What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Larry Johnson a Patriot in '09? (1 Viewer)

TheBradyBunch

Footballguy
John Clayton audio on WGR 550 Radio

Here's the quote from about the 5:50 mark:

"I'm going to make two predictions. Obviously Tom Brady will be back and I think they'll have Larry Johnson in their backfield."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone explain how this might happen? Would they just cut him in the off season? I don't think LJ would want to be traded and lose that sweet contract he's got.

Maybe it's just me, but I can't remember Clayton being right very much.

 
Can someone explain how this might happen? Would they just cut him in the off season? I don't think LJ would want to be traded and lose that sweet contract he's got.Maybe it's just me, but I can't remember Clayton being right very much.
The Chiefs will have to trade him in order to move him. Johnson has over 5 mil guaranteed in both 2009 and 2010. They won't cut him.
 
First of all the Pats need to upgrade their RB situation from what they currently have. Maroney's not the answer and while Morris, Faulk and BJGE all can contribute none of them are a RB that you want to rely on as your #1. They're all better suited as role players. Secondly, the Pats have had success with players that were underachieving and considered risks as both Corey Dillon and Randy Moss revitalized their careers with the Pats. Finally, KC is in a serious rebuilding mode and my guess is LJ is not going to be a part of it and he will be available and the Pats are not shy about trading draft picks for a veteran.

This is the first I've heard of this but this is a scenario I could see since I fully expect the Pats to have a new starting RB next year whether it's Larry Johnson, another veteran or a rookie they pick up on draft day.

 
First of all the Pats need to upgrade their RB situation from what they currently have. Maroney's not the answer and while Morris, Faulk and BJGE all can contribute none of them are a RB that you want to rely on as your #1. They're all better suited as role players. Secondly, the Pats have had success with players that were underachieving and considered risks as both Corey Dillon and Randy Moss revitalized their careers with the Pats. Finally, KC is in a serious rebuilding mode and my guess is LJ is not going to be a part of it and he will be available and the Pats are not shy about trading draft picks for a veteran.

This is the first I've heard of this but this is a scenario I could see since I fully expect the Pats to have a new starting RB next year whether it's Larry Johnson, another veteran or a rookie they pick up on draft day.
I remember hearing something like this about 2 months ago as a possible trade deadline deal, back when KC was supposedly going to move LJ and Gonzo.I think LJ would gladly play for NE and would be a perfect fit just like Dillon was.

I feel pretty comfortable saying LJ won't be a Chief in 2009 so I'd give this about a 50-50 chance of being right.

 
Seems like a good fit. Lots of diapers in that locker room already.
such as??
LINK
That sure is indicative of the Moss that has been on display since joining NE. ;) I don't know how well the off field issues will fly with the NE area. Roughing up women isn't likely to have the region reach out to embrace LJ if he were moved to NE. And the NE brass is very tuned into public perception. I'm not certain they'd take on the PR headache he would be ( or become )

 
I agree 100%. Plus I said this about a month ago on here.

It's exactly what they did with Dillon.

LJ is unhappy, a distraction, they have a youth movement. He's 29. Dillon was in the same boat. Unhappy with losing. They need a RB BADLY. Chiefs were shopping him before the deadline. They'd love to get a 3rd for him and call it a day. The Pats need to win now, Moss is getitng up there, Brady is what 32? The time is now for that team. With a top 5-6 RB in the backfield, they'd be unstoppable.

The Pats love to pick studs up from realllly crappy teams. Dillon, Moss, now probably LJ. It's a perfect fit.

 
Seems like a good fit. Lots of diapers in that locker room already.
such as??
LINK
That sure is indicative of the Moss that has been on display since joining NE. :rolleyes:
Yeah, he should be the NFL's Man of the Year.
Bitter much?
Daily. Why do you ask?
:lmao: Solid answer.
 
