What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

LJ (1 Viewer)

longlip

Footballguy
i played grant and mjd instead of putting lj in the lineup....urrrrrrrrrr :crazy: but i still have chance to win my game...i really thought denver would be way ahead and KC would abandon the run...boy was i wrong

 
Had him on my bench in a ppr. Sat him for Perry Sunday morning. Will probably cost me the win since I am only by 10 tonight instead of 35 and my opponent has Ward and Miller.

 
thanks for doing a quick data check...i fugured i was the only one.... :crazy: mine was ppr also

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Had him on my bench in a ppr. Sat him for Perry Sunday morning. Will probably cost me the win since I am only by 10 tonight instead of 35 and my opponent has Ward and Miller.
Damn. If going to have to go back and look at my inputs. Is your league off line by chance?
 
IMO, Denver is one of those defenses where you almost have to start whoever you have going against them.

 
Why in the world would anybody have benched the guy? He was going against Denver and coming off his first good game of the season.

 
A guy I played had him on his bench... I benched Steven Jackson in favor of MJD. So it sort of balanced out. Then again, I had Farve on my bench too. :nerd:

 
Had him on my bench in a ppr. Sat him for Perry Sunday morning. Will probably cost me the win since I am only by 10 tonight instead of 35 and my opponent has Ward and Miller.
Damn. If going to have to go back and look at my inputs. Is your league off line by chance?
I agree. The data clearly showed only 1 poor soul didn't start LJ.
Had Barber, LJ and Jones Drew. I played Barber and Jones Drew. :confused:
 
I did one better. Dumped him after week 2! Yes I knew he had a good match up week 4 but I;ll be last one laughing when he scores my opponet a miserable 2 pts like he did me week 2!

I had a chance to pick him back up but decided to stick with Bush instead as I already own McFadden. And Slaton! And only have to play one RB each week as it is with S.Smith, Edwards, Welker and Bowe to pick from also!

I gave him 2 weeks to prove he's worthy of this team and he failed. I maybe regretting it but maybe not. He had no keeper value in this type of league and thought I could use his spot for help in other areas. Obviously so far it was a bad move on my part but it's a long year and his bid value was unbeatable after week 2 where I could bid him for anyone I wanted! :coffee:

 
No, but I understand that the fantasy "expert" (Berry?) on ESPN said to bench him. :lmao:
I saw that...I was cracking up , laughing at the guy.. :lmao: :lmao: I mean, its Denver thy were playing, not Tennessee!ESPN has a bunch of 'experts' and none is ever right.. :wall: as for LJ, he's #3 in rushing yards in the entire league... :yes: :yes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK If it was silly to bench him why did the FBG Cheatsheet have Chris Perry way ahead of LJ

If people had both players and they used the cheatsheets I think you would start Perry over LJ. If not why use the cheatsheets.

I'm just saying it was not that silly to sit him.

There were 15 RB ahead of LJ on Sunday's Cheatsheet :thumbdown:

 
OK If it was silly to bench him why did the FBG Cheatsheet have Chris Perry way ahead of LJIf people had both players and they used the cheatsheets I think you would start Perry over LJ. If not why use the cheatsheets.I'm just saying it was not that silly to sit him.There were 15 RB ahead of LJ on Sunday's Cheatsheet :lmao:
bingo :goodposting:
 
Almost benched him for Buckhalter....thankfully I didnt.. some times you just have to go with your gut and ignore the cheatsheets.

 
Benched him for Perry in a ppr, which turned out to be a REALLY bad decision when Palmer got scratched. Fortunately I managed to squeak out a 2 point win thanks to the Steelers sack, fumble recovery, and TD in the third quarter tonight.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top