kimbosliced
Footballguy
Is Fitz still a WR1 going forward? Dodds has him ranked at 6, but the game summary from a few week ago noted Fitz as a "flex starter."
What gives?
What gives?
/thread
I can.WelkerWallaceCalvinSteve SmithJenningsNicksMiles AustinAndre JohnsonVincent JacksonStevie JohnsonWhen someone says WR1 to me I think "top 10 WRs". If you can name 10 WRs you'd rather have than Fitz, then so be it. Personally, I'd have trouble doing that so Fitz will always be a WR1 to me pretty much regardless of the QB situation and his current numbers.
Tampa Mike?WTF.You didnt overpay, you got Ponzi'dGronk alone is more valuable at this point, and has a qb who put up as many tds in 1 game as Fitz's has all season.Wow man... I dont usually critique on trades, but that was a stinker.I threw in basically my entire in bench to grab him--Mike Williams, Battle, Julio, Gronk, and Morris. Hope it's worth it. Really need a WR1.
When someone says WR1 to me I think "top 10 WRs". If you can name 10 WRs you'd rather have than Fitz, then so be it. Personally, I'd have trouble doing that so Fitz will always be a WR1 to me pretty much regardless of the QB situation and his current numbers.
That's actually a pretty good list, but come on if someone offered you Fitzgerald for Stevie Johnson straight up you wouldn't take it? Agree to disagree I guess.I can.WelkerWallaceCalvinSteve SmithJenningsNicksMiles AustinAndre JohnsonVincent JacksonStevie JohnsonWhen someone says WR1 to me I think "top 10 WRs". If you can name 10 WRs you'd rather have than Fitz, then so be it. Personally, I'd have trouble doing that so Fitz will always be a WR1 to me pretty much regardless of the QB situation and his current numbers.
Gronk's on your bench??!! Who are you playing? Agree with Wolfman above--I'd sure take Fitz over Johnson but that might be a personal bias.I threw in basically my entire in bench to grab him--Mike Williams, Battle, Julio, Gronk, and Morris. Hope it's worth it. Really need a WR1.
Good list. Would even add Dwayne Bowe.I can.WelkerWallaceCalvinSteve SmithJenningsNicksMiles AustinAndre JohnsonVincent JacksonStevie JohnsonWhen someone says WR1 to me I think "top 10 WRs". If you can name 10 WRs you'd rather have than Fitz, then so be it. Personally, I'd have trouble doing that so Fitz will always be a WR1 to me pretty much regardless of the QB situation and his current numbers.
As a Vincent Jackson owner, I would be thrilled to get a Jackson for Fitzgerald offer.I can.WelkerWallaceCalvinSteve SmithJenningsNicksMiles AustinAndre JohnsonVincent JacksonStevie JohnsonWhen someone says WR1 to me I think "top 10 WRs". If you can name 10 WRs you'd rather have than Fitz, then so be it. Personally, I'd have trouble doing that so Fitz will always be a WR1 to me pretty much regardless of the QB situation and his current numbers.
As a Fitz owner, so would I. Too bad we're not in the same league.As a Vincent Jackson owner, I would be thrilled to get a Jackson for Fitzgerald offer.I can.WelkerWallaceCalvinSteve SmithJenningsNicksMiles AustinAndre JohnsonVincent JacksonStevie JohnsonWhen someone says WR1 to me I think "top 10 WRs". If you can name 10 WRs you'd rather have than Fitz, then so be it. Personally, I'd have trouble doing that so Fitz will always be a WR1 to me pretty much regardless of the QB situation and his current numbers.
??? vjax has more pts w/one less game played due to a byelogic?As a Vincent Jackson owner, I would be thrilled to get a Jackson for Fitzgerald offer.
I was already involved in a multi-player trade that had me shipping off VJax and getting Fitz in return. I have no problems with it still. History shows Fitz has a better chance of staying on the field and that he will get his fantasy points. I'm not concerned in the least and believe Fitz will have a great year.As a Vincent Jackson owner, I would be thrilled to get a Jackson for Fitzgerald offer.I can.WelkerWallaceCalvinSteve SmithJenningsNicksMiles AustinAndre JohnsonVincent JacksonStevie JohnsonWhen someone says WR1 to me I think "top 10 WRs". If you can name 10 WRs you'd rather have than Fitz, then so be it. Personally, I'd have trouble doing that so Fitz will always be a WR1 to me pretty much regardless of the QB situation and his current numbers.
I think they are going to end the year very close. Fitzgerald is much more consistent from game to game, and I think that's what you look for from your WR1. That, combined with the fact that V-Jax is already battling multiple injuries, is why I give the slight edge to Fitzgerald. I don't think his season could get much worse, while injuries could bring Jackson much lower.