Seems like a good fit. Lots of diapers in that locker room already.
such as??
LINK
That sure is indicative of the Moss that has been on display since joining NE. :rolleyes:
Yeah, he should be the NFL's Man of the Year.
nm
I thought he was referring to when Maroney's teammates dumped a bunch of diapers in his locker in reference to him needing to grow up.The Pats have an extra #2 this year and I would not be surprised at all for them to send a 2 or 3 to KC for Johnson.

 
Can someone explain how this might happen? Would they just cut him in the off season? I don't think LJ would want to be traded and lose that sweet contract he's got.

Maybe it's just me, but I can't remember Clayton being right very much.
The Chiefs will have to trade him in order to move him. Johnson has over 5 mil guaranteed in both 2009 and 2010. They won't cut him.
From an article by Jeffri Chadiha on ESPN.com a little over a week ago.
The likelihood of his remaining with the Chiefs beyond this season also remains very much in doubt. That suspension triggered a conduct clause in the five-year contract extension Johnson signed in August 2007, one that allows the Chiefs to void the $3.75 million he is guaranteed next season. Peterson admits that exercising that option "is a possibility."
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?id=3694547
 
From a fantasy perspective, do you think the Chiefs pull back on the # of carries they give LJ down the stretch so as not to ruin their trade value?

 
I'm calling this prediction bunk.

Perhaps LJ's agent whispered in Clayton's ear.

The big names that have come to NE have done so off the radar (nobody expected Dillon, Moss, etc.).

I doubt NE will bring in LJ unless he's willing to move significantly away from his current compensation.

With Brady, the Pats do not need a Top 5 back, which is what LJ's agent should be seeking.

A better / more believable prediction would be Edgerrin James.

 
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.

From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.

Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.

 
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
I don't think age will be a factor as long as they think he still has gas left in the tank. The Pats are not afraid to go after players in the 30 year old age range as they have brought in Dillon, Moss, Rodney and Thomas (as well as trying to get John Lynch back when they got Rodney and offering Derrick Mason a deal when he signed with the Ravens) who were all right at that mark or older when they obtained them. As for LJ's interest in the Pats and willingness to take a pay cut like Dillon and Moss did it's anyone's guess. Yet, his current circumstances look similar to that of Moss and Dillon when the Pats obtained them. A player who's been very productive in the past who has already made some good money who's now underachieving and/or misbehaving as well as being in a very bad situation. If LJ's mindset is like Dillon and Moss he might be willing to take low money to come to a situation where he can potentially win a championship as well as regain his reputation and than get another quality contract.Obviously this is all pure speculation and there's not a shred of real information right now. Yet, from a big picture standpoint a move like this is very easy to see because the Pats have been able to make this exact type of move in the past.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From a fantasy perspective, do you think the Chiefs pull back on the # of carries they give LJ down the stretch so as not to ruin their trade value?
Uh, I think it works the opposite. :yucky: The Chiefs benefit just as much from LJ looking like a stud down the stretch. What good does it do a team trying to get good value from a player to limit his carries? They're paying him big money, they're gonna play him. 19 carries last week in his first game back kind of sums it up.
 
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
No one really "saw" the Pats trading for Moss or Dillon either honestly considering before those guys came along they had a reputation for being tight with their wallets and not wanting to fork over big contracts. Signing guys like Moss and Dillon kind of went against the grain there.I don't think the money would be the big obstacle to signing LJ honestly.......they can afford it and if they want him bad enough, they'll pay up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
I agree 100%. NE is a destination for good players tired of being on a losing team and are willing to take a pay cut to be in a winning organization. I don't get the feeling that LJ cares about the losing nearly as much as wanting to carry the ball 100% of the time. And NE has been a RBBC team for some time now and I don't see them changing that even with LJ. Bottom line, not a good fit for either LJ or NE, but stranger things have happened.
 
