What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Lucis trust the U.N. publisher (1 Viewer)

What’s depressing is how people have the information but look the other way because it’s easier. https://www.lucistrust.org
 

They are the U.N. publisher. Nothing false or misleading about that.
What’s depressing is when people post false information, get called out with the correct info and they flat out ignore it because it doesn’t fit their narrative.   (Re: “Bob Mueller of Russiagate hoax fame was also the United Nations architect of common core”).   This is exactly how thingS like Q and Flat Earth gain momentum.  

 
Is this about Lucis of Borg or Lucis the rapper?

(whoops, Locutis of Borg and Ludacris the rapper)  I wonder if those two are working together to undo the civilized world.  That would be dope.
The clues have always been right in front of our eyes. You think Luda's flying from the Puerto Rican Day parade in New York to drinking hand grenades in New Orleans that same night without the help of a global cabal? Come on. The guy's going from Jamaica to Japan, Canada to Chicago and then finally to Africa (where the best women reside). Who travels like that?  International conspirators, that's who.

 
What’s depressing is when people post false information, get called out with the correct info and they flat out ignore it because it doesn’t fit their narrative.   (Re: “Bob Mueller of Russiagate hoax fame was also the United Nations architect of common core”).   This is exactly how thingS like Q and Flat Earth gain momentum.  
What? Bob had no input? Please enlighten me. I honestly missed it.

Sorry about the Rams by the way. At least your not a Falcon fan like me lol

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's a tie via a yahoo article between an NGO who needed a lawyer and Joe Biden's younger brother sufficient that younger Biden got a call to help find a lawyer.

This single fact supports nothing else in this entire thread.

 
Does that make you question any of your other assumptions, or maybe that other things you considered to be "facts" aren't actually facts?
Nah you need to read more and connect the dots. I stated that Lucis trust is their publisher and that they do influence policy. All you have to do is read their philosophy and then draw your own conclusions. If you haven’t looked through their material then your opinion is uninformed conjecture.

 
Does that make you question any of your other assumptions, or maybe that other things you considered to be "facts" aren't actually facts?
@pinkham13.   This is the point.

Most every one of the conspiracies out there are a few degrees or small detailed fact away from the truth, that’s why people fall for them. 

 
@pinkham13.   This is the point.

Most every one of the conspiracies out there are a few degrees or small detailed fact away from the truth, that’s why people fall for them. 
The same can be said about CNN and the Russia gate hoax. People wouldn’t look at alternative outlets if they weren’t lied to 24/7 on mainstream news.

 
Nah you need to read more and connect the dots. I stated that Lucis trust is their publisher and that they do influence policy. All you have to do is read their philosophy and then draw your own conclusions. If you haven’t looked through their material then your opinion is uninformed conjecture.
I don't connect dots that are worlds apart.  If you want folks to connect dots, you don't put one in the US, another in China, and tell folks to fill in the gaps.

Paint a picture with facts.Move the dots close together, put enough there that it's indisputable what picture is drawn when you connect them.

Hell, connecting your two dots you just barely have a straight line.

 
Nah you need to read more and connect the dots. I stated that Lucis trust is their publisher and that they do influence policy. All you have to do is read their philosophy and then draw your own conclusions. If you haven’t looked through their material then your opinion is uninformed conjecture.


I try man I try. If the FBI can make 17 mistakes on a FISA and impeach on hearsay then I’m entitled to make a mistake too.
The fact these 2 statements were posted back to back without the slightest bit of self awareness irony is Fascinating (yes, with a capital F).

 
I don't connect dots that are worlds apart.  If you want folks to connect dots, you don't put one in the US, another in China, and tell folks to fill in the gaps.

Paint a picture with facts.Move the dots close together, put enough there that it's indisputable what picture is drawn when you connect them.

Hell, connecting your two dots you just barely have a straight line.
When you read through their website and realize I have a point get back to me. But you won’t investigate it. It’s too hard to question the government news outlets.

 
The same can be said about CNN and the Russia gate hoax. People wouldn’t look at alternative outlets if they weren’t lied to 24/7 on mainstream news.
They're not lied to 24/7 on mainstream news.

It's approaches like this that cause folks to fall for anything.  The mainstream media is overwhelmingly a media source that can be trusted.  Alternative sources are much less trustworthy, yet for a handful of errors, folks will throw out the mainstream media and never trust them again, while continuing to accept error after error from their alternative sources.

