistake, TBs offensive line is not a pro when evaluating Blount. The one good thing I'll say about the line is that Caddy has proven to be completely ineffective rushing behind it. Blount is the only chance TB has to establish the run.I'm not trying to rain on Blount's parade. I have him in every league I play and I believe in his talent. His value is WAY up now and I don't think it's a mistake to trade him if you can get a top RB or WR. There's no way I'd take 2 lesser players for him, but if you can package him for a Roddy White or Chris Johnson type, I'd make it happen.
Package him for a Roddy White and Chris Johnson type? Blount would be a throw in, in such a trade with relatively no value. We would basically be talking about a Adrian Peterson+Blount for Chris Johnson type trade, lol. Basically, Blount's value is no where near high enough to make any difference in such a trade. I have Blount in all my leagues as well, and regardless of your offensive line, it would be wise to use Blount in a "package deal" for the likes of CJ or Roddy, but that's just not going to happen. And if it did happen there would be talk of collusion.
All players have value in a trade. I hear people say this at times that the guy is just a "throw in," but those guys have value. You may be planning on dumping him the minute the trade is done, but in that case the "throw in" player is helping you upgrade a position and create a roster spot to get a guy off waivers that you want.In this case, however, Blount in no way qualifies as a throw in player. He has a legitimate shot to put up decent numbers on a regular basis. Will he be Chris Johnson, Arian Foster or Adrian Peterson? I think not, but I think he will finish as a top 25 RB and that gives him value in my world.
Did you just lump Arian Foster in with CJ3 and ADP, the two best RB's in the league? The dude doesn't even have a nickname...

 
Air Stich said:
Premier said:
Faine (allegedly) comes back next week, which moves Zuttah back to his natural center position.

Trueblood sucks and may have lost his job to Lee, so they may be back to full strength next week.
Faine is the starting center. Zuttah has been playing center and will move back to guard when (if) Faine comes back healthy. The problem is, Zuttah has been playing a lot better at C then he was at guard. Make no mistake, TBs offensive line is not a pro when evaluating Blount. The one good thing I'll say about the line is that Caddy has proven to be completely ineffective rushing behind it. Blount is the only chance TB has to establish the run.I'm not trying to rain on Blount's parade. I have him in every league I play and I believe in his talent. His value is WAY up now and I don't think it's a mistake to trade him if you can get a top RB or WR. There's no way I'd take 2 lesser players for him, but if you can package him for a Roddy White or Chris Johnson type, I'd make it happen.
Package him for a Roddy White and Chris Johnson type? Blount would be a throw in, in such a trade with relatively no value. We would basically be talking about a Adrian Peterson+Blount for Chris Johnson type trade, lol. Basically, Blount's value is no where near high enough to make any difference in such a trade. I have Blount in all my leagues as well, and regardless of your offensive line, it would be wise to use Blount in a "package deal" for the likes of CJ or Roddy, but that's just not going to happen. And if it did happen there would be talk of collusion.
All players have value in a trade. I hear people say this at times that the guy is just a "throw in," but those guys have value. You may be planning on dumping him the minute the trade is done, but in that case the "throw in" player is helping you upgrade a position and create a roster spot to get a guy off waivers that you want.In this case, however, Blount in no way qualifies as a throw in player. He has a legitimate shot to put up decent numbers on a regular basis. Will he be Chris Johnson, Arian Foster or Adrian Peterson? I think not, but I think he will finish as a top 25 RB and that gives him value in my world.
I would hope so. If he finishes as a top-25 RB in just 10 games (counting this last week), than that would put him par with a top-12 RB scoring.I see him getting about 15 carries a game (more in games w/a lead, less in games when they're behind) and getting some goal-line love. A great RB3, and possible solid RB2 for the rest of the year.

 
Air Stich said:
Premier said:
Faine (allegedly) comes back next week, which moves Zuttah back to his natural center position.

