What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Lori Laughlin & Felicity Huffman BUSTED! (2 Viewers)

jomar's post pointed out that the FBI used techniques almost identical to another, better known investigation currently going on. Yet, in that one, the Bureau's integrity and use of said techniques is endlessly criticized yet no one has done so in this admissions scandal.
Which investigation? I'm shuked here.

 
What if schools offered a buy-in for wealthy but unqualified students (i.e., somewhere from 2-10 times the normal tuition rate) but their permanent record designated them as a "financial" or "legacy" or (make up your own word) admission? Would Mr. and Mrs. Rich Southerncalifornian be ok with that? I'm thinking that a system like that would help a lot of other students who come up short in affordability.

 
Sinn Fein said:
This irritates me much more than the original scandal:

The first lawsuits targeting elite universities and individuals charged by federal prosecutors in a sweeping college admissions scandal were filed by a student and parent on Wednesday in California.

The parent, Jennifer Kay Toy, claimed in San Francisco Superior Court that her son Joshua — with a 4.2 grade-point average — was not admitted to some schools because of the "despicable actions" of parents implicated in the scandal.

***

In addition to Toy's civil complaint, a Stanford student filed what she's hoping will become a class-action lawsuit against the school and all the other implicated universities, claiming their degrees will not be "worth as much as" before.
Wait a second, I've got 4 kids too stupid to get in to elite universities.

JACKPOT!!

@General Malaise - assuming your offspring got your smarts I've got some good news for you!

 
You know, it would've helped if jomar was just upfront about the whole thing. I still have no idea what he's talking about.
Me neither. I’m confused by the cryptic posts. Just tell us what investigation you’re referring to!! I don’t watch news or follow politics at all, so I assume it’s something related to politics that I have no clue about. I get my news from here  :bag:

 
Me neither. I’m confused by the cryptic posts. Just tell us what investigation you’re referring to!! I don’t watch news or follow politics at all, so I assume it’s something related to politics that I have no clue about. I get my news from here  :bag:
He's talking about the Mueller investigation and Trump. People over in the PSF are calling the method with which they might get the President a "process crime." It's really both sides polluting the PSF, which is all that place is. 

I'm just clearing it up because this is an interesting thread. Those threads in the PSF aren't, and are just a lot of anger on both sides of the political equation. I stay out of those other than to point out the hysteria brought forth by both sides.    

 
He's talking about the Mueller investigation and Trump. People over in the PSF are calling the method with which they might get the President a "process crime." It's really both sides polluting the PSF, which is all that place is. 

I'm just clearing it up because this is an interesting thread. Those threads in the PSF aren't, and are just a lot of anger on both sides of the political equation. I stay out of those other than to point out the hysteria brought forth by both sides.    
Thanks. Just to put into perspective how detached I am from news and politics, I have no idea what the Mueller investigation is or about. I’m much happier not knowing tbh. 

 
No matter what side of the political spectrum one falls - willful ignorance to the world around you is dangerous.
Nah. There are 8 billion other people who can worry. I went down the rabbit hole 10 years ago and have come full circle. Some stuff is just out of our control and until the masses wake the F up, nothing is changing soon. 

 
No matter what side of the political spectrum one falls - willful ignorance to the world around you is dangerous.
I think it's really haughty to constantly laud terrorism and/or bring it up in both avatar and name yet castigate people for not being politically involved. 

It makes me worry about political involvement. 

Back to Laughlin and Huffman. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's really haughty to constantly laud terrorism and/or bring it up in both avatar and name yet castigate people for not being politically involved. 

It makes me worry about political involvement. 

Back to Laughlin and Huffman. 
You don't like my avatar?

I don't like it either.  :shrug:

I don't think it represents terrorism though....

 
And - "Not being politically involved"  <> "I have no idea what the Mueller investigation is or about."

Most people are not politically involved.  But that is different than being aware, even tangentially, with the news that has dominated the media for the last two years - no matter what you think if the investigation.

 
You don't like my avatar?

I don't like it either.  :shrug:

I don't think it represents terrorism though....
No. It's Liverpool and the ninety-six, IIRC and the song they sing at Anfield. Did an entire law school Sports Law paper on soccer hooliganism and policing and the EU and human rights, etc. (Anfield and the 96 being the product of a crush because of policing and pens designed to take away taking "ends," etc.)

But you have had terroristic avatars about Ireland. Look, do what you want. I just...it just gives me substantive pause.  

 
And - "Not being politically involved"  <> "I have no idea what the Mueller investigation is or about."

Most people are not politically involved.  But that is different than being aware, even tangentially, with the news that has dominated the media for the last two years - no matter what you think if the investigation.
So not paying attention to news is dangerous how? I’d say it’s the opposite. I’m constantly happy and positive and pass it along to anyone I come in contact with. 10 years ago I was preaching doom and gloom and was a miserable SOB  :shrug:

 
:shrug:   ok?

