Jordan has more talent than Rhodes, but seems to be a bit of a cancer. Given Kiffin's desire to unify and motivate this team, along with Jordan's complacent attitude, I can see this if Jordan gets into the doghouse.I wouldn't be surprised if Rhodes emerged as the week 1 starter. He was brought in under Kiffen, and I see him being the primary ball carrier for the first half of the season, about a 60/40 tween him and Jordan. What happens after that will be dictated by Bush's recovery.
Agreed - I never got the sense that he was a cancer. Maybe outspoken, but not a cancer from what I've heard/read.What has Jordan shown that would indicate he's a cancer? I realize he quit on the team last year, but the coaching in Oakland last season was some of the worst coaching the NFL has ever seen. A lot of players started mailing it in.![]()
I said "a bit" of a cancer.He's openly complained in the past; he's admitted to not learning blocking schemes (under Turdner); he's upset and has vocalized it recently about taking a pay cut to $3 MM this year.Frankly, as a Raiders homer, I've been pretty underwhelmed by Jordan since he's arrived. He talks a big game, but tends to run soft and without vision. He had an okay season under Norv, but what RB hasn't? Even that year, he avg'd below 4 YPC and only did well from a fantasy perspective b/c of a ton of catches and moderate TDs.He has talent, and could be very good if given the rock in a competent offense, but I think Rhodes will push him for PT.Agreed - I never got the sense that he was a cancer. Maybe outspoken, but not a cancer from what I've heard/read.What has Jordan shown that would indicate he's a cancer? I realize he quit on the team last year, but the coaching in Oakland last season was some of the worst coaching the NFL has ever seen. A lot of players started mailing it in.![]()
Rhodes isin't good enough to be a starting RB in this league. He is a spot starter at best, and an ok RBBC back. He just doesn't have the all arond tools to be starting RB material and is best utilized as a COP/RBBC type player.Jordan has the tools to be a starting RB, and could be very good in the right offense. The problem with Jordan is he has had to play in one of the worst all around offenses in the league the last 2 years (especially last season) and he may have lost some confidence after last years struggles.I don't know who will be the week 1 starter, but Jordan will end up looking better than Rhodes and will get more touches. At this time I really don't know the percentage of those touches; the Raiders offense has the most question marks in the league at this time due to all of the changes that have taken place.I wouldn't be surprised if Rhodes emerged as the week 1 starter. He was brought in under Kiffen, and I see him being the primary ball carrier for the first half of the season, about a 60/40 tween him and Jordan. What happens after that will be dictated by Bush's recovery.
I do give you props, Carter. You've stuck with this guy for some time now. I thought a lot of him before he came to the Raiders, but I've definitely soured on him. Sure he's been in a poor offense the past few years, but so have plenty of RBs (even those not named Tomlinson). If he were that good, he still would have shown more than he has. As someone noted earlier, he didn't have a great year under Turner - fantasy-wise yes, but not from an NFL standpoint (3.8 YPC).Rhodes isin't good enough to be a starting RB in this league. He is a spot starter at best, and an ok RBBC back. He just doesn't have the all arond tools to be starting RB material and is best utilized as a COP/RBBC type player.Jordan has the tools to be a starting RB, and could be very good in the right offense. The problem with Jordan is he has had to play in one of the worst all around offenses in the league the last 2 years (especially last season) and he may have lost some confidence after last years struggles.I don't know who will be the week 1 starter, but Jordan will end up looking better than Rhodes and will get more touches. At this time I really don't know the percentage of those touches; the Raiders offense has the most question marks in the league at this time due to all of the changes that have taken place.I wouldn't be surprised if Rhodes emerged as the week 1 starter. He was brought in under Kiffen, and I see him being the primary ball carrier for the first half of the season, about a 60/40 tween him and Jordan. What happens after that will be dictated by Bush's recovery.
Rhodes is the perfect example of an AL DAVIS free agent signing.1) Super Bowl experienceHe was brought in under Kiffen
lol at least no what you're talking about if you're going to post in this thread. Rhodes has a base salary of only 1.5 million for this season and only a 1 million dollar signing bonus. Ya that is HUGE He's 28 - the prime years for a RB - and RBs typically hit wall at 30 well guess what he's signed on for only 2 years. Add the fact that Rhodes has a lot of mileage left in him and his recieving abilities fit well in Kiffin's scheme and his pass blocking (which will be a huge upgrade among the rest of the RBs on the roster) make it a smart signing. He should be a good #2 back complimenting Jordan until Bush is ready to be the man. And I'm not even mention the winning/playoff experience he brings to a very young team.Rhodes is the perfect example of an AL DAVIS free agent signing.1) Super Bowl experienceHe was brought in under Kiffen
2) past his prime
3) no other team would pay him what the Raider did immediately after becoming a free agent after winning the championship.
ie. Larry Brown(never had a prime), Warren sapp, Sam Adams, Teddy Washington, etc...those are the obvious players that come to mind.
