Hipple Long Ware & Peete
Footballguy
What if wasted space 25 was also the source referred to at pft.'Twenty-Four Eighty-Four said:
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Lynch uncertain for Week 1 (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter killrobotkill
- Start date
Hipple Long Ware & Peete
Footballguy
Fwiw the fbgs are split. Bloom sees lynch playing, Dodds does not...
rockaction
Footballguy
Here's more - Lynch to play unless something "crazy happens"eta* Oh man, I did not see this above. Sorry.
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe he will play but I still have a tough time committing to him. He could reagravate his back early and I can't help but think Seattle is going to crush ariizona this week which might have the team pulling him early if that's the case.
Last edited by a moderator:
brednbuddah
Footballguy
source: CBS sportsline
shnikies
Footballguy
Seattle is a 2.5 point favorite on the road with a rookie quarterback. I doubt they run away with the game.
shnikies
Footballguy
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter
Marshawn Lynch is expected to play, though Seattle will be mindful of the workload it gives him with his back spasms.
I'm a little confused by this. If back spasms are the problem and he's able to play, I'm guessing he's not currently having back spasms. If so, why would they have to limit his workload? It's not something you have to worry further injuring, right? So, it's a matter of pain tolerance. I just don't get it. Seems like it should be, not playing or a full workload, middle ground doesn't make sense.
Marshawn Lynch is expected to play, though Seattle will be mindful of the workload it gives him with his back spasms.
I'm a little confused by this. If back spasms are the problem and he's able to play, I'm guessing he's not currently having back spasms. If so, why would they have to limit his workload? It's not something you have to worry further injuring, right? So, it's a matter of pain tolerance. I just don't get it. Seems like it should be, not playing or a full workload, middle ground doesn't make sense.
footballnerd
Footballguy
Mike Sando's weird little 29-55 stat dig kinda bugs, but wasn't he splitting with fred jax during that time?
Twenty-Four Eighty-Four
Footballguy
I think it's easy to say they'll be mindful of his carries, but if he's in the game and is effective it'll be difficult to pull him.
display name
Footballguy
I'm no doctor but I don't think it's just a matter of tolerating the pain. I think with the back spasms their will be some mobility issues if they start to act up. I also would imagine they could flare up due to physical exertion. We're basically talking about very tight muscles. If they did flare up I don't think he'd be able to perform during the game. I'm guessing that their could be some after affect if the muscles are over exerted as well.Never had back spasms and no doctor but this seems like common sense.
Last edited by a moderator:
I have had back spasms before and you are right. One minute you feel great and you are working, or playing or doing whatever. Then you twist a certain way, bend down to pick something up, get up after you were sitting down and they flare up. Then you don't want to move or do anything. I am not sure how severe his are, but starting him might be risky today. One carry in and boom he is out for the game.
Apple Jack
Footballguy
Spasms aren't an exact science. It's not that difficult to grasp.
shnikies
Footballguy
I'm not a doctor either, hence my complete ignorance.
FarEastKilla
Footballguy
Wilson 20 yards > Turbin 5 yardsxBold prediction:Total rushing yards in game one-Wilson > Turbin