You in this topic made a serious error in your initial post.  It was pointed out to you.  Folks know you misled them or were honestly wrong.  

 
When you read through their website and realize I have a point get back to me. But you won’t investigate it. It’s too hard to question the government news outlets.
You want me to do your work for you.

You put two dots out in the world, and tell me to research the rest and figure it out and then get back with you.  No thanks.

 
You want me to do your work for you.

You put two dots out in the world, and tell me to research the rest and figure it out and then get back with you.  No thanks.
No I don’t.  I want you to educate yourself. I conceded the Mueller point but that small concession doesn’t invalidate anything. I just made an error anyone could have made.

 
Simple they are contributing money. All NGOs that contribute cash influence policy. Check out their website and you can see how their vision is being implemented. I reposted the Biden connection to Communist NGO leader who was arrested since you obviously ignored it.

https://news.yahoo.com/china-wants-new-world-order-u-n-china-linked-ngos-secretly-paid-cash-promote-beijings-vision-145746181.html
Contributing money does not equal influencing policy.  A lot of people contribute money to the UN...that does not mean they are influencing policy.  Ive read about lucis...there seems to be zero that is really all that concerning outside of some pretty crazy conspiracy stuff.  They don't appear to be doing anything actually illegal...so, sorry, but meh.

I saw you posted a connection to an NGO leader who apparently called Biden's Brother...something which still has nothing to do with anything I have said in here while asking about Lucis Publishing influencing policy.   So yes, I ignored the link that was irrelevant to anything I actually posted about.

Reading further about it...a former government official called Biden's brother...asking about a lawyer.  There appears to be no other actual connection to Biden in any way doing anything illegal or immoral.  Its a non-story when it comes to Biden and Lucis. 

 
No I don’t.  I want you to educate yourself. I conceded the Mueller point but that small concession doesn’t invalidate anything. I just made an error anyone could have made.
It invalidated the link you made between Russiagate, the UN, and common core. You wrote:

Did you know Bob Mueller of Russiagate hoax fame was also the United Nations architect of common core? The train wreck goofy math taught in our schools.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/17925-un-obama-and-gates-are-globalizing-education-via-common-core
No mainstream media outlet would've made that mistake.

 
Contributing money does not equal influencing policy.  A lot of people contribute money to the UN...that does not mean they are influencing policy.  Ive read about lucis...there seems to be zero that is really all that concerning outside of some pretty crazy conspiracy stuff.  They don't appear to be doing anything actually illegal...so, sorry, but meh.

I saw you posted a connection to an NGO leader who apparently called Biden's Brother...something which still has nothing to do with anything I have said in here while asking about Lucis Publishing influencing policy.   So yes, I ignored the link that was irrelevant to anything I actually posted about.

Reading further about it...a former government official called Biden's brother...asking about a lawyer.  There appears to be no other actual connection to Biden in any way doing anything illegal or immoral.  Its a non-story when it comes to Biden and Lucis. 
Well my man thanks for the reply. I never said the trust did anything illegal. All you have to do is read through their site to understand how many of their core beliefs are becoming U. N. policy. 

 
It invalidated the link you made between Russiagate, the UN, and common core. You wrote:

No mainstream media outlet would've made that mistake.
No it didn’t I confused a man with the same exact name that’s all.
I guess the 17 FISA mistakes never happened.

 
The fact these 2 statements were posted back to back without the slightest bit of self awareness irony is Fascinating (yes, with a capital F).
Guess you read the transcript of the call and called your Senator to impeach right away. Whistleblower who wasn’t even on the call just protecting the criminal actions of the Bidens. Trump was hired to drain the swamp. I have my doubts though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No it didn’t I confused a man with the same exact name that’s all.
I guess the 17 FISA mistakes never happened.
Bob Mueller != Bob Muller.  And yes, the fact that Bob Mueller isn't Bob Muller invalidates any links between Russiagate and the UN and common core that you made.

 
No I don’t.  I want you to educate yourself. I conceded the Mueller point but that small concession doesn’t invalidate anything. I just made an error anyone could have made.
Can you please correct the error in the OP? That might help with anyone jumping into the thread and reading through. 

 
Bob Mueller != Bob Muller.  And yes, the fact that Bob Mueller isn't Bob Muller invalidates any links between Russiagate and the UN and common core that you made.
Not really but people believe what is easy to believe. 
 