A trade to NE would hurt LJ's value, not help it. NE likes to throw the ball, and mix in Faulk (and others). That won't change. LJ owners need him to be on a team where he gets 90% of the carries, and NE isn't that place.

 
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
And NE has been a RBBC team for some time now and I don't see them changing that even with LJ. Bottom line, not a good fit for either LJ or NE, but stranger things have happened.
It would be impossible for me to disagree with this more...all you have to look at is Dillon's stats in 2004 to see why. Whether it's Dillon running in 2004 or Moss catching te ball last year (I remember many saying the Pats apread the ball around too much in the passing game for Moss to blow up) BB has shown that if if has a stud he will get the ball in his hands a ton.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
And NE has been a RBBC team for some time now and I don't see them changing that even with LJ. Bottom line, not a good fit for either LJ or NE, but stranger things have happened.
It would be impossible for me to disagree with this more...all you have to look at is Dillon's stats in 2004 to see why. Whether it's Dillon running in 2004 or Moss catching te ball last year (I remember many saying the Pats apread the ball around too much in the passing game for Moss to blow up) BB has shown that if if has a stud he will get the ball in his hands a ton.
:no: People keep saying it's "not a good fit" because LJ needs lot of carries, NEhas been RBBC and so on. Everything with NE is a matter of circumstance depending on the players they have. RBBC is often dictated by the talent and situation with individual players. Once Moss came there they were no longer a WRBC were they? Dillon was the man when healthy for the Pats.LJ's only been on ONE team his entire career and people are assuming he wouldn't be a "good fit" That doesn;t give Belicheck a lot of credit does it?? BB would MAKE it a GOOD FIT just like he did with Moss and with Dillon. Yes folks, he really is that good of a coach.
 
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
And NE has been a RBBC team for some time now and I don't see them changing that even with LJ. Bottom line, not a good fit for either LJ or NE, but stranger things have happened.
It would be impossible for me to disagree with this more...all you have to look at is Dillon's stats in 2004 to see why. Whether it's Dillon running in 2004 or Moss catching te ball last year (I remember many saying the Pats apread the ball around too much in the passing game for Moss to blow up) BB has shown that if if has a stud he will get the ball in his hands a ton.
Dillon was the only quality RB on the roster in 2004. Once Maroney was drafted it was RBBC which tells me NE will not just give the ball to LJ every down when they have seen they have a talented rookie on the roster in Green-Ellis. I would expect a 60-40 split in favor of LJ if he were on the team next year.Again, not the kind of situation it would appear LJ favors, and we know he's all about the benjamins so I don't see how he'd agree to go from $5 mill to $2mill or less next year. And no way KC just cuts him, although I'd like to hear more about his contract details around a conduct clause.
 
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
And NE has been a RBBC team for some time now and I don't see them changing that even with LJ. Bottom line, not a good fit for either LJ or NE, but stranger things have happened.
It would be impossible for me to disagree with this more...all you have to look at is Dillon's stats in 2004 to see why. Whether it's Dillon running in 2004 or Moss catching te ball last year (I remember many saying the Pats apread the ball around too much in the passing game for Moss to blow up) BB has shown that if if has a stud he will get the ball in his hands a ton.
Dillon was the only quality RB on the roster in 2004. Once Maroney was drafted it was RBBC which tells me NE will not just give the ball to LJ every down when they have seen they have a talented rookie on the roster in Green-Ellis. I would expect a 60-40 split in favor of LJ if he were on the team next year.Again, not the kind of situation it would appear LJ favors, and we know he's all about the benjamins so I don't see how he'd agree to go from $5 mill to $2mill or less next year. And no way KC just cuts him, although I'd like to hear more about his contract details around a conduct clause.
Maroney was drafted when Dillon started to decline. The two times the Pats have had a high quality RB (Dillon in 2004 and Antowain in 2001) they have treated them as a legit #1. They even treated Dillon like a legit #1 in 2005 which was the year he began to decline which is why they drafted Maroney in 2006. When they haven't had a legit #1 they have gone RBBC. BB is is not afraid to do either and the talent dictates what he does not the philosophy. If a RB like LJ were brought into the fold and he showed he could play like he did a few years back I can guarantee you they would treat him as a workhorse. This type of discussuion was the same going on before last season with Moss. Many thought the Pats would never have a big time #1 WR because they spread the ball around too much. Yet, Moss had an historical year. The bottomline is BB is a chameleon and he will change what he does based on his talent. If a big time RB ends up on the Patriot roster next season I fully expect him to get the majority of the workload. If that type of RB doesn't show up than it will be RBBC.
 
