Gotta agree here. Maroney really just seems like a system RB to me. I was never all that impressed with him in college and I watch a good amount of Big 10 football. Williams seems like the more talented player and is in a better situation. He should not have much trouble at all in taking over for Foster and Maroney has Dillon there still. I like Williams over Maroney in both redraft and dynasty and drafted him and White ahead of Maroney.In my very biased opinion, DeAngelo Williams will start by week 3 if not the opener, while Maroney will not get any significant playing time until next year at the earliest.
If NE plans on implementing a zone-blocking scheme like the one he ran in at Minnesota, he's going to be a stud.
Otherwise, we're looking at Kevin Faulk #2.
Williams will be the centerpiece of a rush-oriented offense for the foreseeable future. The same cannot be said of Maroney.
I'm a little concerned about how Carolina may split the reps with Foster and Williams. I just think RBBC is more likely than having one guy carry the load. What is attractive to me about the Dillon /Maroney situation is that one of them will probably get the bulk of the carries. Sort of an all or nothing situation, but with big upside.Gotta agree here. Maroney really just seems like a system RB to me. I was never all that impressed with him in college and I watch a good amount of Big 10 football. Williams seems like the more talented player and is in a better situation. He should not have much trouble at all in taking over for Foster and Maroney has Dillon there still. I like Williams over Maroney in both redraft and dynasty and drafted him and White ahead of Maroney.In my very biased opinion, DeAngelo Williams will start by week 3 if not the opener, while Maroney will not get any significant playing time until next year at the earliest.
If NE plans on implementing a zone-blocking scheme like the one he ran in at Minnesota, he's going to be a stud.
Otherwise, we're looking at Kevin Faulk #2.
Williams will be the centerpiece of a rush-oriented offense for the foreseeable future. The same cannot be said of Maroney.
If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams? It's getting a bit old hearing how Foster is going to finally light it up. I feel like he is the Vick of RBs.Neither will start this year barring injury to the guy's ahead of them.
For dynasty both are nice picks. But I would take Foster ahead of Williams because he is still young.
Redraft..mid round handcuff's if you feel you need to.
Foster is primed for a huge break out year, now that the job his is.
Everyone thinks he will get hurt again. Broken bones are bad luck....not injury prone nagging muscles injuires.
Foster is a stud when he plays.
He was in 15/16 regular season games last season and split with Davis.
per nfl.comWilliams: 5-9, 217The ONLY reason I did not draft Willaims was his size.
I have NEVER been a fan of the "small back".
He will be fine however (Think of a certain Atl. RB ... Dunn
![]()
... But i took Maroney (2nd OA) and then followed with White (While Williams was still on the board)
You would do wise in listening to myself, jurb and Magaw. We don't make stuff up.I see the board is split. Y'all aren't making my #2 rookie RB pick any easier!![]()
Fox, unlike some coaches, despises RBBC. Foster, like Tatum Bell, is a fantastic 3DB.As a starter, he's not durable enough.I'm a little concerned about how Carolina may split the reps with Foster and Williams. I just think RBBC is more likely than having one guy carry the load. What is attractive to me about the Dillon /Maroney situation is that one of them will probably get the bulk of the carries. Sort of an all or nothing situation, but with big upside.
A couple more:Walter Payton Height, 5-10. Weight, 202per nfl.comWilliams: 5-9, 217The ONLY reason I did not draft Willaims was his size.
I have NEVER been a fan of the "small back".
He will be fine however (Think of a certain Atl. RB ... Dunn
![]()
... But i took Maroney (2nd OA) and then followed with White (While Williams was still on the board)
Maroney: 5-11, 211
Dunn: 5-9, 180
Emmitt Smith: 5-10, 216
I think you just make stuff up.
You would do wise in listening to myself, jurb and Magaw. We don't make stuff up.I see the board is split. Y'all aren't making my #2 rookie RB pick any easier!
