fantasycurse42
Footballguy Jr.
Pretty sure he was last spotted in a suspicious car in Suffolk, VA.Where hasbeen lately?
Pretty sure he was last spotted in a suspicious car in Suffolk, VA.Where hasbeen lately?
I agree with you in general and I even gave your post a like because I know you passionately care about likes so much, but still I have a hard time believing that anybody could reasonably mistake a 13 year old for an 18 year old.Laws should take into consideration intent. If he has correspondence showing she lied then that should be a positive defense as he had no intent of having sex with a minor and he didn't think he was. Intent should matter.Is this surprising to anyone? Statutory rape is a crime even if you think she's old enough. I'd assume that's been the law in every state since any of us have been adults.
In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
You're 18 or 19 and you skinny dip with a 17 year old - that's statutory rape?!In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
I don't know man I have seen some young girls that could pass.I agree with you in general and I even gave your post a like because I know you passionately care about likes so much, but still I have a hard time believing that anybody could reasonably mistake a 13 year old for an 18 year old.Laws should take into consideration intent. If he has correspondence showing she lied then that should be a positive defense as he had no intent of having sex with a minor and he didn't think he was. Intent should matter.Is this surprising to anyone? Statutory rape is a crime even if you think she's old enough. I'd assume that's been the law in every state since any of us have been adults.
Most states 17 is legal. But if she is 15 in some states I think that would do it.You're 18 or 19 and you skinny dip with a 17 year old - that's statutory rape?!In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
This kind of thing really pisses me off, along with the "sexting = child porn" thing. These kinds of laws can and have ruined people's lives because of adolescent poor judgment.Most states 17 is legal. But if she is 15 in some states I think that would do it.You're 18 or 19 and you skinny dip with a 17 year old - that's statutory rape?!In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
Huh. Interesting. Which states, just out of curiosity?In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
True.This kind of thing really pisses me off, along with the "sexting = child porn" thing. These kinds of laws can and have ruined people's lives because of adolescent poor judgment.Most states 17 is legal. But if she is 15 in some states I think that would do it.You're 18 or 19 and you skinny dip with a 17 year old - that's statutory rape?!In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
I think NC was one of them. IIRC correctly at one time it was something like the top 3 buttons unbuttoned. I have to admit I don't keep up these days though.Huh. Interesting. Which states, just out of curiosity?In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
Not really. The philosophy of the state exercising its safety and policy concerns regarding younger girls sleeping with older men by criminalizing such behavior and, in doing so, creating a strict liability age to simplify the litigation process, is probably a good one.Age of consent is the stupidest law ever.
How often do teen girls where shirts with buttons anyway?I think NC was one of them. IIRC correctly at one time it was something like the top 3 buttons unbuttoned. I have to admit I don't keep up these days though.Huh. Interesting. Which states, just out of curiosity?In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
I would bd curious to see a nation poll on this stuff. What % believe sexting between teenagers should be treated as child porn or HS aged students willingly having sex, skinny dipping, groping, etc. should ever be considered rape.This kind of thing really pisses me off, along with the "sexting = child porn" thing. These kinds of laws can and have ruined people's lives because of adolescent poor judgment.Most states 17 is legal. But if she is 15 in some states I think that would do it.You're 18 or 19 and you skinny dip with a 17 year old - that's statutory rape?!In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
There are pills for that now.I think NC was one of them. IIRC correctly at one time it was something like the top 3 buttons unbuttoned. I have to admit I don't keep up these days though.Huh. Interesting. Which states, just out of curiosity?In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
13 is miles away from 18. A 13 year old girl is in the 7th grade. Mistaking 16 for 18? Sure, but not 13 unless she's a massive outlier in regards to how old she looks. If you have sex with a 13 year old and claim you thought she was 18 because that's what she told you, 99.9% chance you knew she was way younger than 18 but choose to overlook it.I don't know man I have seen some young girls that could pass.I agree with you in general and I even gave your post a like because I know you passionately care about likes so much, but still I have a hard time believing that anybody could reasonably mistake a 13 year old for an 18 year old.Laws should take into consideration intent. If he has correspondence showing she lied then that should be a positive defense as he had no intent of having sex with a minor and he didn't think he was. Intent should matter.Is this surprising to anyone? Statutory rape is a crime even if you think she's old enough. I'd assume that's been the law in every state since any of us have been adults.