Trueblood sucks and may have lost his job to Lee, so they may be back to full strength next week.
Faine is the starting center. Zuttah has been playing center and will move back to guard when (if) Faine comes back healthy. The problem is, Zuttah has been playing a lot better at C then he was at guard. Make no mistake, TBs offensive line is not a pro when evaluating Blount. The one good thing I'll say about the line is that Caddy has proven to be completely ineffective rushing behind it. Blount is the only chance TB has to establish the run.I'm not trying to rain on Blount's parade. I have him in every league I play and I believe in his talent. His value is WAY up now and I don't think it's a mistake to trade him if you can get a top RB or WR. There's no way I'd take 2 lesser players for him, but if you can package him for a Roddy White or Chris Johnson type, I'd make it happen.
Package him for a Roddy White and Chris Johnson type? Blount would be a throw in, in such a trade with relatively no value. We would basically be talking about a Adrian Peterson+Blount for Chris Johnson type trade, lol. Basically, Blount's value is no where near high enough to make any difference in such a trade. I have Blount in all my leagues as well, and regardless of your offensive line, it would be wise to use Blount in a "package deal" for the likes of CJ or Roddy, but that's just not going to happen. And if it did happen there would be talk of collusion.
All players have value in a trade. I hear people say this at times that the guy is just a "throw in," but those guys have value. You may be planning on dumping him the minute the trade is done, but in that case the "throw in" player is helping you upgrade a position and create a roster spot to get a guy off waivers that you want.In this case, however, Blount in no way qualifies as a throw in player. He has a legitimate shot to put up decent numbers on a regular basis. Will he be Chris Johnson, Arian Foster or Adrian Peterson? I think not, but I think he will finish as a top 25 RB and that gives him value in my world.
I would hope so. If he finishes as a top-25 RB in just 10 games (counting this last week), than that would put him par with a top-12 RB scoring.I see him getting about 15 carries a game (more in games w/a lead, less in games when they're behind) and getting some goal-line love. A great RB3, and possible solid RB2 for the rest of the year.
thats all I need...no need to be greedy here

 
Air Stich said:
Premier said:
Faine (allegedly) comes back next week, which moves Zuttah back to his natural center position.

Trueblood sucks and may have lost his job to Lee, so they may be back to full strength next week.
Faine is the starting center. Zuttah has been playing center and will move back to guard when (if) Faine comes back healthy. The problem is, Zuttah has been playing a lot better at C then he was at guard. Make no mistake, TBs offensive line is not a pro when evaluating Blount. The one good thing I'll say about the line is that Caddy has proven to be completely ineffective rushing behind it. Blount is the only chance TB has to establish the run.I'm not trying to rain on Blount's parade. I have him in every league I play and I believe in his talent. His value is WAY up now and I don't think it's a mistake to trade him if you can get a top RB or WR. There's no way I'd take 2 lesser players for him, but if you can package him for a Roddy White or Chris Johnson type, I'd make it happen.
Package him for a Roddy White and Chris Johnson type? Blount would be a throw in, in such a trade with relatively no value. We would basically be talking about a Adrian Peterson+Blount for Chris Johnson type trade, lol. Basically, Blount's value is no where near high enough to make any difference in such a trade. I have Blount in all my leagues as well, and regardless of your offensive line, it would be wise to use Blount in a "package deal" for the likes of CJ or Roddy, but that's just not going to happen. And if it did happen there would be talk of collusion.
All players have value in a trade. I hear people say this at times that the guy is just a "throw in," but those guys have value. You may be planning on dumping him the minute the trade is done, but in that case the "throw in" player is helping you upgrade a position and create a roster spot to get a guy off waivers that you want.In this case, however, Blount in no way qualifies as a throw in player. He has a legitimate shot to put up decent numbers on a regular basis. Will he be Chris Johnson, Arian Foster or Adrian Peterson? I think not, but I think he will finish as a top 25 RB and that gives him value in my world.
I would hope so. If he finishes as a top-25 RB in just 10 games (counting this last week), than that would put him par with a top-12 RB scoring.I see him getting about 15 carries a game (more in games w/a lead, less in games when they're behind) and getting some goal-line love. A great RB3, and possible solid RB2 for the rest of the year.
I agree, I'm just trying to temper my enthusiasm and try not to get too caught up in a couple outings. I do think that he separated himself from Caddy this week and that was the most important thing...well that and he helped me win this week.

 
http://www.nfl.com/videos/tampa-bay-buccan...-role-with-Bucs

Pretty good video and interview with Blount. Listening to him speak, he seems very mild-mannered and polite. Perhaps the "character concern" based on 1 (or 1.5 if you count his Titans training camp moment) incident(s) is blown out of proportion? Also, it was nice to hear him harping on pass protection. It seems like he knows what he needs to do to get and stay on the field, and that's great news for his fantasy prospects.

 
http://www.nfl.com/videos/tampa-bay-buccan...-role-with-Bucs

Pretty good video and interview with Blount. Listening to him speak, he seems very mild-mannered and polite. Perhaps the "character concern" based on 1 (or 1.5 if you count his Titans training camp moment) incident(s) is blown out of proportion? Also, it was nice to hear him harping on pass protection. It seems like he knows what he needs to do to get and stay on the field, and that's great news for his fantasy prospects.
There might be a couple other video's you need to watch.. lol
 
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.

 
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
 
Gr00vus said:
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
The guy's pushin 250 lbs, how fast do you expect him to be?
 