(I don't think I have had an Irish-related avatar for 4-5 years, but thanks for keeping tabs  :thumbup:  )
Sure. Hey, I like some of the substantive stuff in your posts, but I think IK has commented about it before, too. Do what you want, but don't expect it not to be seen. It's there for a reason, GB. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What if schools offered a buy-in for wealthy but unqualified students (i.e., somewhere from 2-10 times the normal tuition rate) but their permanent record designated them as a "financial" or "legacy" or (make up your own word) admission? Would Mr. and Mrs. Rich Southerncalifornian be ok with that? I'm thinking that a system like that would help a lot of other students who come up short in affordability.
I'm 99% sure they would not be ok with that.

They want the illusion (which over time morphs into reality) that their kid got into and graduated from a top school on their own merits.

 
So obviously these kids are nowhere near being smart enough to get in. I think if a kid of an affluent family has bad grades, they should investigate. Maybe there needs to be a minimum set to be able to stay enrolled. Otherwise after this blows over, it will start again. Just my opinion. 

 
So obviously these kids are nowhere near being smart enough to get in. I think if a kid of an affluent family has bad grades, they should investigate. Maybe there needs to be a minimum set to be able to stay enrolled. Otherwise after this blows over, it will start again. Just my opinion. 
People aren’t going to risk going to federal prison for their dumb kids after this. I doubt it starts back up to this extent. 

 
People aren’t going to risk going to federal prison for their dumb kids after this. I doubt it starts back up to this extent. 
If these 2 film stars don't see jail time then I can see parents risking it all for their kids, esp if their career is pretty much over anyway. 

 
None of these rich people are hardened criminals.  They are going to be singing like canaries about anything and everything.  If there was anyone that the FBI may have missed, or didn't have enough evidence to bring a charge, chances are they may obtain it when these people start trying to make deals.

 
Nah. There are 8 billion other people who can worry. I went down the rabbit hole 10 years ago and have come full circle. Some stuff is just out of our control and until the masses wake the F up, nothing is changing soon. 
Don’t have a problem with your worldview, but how can you say “I don’t pay attention to that stuff” and then call out the people who need to wake up? Anyway, I don’t blame you for avoiding that stuff, it’s disheartening. 

One glaring issue here that is being completely overlooked is how rich people create/abuse charities as tax shelters or to otherwise launder money. How many politicians, or their spouses, have a charity?

Paid for rent while incarcerated with charity

More...

Kilpatrick civic fund in a nutshell 

^^^this last one is probably covers the other two

Kwame Kirkpatrick not only bilked the people of Detroit with pay to play politics but also collected millions for his charity that went to administrative costs and employed relatives. This guy in the college case had a charity that people donated to. Politicians set up charities and anonymous donors can funnel money directly to them, and this still happens today. 

You could theoretically take dirty money, show it as collected donations in your charity, and pay it back out as salary, or for services to a shell company that the original  donor set up. And while some charities do amazing work, a lot don’t.

Top 50 worst charities (2013)

1.3 billion collected, 900+ million paid to those who collected, not for whom it was intended. Legally, apparently, as this is pretty common and there are no repercussions. 

I’m going to email Jon Oliver. This has a show written all over it. 

 
He's talking about the Mueller investigation and Trump. People over in the PSF are calling the method with which they might get the President a "process crime." It's really both sides polluting the PSF, which is all that place is. 

I'm just clearing it up because this is an interesting thread. Those threads in the PSF aren't, and are just a lot of anger on both sides of the political equation. I stay out of those other than to point out the hysteria brought forth by both sides.    
Thank you!

 
Officer Pete Malloy said:
Totally serious.  I had to look it up but that show was on from 1987 to 1995.

From 87-92 I was working nights and/or partying.

After that I had little kids. Full House was not on my radar.
Every once in a while, OPM sneaks in a non-shtick post.

 
Well, at least we know that campus demographics have changed. Used to be that you were a scion who donated a wing to let your grandson in for class. Now you're an actress female who lets your daughter in to sell makeup. Great system of meritocracy we have going. 

#### this ####. 

Tune in. Turn on. Drop out. 

 
xulf said:
There is no way anybody shouldn't know Aunt Becky.  However, 1992 had a bunch of really good shows.


Officer Pete Malloy said:
Totally serious.  I had to look it up but that show was on from 1987 to 1995.

From 87-92 I was working nights and/or partying.

After that I had little kids. Full House was not on my radar.
this  but more partying, no kids.

show is stupid, as well. 

 
I just don't understand.   If you are going to drop 500K  to get your kid into a school, you're telling me a new "whatever facility/wing" wouldn't have worked?

Is that not a thing anymore?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top