I have him and I wouldn't take anything that would likely be offered at this point. I'd rather keep him and wait for him to emerge. It helps that I am 3-1 and have a decent chance to go to 4-1 this week.Hey LJ owners, what would you think about in trade for him right now? I cannot believe hes THAT bad and am thinking about trying to pick him up this week in both my leagues. What players would you take for him at this point?
I don't like Herm, but in his defense they are facing a awful lot of 8 man fronts. If the QB/O-Line situation was better LJ would be doing pretty good.KC is attempting a lot more passes than runs so far, which is really odd for Herm. Eventhough they are behind a lot, he has never really abandoned the run like this before. I can't imagine it will continue. LJ's stats gotta get better than this, right?
What concerns me is that this line seems much more adept at pass blocking than run blocking. They are getting ZERO push. The passing game/QB are NOT the problem - Huard/Gonzalez/Bowe, etc look BETTER than last year. The run game is the problem. They need to do some misdirection to give LJ a chance. Teams are just pouncing on him, especially on screens.KC is attempting a lot more passes than runs so far, which is really odd for Herm. Eventhough they are behind a lot, he has never really abandoned the run like this before. I can't imagine it will continue. LJ's stats gotta get better than this, right?
The passing game looks better beacuse there is 7 or 8 in the box every play. Teams are worried about LJ beating them, not Huard.What concerns me is that this line seems much more adept at pass blocking than run blocking. They are getting ZERO push. The passing game/QB are NOT the problem - Huard/Gonzalez/Bowe, etc look BETTER than last year. The run game is the problem. They need to do some misdirection to give LJ a chance. Teams are just pouncing on him, especially on screens.KC is attempting a lot more passes than runs so far, which is really odd for Herm. Eventhough they are behind a lot, he has never really abandoned the run like this before. I can't imagine it will continue. LJ's stats gotta get better than this, right?
Didn't teams do this last year?On another note...anyone feel this year is jinxed or something. The top four on most peopled boards were LT, S Jax, Gore, and LJ and every single one of them has been a disappointment, especially LJ and S Jax.thayman said:The passing game looks better beacuse there is 7 or 8 in the box every play. Teams are worried about LJ beating them, not Huard.Judge Smails said:What concerns me is that this line seems much more adept at pass blocking than run blocking. They are getting ZERO push. The passing game/QB are NOT the problem - Huard/Gonzalez/Bowe, etc look BETTER than last year. The run game is the problem. They need to do some misdirection to give LJ a chance. Teams are just pouncing on him, especially on screens.PahtyTom said:KC is attempting a lot more passes than runs so far, which is really odd for Herm. Eventhough they are behind a lot, he has never really abandoned the run like this before. I can't imagine it will continue. LJ's stats gotta get better than this, right?
The difference being Green was the QB, and after he got hurt Huard with no film was in. Teams have film on Huard now and know his tendancies. Also the O-line is another year older and slowerDidn't teams do this last year?On another note...anyone feel this year is jinxed or something. The top four on most peopled boards were LT, S Jax, Gore, and LJ and every single one of them has been a disappointment, especially LJ and S Jax.thayman said:The passing game looks better beacuse there is 7 or 8 in the box every play. Teams are worried about LJ beating them, not Huard.Judge Smails said:What concerns me is that this line seems much more adept at pass blocking than run blocking. They are getting ZERO push. The passing game/QB are NOT the problem - Huard/Gonzalez/Bowe, etc look BETTER than last year. The run game is the problem. They need to do some misdirection to give LJ a chance. Teams are just pouncing on him, especially on screens.PahtyTom said:KC is attempting a lot more passes than runs so far, which is really odd for Herm. Eventhough they are behind a lot, he has never really abandoned the run like this before. I can't imagine it will continue. LJ's stats gotta get better than this, right?
I was offered Lynch for Him & turned it down. I am trying to move SA for Lynch instead.I won't take anything less than a tier 1 player for LJ. So I am holding.madviking10 said:Hey LJ owners, what would you think about in trade for him right now? I cannot believe hes THAT bad and am thinking about trying to pick him up this week in both my leagues. What players would you take for him at this point?
LJ lovers are a pretty fierce breed around here. Even now the battle-cry is that now is the time to trade for him and things will get better.It's funny how (before drafts) people were considered "brain-dead" for even thinking of passing up LJ at #3 . . .
Tomlinson at #1, Jackson at #2 are both busts at this point. You still can't pass them up, who else would you have taken? Addai?? LJ still had more points this week then Addai did.It's funny how (before drafts) people were considered "brain-dead" for even thinking of passing up LJ at #3 . . .
Just put in an offer for him. i think his best days are ahead of him, he has a more favorable schedule from here on out. I think its kind of like Evans (but on a higher level obv). What a current disappointment, but down the stretch this guy could pave the way to a trophy.madviking10 said:Hey LJ owners, what would you think about in trade for him right now? I cannot believe hes THAT bad and am thinking about trying to pick him up this week in both my leagues. What players would you take for him at this point?
Joke, right?LJ owners - would you bite if someone offered you MJD?
No way someone would do that IMO. Anyone with LJ would probably only trade him for another RB, as he's their first round pick and would leave a big hole at RB.As nice as it is to have an elite TE (I luckily nabbed Witten), LJ with the remaining schedule will require an elite QB or WR or a 1st tier RB IMO (perhaps ending at Marion Barber).I am curious to know if LJ owners would consider parting ways with him at this point? Say an Antonio Gates?
Do what you want. Trade him for MJD or Gates if you think that'll work. I just don't think those two trades would make an LJ owner's team any better. Call this being a clueless LJ owner thing if you want, but the facts are still:- LJ is very, very talented- the schedule gets a LOT, not a little, better- the chiefs have played against the 1st (MIN), 7th (HOU), 8th (SD), 12th (JAX) and 28th (CHI) best teams against the run. And the Jags were VERY skewed by several key injuries in week one, as they gave up 241 on the ground, then 80 to ATL and 50 to DEN.So make your "LJ owners with heads in the sand" comments, but I'll continue to go with what seems to better my team, and right now that is sticking with LJ.Are there worries? Sure. But the key: What are you getting in return, and how are the prospects for that replacement?Might as well rename this one the "LJ Owner Here: I'm In Denial And Proud Of It" or Little Orphan Fantasy Football Annie's "Tomorrow, Tomorrow, The Chiefs Will Get Their Crap Together Tomorrow" thread...
The Pats O-Line has been like that in the past as well. This is the first year they have looked solid blocking in both phases. KCdoes not seem to have any offensive rhythm. Jacksonville has a really solid defense. Hard for an inexperienced offense to beat them. KC's main targets are a rookie and a TE who likely has blocking responsibilities. This is not a good scenario for offensive output.Judge Smails said:What concerns me is that this line seems much more adept at pass blocking than run blocking. They are getting ZERO push. The passing game/QB are NOT the problem - Huard/Gonzalez/Bowe, etc look BETTER than last year. The run game is the problem. They need to do some misdirection to give LJ a chance. Teams are just pouncing on him, especially on screens.PahtyTom said:KC is attempting a lot more passes than runs so far, which is really odd for Herm. Eventhough they are behind a lot, he has never really abandoned the run like this before. I can't imagine it will continue. LJ's stats gotta get better than this, right?
The league I have LJ in is on good pace to make the playoffs.
Dear LJ,
...Just get hot for the playoffs & I'll be golden.
O.
YesThe league I have LJ in is on good pace to make the playoffs.
Dear LJ,
...Just get hot for the playoffs & I'll be golden.
O.Does this mean LJ is a bust or that he's still awesome?
The LJ owner in my owner league officially announced him being placed on the trading block. Luckily i had his AIM, so i was able to talk negotiations. My best offer without "overpaying" was Marvin Harrison and Sammy Morris, all his other offers he's received around the league were low balling deals.I got Morris off waivers after week 1 before he blew up so it didn't cost me much. And i recieved Harrrison from trading my 5th round pick. Braylon for Portis. Then Portis to another owner for Harrison.He got 3 days to think about the deal. I hope it goes thru and i hope no one thinks i over payed for himWhat would it take at this point to get him from you? I recently had an owner laugh at my offer of Jordan+Harrison for him. Do you guys still think he can get it going or is it full-panic sell-mode now?
For lazy owners there's probably panic. For all others, there's not. Basically, the schedule and offensive growing pains tell the main story of the first 5 weeks. Again, it comes down to what you can get for him. I didn't stick with LJ through this time that I knew would difficult just to let him go. I've put the time in, and hope to reap now.What would it take at this point to get him from you? I recently had an owner laugh at my offer of Jordan+Harrison for him. Do you guys still think he can get it going or is it full-panic sell-mode now?
I own LJ in a dynasty league and a redraft. I would have accepted your offer in the redraft (pre Jordan and Harrison injuries of course) but no way do I move LJ in a dynasty for almost anything. His value is at an all time low and that is the worst possible time for trading him away if you are a smart LJ owner. In most redrafts, the LJ owner is likely not doing so hot right now. If you have a decent #2 RB (i.e. someone in the 8-15 range) and a servicable WR, I would put them out there and see if the LJ owner bites. LJ does indeed have a softer schedule from this point out and trading for him might be the move that puts a deep team over the top. In a dynasty league, you better come with a good offer; something in the neighborhood of a 1st rounder (or 2), a good young RB prospect, and probably something else (depending on your depth and their team needs) - otherwise I won't even entertain the offer. This is just one humble LJ owners value system. Hope it helps...What would it take at this point to get him from you? I recently had an owner laugh at my offer of Jordan+Harrison for him. Do you guys still think he can get it going or is it full-panic sell-mode now?
True, but lets put that in perspective. Scoring ugly last year put him in the top 3 player in fantasy and won me a title. And it wasn't close: LT 451, SJax 369, LJ 348, Manning 305, Westy 290.Since he's the lone ranger in that backfield, if he can get back to ugly success that would be mighty fine.BTW, the Croyle-era scares me a little... I think that'll hurt LJ, but we'll see.Larry Johnson already had the magical run of nine or ten 100 yards games with bunches of TDs late in 2005 season as replacement for Priest H. That is a run that is probably going to happen only once in a player career as everything has to line-up perfectly for have that type of production. I feel like many people are expecting this to happen. Last year, Johnson at least was scoring ugly in games, pretty much no matter wh he faced. Now, that is not even occuring. While the schedule may make it easier for Johnson to play better, this probably only means closer to scoring ugly than it does a return to the uberstud LJ.
But any run of scoring ugly won't put Johnson there this year. Many (not all) Johnson owners are already in the hole. At this point, the ugly (22 for 67 1 TD 3 catches for 28 yard) 16-17 point game will certainly be a vast improvement but may not be enough to justify the draft position, what people are asking in trade, and truly get the player out of the mess of depending on him. The point of drafting a Larry Johnson (assuming health) is that his ugly games are among his lesser ones, not waiting for the schedule to ease up so he can actually score a touchdown.NatronIsMean said:True, but lets put that in perspective. Scoring ugly last year put him in the top 3 player in fantasy and won me a title. And it wasn't close: LT 451, SJax 369, LJ 348, Manning 305, Westy 290.Since he's the lone ranger in that backfield, if he can get back to ugly success that would be mighty fine.BTW, the Croyle-era scares me a little... I think that'll hurt LJ, but we'll see.coolnerd said:Larry Johnson already had the magical run of nine or ten 100 yards games with bunches of TDs late in 2005 season as replacement for Priest H. That is a run that is probably going to happen only once in a player career as everything has to line-up perfectly for have that type of production. I feel like many people are expecting this to happen. Last year, Johnson at least was scoring ugly in games, pretty much no matter wh he faced. Now, that is not even occuring. While the schedule may make it easier for Johnson to play better, this probably only means closer to scoring ugly than it does a return to the uberstud LJ.
Well, it is what it is. I'm a keeper league owner. I'm not trying to justify his ADP, which at this point is a moot issue for me. Looking forward, I'm hopeful when comparing him to the other backs out there. Man, it's amazing how few RBs are looking very solid right now. Considering the other options, I still think he can come up huge 2nd half.But any run of scoring ugly won't put Johnson there this year. Many (not all) Johnson owners are already in the hole. At this point, the ugly (22 for 67 1 TD 3 catches for 28 yard) 16-17 point game will certainly be a vast improvement but may not be enough to justify the draft position, what people are asking in trade, and truly get the player out of the mess of depending on him. The point of drafting a Larry Johnson (assuming health) is that his ugly games are among his lesser ones, not waiting for the schedule to ease up so he can actually score a touchdown.NatronIsMean said:True, but lets put that in perspective. Scoring ugly last year put him in the top 3 player in fantasy and won me a title. And it wasn't close: LT 451, SJax 369, LJ 348, Manning 305, Westy 290.Since he's the lone ranger in that backfield, if he can get back to ugly success that would be mighty fine.BTW, the Croyle-era scares me a little... I think that'll hurt LJ, but we'll see.coolnerd said:Larry Johnson already had the magical run of nine or ten 100 yards games with bunches of TDs late in 2005 season as replacement for Priest H. That is a run that is probably going to happen only once in a player career as everything has to line-up perfectly for have that type of production. I feel like many people are expecting this to happen. Last year, Johnson at least was scoring ugly in games, pretty much no matter wh he faced. Now, that is not even occuring. While the schedule may make it easier for Johnson to play better, this probably only means closer to scoring ugly than it does a return to the uberstud LJ.
You can't do misdirection plays with an o-line that can't block. They take too long to develop and you've already got 4 or 5 defenders in the backfield on every snap as is. If they can't run the ball between the tackles...they're doomed.Judge Smails said:What concerns me is that this line seems much more adept at pass blocking than run blocking. They are getting ZERO push. The passing game/QB are NOT the problem - Huard/Gonzalez/Bowe, etc look BETTER than last year. The run game is the problem. They need to do some misdirection to give LJ a chance. Teams are just pouncing on him, especially on screens.PahtyTom said:KC is attempting a lot more passes than runs so far, which is really odd for Herm. Eventhough they are behind a lot, he has never really abandoned the run like this before. I can't imagine it will continue. LJ's stats gotta get better than this, right?
I just traded for him in dynasty: Cedric Benson, Adrian Peterson (Chi) and Calvin JohnsonLondo said:In a dynasty league, you better come with a good offer; something in the neighborhood of a 1st rounder (or 2), a good young RB prospect, and probably something else (depending on your depth and their team needs) - otherwise I won't even entertain the offer.
What a deal you got. That Chicago situation... no thanks now or next year, as the line is getting VERY old. Calvin is nice upside, but doesn't make the difference IMO.I just traded for him in dynasty: Cedric Benson, Adrian Peterson (Chi) and Calvin JohnsonLondo said:In a dynasty league, you better come with a good offer; something in the neighborhood of a 1st rounder (or 2), a good young RB prospect, and probably something else (depending on your depth and their team needs) - otherwise I won't even entertain the offer.