Hipple Long Ware & Peete
Footballguy
Would be nice for people to comment/ask questions, say where they disagree etc, without having to take it to the SP. This could also satiate those that want a 'subscribers only forum' as this is the kind of stuff they'd want to discuss and comment on too. Not sure why you have the comments set up as needing to be approved. Seems a lot of unnecessary work, and that it kind of stifles the discussion, by not allowing responses while you are still on that page article etc.
For e.g. I have some questions/issues with a few of the 'internal workings' of a few of Dodds Defensive rankings this week. Would be easier to say "I'm a little suprised that you project 2.9 sacks for ___ and 2.2 sacks for ________, with how bad the ______'s O line has looked in relation to the _______ O line.
Would also be a way to use the 'wisdom of the crowds' concept for Dodds/Bloom/Tremblay Norton to question their own rankings, and maybe tweak them if they agree with the criticism in much the same manner that MOP uses the SP feedback at times to alter his RB predictions.
For e.g. I have some questions/issues with a few of the 'internal workings' of a few of Dodds Defensive rankings this week. Would be easier to say "I'm a little suprised that you project 2.9 sacks for ___ and 2.2 sacks for ________, with how bad the ______'s O line has looked in relation to the _______ O line.
Would also be a way to use the 'wisdom of the crowds' concept for Dodds/Bloom/Tremblay Norton to question their own rankings, and maybe tweak them if they agree with the criticism in much the same manner that MOP uses the SP feedback at times to alter his RB predictions.
Last edited by a moderator:
