This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
No he isn't. Trent's vision is improving this season, but it still hasn't reached Ingram's level. And while Trent's balance is incredible...its not 'much better' than what Ingram showed.But keep talking your talk.
Yes, I get all that. My point is... it ain't gonna happen, it's all educated GUESS WORK with a fair amount of LUCK thrown in. If you think you're paying for some insider knowledge and closely-guarded secrets that you feel you should be able to hold people accountable for... well, let's just say life is full of "stuff" like that.Instead of whining like teenage girls, people that took it deep and got burned should suck it up and move on.Um, actually the goal of every list is to predict that as accurately as possible. That's the point. Ideally, we are paying for better lists here than lists other people go to, which should give us an edge. Obviously perfection isn't possible, and if it was the people who could would be richer beyond their wildest dreams.How boring life would be if all of the FBG projections played out exactly like the preseason rankings. We would all draft from the same lists, right down the line, and everyone would finish at .500 with the same number of points. No busts, no steals... yeah, that would be awesome.
Richardson is a steroid risk. I guarantee you he is on performance enhancers. As a spronsored competitive body builder (well, fitness competitor but it's essentialy the same thing with different type of competition) I have very strong instincts for these things. There are tell tale signs that you can see in the structure of his body for a man under 20. I wouldn't put it past some gentic freak to be about to bench 425 at 6% body fat so I am not basing my thoughts on his seemingly impossible weight room results but you can't hide some things.
Richardson and Ingram are different runners all together. Both have potential to be monsters. I don't understand the mentality that for Richardson to be great that Ingram must suck. I think both are going to be in the league for a long, long time.'gump said:
I'll just say that I am experienced in all forms of supplementation and leave it at that.
You can dabble, but in order to maintain results you need to have a maintenence regimine plus "off treatment" which will trigger tests if you get sloppy.
Please clarify. Do you mean he is a BUY for redraft or for dynasty, or for both, and why? Just because Payton keeps saying he wants to get Ingram more touches doesn't mean a whole lot until we see it on the field, and we see Ingram doing something with the touches. Do you believe that Thomas is going to be relegated to the bench?
Sorry, this is in dynasty. I don't have much opinion in redraft since it's inferior.
what do you think his dynasty value is?
I think he's a top 15 RB.
Obviously he against Ingram before he voted for him.
Oh, stop twisting his words around.
Not sure how I twisted anything, just quoted the posts as is. Either he sucks or he doesn't.Oh, stop twisting his words around.
I know. I was being a smart###.Not sure how I twisted anything, just quoted the posts as is. Either he sucks or he doesn't.Oh, stop twisting his words around.
Ah, guess my sarcasm meter is off todayI know. I was being a smart###.Not sure how I twisted anything, just quoted the posts as is. Either he sucks or he doesn't.Oh, stop twisting his words around.
Ah, guess my sarcasm meter is off todayI know. I was being a smart###.Not sure how I twisted anything, just quoted the posts as is. Either he sucks or he doesn't.Oh, stop twisting his words around.
that was Pierre Thomas
CBS gametracker had it as Ingram but looks like they changed it, nice. Hopefully that just makes it an Ingram and Sproles show instead of all 3'hines said:
Please don't bother us with the facts. Some of us are just looking for any chance we can find to stab Ingram in the back. Clearly it's HIS or SOMEONE else's fault we drafted him. I'm pretty sure someone took over my keyboard in round 3.'hines said:
LOL, don't pretend like you are not playing on yahoo.
I've got Ingram in a CBS, Yahoo and ESPn league and only yahoo listed it as his fumble.Yeah. A fumble would really put a damper on his 5-10 performance.'hines said:Ingram's got a heckuva hate club.
Can't totally disagree, but one injury to either PT or Sproles and he blows up.Dynasty he is a long term diamond.
I think so too. I think he can play, just not so fittable in that offense right now as they are pass happy.
Until this drive, the Bucs had stymied the entire NO ground game. Neither Ingram nor Thomas had been getting room. Ingram has a 12 yd, 7 yd, and 5 yd run in this game nevertheless.
Devil's advocate:That's one play -- show me more ... and sustain it.
Ingram be their feature back at some point. Certainly by next season. Until then, he'll be inconsistent simply because of the lack of touches.Eyeballs tell me this kid is going to be a stud, though. Lots of people are going to have to change their minds about Ingram. Not only is he a special talent, he's also in a good situation (again, when he becomes their feature back...& it's going to happen...Payton isn't dumb).
This is two weeks in the last 3 with a TD. The kid needs time.