Russiagate hoax

climate change hoax

hearsay impeachment hoax

Biden guilty

Drain the swamp

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pinkham, I guarantee that if you listened to mainstream media sources you'd be better informed than you will be listening to whoever you're listening to.  When your sources make mistakes of factual natures, hold them to the same standards as you hold the mainstream media to and see how they stack up.  How quickly do they correct their stories?  What editorial scrutiny do their pieces go through?  What kind of accountability of any kind do they have?  Good day, and best of luck, but i'm out here.

 
Why exactly is promoting education a bad thing?  An effort to make sure that all children are literate and can make informed decisions for themselves is a bad thing?  A common understanding globally that could prevent more world wars is a bad thing?

The UN isn't perfect (just like FISA applications I guess) but not sure how promoting education qualifies for outrage.

Is this the part where pizza and Epstein get added to the story?  I saw that Schiff might have been up to some funny business (https://twitter.com/jennajameson/status/1206696471485005825) and that Anthony Bourdain got whacked because he found out.  Man, there are some rabbit holes out there if you are inclined to look.

 
Pinkham, I guarantee that if you listened to mainstream media sources you'd be better informed than you will be listening to whoever you're listening to.  When your sources make mistakes of factual natures, hold them to the same standards as you hold the mainstream media to and see how they stack up.  How quickly do they correct their stories?  What editorial scrutiny do their pieces go through?  What kind of accountability of any kind do they have?  Good day, and best of luck, but i'm out here.
Thanks I know you mean well

Like how CNN promoted the Iraq war and faked being attacked on camera?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isMtxbPdvzg

probably just another conspiracy theory lol

you can trust the government and their news hahaha

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lucis trust formerly known as Lucifer publishing and established by Alice Bailey does all the publishing for the U.N.

https://www.lucistrust.org

Agenda 21,climate change, communism you get it all at the United Nations straight from  Saul Alinskys hero, Satan himself. Saul was Hillary Clinton’s hero too so that says a lot about her and how we got to where we are.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/20/hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-and-lucifer-explained/
Lost interest in this thread after seeing the bolded. 

 
But felt the need to tell everyone how you don’t really care that these people influence policy.
Saul Alinsky is not influencing people or policies in 2019. Most liberals or progressives I know had never heard of him until a few years back after those on the right started claiming he was some sort of hero on the left or that Democrats had adopted points from his rulebook.

And Satan was not his hero. Please. Alinsky made a literary allusion by writing an epigraph describing the rebellious angel Lucifer as "the first radical known to man" in his book "Rules for Radicals." However he did not dedicate "Rules for Radicals" to Lucifer as has been falsely claimed.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/saul-alinsky-dedicated-rules-for-radicals-to-lucifer/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not really but people believe what is easy to believe. 
 

Russiagate hoax

climate change hoax

hearsay impeachment hoax

Biden guilty

Drain the swamp
There was no hoax with Russiagate or Mueller.  He reported on what Russia did...and what connections there were to Trump and concluded there was not evidence of criminal conspiracy.  That does not make any of it any kind of hoax.

Climate Change is a hoax?  Well, that is interesting and seems quite untrue.

Hearsay impeachment hoax...has what to do with the publisher or UN?  Oh wait, nothing?  Its also not actually a hoax...we pretty much know well that what the WB said happened, actually happened.  Its clear there was withholding aid for crack pot investigations.

Biden guilty of what exactly?

What swamp?  The one Trump continues to create?  Mueller did well of draining part of that swamp...if key people would testify into the Ukraine issue, a few other of Trump's swamp would be drained as well.

All which have zero to do with Lucis Trust.

 
What’s the endgame here?  Q at least had some sort of promise of pulling back the curtain, exposing avenues and vehicles of malfeasance.  Is something like that here, is there some sort of reveal that leads to an action of any kind?  Even if I bought into the premise of these stories, what am I supposed to do with the info?  If true, I’m defeated already.  If false, just another fun story to distract me from the here and now I guess.

It’s so weird to me that there are all these monstrous underground entities that control the world and they’re all known and their actions/desires right there, yet no one is actually taking control of the whole, there’s no singular government or organization being elevated to overall leader, and nothing seems to have truly improved for the players; they’re rich, but they were rich before

 
There has now been six Russian Hoaxwitches locked up (including Gates).

Flynn will make seven.

Will they all file suits for false imprisonment?
 

 
There has now been six Russian Hoaxwitches locked up (including Gates).

Flynn will make seven.

Will they all file suits for false imprisonment?
 
Only if they call Biden’s brother for a lawyer I guess.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top