Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
LJ Update (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter eefflrat
- Start date
hmmmm...so he's healing nicely but may need surgery. Makes perfect sense
This has to be the most F'ed up speculation I have seen in a long time. I am waiting for a newsreport telling us they just amputated his foot. That would put an end to the speculation at least
Last edited by a moderator:
dickey moe
Fingerpicker
Keith Lewis
Footballguy
FFdork
Footballguy
So, you're basing this on what exactly? That the injury involves a foot? I haven't heard this mentioned as a possibility anywhere besides the 'I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express' wannabe doctors on this forum.
fatness
Footballguy
So the fact that it's progressing like a sprain shows it's a lis franc injury?
Does the fact that he will likely miss the last 8 games of the year on IR sound like its just a sprain? The chiefs are still in the playoff hunt, why would they IR LJ for the rest of the year if its just a sprain? Face it, hes done for 2007 and this will surely affect his 2008 workload and performance. Very similar to Kevin Jones last year.
This is really a whole lot of speculation on your point. He has several cracked bones in his foot. He is a running back. He uses his feet. I would be shocked if he played again soley based on the fracture diagnosis. Yes a Lisfranc is in the differential but you have no more information today then you had yesterday that this is anything more then what the Chiefs have been saying.
Sabertooth
Footballguy
Milwalkeysbeast
Footballguy
speculation
Tat
Has-been punter
saw this on Sportsline too
G-Money
Footballguy
Chiefs clarify Johnson's injury situation -- sort of
Posted: November 20, 2007
KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) -- The mystery surrounding Larry Johnson's foot injury has finally been solved.
Not the injury itself, but the reason the Kansas City Chiefs have been so coy about the extent of it: Johnson didn't want anyone to know.
The subterfuge surrounding Johnson's injury started almost the minute he caught his foot in the turf during a game against Green Bay on Nov. 5, the questions flying from every direction. Was he going to need surgery? Would he play this week or the week after? Is he done for the season? Is the foot broken, as a Denver news station reported?
The Chiefs swatted away every volley, appearing awkward at times as they turned Johnson's status into a John Grisham novel. The verbal labyrinth continued for a brief while Tuesday before general manager Carl Peterson finally gave an explanation for the charade.
"There is something between a doctor and a patient, and if the patient doesn't want the information out there, he's (the doctor) obligated, as we are under the rules of HIPPA, to not go into it," Peterson said. "We're just going to give what we're required to give by the National Football League for a lot of reasons."
Since the injury, the Chiefs have said Johnson had a mid-foot sprain and his status would be evaluated each week. The former Pro Bowler missed the past two games and coach Herm Edwards said he wouldn't play Sunday at Oakland.
Johnson had tests on the foot Monday, though Edwards evaded questions about the results, saying only that they showed "that he's rehabbing it." When pressed for an answer, Edwards searched for words before Peterson curtly jumped in.
"We're not going to get into medical terms. We said that from the onset," he said.
It hasn't helped that Johnson has stopped talking to the media. The one time he broke the silence, on Peterson's weekly radio show last week, Johnson said nothing about the severity of the injury, only that he expects to play again this season.
The Chiefs might be evasive about the extent of Johnson's injury, but it's obvious they still have hopes he'll return in 2007. Had they thought he was done, Johnson already would have been on injured reserve.
"If we didn't think he's going to play for us, we'd probably make that decision," Peterson said. "Every week we have to put down eight players, injured or not, so it's an easy decision to make unless it's a decision where we know absolutely 100 percent he's finished for the year. But we don't feel that. Our doctors tell us that's not the situation."
Posted: November 20, 2007
KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) -- The mystery surrounding Larry Johnson's foot injury has finally been solved.
Not the injury itself, but the reason the Kansas City Chiefs have been so coy about the extent of it: Johnson didn't want anyone to know.
The subterfuge surrounding Johnson's injury started almost the minute he caught his foot in the turf during a game against Green Bay on Nov. 5, the questions flying from every direction. Was he going to need surgery? Would he play this week or the week after? Is he done for the season? Is the foot broken, as a Denver news station reported?
The Chiefs swatted away every volley, appearing awkward at times as they turned Johnson's status into a John Grisham novel. The verbal labyrinth continued for a brief while Tuesday before general manager Carl Peterson finally gave an explanation for the charade.
"There is something between a doctor and a patient, and if the patient doesn't want the information out there, he's (the doctor) obligated, as we are under the rules of HIPPA, to not go into it," Peterson said. "We're just going to give what we're required to give by the National Football League for a lot of reasons."
Since the injury, the Chiefs have said Johnson had a mid-foot sprain and his status would be evaluated each week. The former Pro Bowler missed the past two games and coach Herm Edwards said he wouldn't play Sunday at Oakland.
Johnson had tests on the foot Monday, though Edwards evaded questions about the results, saying only that they showed "that he's rehabbing it." When pressed for an answer, Edwards searched for words before Peterson curtly jumped in.
"We're not going to get into medical terms. We said that from the onset," he said.
It hasn't helped that Johnson has stopped talking to the media. The one time he broke the silence, on Peterson's weekly radio show last week, Johnson said nothing about the severity of the injury, only that he expects to play again this season.
The Chiefs might be evasive about the extent of Johnson's injury, but it's obvious they still have hopes he'll return in 2007. Had they thought he was done, Johnson already would have been on injured reserve.
"If we didn't think he's going to play for us, we'd probably make that decision," Peterson said. "Every week we have to put down eight players, injured or not, so it's an easy decision to make unless it's a decision where we know absolutely 100 percent he's finished for the year. But we don't feel that. Our doctors tell us that's not the situation."
BigRed
Footballguy
yeah clear as mudSounds like meaningless soap opera BS - who cares why he or they said what they did? Cmon KC, IR the guy or not would ya
Last edited by a moderator:
Nate
Footballguy
Rotoworld (via PFT) reporting LJ has the Lisfranc, but that he won't have surgery
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...NFL&id=1315
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...NFL&id=1315
Similar threads
