Frostillicus
Footballguy
Well?
That's because those of us that know how great he was also know he isn't #1.I can't believe I was the first vote for KAJ. This is a FOOTBALL board I guess, so I shouldn't be surprised.
Who was three? I think that’s where the debate begins really.1 & 2 are essentially settled. I believe we already decided #3, so the 4 spot is where things get interesting.
Here is the debate in case you missed this threadWho was three? I think that’s where the debate begins really.1 & 2 are essentially settled. I believe we already decided #3, so the 4 spot is where things get interesting.
Agreed with all of this except the strong argument for Lebron partI believe the answer is MJ with a strong argument to be made for Lebron.
Any other answer seems truly ludicrous to me and I wish the poll was made public so we can see who is truly nonsensical.
But did he?mJ seems like the choice here but many of the votes are going his way simply based on our demographics. Those of us in our 40s grew up watching him in our formative years. I was a Pistons fan, so I watched a lot of Jordan. That was one of the best rivalries ever - Jordan vs the bad boys. It took a while and adding the right players but Jordan eventually won that war.
It’s really 1a/1b with Lebron.
He was 1st team all-nba three times in 13 seasons. I never saw him play, but since I’m not a “count the rings” guy, I have a hard time calling someone the best when he was rarely even considered the best at his position in real time.Somehow Bill Russell and his eleven rings always gets forgotten in these types of discussions.
If you’re limiting it to 4 years, ok. But their reign ended in 91, when the bulls went on to 3 straight and 6 of the next 8 championships. So yeah, the Bulls with Jordan eventually won the war. (I’m not limiting the war to those 4 years)But did he?mJ seems like the choice here but many of the votes are going his way simply based on our demographics. Those of us in our 40s grew up watching him in our formative years. I was a Pistons fan, so I watched a lot of Jordan. That was one of the best rivalries ever - Jordan vs the bad boys. It took a while and adding the right players but Jordan eventually won that war.
It’s really 1a/1b with Lebron.
Jordan's Bulls faced the Bad Boy Pistons four times in the playoffs.
The Pistons won three of the series, leading to TWO NBA championships and another Finals appearance.
The Bulls won one of the series, leading to ONE NBA championship.
Sounds, to me, like the Pistons got the better of the Bulls in their war/rivalry.
Now, the Bulls obviously went on to greater success by winning five more championships, while those Pistons never won another, so on the grander scale, sure, the Bulls won the war over the NBA as a whole, but in the Bulls/Pistons rivalry, the Pistons, in that four-year stretch, won it.
He's my vote for 3 fwiw.Somehow Bill Russell and his eleven rings always gets forgotten in these types of discussions.
He said "eventually", as in the Pistons won the first two battles but eventually the Bulls prevailed.ordan's Bulls faced the Bad Boy Pistons four times in the playoffs.
The Pistons won three of the series, leading to TWO NBA championships and another Finals appearance.
The Bulls won one of the series, leading to ONE NBA championship.
Sounds, to me, like the Pistons got the better of the Bulls in their war/rivalry.
He also had 5 MVP's.He was 1st team all-nba three times in 13 seasons. I never saw him play, but since I’m not a “count the rings” guy, I have a hard time calling someone the best when he was rarely even considered the best at his position in real time.Somehow Bill Russell and his eleven rings always gets forgotten in these types of discussions.
Agreed with all of this except the strong argument for Lebron partI believe the answer is MJ with a strong argument to be made for Lebron.
Any other answer seems truly ludicrous to me and I wish the poll was made public so we can see who is truly nonsensical.
This.I’ve said it before but no player has had the combo of unreal athleticism, insane basketball IQ, elite skills and the will to want to murder everyone in their path the way MJ did.
Agreed. There's a lot of nostalgia for that rivalry but the teams didn't really sync up in terms of title windows. 89-90 was probably the only season they were both championship caliber and the only time the series went 7, and the Pistons won that one.Sounds, to me, like the Pistons got the better of the Bulls in their war/rivalry.
Now, the Bulls obviously went on to greater success by winning five more championships, while those Pistons never won another, so on the grander scale, sure, the Bulls won the war over the NBA as a whole, but in the Bulls/Pistons rivalry, the Pistons, in that four-year stretch, won it.
He was a below average defender and not a good outside shooter. He also benefitted greatly from playing with the guy I actually have ranked at #3.Probably closer than people think between LeBron and Michael.
