Larry Fitzgerald, WR, Arizona Cardinals (1 Viewer)

[JPeso]

95, 1300, 8 = 273 PPR, 17.1 PPR PPG

 

[-jb-]

Worthy of a post-craptacular QB performance bump. Abbot and Costello are destroying Fitz.

 

[Terpman22]

Worthy of a post-craptacular QB performance bump. Abbot and Costello are destroying Fitz.

Skelton did not really impede Fitz's production last year.

 

[-jb-]

Worthy of a post-craptacular QB performance bump. Abbot and Costello are destroying Fitz.

Skelton did not really impede Fitz's production last year.

Agree and disagree. I don't think a WR can sustain 51% of a QBs production like he had last year.

 

[resko99]

Skelton will be starting by week 4 and probably as early as week 1. I'm quite a bit higher on Fitz with him starting over Kolb.

I love a guy who has a Floor of 1100/7-8 even with crap at QB. His upside is 1500/11-12. How many other WR can you say THAT about.

Best Guess this year 85 catches for 1350 yards and 10 TDs.

 

[Sabertooth]

Skelton will be starting by week 4 and probably as early as week 1. I'm quite a bit higher on Fitz with him starting over Kolb.

I love a guy who has a Floor of 1100/7-8 even with crap at QB. His upside is 1500/11-12. How many other WR can you say THAT about.

Best Guess this year 85 catches for 1350 yards and 10 TDs.

Imagine Fitz next season with Mallet or Hasselbeck at the helm. I have a sneaking suspicion Tarvaris Jackson could end up down in the desert as well. Just a hunch.As for a prediction: 87 catches, 1200 yards, 9 touchdowns. Very solid PPR numbers.

 

[Iwannabeacowboybaby!]

I really think Fitzgerald is handicapped by his Qb situation and lack of overall talent in the other skilled positions on the Cardinals. I don't see how Fitz lives up to his ADP and is a player I'm chilly on this year heading into the 2012 season.

89 receptions, 1100 yards and 7 tds

 

[Bills_Fan11]

95 catches, 1200 yards, 8 TDs

I agree with this, and these numbers put me to sleep. I won't be drafting Fitz since he's top 3 to 5 on everyone's list. His numbers could be monstrous with a great QB, but he has total crap. I'd rather take WR's a round or 2 later who are going to put up the exact same numbers.

And who might these guys be? I have no doubt some players can put up those type of stats but I'm having trouble thinking of who they might be 12-24 picks later.

Welker, Nicks, Brandon Marshall, Victor Cruz

Maclin, Bowe, Dez & Miles, Demaryius Thomas.

i like this list a lot better than the previous one. I can see it with maclin. I have reservations on Bowe (new sysytem, Charles is back, contract unsettled). Dez or Miles, one or the other, is likely to hit the yardage and/or TDs, but 95 catches on a team that has Murray, Jones, Witten, and the other WR (Miles or DEZ), is a lot to ask for. Thomas, will not happen. If Manning is nothing, he is a creature of precision and trust and I think Tamme has the trust issue and Decker is the guy that fits more of what Peyton likes to do. I can see thomas being a high TD guy with average yardage and 65-80 catches, but not top shelf numbers across the board.So basically that leaves me with a decision of taking Fitz, who I know will, somehow, someway, post a top WR statline when all is said or done, or I gamble and try to think that someone in the next 12-24 picks won't have a good sense about Maclin. I think I take fitz and rest well at night. Too many questions with all the others.

I thought the point of posting the 2nd group was that they're typically going ~24 picks after the first & could easily match their production; so to think the NYG WR's are some kind of great value is a bit questionable. Guess I'm the only one who read it like that though.