In a Yahoo first-year redraft league with people who post on a non-fantasy football message board, I offered a trade last week of Jahvid Best, Larry Fitzgerald and Minn for DeAngelo Williams, Dwayne Bowe and Balt. The trade was accepted Saturday morning, the first trade made in the league. Yahoo has an automatic 48-hour delay for trades. I remember encountering this two years ago when I did a Yahoo league with people from the same message board. The commish (a different person) would manually approve these trades, given there were no objections to the trade or indication of collusion, so rosters could be set for that week's games. I expected the same to happen here, and on Saturday morning I posted a message on the league site, sent an e-mail to the commish and sent him a pm over the message board asking for the approval process to be expedited. The commish never showed up Saturday. On Saturday afternoon, I posted on the league site suggesting my trading partner posted his post-trade starting lineup there. I would do the same and the commish could update the rosters on Sunday. I posted my lineup but the trading partner did not do so. At this time Saturday, I also posted that this trade was intended to take place prior to Week 2 games and that, if it did not process prior to the games, I considered the trade invalidated.
I would never make a trade one week that didn't complete until the next week. That seems ludicrous. You trade based on what happened the previous week. So much changes during a week's games. A player involved could be knocked out for the year. Or a player can go off, as Best did in this case. In the approximately 30 fantasy football leagues I've done over 15 years, trades agreed upon late in the week were always put through prior to that week's games. If the commish wasn't around to approve the trade Saturday, we would post our new lineups for the week and the commissioner would update our rosters on Sunday. Despite Best's performance, I would like for the trade to go through for Week 2's games. Even if it costs me a win this week and hurts my team in the long term, I offered the trade based on Week 1 and would stand by it. Unfortunately, the trading partner did not post a post-trade lineup so the trade can't be put through for Week 2. The trading partner wants the trade to go through for Week 3. I say the trade was offered in Week 2, accepted in Week 2 and that I explicitly wrote Saturday that the trade was meant for Week 2 and would no longer be valid after the games were played. There were no rules established on this in the league prior, and this was the first trade accepted in the league. The commish has yet to make a decision on the outcome. What do you think should be done?
I would never make a trade one week that didn't complete until the next week. That seems ludicrous. You trade based on what happened the previous week. So much changes during a week's games. A player involved could be knocked out for the year. Or a player can go off, as Best did in this case. In the approximately 30 fantasy football leagues I've done over 15 years, trades agreed upon late in the week were always put through prior to that week's games. If the commish wasn't around to approve the trade Saturday, we would post our new lineups for the week and the commissioner would update our rosters on Sunday. Despite Best's performance, I would like for the trade to go through for Week 2's games. Even if it costs me a win this week and hurts my team in the long term, I offered the trade based on Week 1 and would stand by it. Unfortunately, the trading partner did not post a post-trade lineup so the trade can't be put through for Week 2. The trading partner wants the trade to go through for Week 3. I say the trade was offered in Week 2, accepted in Week 2 and that I explicitly wrote Saturday that the trade was meant for Week 2 and would no longer be valid after the games were played. There were no rules established on this in the league prior, and this was the first trade accepted in the league. The commish has yet to make a decision on the outcome. What do you think should be done?