Gr00vus said:
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
The guy's pushin 250 lbs, how fast do you expect him to be?
I just need him to be fast enough to get into the endzone. :lmao:
 
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Reminds me of a modern day Jim Brown.
 
Gr00vus said:
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
The guy's pushin 250 lbs, how fast do you expect him to be?
I just need him to be fast enough to get into the endzone. :shrug:
That works for me.
 
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Reminds me of a modern day Jim Brown.
Except better in every facet of the game.
 
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Reminds me of a modern day Jim Brown.
Except better in every facet of the game.
:rolleyes:
 
Gr00vus said:
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
Clearly you didn't watch the "hurdle" run. Dude was about to pull away from a DB.
 
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Reminds me of a modern day Jim Brown.
Except better in every facet of the game.
:rolleyes:
:thumbup: If you dont think so you clearly know nothing about football
 
Blount >>>>>>>> Jim Brown

I thought that was obvious by now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gr00vus said:
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
Clearly you didn't watch the "hurdle" run. Dude was about to pull away from a DB.
Actually I did see it. The hurdle move was nice, but I didn't see above average NFL RB speed in that run.
 
Gr00vus said:
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
Clearly you didn't watch the "hurdle" run. Dude was about to pull away from a DB.
Actually I did see it. The hurdle move was nice, but I didn't see above average NFL RB speed in that run.
He's very fast for a RB of his weight. He is not VERY fast for a RB in general. He did run track and certainly has more speed than many backs smaller than him. Very good size/speed combo.
 
Gr00vus said:
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
Clearly you didn't watch the "hurdle" run. Dude was about to pull away from a DB.
Until he didn't.

 
Gr00vus said:
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
Clearly you didn't watch the "hurdle" run. Dude was about to pull away from a DB.
Actually I did see it. The hurdle move was nice, but I didn't see above average NFL RB speed in that run.
he`s fast enough that when he runs into a tackler they feel like a train hit them...works for me
 
Crusaderfan said:
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Reminds me of a modern day Jim Brown.
Except better in every facet of the game.
yes, but Brown is 75 years old
 
I wanted to pick up Blount during our Friday night injury move period but got stuck late at work, missing the deadline. Survived another Matthews clunker. As luck would have it I managed to snag him during last nights free agent session. Having just FINALLY worked out a trade that partially involved Matthews for Hillis, I'll be rolling out a Blount/Hillis combo this weekend. :goodposting:

Show me, LGB! :thumbup:

 
any thoughts on how you think Blount will do this weekend
I'm more worried about the ability of (or lack thereof) Tampa's D to keep Atl's offense off the field. IMO, Roddy/Turner/Gonzo will have their way; Atl's run D is "solid", but tat isn't why I'm keeping Blount on the bench. Just my 2 cents.
 
any thoughts on how you think Blount will do this weekend
I'm more worried about the ability of (or lack thereof) Tampa's D to keep Atl's offense off the field. IMO, Roddy/Turner/Gonzo will have their way; Atl's run D is "solid", but tat isn't why I'm keeping Blount on the bench. Just my 2 cents.
143 yards rushing, 32 yard receiving, 2 TD's and a 2 point conversion.
 
The NFL Network had the TB-Arizona replay on last night. I came across it as I was trying to avoid watching election coverage. Really liked what I saw of Blount. He looks a little raw but seems to have good instincts and even caught a few balls. I expect that may increase if he shows he is capable. For a waiver wire guy - he may make a big difference the rest of the way.
Yeah, I liked most of what I've seen. He does look unfast for an NFL RB though. He's in my RB mix for sure going forward regardless, seems like he'll have a good opportunity.
Clearly you didn't watch the "hurdle" run. Dude was about to pull away from a DB.
Until he didn't.
The only thing that stopped him tripping over his own feet.
 
Why is nobody pointing to the fact that Blount got so many carries because Tampa had a lead against one of the worst teams in the league??

How many more times do you think Tampa is going to have that opportunity? I'm not sure if I feel comfortable starting Blount against a team that will eventually make Tampa turn to the passing game.

 
Why is nobody pointing to the fact that Blount got so many carries because Tampa had a lead against one of the worst teams in the league??

How many more times do you think Tampa is going to have that opportunity? I'm not sure if I feel comfortable starting Blount against a team that will eventually make Tampa turn to the passing game.
IMO TB's defense is good enough to keep them in most games, especially looking at their remaining opponents. @BAL is the only game that seems potentially worrisome.Seems to me TB is more likely to go away from the run because it's not working than because they're way behind. And if you're a believer in Blount, then there shouldn't be a ton of concern about the run game not working.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top