Gotta love a group of guys looking for a fight and sticking their noses into something that didn't concern them.I have seen one or two 18 year olds that looked like very young teens. One in particular was 20 and so petite she looked no older than 14. My friend took her to dinner for a date and outside a group of guys confronted him because they thought he was taking out a teen. They didnt believe him until she came out to set things straight before he got pummeled.
This likely varies greatly by state.I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
you do know that is an alias someone has for fishing and isn't really a person with real stories right?Didn't your wife lie about her age and you married her under age?She should be the one in jail.
Because of girls lying about their age?I would love love love to nail a hot 19 year old... Unfortunately I can no longer partake in these activities![]()
Lets go with that.Insein said:Because of girls lying about their age?fantasycurse42 said:I would love love love to nail a hot 19 year old... Unfortunately I can no longer partake in these activities![]()
I wish I could disagree with this.Unless dude is black.Zow said:Not really. The philosophy of the state exercising its safety and policy concerns regarding younger girls sleeping with older men by criminalizing such behavior and, in doing so, creating a strict liability age to simplify the litigation process, is probably a good one. It just appears overly harsh in a lesser percentage of circumstances where the guy really possessing no mens era due to legitimately believing the girl to be of age. In those cases, ideally the prosecuting agency would be able to exercise an appropriate level of discretion.McGarnicle said:Age of consent is the stupidest law ever.
Wha?NCCommish said:In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.matttyl said:I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
I assume that everyone here is their own individual and the personality that they portray is their true personality. It's more entertaining that way.Fennis said:you do know that is an alias someone has for fishing and isn't really a person with real stories right?ClownCausedChaos2 said:Didn't your wife lie about her age and you married her under age?Mr. Cross said:She should be the one in jail.
Depends on the language of the state's law.matttyl said:I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
I was hesitant to believe it too, but am assuming that maybe in some cases such facts have been held to establish a case for an attempt charge.Wha?NCCommish said:In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.matttyl said:I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
There's one case that just happened up here that people are in an uproar about. Girl texts her naughty bits to boy. Boy texts his naughty bits to girl. Girl's mom sees boy's naughty bits and reports him to police. They arrest him but not her. Don't remember exact ages but they were both under 18 and within 1 year of each other.IvanKaramazov said:This kind of thing really pisses me off, along with the "sexting = child porn" thing. These kinds of laws can and have ruined people's lives because of adolescent poor judgment.NCCommish said:Most states 17 is legal. But if she is 15 in some states I think that would do it.matttyl said:You're 18 or 19 and you skinny dip with a 17 year old - that's statutory rape?!NCCommish said:In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.matttyl said:I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
Impotent?fantasycurse42 said:I would love love love to nail a hot 19 year old... Unfortunately I can no longer partake in these activities![]()
They were jealous.packersfan said:Gotta love a group of guys looking for a fight and sticking their noses into something that didn't concern them.MC Gas Money said:I have seen one or two 18 year olds that looked like very young teens. One in particular was 20 and so petite she looked no older than 14. My friend took her to dinner for a date and outside a group of guys confronted him because they thought he was taking out a teen. They didnt believe him until she came out to set things straight before he got pummeled.
Impotent?fantasycurse42 said:I would love love love to nail a hot 19 year old... Unfortunately I can no longer partake in these activities![]()
Unless you're in scuba gear, aren't you always at least 'partially' naked?matttyl said:I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
Okay, great, let's meet at 7 at the club. By the way, what are you wearing? A button-down, you say? Hey you know what, I forgot that my grandma's funeral is tonight. Maybe another time.Ilov80s said:How often do teen girls where shirts with buttons anyway?NCCommish said:I think NC was one of them. IIRC correctly at one time it was something like the top 3 buttons unbuttoned. I have to admit I don't keep up these days though.McGarnicle said:Huh. Interesting. Which states, just out of curiosity?NCCommish said:In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.matttyl said:I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
Yeah, baby. Take that mask off.Unless you're in scuba gear, aren't you always at least 'partially' naked?matttyl said:I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
...says someone who probably doesnt have any kids.McGarnicle said:Age of consent is the stupidest law ever.
FYP...says someone who probably doesnt have anyMcGarnicle said:Age of consent is the stupidest law ever.kidsdaughters.