In my PPR, VJax had 41 points in one game, 20 in another, and has been below average in the other three. Fitzgerald has been much more consistent and I feel like he has less of a chance of disappearing in a game.The huge games are great with Jackson, but the 7 point games aren't.??? vjax has more pts w/one less game played due to a byelogic?As a Vincent Jackson owner, I would be thrilled to get a Jackson for Fitzgerald offer.
agree with this, and also given the fact that gates hasn't been playing and will only take a ton of targets away from jackson. i'd rather have fitz.In my PPR, VJax had 41 points in one game, 20 in another, and has been below average in the other three. Fitzgerald has been much more consistent and I feel like he has less of a chance of disappearing in a game.The huge games are great with Jackson, but the 7 point games aren't.??? vjax has more pts w/one less game played due to a byelogic?As a Vincent Jackson owner, I would be thrilled to get a Jackson for Fitzgerald offer.
He has better numbers than Roddy this season.This is probably owner bias here, but I think the Cards passing game turns a corner, and turns it this weekend. To explain the owner bias, I traded Romo/Lloyd for Mendy/Fitz, and picked up Kolb off the WW (2qb league). I have no reason to think that Kolb will be able to do anything this week, and that Fitz won't get shut down by Taylor, but I have that feeling regardless. No reason to think that at all, but I couldn't bring myself to drop Kolb for Painter all week.I think Fitz is good enough to produce against any DB in the league, and Kolb can be a good QB in this league as he proved last year. He still has a long way to go and they basically face a murderers row of pass defenses over the next five games: Pit, Bal, Stl (the lone easy one), Phi, and SFO. After that it gets much easier, but damn that is a tough run. Basically, if he can make out of this next run with decent stats he could be a monster the rest of the season.Here's a beat-writer piece on Kolbhttp://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/articles/2011/10/17/20111017arizona-cardinals-kevin-kolb-fixing-problems.htmlIt's very close, but I don't think he's a WR1. He's a better WR2, at least for a championship caliber team unless you're stacked at other positions. I'd rather have: Welker, CJ, Wallace, Steve Smith, Maclin, Nicks, Jennings and Austin for sure. Cases can also be made for Roddy, AJ, Bowe and Steve Johnson.
Bal is not that good against the pass neither is SFO. Those are the ways you beat the two teams. Pit and Phi will be tough. But, from here on out, they will be throwing A LOT.He has better numbers than Roddy this season.This is probably owner bias here, but I think the Cards passing game turns a corner, and turns it this weekend. To explain the owner bias, I traded Romo/Lloyd for Mendy/Fitz, and picked up Kolb off the WW (2qb league). I have no reason to think that Kolb will be able to do anything this week, and that Fitz won't get shut down by Taylor, but I have that feeling regardless. No reason to think that at all, but I couldn't bring myself to drop Kolb for Painter all week.I think Fitz is good enough to produce against any DB in the league, and Kolb can be a good QB in this league as he proved last year. He still has a long way to go and they basically face a murderers row of pass defenses over the next five games: Pit, Bal, Stl (the lone easy one), Phi, and SFO. After that it gets much easier, but damn that is a tough run. Basically, if he can make out of this next run with decent stats he could be a monster the rest of the season.Here's a beat-writer piece on Kolbhttp://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/articles/2011/10/17/20111017arizona-cardinals-kevin-kolb-fixing-problems.htmlIt's very close, but I don't think he's a WR1. He's a better WR2, at least for a championship caliber team unless you're stacked at other positions. I'd rather have: Welker, CJ, Wallace, Steve Smith, Maclin, Nicks, Jennings and Austin for sure. Cases can also be made for Roddy, AJ, Bowe and Steve Johnson.
He prob is a flex starter..In a 15 team league!Classic over-reaction imo. Just give them some time, Kolb and Fitz haven't been working together too long. I suspect a big week out of him vs Pitt.Is Fitz still a WR1 going forward? Dodds has him ranked at 6, but the game summary from a few week ago noted Fitz as a "flex starter."What gives?
Fitz has played 14 games against the Niners in his career and has put up 83-1,106-9. He's scored at least once against the Niners every year of his career. Pretty good numbers.I don't have access to Fitz's numbers, but he's been pedestrian against SF in his career. I can't he remember a game as a SF fan where he's killed us.
Fitzgerald's per game averages against SF (14 games): 5.9 receptions, 79 yards, .64 TDsFitzgerald's career per game averages: 5.7 receptions, 76.4 yards, .59 TDsI don't have access to Fitz's numbers, but he's been pedestrian against SF in his career. I can't he remember a game as a SF fan where he's killed us.
