Raiderfan32904
Footballguy
Already had a GL TD vultured from the Saints FB. Where the heck is Ingram?
Wow...from the 1, even. There's not much left to speculate on about how the Saints plan to use this guy.Already had a GL TD vultured from the Saints FB. Where the heck is Ingram?![]()
Ingram was in the game. He was lined up in the slot.Wow...from the 1, even. There's not much left to speculate on about how the Saints plan to use this guy.Already had a GL TD vultured from the Saints FB. Where the heck is Ingram?![]()
Ingram is now the Jumbo formation blocker?Ingram was in the game. He was lined up in the slot.Wow...from the 1, even. There's not much left to speculate on about how the Saints plan to use this guy.Already had a GL TD vultured from the Saints FB. Where the heck is Ingram?![]()

Cool story broI started Sproles over Ingram again this week in my main standard scoring league.
Cool story broI started Sproles over Ingram again this week in my main standard scoring league.

OLOLOLOLOOLOLZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111ONECool story broI started Sproles over Ingram again this week in my main standard scoring league.
Cool story broI started Sproles over Ingram again this week in my main standard scoring league.

I think it is a cool story. Mark Ingram is JUNK.Cool story broI started Sproles over Ingram again this week in my main standard scoring league.![]()
this is totally wrong. Ingram could have easily had 2 TDs today but they went with gimmick plays both times on 1st and goal at the 1 with him lined up at HB. If they hand it to him twice he has a monster game. Just Payton with weird playcallsOne thing should be clear at this point....Ingram is absolutely not the GL back. No matter where they are on the field, Sproles is in if it's 3rd down. If it's 1st or 2nd, it's a toss-up between every RB on the roster. Based on the past 2 weeks, it looks like PT has a leg up on Ingram for RZ carries. Maybe later in the year this will change, but for now Ingram's value in redraft is practically nil. If he had a different name on his jersey and hadn't been so widely drafted in the first 6 rounds, he'd been on waivers in most leagues. His situation is basically the same as Donald Brown's has been the last few years: secondary RB on an extremely pass-heavy team.
Yep. Payton is setting this up so Ingy gets 3 TDs next weekIt's clear that the Saints are just mixing things up. As before the def knew that when Ingram was in the game it was a running play and he was getting the rock but now they are clearing switching things up to counter act what the defs have been doing. Don't give up on Ingram yet, just hold him if you can because a bigger pay day is coming. This is an obvious adjustment by Sean.giddy up
this is totally wrong. Ingram could have easily had 2 TDs today but they went with gimmick plays both times on 1st and goal at the 1 with him lined up at HB. If they hand it to him twice he has a monster game. Just Payton with weird playcallsOne thing should be clear at this point....Ingram is absolutely not the GL back. No matter where they are on the field, Sproles is in if it's 3rd down. If it's 1st or 2nd, it's a toss-up between every RB on the roster. Based on the past 2 weeks, it looks like PT has a leg up on Ingram for RZ carries. Maybe later in the year this will change, but for now Ingram's value in redraft is practically nil. If he had a different name on his jersey and hadn't been so widely drafted in the first 6 rounds, he'd been on waivers in most leagues. His situation is basically the same as Donald Brown's has been the last few years: secondary RB on an extremely pass-heavy team.
Those "wierd playcalls" led to 2 TD's. He didn't have confidence enough to run Ingram near the GL even one time today, on 3 different GL opportunities. Ingram's value is tied to his GL RB status. If doesn't have at least that, he's practically worthless.We get points for decoys. Guy is a beast for the HoPetts.