My wife had a cousin who looked every bit of 18 when she was 13. Especially in a bikini. She was built like a brick well you know. She could walk into a store and buy beer without an ID. This was when the age was 18. And she was always pretty mature for her age emotionally. I think a 19 year old would have believed she was 18 and not thought twice.James Daulton said:13 is miles away from 18. A 13 year old girl is in the 7th grade. Mistaking 16 for 18? Sure, but not 13 unless she's a massive outlier in regards to how old she looks. If you have sex with a 13 year old and claim you thought she was 18 because that's what she told you, 99.9% chance you knew she was way younger than 18 but choose to overlook it.NCCommish said:I don't know man I have seen some young girls that could pass.IvanKaramazov said:I agree with you in general and I even gave your post a like because I know you passionately care about likes so much, but still I have a hard time believing that anybody could reasonably mistake a 13 year old for an 18 year old.Laws should take into consideration intent. If he has correspondence showing she lied then that should be a positive defense as he had no intent of having sex with a minor and he didn't think he was. Intent should matter.Is this surprising to anyone? Statutory rape is a crime even if you think she's old enough. I'd assume that's been the law in every state since any of us have been adults.
I may be old but there is still one thing that works like the old days. I don't need any pills.matttyl said:There are pills for that now.NCCommish said:I think NC was one of them. IIRC correctly at one time it was something like the top 3 buttons unbuttoned. I have to admit I don't keep up these days though.McGarnicle said:Huh. Interesting. Which states, just out of curiosity?NCCommish said:In some states you only have to have the girl with some buttons undone that will do it.matttyl said:I'm totally ignorant on the topic, but at what point would "statutory rape" actually have taken place? It says the two were "partially naked" in the vehicle, it doesn't say anything about any sexual intercourse or contact.
So as the law stands now, a 13-14 or underage girl can get a guy thrown in jail and branded a sex offender for life just because she doesn't like him or wants to help someone get back at a guy by coming onto him and having sex with him?the minute this is changed, the whole law becomes irrelevant. if "i thought she was 18" was a defense, guess what everyone will say? even if they have to get correspondence as evidence - (hey, send me a text saying you're 18).Laws should take into consideration intent. If he has correspondence showing she lied then that should be a positive defense as he had no intent of having sex with a minor and he didn't think he was. Intent should matter.Is this surprising to anyone? Statutory rape is a crime even if you think she's old enough. I'd assume that's been the law in every state since any of us have been adults.
Well, to be fair since you're bringing in fairness, it is possible to resist the advances of a 13-14 year old.So as the law stands now, a 13-14 or underage girl can get a guy thrown in jail and branded a sex offender for life just because she doesn't like him or wants to help someone get back at a guy by coming onto him and having sex with him?the minute this is changed, the whole law becomes irrelevant. if "i thought she was 18" was a defense, guess what everyone will say? even if they have to get correspondence as evidence - (hey, send me a text saying you're 18).Laws should take into consideration intent. If he has correspondence showing she lied then that should be a positive defense as he had no intent of having sex with a minor and he didn't think he was. Intent should matter.Is this surprising to anyone? Statutory rape is a crime even if you think she's old enough. I'd assume that's been the law in every state since any of us have been adults.
Seems fair.
Well of course it is. Geez......Well, to be fair since you're bringing in fairness, it is possible to resist the advances of a 13-14 year old.So as the law stands now, a 13-14 or underage girl can get a guy thrown in jail and branded a sex offender for life just because she doesn't like him or wants to help someone get back at a guy by coming onto him and having sex with him?the minute this is changed, the whole law becomes irrelevant. if "i thought she was 18" was a defense, guess what everyone will say? even if they have to get correspondence as evidence - (hey, send me a text saying you're 18).Laws should take into consideration intent. If he has correspondence showing she lied then that should be a positive defense as he had no intent of having sex with a minor and he didn't think he was. Intent should matter.Is this surprising to anyone? Statutory rape is a crime even if you think she's old enough. I'd assume that's been the law in every state since any of us have been adults.
Seems fair.
No shtick, I had a girl probably of 16 or 17 come on to me last night (she was impressed by my tennis skills) and I had enough will power to not succumb to her advances. So while I agree completely with NC's position that some level of mens era should be required, I strongly disagree with your assertion that the strict liability law somehow has created an epidemic or enough cases to draw our worry where some poor guy over 17 gets victimized by the young girl trying to get him in trouble.
How exactly would the federal age of consent come in to effect?For those wondering, 18 is the federal law for age of consent but that is only if someone crosses state lines.