That third place thing not going Magic's way is stunning to me. Nobody changed the game like him. Seven footers always gonna seven foot. 6'9" at point guard? That totally changed the way GMs scout these guys, both shooting and point guards.
Showtime at 6'9". Running floors and dishing and wishing (as Clyde Frazier might say).
But I guess the NBA is a bigs-driven league so. . .seven footers gonna seven foot in the rankings.
Dwyane Wade
He was a below average defender and not a good outside shooter.
He was a below average defender and not a good outside shooter.
His miracle three in Boston will live as the one of the all-time daggers to the heart in NBA play.
But if you say so, then who am I to suggest otherwise? You do this stuff for breakfast.
Magic is the greatest PG of all time, did revolutionize the position and is a lock in the top 7 of this list. We're just splitting hairs at this level and I've always felt like he was a bit overrated due to the aforementioned issues. I just don't think he belongs in the top 3 discussion.
I like this entire post and would pretty much agree 100%I'm a Laker fan and Magic stan, always rooted against MJ, but I still have to put him at #1. Hard to argue against LeBron's body of work, so I reluctantly put him at #2.
Behind them I do have Magic, Kareem, Wilt and Russell in some order. I have a hard time with the Wilt v Russell thing. NBA historians pretty much all put Russ ahead, but Wilt was the most dominating player in the game, probably ever (peak Shaq the only counter argument I can see). Hell he may have been the greatest athlete on the planet in the 60s. He played both ends of the court, while Russell could barely shoot and didn't score much (15 ppg for his career). No question Russell is the greatest winner in sports history (2 NCAAs, Olympic Gold, 11 NBA titles? Ridiculous!). But he almost always had the best team around him. Wilt had the better team twice, maybe three times, and won the title two of those seasons. And it was way closer than people remember: Wilt team's lost to the Celtics in Game 7 four times - by a combined 9 points! He was just a better basketball player, but so often distracted by stats and off court shenanigans while Russ only cared about winning so he kept getting the best of him.
Goliath, a three part docuseries about Wilt on Showtime, is a great watch. The Paul Arizin story at the end![]()
Magic was a 30% career 3-pt shooter, but he was also an 85% career FT shooter. Nobody really practiced 3’s back in the day, but based on his FT shooting he probably would have become a solid outside shooter if he played today.He was a below average defender and not a good outside shooter.
His miracle three in Boston will live as the one of the all-time daggers to the heart in NBA play.
But if you say so, then who am I to suggest otherwise? You do this stuff for breakfast.
Really don't see how you can say the bolded and be talking about Lebron. If you are gonna use the bolded as point, then it has to be Bill Russell imo.I think Jordan is probably the best player in NBA history based on his higher peak, but I think Lebron has the best full resume based on the longer career of team and personal success. If Lebron can maintain something near his 22-23 level where he is playing at or near an All-NBA level for another couple years, I think his significantly extended resume will surpass the accomplishments of Jordan's slightly higher peak.
He had a set shot.Magic was a 30% career 3-pt shooter, but he was also an 85% career FT shooter. Nobody really practiced 3’s back in the day, but based on his FT shooting he probably would have become a solid outside shooter if he played today.He was a below average defender and not a good outside shooter.
His miracle three in Boston will live as the one of the all-time daggers to the heart in NBA play.
But if you say so, then who am I to suggest otherwise? You do this stuff for breakfast.
About Ball’s shooting? Or Magic’s?He had a set shot.Magic was a 30% career 3-pt shooter, but he was also an 85% career FT shooter. Nobody really practiced 3’s back in the day, but based on his FT shooting he probably would have become a solid outside shooter if he played today.He was a below average defender and not a good outside shooter.
His miracle three in Boston will live as the one of the all-time daggers to the heart in NBA play.
But if you say so, then who am I to suggest otherwise? You do this stuff for breakfast.
This article explains everything you need to know about his shooting.
Really don't see how you can say the bolded and be talking about Lebron. If you are gonna use the bolded as point, then it has to be Bill Russell imo.I think Jordan is probably the best player in NBA history based on his higher peak, but I think Lebron has the best full resume based on the longer career of team and personal success. If Lebron can maintain something near his 22-23 level where he is playing at or near an All-NBA level for another couple years, I think his significantly extended resume will surpass the accomplishments of Jordan's slightly higher peak.