I think it's clear that this is one of Clayton's throw it against the wall type things. At least he called it a prediction instead of implying he had heard this from somewhere like he used to.

I hadn't read that about the Chiefs being able to void his guaranteed $ for next season--unless I'm missing something I would think that makes it a virtual certainty that the Chefs will release him. After that, the Patriots would just have to be in the ballpark and they would certainly be one of the more appealing destinations...I don't think anyone is going to give him huge $ again at his age.

 
The bottomline is BB is a chameleon and he will change what he does based on his talent. If a big time RB ends up on the Patriot roster next season I fully expect him to get the majority of the workload. If that type of RB doesn't show up than it will be RBBC.
Great point. Whether or not he ends up a Patriot is tough to say, maybe Clayton's just throwing darts. ESPN guys have been known to do that......BUT if LJ ends up a Patriot as a football fan if they had a healthy Brady back along with LJ, WOW! As a fantasy football fan, I see him as a Top 15 RB, but not worthy of a high first round pick simply because of the balance they would have on offense.
 
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
No one really "saw" the Pats trading for Moss or Dillon either honestly considering before those guys came along they had a reputation for being tight with their wallets and not wanting to fork over big contracts. Signing guys like Moss and Dillon kind of went against the grain there.I don't think the money would be the big obstacle to signing LJ honestly.......they can afford it and if they want him bad enough, they'll pay up.
The Pats had talked about trying to get Randy Moss for a full year before they actually traded for him. That one should not have surprised many people (although the timing of it sort of did). Dillon was bit surprising in that he slipped under the Patriots radar, but the Bengals were actively shopping him so it again was not a total shock.The money WOULD be an issue, as the Pats don't have a lot of cap space and have a lot of players with contracts up, almost up, or guys that need extensions.Guys with contracts up in 2009:Richard Seymour, Mike Vrabel, Jarvis Green, Kevin Faulk, Stephen Neal, Vince Wilfork, Ellis Hobbs, Logan Mankins, Nick Kaczur, Ben Watson,GUys with contracts up in 2010:Tom Brady, Randy Moss, Matt LightThey are about $4 million under the cap currently (they normally leave a rainy day emergency fund). They appear to have a lot of contracts to work out (or need to decide who they will let walk). I'm not sure adding LJ AT HIS CURRENT CONTRACT makes much sense.
 
The bottomline is BB is a chameleon and he will change what he does based on his talent. If a big time RB ends up on the Patriot roster next season I fully expect him to get the majority of the workload. If that type of RB doesn't show up than it will be RBBC.
Great point. Whether or not he ends up a Patriot is tough to say, maybe Clayton's just throwing darts. ESPN guys have been known to do that......BUT if LJ ends up a Patriot as a football fan if they had a healthy Brady back along with LJ, WOW! As a fantasy football fan, I see him as a Top 15 RB, but not worthy of a high first round pick simply because of the balance they would have on offense.
Glad a few people in here have some common sense. If anything has been proven over the years it is that BB will alter his team strategy to the players around him. All great coaches do. None do it better than BB IMO. If, and it's a big IF, LJ should end up in NE next year there is an extremely low chance of RBBC if you ask me. LJ is vastly more talented than anyone else on the NE roster right now. How quickly we forget all the people who said Moss wouldn't thrive in NE because "they like to spread the ball around." When an elite talent arrives, game plans change.As a guy who recently traded for LJ a few weeks back seeing him as a buy low I really hope this happens. As a realist I'm not so sure. I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility and honestly I traded for LJ because I'm a firm believer that he will be playing somewhere other than KC next year. I just don't know if NE will be that location.
 
