What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Maclin's ranking this week (1 Viewer)

coltsnut

Footballguy
FBG's has Maclin ranked #40 WR this week. Philly is playing Was, the 31st ranked pass defense in the league. Vick is playing well, and Maclin had the same number of targets as D Jackson last week. I can't understand why he would be ranked outside the top 20 WRs...he's been pretty consistent all year and has a juicy matchup.

 
I don't understand it either. Is he not even a startable WR3 (flex) player? I would think he'd be a decent WR2 this week. Maclin has been consistently ranked very low all yearalthough he is still the #10 WR in my league.

 
I don't understand it either. Is he not even a startable WR3 (flex) player? I would think he'd be a decent WR2 this week. Maclin has been consistently ranked very low all yearalthough he is still the #10 WR in my league.
#9 ranked WR in my league (non ppr)
 
Perhaps they are referencing the last meeting between these two teams? Washington's D played well and played up a lot, essentially taking away any possibilities of big plays. They frustrated the Eagles receivers, specifically Maclin who only had 1 catch for 15 yds. I expect the results of this weeks game to be different as the Washington D won't be able to play so conventional with Vick at QB the whole game. I also expect the Eagles coaches to adjust their game plan. Add to that the last two disapointing statistical games and Maclin drops further down. Perhaps a little too far but I guess I see why they are so low on him for this game.

 
Maclin was an afterthought at best the entire first half last week vs Indy (I'm not sure if he even had a target until 2nd half)...just sayin'.

I'm no longer a FBG subscriber, so I don't know, but if DJax is still ranked relatively high (as he should be), maybe FBG's staff thinks it's clear Maclin will only get the scraps once DJax gets his? I have no idea other than that...

 
i wish they would start using Maclin more as it is clear he is a stud and still a year younger then Djax who is in his 3rd year Maclin 2nd..... I still think maclin will bust out with huge games every 4 and be around 10-12 the other games.... hope this is his big week

 
You have to view the Tuesday stuff as very preliminary. People wanted them so they are accommodating that, but they are obviously rushed and there are head scratchers pretty much every week.

I said it in another of these threads, but I kind of wish they would get a couple of other staffers to do a first blush set of rankings/projections/value going forward for people making Tuesday WW decisions. Then Dodds can devote his full attention to the process of coming out with really good 'official' projections/top250 on Wednesday...it's obvious that was he does is a lengthy process.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
FBG's hate Maclin.

Even Sig and Cecil have nothing really good to say about him on the Audible. Not sure why this is the case since he is in one of the best passing offenses in the NFL. They need to do a stop the insanity bit on why the dislike for Maclin.

He has been a solid WR2 for my teams all year long. The thing about he Maclin/DeSean if one has a big week one week the other will the next. Not very often you see them both have huge numbers in the same week.

 
The thing about he Maclin/DeSean if one has a big week one week the other will the next. Not very often you see them both have huge numbers in the same week.
Not sure this is correct, at least not in the league I play in. Using my leagues scoring (TD heavy)
Code:
Week 1:	 JM - 8pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 2:	 JM - 7pts	 DJ 13ptsWeek 3:	 JM - 16pts	DJ 14ptsWeek 4:	 JM - 0pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 5:	 JM - 4pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 6:	 JM - 9pts	 DJ 15ptsWeek 7:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 0ptsWeek 9:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 12pts
Aside from weeks 1 and 9, it looks more like to me that if one has a difficult day, so will the other. Same goes for good weeks. They will simply take turns in who has slightly more points each given week.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The thing about he Maclin/DeSean if one has a big week one week the other will the next. Not very often you see them both have huge numbers in the same week.
Not sure this is correct, at least not in the league I play in. Using my leagues scoring (TD heavy)
Code:
Week 1:	 JM - 8pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 2:	 JM - 7pts	 DJ 13ptsWeek 3:	 JM - 16pts	DJ 14ptsWeek 4:	 JM - 0pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 5:	 JM - 4pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 6:	 JM - 9pts	 DJ 15ptsWeek 7:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 0ptsWeek 9:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 12pts
Aside from weeks 1 and 9, it looks more like to me that if one has a difficult day, so will the other. Same goes for good weeks. They will simply take turns in who has slightly more points each given week.
Look at the chart. Maclin had zero points in week 4. Guess who the Eagles played in week 4? The Redskins. Guess who they play this week? The Redskins. There is your answer. Really no need to overthink this.
 
The thing about he Maclin/DeSean if one has a big week one week the other will the next. Not very often you see them both have huge numbers in the same week.
Not sure this is correct, at least not in the league I play in. Using my leagues scoring (TD heavy)
Code:
Week 1:	 JM - 8pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 2:	 JM - 7pts	 DJ 13ptsWeek 3:	 JM - 16pts	DJ 14ptsWeek 4:	 JM - 0pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 5:	 JM - 4pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 6:	 JM - 9pts	 DJ 15ptsWeek 7:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 0ptsWeek 9:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 12pts
Aside from weeks 1 and 9, it looks more like to me that if one has a difficult day, so will the other. Same goes for good weeks. They will simply take turns in who has slightly more points each given week.
Look at the chart. Maclin had zero points in week 4. Guess who the Eagles played in week 4? The Redskins. Guess who they play this week? The Redskins. There is your answer. Really no need to overthink this.
Or you could consider that they alternate better weeks which has been consistent so far this year.
 
The thing about he Maclin/DeSean if one has a big week one week the other will the next. Not very often you see them both have huge numbers in the same week.
Not sure this is correct, at least not in the league I play in. Using my leagues scoring (TD heavy)
Code:
Week 1:	 JM - 8pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 2:	 JM - 7pts	 DJ 13ptsWeek 3:	 JM - 16pts	DJ 14ptsWeek 4:	 JM - 0pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 5:	 JM - 4pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 6:	 JM - 9pts	 DJ 15ptsWeek 7:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 0ptsWeek 9:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 12pts
Aside from weeks 1 and 9, it looks more like to me that if one has a difficult day, so will the other. Same goes for good weeks. They will simply take turns in who has slightly more points each given week.
I don't really know what "TD heavy" means in your league but Maclin went 7 for 159 with 2 TDs in week 6. Jackson had one catch for 34 yards and ran the ball twice for 44 yards, with a rec/rush TD. So how JM has 9 pts in that system and DJ had 15 pts tells me there's something wrong with your data, your system, or both.
 
The thing about he Maclin/DeSean if one has a big week one week the other will the next. Not very often you see them both have huge numbers in the same week.
Not sure this is correct, at least not in the league I play in. Using my leagues scoring (TD heavy)
Code:
Week 1:	 JM - 8pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 2:	 JM - 7pts	 DJ 13ptsWeek 3:	 JM - 16pts	DJ 14ptsWeek 4:	 JM - 0pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 5:	 JM - 4pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 6:	 JM - 9pts	 DJ 15ptsWeek 7:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 0ptsWeek 9:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 12pts
Aside from weeks 1 and 9, it looks more like to me that if one has a difficult day, so will the other. Same goes for good weeks. They will simply take turns in who has slightly more points each given week.
I don't really know what "TD heavy" means in your league but Maclin went 7 for 159 with 2 TDs in week 6. Jackson had one catch for 34 yards and ran the ball twice for 44 yards, with a rec/rush TD. So how JM has 9 pts in that system and DJ had 15 pts tells me there's something wrong with your data, your system, or both.
This is from a 1 PPR leagueWeek 1: JM - 14.9pts DJ 7ptWeek 2: JM - 11.6pts DJ 24ptsWeek 3: JM - 24.3pts DJ 27.1ptsWeek 4: JM - 2.5pts DJ 5.1ptWeek 5: JM - 15.5pts DJ 5.2ptWeek 6: JM - 34.9pts DJ 20.8ptsWeek 7: JM - 10.6pts DJ DNPWeek 9: JM - 8.8pts DJ 25.9pts
 
Vick went down in the last contest vs Was... Maclin will do better if Vick can stay in the entire contest, IMO.
This. If we are going to compare to the last meeting, you have to look at the whole story. Vick got hurt in the first quarter and Kolb wasn't very effective. Jackson only had 3 receptions. Is he ranked low this week, too? Start Maclin with confidence.
 
Vick went down in the last contest vs Was... Maclin will do better if Vick can stay in the entire contest, IMO.
Bingo on the bolded....However Desean will do better with Vick playing the whole game. Kolb seemed to look for Maclin and Celek when he was the starter.
 
The thing about he Maclin/DeSean if one has a big week one week the other will the next. Not very often you see them both have huge numbers in the same week.
Not sure this is correct, at least not in the league I play in. Using my leagues scoring (TD heavy)
Code:
Week 1:	 JM - 8pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 2:	 JM - 7pts	 DJ 13ptsWeek 3:	 JM - 16pts	DJ 14ptsWeek 4:	 JM - 0pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 5:	 JM - 4pts	 DJ 1ptWeek 6:	 JM - 9pts	 DJ 15ptsWeek 7:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 0ptsWeek 9:	 JM - 2pts	 DJ 12pts
Aside from weeks 1 and 9, it looks more like to me that if one has a difficult day, so will the other. Same goes for good weeks. They will simply take turns in who has slightly more points each given week.
I don't really know what "TD heavy" means in your league but Maclin went 7 for 159 with 2 TDs in week 6. Jackson had one catch for 34 yards and ran the ball twice for 44 yards, with a rec/rush TD. So how JM has 9 pts in that system and DJ had 15 pts tells me there's something wrong with your data, your system, or both.
Sorry, typo. That should be 19, not 9.
 
Vick went down in the last contest vs Was... Maclin will do better if Vick can stay in the entire contest, IMO.
Exactly, you can throw the last meeting out the window when projecting for this week. That game was Kolb's "Captain Checkdown" game, McCoy had like 20 catches and Kolb never even looked to throw downfield. I'd be surprised if Philly can't move the ball pretty comfortably this week, I'd be starting any Eagle except Celek.
 
PLAYER, TEAM POS REC YDS TD TAR AVG

Jaguars vs. WR, Jac WR 107 1595 12 163 27.3

Cowboys vs. WR, Dal WR 105 1382 13 149 26.8

Texans vs. WR, Hou WR 104 1507 12 174 26.4

Falcons vs. WR, Atl WR 101 1445 10 162 26.0

Redskins vs. WR, Was WR 137 1611 10 213 25.5

Maclin should be a solid play :unsure:

 
Glad I went with my gut on this one and started Maclin. I love FBGs...but some of their rankings this year have been head scratches....specifically J. Stew being ranked in top 5 his first start and Maclin this week. Nobody gets them all right though.

 
Yeah, not sure what is going on here with the rankings. I read them only after I set my lineups for news purposes. I don't really trust the cheat sheets this season as they seem to be behind the curve quite a bit.

 
There are no fantasy experts. Everyone can get the same info on the internet. It's a voluntary hobby. If you really enjoy it, stop paying others to draft your team and manage it throughout the year. If you don't like those aspects of it, pick up a different hobby. I made these points on another thread a couple weeks ago and got blasted for making them, but I think they're still valid. :mellow:

 
I'm seeing these threads every week, which is why I posted above about the early projections. They're very preliminary and not considered the 'official' projections, yet it seems like there are a % of people that look at those first ones and never look again.

You guys do realize that he was ranked #25 by the end of the week (i.e. a starter in all 3 WR leagues), right? There was also very little difference between spots 19 and 25. Looking at spots 1-18, I only see one guy that I would have obviously started Maclin ahead of (Sims-Walker, and even there I understood the rationale even if I disagreed with it)--everyone else would have been a tough decision.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top