So did he run any running backs at the GL??? If so, who and how many times?this is totally wrong. Ingram could have easily had 2 TDs today but they went with gimmick plays both times on 1st and goal at the 1 with him lined up at HB. If they hand it to him twice he has a monster game. Just Payton with weird playcallsOne thing should be clear at this point....Ingram is absolutely not the GL back. No matter where they are on the field, Sproles is in if it's 3rd down. If it's 1st or 2nd, it's a toss-up between every RB on the roster. Based on the past 2 weeks, it looks like PT has a leg up on Ingram for RZ carries. Maybe later in the year this will change, but for now Ingram's value in redraft is practically nil. If he had a different name on his jersey and hadn't been so widely drafted in the first 6 rounds, he'd been on waivers in most leagues. His situation is basically the same as Donald Brown's has been the last few years: secondary RB on an extremely pass-heavy team.Those "wierd playcalls" led to 2 TD's. He didn't have confidence enough to run Ingram near the GL even one time today, on 3 different GL opportunities. Ingram's value is tied to his GL RB status. If doesn't have at least that, he's practically worthless.
Yes, he ran the fullback from one yard out. He scored.So did he run any running backs at the GL??? If so, who and how many times?this is totally wrong. Ingram could have easily had 2 TDs today but they went with gimmick plays both times on 1st and goal at the 1 with him lined up at HB. If they hand it to him twice he has a monster game. Just Payton with weird playcallsOne thing should be clear at this point....Ingram is absolutely not the GL back. No matter where they are on the field, Sproles is in if it's 3rd down. If it's 1st or 2nd, it's a toss-up between every RB on the roster. Based on the past 2 weeks, it looks like PT has a leg up on Ingram for RZ carries. Maybe later in the year this will change, but for now Ingram's value in redraft is practically nil. If he had a different name on his jersey and hadn't been so widely drafted in the first 6 rounds, he'd been on waivers in most leagues. His situation is basically the same as Donald Brown's has been the last few years: secondary RB on an extremely pass-heavy team.Those "wierd playcalls" led to 2 TD's. He didn't have confidence enough to run Ingram near the GL even one time today, on 3 different GL opportunities. Ingram's value is tied to his GL RB status. If doesn't have at least that, he's practically worthless.
I'm sure he has confidence in Ingram. I was just saying he was the GL back very clearly. just didn't call his number, if he had I'm sure he would have had at least a TD and this would have been a quieter threadthis is totally wrong. Ingram could have easily had 2 TDs today but they went with gimmick plays both times on 1st and goal at the 1 with him lined up at HB. If they hand it to him twice he has a monster game. Just Payton with weird playcallsOne thing should be clear at this point....Ingram is absolutely not the GL back. No matter where they are on the field, Sproles is in if it's 3rd down. If it's 1st or 2nd, it's a toss-up between every RB on the roster. Based on the past 2 weeks, it looks like PT has a leg up on Ingram for RZ carries. Maybe later in the year this will change, but for now Ingram's value in redraft is practically nil. If he had a different name on his jersey and hadn't been so widely drafted in the first 6 rounds, he'd been on waivers in most leagues. His situation is basically the same as Donald Brown's has been the last few years: secondary RB on an extremely pass-heavy team.Those "wierd playcalls" led to 2 TD's. He didn't have confidence enough to run Ingram near the GL even one time today, on 3 different GL opportunities. Ingram's value is tied to his GL RB status. If doesn't have at least that, he's practically worthless.
For redraft purposes, I can't see any reason to hold onto this guy any longer.