This makes a lot of sense. LJ would go to a winning team and be able to be the main back. Pats have the extra picks to deal and have room to rework the contract.

Pats use to let on back run with the ball in the past. Right now they dont have one back that can handle the duties so they split it up. Before Brady and Moss melted together last year, Pats ran a balance attack on offense.

Belicheck is all about winning and I see him trying to make a move like this so his team can get back to the top.

 
No one I know has heard anything about this. Sounds like Clayton throwing out a wild guess, much like someone would do in a Shark Pool wild spculation/predictions thread. Unless he knows something other people don't, he's just throwing it out there to stir the pot.From what I could find, LJ would carry a $4.5 million salary in 2009 and $5 million in 2010 (provided his contract doesn't change, the Chiefs don't invoke a detrimental conduct clause, or he's not cut). THe Pats already have a bunch of 30+ running backs, and he'll turn 30 during the season next year.Given the current set of circumstances, I don't see the Pats trading for Johnson. If he were to be released and interested in a short term deal for low dollars, then sure anything is possible, but I doubt LJ would be interested in that.
No one really "saw" the Pats trading for Moss or Dillon either honestly considering before those guys came along they had a reputation for being tight with their wallets and not wanting to fork over big contracts. Signing guys like Moss and Dillon kind of went against the grain there.I don't think the money would be the big obstacle to signing LJ honestly.......they can afford it and if they want him bad enough, they'll pay up.
The Pats had talked about trying to get Randy Moss for a full year before they actually traded for him. That one should not have surprised many people (although the timing of it sort of did). Dillon was bit surprising in that he slipped under the Patriots radar, but the Bengals were actively shopping him so it again was not a total shock.The money WOULD be an issue, as the Pats don't have a lot of cap space and have a lot of players with contracts up, almost up, or guys that need extensions.Guys with contracts up in 2009:Richard Seymour, Mike Vrabel, Jarvis Green, Kevin Faulk, Stephen Neal, Vince Wilfork, Ellis Hobbs, Logan Mankins, Nick Kaczur, Ben Watson,GUys with contracts up in 2010:Tom Brady, Randy Moss, Matt LightThey are about $4 million under the cap currently (they normally leave a rainy day emergency fund). They appear to have a lot of contracts to work out (or need to decide who they will let walk). I'm not sure adding LJ AT HIS CURRENT CONTRACT makes much sense.
This was all I needed to read. Thanks David.The rest of you can continue to speculate away.
 
This makes a lot of sense. LJ would go to a winning team and be able to be the main back. Pats have the extra picks to deal and have room to rework the contract.Pats use to let one back run with the ball in the past. Right now they dont have one back that can handle the duties so they split it up. Before Brady and Moss melted together last year, Pats ran a balance attack on offense.Belicheck is all about winning and I see him trying to make a move like this so his team can get back to the top.
I agree with some of this and disagree with some of this. Yes, I think the Pats will look at each individual team they have and game plan accordingly to figure out their best chance to win.IMO, the Pats have bigger issues than worrying about adding a high priced RB. Their secondary needs a lot of help, they still need a replacement for Bruschi, key guys on their OL and DL could walk after next year, and they need a TE. They are also going to have to rework Brady's deal as well. So I don't see them shipping off many draft picks unless they find a long term solution as a position. With Johnson, they probably would get two years out of him before they found themselves right back where they are now (aging RB corps with a guy that hasn't done much).From what I have heard, the Pats likely will not look to make a splash at RB either in the draft or free agency unless someone falls in their laps for not a lot of money. They may make some inquiries and have some talks with free agents, but they are not expected to make a major move (at least that's the story I've been told.)Despite what we fantasy footballers may think, even though the Pats leading rusher is Sammy Morris with only 321 rushing yards, the Pats rank 5th in rushing attempts, 8th in rushing yards, and 7th in rushing TD. Their team ypc average is almost always lower than their other rankings, and this year is no different (15th). For a RBBC approach, those still are very good team rushing numbers. (We can debate what those numbers would be had Brady stayed healthy, but even then the Pats likely would not be as concerned about their RBs if they were pass happy.)
 