Thanks for posting. Better than I thought. I'd be interested in his numbers since Willis arrived 2007. I feel like we've played him pretty well in recent years that could be clouding my judgement.Fitz has played 14 games against the Niners in his career and has put up 83-1,106-9. He's scored at least once against the Niners every year of his career. Pretty good numbers.I don't have access to Fitz's numbers, but he's been pedestrian against SF in his career. I can't he remember a game as a SF fan where he's killed us.
2007: 12-176-22008: 11-77-22009: 8-93-12010: 15-162-1Thanks for posting. Better than I thought. I'd be interested in his numbers since Willis arrived 2007.Fitz has played 14 games against the Niners in his career and has put up 83-1,106-9. He's scored at least once against the Niners every year of his career. Pretty good numbers.I don't have access to Fitz's numbers, but he's been pedestrian against SF in his career. I can't he remember a game as a SF fan where he's killed us.
Thanks again. Yardage wise he's only had one 100 yard game in the past 3 years, and that was week 17 last year, useless for most fantasy people. But he's been consistent with TD's. Still better than expected.'packersfan said:2007: 12-176-22008: 11-77-22009: 8-93-12010: 15-162-1'morris4903 said:Thanks for posting. Better than I thought. I'd be interested in his numbers since Willis arrived 2007.'packersfan said:Fitz has played 14 games against the Niners in his career and has put up 83-1,106-9. He's scored at least once against the Niners every year of his career. Pretty good numbers.'morris4903 said:I don't have access to Fitz's numbers, but he's been pedestrian against SF in his career. I can't he remember a game as a SF fan where he's killed us.
Did you include a jar of vasoline in that deal?He has better numbers than Roddy this season.This is probably owner bias here, but I think the Cards passing game turns a corner, and turns it this weekend. To explain the owner bias, I traded Romo/Lloyd for Mendy/Fitz, and picked up Kolb off the WW (2qb league). I have no reason to think that Kolb will be able to do anything this week, and that Fitz won't get shut down by Taylor, but I have that feeling regardless. No reason to think that at all, but I couldn't bring myself to drop Kolb for Painter all week.It's very close, but I don't think he's a WR1. He's a better WR2, at least for a championship caliber team unless you're stacked at other positions. I'd rather have: Welker, CJ, Wallace, Steve Smith, Maclin, Nicks, Jennings and Austin for sure. Cases can also be made for Roddy, AJ, Bowe and Steve Johnson.
I think Fitz is good enough to produce against any DB in the league, and Kolb can be a good QB in this league as he proved last year. He still has a long way to go and they basically face a murderers row of pass defenses over the next five games: Pit, Bal, Stl (the lone easy one), Phi, and SFO. After that it gets much easier, but damn that is a tough run. Basically, if he can make out of this next run with decent stats he could be a monster the rest of the season.
Here's a beat-writer piece on Kolb
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/articles/2011/10/17/20111017arizona-cardinals-kevin-kolb-fixing-problems.html
Because Beanie has been a goal-line beast this season. There is no reason to put the ball in the air when your back can run it in for much less risk.Fitz lines up outside every play. They bump him with their top corner every play with a safety over the top... every play. There isn't another receiver to draw coverage. Todd Heap is solid but isn't threatening anyone down the seam.
What's mystifying to me is how Fitz isn't scoring once a game down near the goal line when teams have no choice but to cover him one on one. There isn't a corner in the league that can win jump balls with Larry Fitz, so why isn't that their #1 option in the red zone? The Lions seem to have figured it out, Cardinals still haven't.
I do think Arizona will be competitive this week. I know the Steelers have been hot, running the ball effectively and shutting down the run. That may still be the case but Arizona plays better at home and they have too much talent on that team to go to 1-5. It may still happen but they'll be in that game. I like Larry Fitz to get his 90-100 yards and tally a score, perhaps two.
Raise your hand if you sat him against the Eagles last week (when he blew up) and started him this week (when he's invisible).![]()
has AZ even had the ball?Raise your hand if you sat him against the Eagles last week (when he blew up) and started him this week (when he's invisible).![]()
They stayed in the locker room. "What's the point?" they said.has AZ even had the ball?Raise your hand if you sat him against the Eagles last week (when he blew up) and started him this week (when he's invisible).![]()
they move a slower in the south...They stayed in the locker room. "What's the point?" they said.has AZ even had the ball?Raise your hand if you sat him against the Eagles last week (when he blew up) and started him this week (when he's invisible).![]()
Same here, missed the blowup game, got all the rest. Frustrating.Agree, I only benched him once this year though, the Eagles game. Wouldn't want to do that again.