Maybe you should watch the game?Has this stiff gained more than 2 yards on any carry today?
I didn't see any of the game. He's just not getting enough touches. What am I missing?For redraft purposes, I can't see any reason to hold onto this guy any longer.![]()
![]()
Are you laughing because it took him this long to come to that conclusion? I think it's fairly clear that he's pretty much worthless unless you play in a 14+ team league with decent benches. Can't wait to hear all the apologists tell us how great the Jacksonville run defense is though and how he's going to be an absolutely stud the second half of the season with 12+ TDs.For redraft purposes, I can't see any reason to hold onto this guy any longer.![]()
![]()
I dont know about your league, but the best RBs on my WWs are John Kuhn, Marcel Reece, Lance Ball, and Delone Carter. If youre dropping Ingram for 1 of them, go for it.I didn't see any of the game. He's just not getting enough touches. What am I missing?For redraft purposes, I can't see any reason to hold onto this guy any longer.![]()
![]()
It's week 4. Granted he hasn't done anything to make us go "wow." However, he's potentially the #1 RB on a very potent offense. You'd be stupid to drop him. He could have had 2 TDs today, but he didn't. Go ahead and drop him.Are you laughing because it took him this long to come to that conclusion? I think it's fairly clear that he's pretty much worthless unless you play in a 14+ team league with decent benches. Can't wait to hear all the apologists tell us how great the Jacksonville run defense is though and how he's going to be an absolutely stud the second half of the season with 12+ TDs.For redraft purposes, I can't see any reason to hold onto this guy any longer.![]()
![]()
No kidding. Not to mention he is a rookie with limited offseason work. I could easily see him getting hot down the stretch and carrying some teams. The talent is not in question. I wouldn't be cutting him unless it was a shallow league with some really good options on the WW.It's week 4. Granted he hasn't done anything to make us go "wow." However, he's potentially the #1 RB on a very potent offense. You'd be stupid to drop him. He could have had 2 TDs today, but he didn't. Go ahead and drop him.Are you laughing because it took him this long to come to that conclusion? I think it's fairly clear that he's pretty much worthless unless you play in a 14+ team league with decent benches. Can't wait to hear all the apologists tell us how great the Jacksonville run defense is though and how he's going to be an absolutely stud the second half of the season with 12+ TDs.For redraft purposes, I can't see any reason to hold onto this guy any longer.![]()
![]()
Ingram "could have easily" had 2TDs every week this season. The observations in ths thread of the Saint's play calling Have generally been around their aversion to using Ingram in the role which all the fantasy speculators thought they would. After this week, you'll see that Sproles probably has more RZ plays than Ingram for the season. By almost any definition, Ingram is a bust at this point in the season for redraft. I'm not knocking Ingram the player, but it's high time we all wake up and accept that Payton is basically Shanahan when it comes to RB play calling in the RZ. 1/3rd through the fantasy season Ingram, is not a player who can be trusted in lineups (because of Payton). We've seen it all: playing with the lead, playing from behind, inside the 20, inside the 5, early in the game, late in the game. The only thing we can say with certainty is that Ingram may he used as a decoy at some point in each game. He is not guaranteed anything fantasy-wise outside of 8 carries for 30-something yards.this is totally wrong. Ingram could have easily had 2 TDs today but they went with gimmick plays both times on 1st and goal at the 1 with him lined up at HB. If they hand it to him twice he has a monster game. Just Payton with weird playcallsOne thing should be clear at this point....Ingram is absolutely not the GL back. No matter where they are on the field, Sproles is in if it's 3rd down. If it's 1st or 2nd, it's a toss-up between every RB on the roster. Based on the past 2 weeks, it looks like PT has a leg up on Ingram for RZ carries. Maybe later in the year this will change, but for now Ingram's value in redraft is practically nil. If he had a different name on his jersey and hadn't been so widely drafted in the first 6 rounds, he'd been on waivers in most leagues. His situation is basically the same as Donald Brown's has been the last few years: secondary RB on an extremely pass-heavy team.
For this to happen THIS SEASON, which is all I care about, he's got have at least 18 carries every game, and I'm just not seeing that happen. If he only gets 10 carries or so, then the fact that he could have had 2 touchdowns today is meaningless, because he'll never be good enough to start.It's week 4. Granted he hasn't done anything to make us go "wow." However, he's potentially the #1 RB on a very potent offense. You'd be stupid to drop him. He could have had 2 TDs today, but he didn't. Go ahead and drop him.Are you laughing because it took him this long to come to that conclusion? I think it's fairly clear that he's pretty much worthless unless you play in a 14+ team league with decent benches. Can't wait to hear all the apologists tell us how great the Jacksonville run defense is though and how he's going to be an absolutely stud the second half of the season with 12+ TDs.For redraft purposes, I can't see any reason to hold onto this guy any longer.![]()
![]()
Of course you aren't. Go ahead and drop him.For this to happen THIS SEASON, which is all I care about, he's got have at least 18 carries every game, and I'm just not seeing that happen.It's week 4. Granted he hasn't done anything to make us go "wow." However, he's potentially the #1 RB on a very potent offense. You'd be stupid to drop him. He could have had 2 TDs today, but he didn't. Go ahead and drop him.Are you laughing because it took him this long to come to that conclusion? I think it's fairly clear that he's pretty much worthless unless you play in a 14+ team league with decent benches. Can't wait to hear all the apologists tell us how great the Jacksonville run defense is though and how he's going to be an absolutely stud the second half of the season with 12+ TDs.For redraft purposes, I can't see any reason to hold onto this guy any longer.![]()
![]()
A bit hyperbolic there. I'd say that Ingram is still a bit more than remotely valuable.In much shallower redraft leagues, he may be a cut. But in your average redraft, there's not much better than him on the wire.I'm a Saints fan and an Ingram believer, but I'd probably drop him in redraft if there was anyone remotely valuable on the WW.
40+ attempts from Brees in the game. Why?Payton.This is typical Payton for anyone who follows the Saints.