This makes a lot of sense. LJ would go to a winning team and be able to be the main back. Pats have the extra picks to deal and have room to rework the contract.

Pats use to let one back run with the ball in the past. Right now they dont have one back that can handle the duties so they split it up. Before Brady and Moss melted together last year, Pats ran a balance attack on offense.

Belicheck is all about winning and I see him trying to make a move like this so his team can get back to the top.
I agree with some of this and disagree with some of this. Yes, I think the Pats will look at each individual team they have and game plan accordingly to figure out their best chance to win.IMO, the Pats have bigger issues than worrying about adding a high priced RB. Their secondary needs a lot of help, they still need a replacement for Bruschi, key guys on their OL and DL could walk after next year, and they need a TE. They are also going to have to rework Brady's deal as well. So I don't see them shipping off many draft picks unless they find a long term solution as a position. With Johnson, they probably would get two years out of him before they found themselves right back where they are now (aging RB corps with a guy that hasn't done much).

From what I have heard, the Pats likely will not look to make a splash at RB either in the draft or free agency unless someone falls in their laps for not a lot of money. They may make some inquiries and have some talks with free agents, but they are not expected to make a major move (at least that's the story I've been told.)

Despite what we fantasy footballers may think, even though the Pats leading rusher is Sammy Morris with only 321 rushing yards, the Pats rank 5th in rushing attempts, 8th in rushing yards, and 7th in rushing TD. Their team ypc average is almost always lower than their other rankings, and this year is no different (15th). For a RBBC approach, those still are very good team rushing numbers. (We can debate what those numbers would be had Brady stayed healthy, but even then the Pats likely would not be as concerned about their RBs if they were pass happy.)
Good stuff here.DY, who would you predict does NOT stay in 2009?

Richard Seymour, Mike Vrabel, Jarvis Green, Kevin Faulk, Stephen Neal, Vince Wilfork, Ellis Hobbs, Logan Mankins, Nick Kaczur, Ben Watson

 
As for the Pats implementing a primary back model, the only year they really had one guy get a ton of work was Dillion in 04. Belichick has been there 9 years total now, so I'm not sure we can say he's used one guy extensively (Antowain Smith had a year with a decent workload, but that was based more out of necessity than choice.)

I think most NFL coaches would love to give one guy the ball 25 times a game if he could get 5 yards a pop, never get hurt, and never get worn down or tired. BUt that's not how it works, so I think BB would be content to rotate low dollar guys and spend more money elsewhere that might improve the team.

 
This makes a lot of sense. LJ would go to a winning team and be able to be the main back. Pats have the extra picks to deal and have room to rework the contract.

Pats use to let one back run with the ball in the past. Right now they dont have one back that can handle the duties so they split it up. Before Brady and Moss melted together last year, Pats ran a balance attack on offense.

Belicheck is all about winning and I see him trying to make a move like this so his team can get back to the top.
I agree with some of this and disagree with some of this. Yes, I think the Pats will look at each individual team they have and game plan accordingly to figure out their best chance to win.IMO, the Pats have bigger issues than worrying about adding a high priced RB. Their secondary needs a lot of help, they still need a replacement for Bruschi, key guys on their OL and DL could walk after next year, and they need a TE. They are also going to have to rework Brady's deal as well. So I don't see them shipping off many draft picks unless they find a long term solution as a position. With Johnson, they probably would get two years out of him before they found themselves right back where they are now (aging RB corps with a guy that hasn't done much).

