Henry Ford
Footballguy
Maybe he just keeps an open mind, like Hillary Clinton.http://rivoters.com/by_number/060007/10230_fred_p_gralinski.html
I think you had it right originally. Looks like he switched parties frequently
Maybe he just keeps an open mind, like Hillary Clinton.http://rivoters.com/by_number/060007/10230_fred_p_gralinski.html
I think you had it right originally. Looks like he switched parties frequently
Once again you seem to have let your position slant your ability to read. Your link states the last time he voted as...Found it. Used to be a Democrat, then went insane and registered R before issuing idiotic statements
http://rivoters.com/by_number/060007/10230_fred_p_gralinski.html
And Tim's the Democrat!Plot twist: the Republican is rockaction
And it states that since that date he reregistered as a Republican. You saw that, right?Once again you seem to have let your position slant your ability to read. Your link states the last time he voted as...
...Wait for it.
GRALINSKI voted in a STATEWIDE PRIMARY on 09/09/2014 as a Democrat in precinct 06003.
No, it says he WAS a Republican as in past tense. It seems he has been voting as a Democrat.. I do not see at any time this guy has voted as a Republican.And it states that since that date he reregistered as a Republican. You saw that, right?
No, it says he WAS a Republican as in past tense. It seems he has been voting as a Democrat.. I do not see at any time this guy has voted as a Republican.
VOTING HISTORY
• GRALINSKI voted in a STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION on 11/04/2014 in precinct 06003. • GRALINSKI voted in a STATEWIDE PRIMARY on 09/09/2014 as a Democrat in precinct 06003. • GRALINSKI voted in a PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION on 11/06/2012 in precinct 06003. • GRALINSKI voted in a STATEWIDE PRIMARY on 09/11/2012 as a Democrat in precinct 06003. • GRALINSKI voted in a STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION on 11/02/2010 in precinct 06002. • GRALINSKI voted in a STATE WIDE PRIMARY on 09/14/2010 as a Democrat in precinct 06002. • GRALINSKI voted in a PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION on 11/04/2008 in precinct 06002.
And you seem to not understand that the official voting record is all that matters, Not the commentary at the top. However, Keep misleading the facts. We shall see how he votes in the next election.Oh, I see. So you don't actually know how to read that. That's fair.
Did you see the official registration information I posted? That on 2/11/15 he reregistered with R privileges?And you seem to not understand that the official voting record is all that matters, Not the commentary at the top. However, Keep misleading the facts. We shall see how he votes in the next election.
Perhaps there is a motive for a Life long Democrat switching to Republican right before a primary. A Democrat would never play dirty would they?Did you see the official registration information I posted? That on 2/11/15 he reregistered with R privileges?
Well, it's not like we're going to agree that there are ridiculous idiots in every segment of the political spectrum.We're going to have to get to the bottom of Fred Gralinski's party affiliation and then play gotcha with the other side.
It will be nice. A fallacy of composition, as it were.
Dude, we should call Mr. Gralinski's office, at least.Is he listed on whitepages? Can we call him?
Day isn't over yet...Republican or democrat, he's an idiot, and what he said is dumber than anything I've read in the FFA today.
That's a quality like right there.One of which was mine.
Oh, and here's another like for ya.
I was wondering how long it would take for cries of a false flag operation. Should we guess whether he votes for Trump?Perhaps there is a motive for a Life long Democrat switching to Republican right before a primary. A Democrat would never play dirty would they?
Also, this is not at all official as also stated on the link you provided.
This is a privately owned and operated genealogy website using a purchased copy of the Rhode Island voter list as of early 2015, which is all unrestricted, public information by law. Use this website at your own risk. There is no warranty.
I believe it's Chairman Gralinski.Dude, we should call Mr. Gralinski's office, at least.
As long as it isn't a nonexistent nanny, I'm good.I'm telling your wife!
Because anyone with a half a brain knows one person represents everyone. Duh.I wonder why it matters what some nutjob said?
I did, but didn't get a response. She originally told me I "did something awful with our nanny" in her dream. I pointed out we don't have a nanny. She said we did in the dream. I asked "is she a looker?" The the battle began.Did you ask the wife for a description of the imaginary nanny? Like, hot and flirty Latino, icy cold Nordic goddess, brown eyed buxomy Irish lass, etc? The details are important.
You could hire a criminal sketch artist to help your wife better describe her, for everyone's benefit.I did, but didn't get a response. She originally told me I "did something awful with our nanny" in her dream. I pointed out we don't have a nanny. She said we did in the dream. I asked "is she a looker?" The the battle began.
Because of the lame stream media IMO.This doesn't seem to be going as planned for the OP