If you stay within state, state law apply and that can be younger for most of the country.
Here is the break down from wiki
age of consent 16: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia
age of consent 17: Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas, Wyoming
age of consent 18: Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin
Well as he mentioned once you cross a state line the Feds can get involved.How exactly would the federal age of consent come in to effect?For those wondering, 18 is the federal law for age of consent but that is only if someone crosses state lines.
If you stay within state, state law apply and that can be younger for most of the country.
Here is the break down from wiki
age of consent 16: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia
age of consent 17: Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas, Wyoming
age of consent 18: Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin
Cross state lines in what way? Go meet a girl in another state? Take her to another state?Well as he mentioned once you cross a state line the Feds can get involved.How exactly would the federal age of consent come in to effect?For those wondering, 18 is the federal law for age of consent but that is only if someone crosses state lines.
If you stay within state, state law apply and that can be younger for most of the country.
Here is the break down from wiki
age of consent 16: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia
age of consent 17: Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas, Wyoming
age of consent 18: Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin
Live in Phillipsburgh. Meet her in NY. Go bang her in atlantic City over a weekend after just meeting her. Continue to sleep together at each others' places. Three different states with arguably one on-going criminal action.Cross state lines in what way? Go meet a girl in another state? Take her to another state?Well as he mentioned once you cross a state line the Feds can get involved.How exactly would the federal age of consent come in to effect?For those wondering, 18 is the federal law for age of consent but that is only if someone crosses state lines.
If you stay within state, state law apply and that can be younger for most of the country.
Here is the break down from wiki
age of consent 16: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia
age of consent 17: Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas, Wyoming
age of consent 18: Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin
No. The sex act has to actually occur across a state line. It happens more than you'd think.Cross state lines in what way? Go meet a girl in another state? Take her to another state?Well as he mentioned once you cross a state line the Feds can get involved.How exactly would the federal age of consent come in to effect?For those wondering, 18 is the federal law for age of consent but that is only if someone crosses state lines.
If you stay within state, state law apply and that can be younger for most of the country.
Here is the break down from wiki
age of consent 16: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia
age of consent 17: Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas, Wyoming
age of consent 18: Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin
Or 4.Live in Phillipsburgh. Meet her in NY. Go bang her in atlantic City over a weekend after just meeting her. Continue to sleep together at each others' places. Three different states with arguably one on-going criminal action.Cross state lines in what way? Go meet a girl in another state? Take her to another state?Well as he mentioned once you cross a state line the Feds can get involved.How exactly would the federal age of consent come in to effect?For those wondering, 18 is the federal law for age of consent but that is only if someone crosses state lines.
If you stay within state, state law apply and that can be younger for most of the country.
Here is the break down from wiki
age of consent 16: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia
age of consent 17: Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas, Wyoming
age of consent 18: Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin
I'd argue it's also pretty easy to resist the advances of a 18-19 year old. Furthermore, I'd argue that most older looking 13-14 year olds probably aren't vindictive enough to go bang an older guy just so somebody else can get some revenge.Well of course it is. Geez......Well, to be fair since you're bringing in fairness, it is possible to resist the advances of a 13-14 year old.So as the law stands now, a 13-14 or underage girl can get a guy thrown in jail and branded a sex offender for life just because she doesn't like him or wants to help someone get back at a guy by coming onto him and having sex with him?the minute this is changed, the whole law becomes irrelevant. if "i thought she was 18" was a defense, guess what everyone will say? even if they have to get correspondence as evidence - (hey, send me a text saying you're 18).Laws should take into consideration intent. If he has correspondence showing she lied then that should be a positive defense as he had no intent of having sex with a minor and he didn't think he was. Intent should matter.Is this surprising to anyone? Statutory rape is a crime even if you think she's old enough. I'd assume that's been the law in every state since any of us have been adults.
Seems fair.
No shtick, I had a girl probably of 16 or 17 come on to me last night (she was impressed by my tennis skills) and I had enough will power to not succumb to her advances. So while I agree completely with NC's position that some level of mens era should be required, I strongly disagree with your assertion that the strict liability law somehow has created an epidemic or enough cases to draw our worry where some poor guy over 17 gets victimized by the young girl trying to get him in trouble.
I guess I have to spell it out here..... AN UNDERAGE GIRL THAT LOOKS OLDER AND TELLS THE GUY SHE'S 18-19 ETC.
![]()
![]()