From what I have heard, the Pats likely will not look to make a splash at RB either in the draft or free agency unless someone falls in their laps for not a lot of money. They may make some inquiries and have some talks with free agents, but they are not expected to make a major move (at least that's the story I've been told.)

Despite what we fantasy footballers may think, even though the Pats leading rusher is Sammy Morris with only 321 rushing yards, the Pats rank 5th in rushing attempts, 8th in rushing yards, and 7th in rushing TD. Their team ypc average is almost always lower than their other rankings, and this year is no different (15th). For a RBBC approach, those still are very good team rushing numbers. (We can debate what those numbers would be had Brady stayed healthy, but even then the Pats likely would not be as concerned about their RBs if they were pass happy.)
Good stuff here.DY, who would you predict does NOT stay in 2009?

Richard Seymour, Mike Vrabel, Jarvis Green, Kevin Faulk, Stephen Neal, Vince Wilfork, Ellis Hobbs, Logan Mankins, Nick Kaczur, Ben Watson
As far as guys not staying PAST 2009 . . .I can see them trying to play hardball with Seymour, so he would be a candidate to go elsewhere. Vrabel is also getting up there age wise so he may just retire or be asked to take a Seau or Bruschi like cheap one year deal. Faulk will proabably retire. I can't see them shelling out big money for Watson given his inability to stay healthy, so I would guess he will be gone as well.

The other guys I think they will try to keep, but if they see $$$ in their eyes I doubt NE will offer them the most money (see Samuel, Asante).

I don't think any of them are in grave danger of not playing for NE in 2009.

 
This makes a lot of sense. LJ would go to a winning team and be able to be the main back. Pats have the extra picks to deal and have room to rework the contract.Pats use to let one back run with the ball in the past. Right now they dont have one back that can handle the duties so they split it up. Before Brady and Moss melted together last year, Pats ran a balance attack on offense.Belicheck is all about winning and I see him trying to make a move like this so his team can get back to the top.
I agree with some of this and disagree with some of this. Yes, I think the Pats will look at each individual team they have and game plan accordingly to figure out their best chance to win.IMO, the Pats have bigger issues than worrying about adding a high priced RB. Their secondary needs a lot of help, they still need a replacement for Bruschi, key guys on their OL and DL could walk after next year, and they need a TE. They are also going to have to rework Brady's deal as well. So I don't see them shipping off many draft picks unless they find a long term solution as a position. With Johnson, they probably would get two years out of him before they found themselves right back where they are now (aging RB corps with a guy that hasn't done much).From what I have heard, the Pats likely will not look to make a splash at RB either in the draft or free agency unless someone falls in their laps for not a lot of money. They may make some inquiries and have some talks with free agents, but they are not expected to make a major move (at least that's the story I've been told.)Despite what we fantasy footballers may think, even though the Pats leading rusher is Sammy Morris with only 321 rushing yards, the Pats rank 5th in rushing attempts, 8th in rushing yards, and 7th in rushing TD. Their team ypc average is almost always lower than their other rankings, and this year is no different (15th). For a RBBC approach, those still are very good team rushing numbers. (We can debate what those numbers would be had Brady stayed healthy, but even then the Pats likely would not be as concerned about their RBs if they were pass happy.)
IMO the Pats #1 need is to upgrade their pass rush (followed by their secondary). If you look at some of their recent loses in big games (Indy and the Giants in the playoffs and the Jets last week as examples) their inability to get to the QB in urgent situations is killing them. They're basically a sack away from winning the past two Super Bowls. I'd love to see Vrabel move inside (I've felt that way for a couple of years now) with Mayo and get another big time pass rushing threat on the outside. That would solve a ton of issues as well as easing the pressure on the secondary.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top