Nice owning of another short-sighted Raider hater post.Add to this the fact that Warren Sapp has played very well the last two years after they moved him back inside to his natural under-tackle position and that Sam Adams was a beast and a big part of the run D that got to the Superbowl the one year he was in Oakland.lol at least no what you're talking about if you're going to post in this thread. Rhodes has a base salary of only 1.5 million for this season and only a 1 million dollar signing bonus. Ya that is HUGE He's 28 - the prime years for a RB - and RBs typically hit wall at 30 well guess what he's signed on for only 2 years. Add the fact that Rhodes has a lot of mileage left in him and his recieving abilities fit well in Kiffin's scheme and his pass blocking (which will be a huge upgrade among the rest of the RBs on the roster) make it a smart signing. He should be a good #2 back complimenting Jordan until Bush is ready to be the man. And I'm not even mention the winning/playoff experience he brings to a very young team.Rhodes is the perfect example of an AL DAVIS free agent signing.1) Super Bowl experienceHe was brought in under Kiffen
2) past his prime
3) no other team would pay him what the Raider did immediately after becoming a free agent after winning the championship.
ie. Larry Brown(never had a prime), Warren sapp, Sam Adams, Teddy Washington, etc...those are the obvious players that come to mind.
From a fantasy perspective I would stay away from this situation, in deep leagues though I would take Bush because he appears to be ready by training camp and he should be the main man at some point later on in the season.
Personally I rank:JacksonBushIronsHenryThough if Bush is not going on IR or PUP I would take him over Jackson.So, Bush's dynasty potential? Would you take him over the following in a dynasty draft:Brandon JacksonChris HenryKenny Irons
NOSo, Bush's dynasty potential? Would you take him over the following in a dynasty draft:Brandon JacksonChris HenryKenny Irons
The Third RB taking yes, I still think LYNCH(barf) was the Best all around RB this Year, Peterson the Monster at Number 2, only because of injury concerns, Bush at #3 then Bradshaw(Highly Underated IMHO) at # 4. But I like the long term outlook for Bush, If the Raiders get thier act together.What do you guys think about Bush's dynasty prospects. To me, he would have been the second RB off the board if he hadn't broken his leg, but he did so he didn't get the scrutiny that other picks have had. What do you guys think about his ability to overcome the injury first of all, and how good could be in the NFL at 100%. Do people pretty much agree he's the back of the future in OAK?
I would take Bush over all of those pretenders listed. But I would not completely abandon Lamont Jordon just yet as a potential sleeper this year for the Raiders.Chris Henry - A #### ing Joke.Brandon Jackson - Mediocre and Morency will win the Starting Job and keep it for the duration.Kenny Irons - A possible, possible stater in a few years, I just dont like him as a primary ball carrier.So, Bush's dynasty potential? Would you take him over the following in a dynasty draft:Brandon JacksonChris HenryKenny Irons
1)Nice owning of another short-sighted Raider hater post. WRONGAdd to this the fact that Warren Sapp has played very well the last two years after they moved him back inside to his natural under-tackle position and that Sam Adams was a beast and a big part of the run D that got to the Superbowl the one year he was in Oakland. I am well aware of this, but this doesn't mean my statements were incorrect.lol at least no what you're talking about if you're going to post in this thread. Rhodes has a base salary of only 1.5 million for this season and only a 1 million dollar signing bonus. Ya that is HUGE He's 28 - the prime years for a RB - and RBs typically hit wall at 30 well guess what he's signed on for only 2 years. Add the fact that Rhodes has a lot of mileage left in him and his recieving abilities fit well in Kiffin's scheme and his pass blocking (which will be a huge upgrade among the rest of the RBs on the roster) make it a smart signing. He should be a good #2 back complimenting Jordan until Bush is ready to be the man. And I'm not even mention the winning/playoff experience he brings to a very young team.Rhodes is the perfect example of an AL DAVIS free agent signing.1) Super Bowl experienceHe was brought in under Kiffen
2) past his prime
3) no other team would pay him what the Raider did immediately after becoming a free agent after winning the championship.
ie. Larry Brown(never had a prime), Warren sapp, Sam Adams, Teddy Washington, etc...those are the obvious players that come to mind.
From a fantasy perspective I would stay away from this situation, in deep leagues though I would take Bush because he appears to be ready by training camp and he should be the main man at some point later on in the season.
Immediately after that year he bolted to Buffalo, where he was a big part of their resurgent defense for the next couple of years.
Ted Dub was just okay and Larry Brown was clearly a joke. As was Desmond Howard, who the poster should've mentioned if he had any real insight. I knew i forgot somebody
At the end of the day tho, Rhodes doesn't equate to ANY of these guys. He may be a solid contributor or a bust, but he was Kiffin's pick, not Al's and just b/c Brown and Howard busted doesn't mean squat to this situation!
I would take him over Chris Henry. No question. Kenny Irons would lose out maybe by a hair. This is close to me and purely depends on your dynasty strategy. Both players are at least two years away from doing anything significant. Irons owners are just hoping Rudi gets bounced out because of contract issues. Great read a couple weeks ago...EBFs thread. Ill link it later http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...=318932&hl=. But i think Bush has more talent and a better situation upcoming.DA RAIDERS said:NOsholditch said:So, Bush's dynasty potential? Would you take him over the following in a dynasty draft:
Brandon Jackson
Chris Henry
Kenny Irons