Fox, unlike some coaches, despises RBBC. Foster, like Tatum Bell, is a fantastic 3DB.As a starter, he's not durable enough.I'm a little concerned about how Carolina may split the reps with Foster and Williams. I just think RBBC is more likely than having one guy carry the load. What is attractive to me about the Dillon /Maroney situation is that one of them will probably get the bulk of the carries. Sort of an all or nothing situation, but with big upside.
Foster will be used enough to help keep Williams fresh. I'd say 7-10 carries as a ceiling, and for DWill, 20-25.
If they thought Foster was a stud in the making, they'd have not spent a first round pick on a blue-chip RB.
Here's a look at his starts:
2001:
IR
2002:
IR
2003:
v.TB - 22/56/0, 1/-2/0
v.DET - 21/76/0, 6/38/1
2004:
@KC - 32/174/1, 0/0/0
v.ATL - 19/51/1, 3/54/0
@DEN - 5/18/0, 2/0/0 (on IR after this game)
2005:
v.NE - 7/37/0, 1/23/0
v.TB - 14/46/0, 2/7/0
@NO - 21/75/0, 2/9/0
v.DAL - 22/68/0, 2/13/0
@ATL - 18/165/1, 0/0/0
@NYG - 27/151/0, 1/4/0
@CHI - 16/54/0, 1/3/0
Everyone remembers the ATL game where the Panthers basically beat up on a team who quit, trying to win the division.
And everyone remembers the Giants game where he ran all over a team with no linebackers.
Outside that is a lot of mediocre trash and a big game against KC.
In addition to the less-than-stellar career, he's got two seasons of IR and several season-ending leg injuries to his credit. It's certainly a viable concern to have, but a closer look at the numbers are more revealing to why CAR was so eager to select Williams in the draft.
Anyone know what is Foster's contract sitch?I lost my link.If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams?
If Car had drafted a guy like Drew and waited until round 2 to go RB, then I would fully agree with your stance here. They did not wait however and drafted the RB they had #2 on their board! Only Bush was ranked higher by Car. Not too mention that if a filler and injury replacement for Foster was what they really wanted, this draft was littered with strong RB prospects that could have been had much later. Calhoun, Drew and Norrwood would all have made great picks to simply backup Foster. The real problem I see here and I think Car sees as well is that despite the perception of Foster being an "elite" talent, he has never (with exception of a few playoff games) lived up to that on the field in 3 years. Sure he has missed time and been injured, but I'm not even using that to down play him. Just look at the numbers:Anyone know what is Foster's contract sitch?I lost my link.If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams?
Drafting an RB In the first round is not ALWAYS an indicator that the team is disappointed or has no faith in existing RBs. They will certainly expect a return on their investment, but if Foster is ready to go inthe next year or two, drafting an RB in round one is not indicative of all that much.
Moreover, given Foster's injury history, that would appear the greater concern than lack of confidence that he can do the job - I think the guy has all the SKILL necessary to be the primary ball carrier, but skill alone is not a team's primary driving force behind taking an RB early.
Jacksonville took Drew in round two despite a glut of RBs - there is little to no chance Drew sees the field much in 2006.
2007 on, however . . .
| Rushing | Receiving |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 2003 car | 14 | 113 429 3.8 0 | 26 207 8.0 2 || 2004 car | 4 | 59 255 4.3 2 | 9 76 8.4 0 || 2005 car | 15 | 205 879 4.3 2 | 34 372 10.9 1 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 33 | 377 1563 4.1 4 | 69 655 9.5 3
I'm not so sure Foster is a stud. The numbers at least could be a little deceiving. For example, last year he averaged 4.28 ypc for the regular season. Two of his three career 100-yard games both came against Atlanta late in the season last year, and in both of those he had one big run that helped him top the 100-yd mark:2005 Week 13: 24 rushes, 131 yards, including a 30-yard run.Foster is primed for a huge break out year, now that the job his is.
Everyone thinks he will get hurt again. Broken bones are bad luck....not injury prone nagging muscles injuires.
Foster is a stud when he plays.
He was in 15/16 regular season games last season and split with Davis.
Ummm yeah ... thats what I doper nfl.comWilliams: 5-9, 217The ONLY reason I did not draft Willaims was his size.
I have NEVER been a fan of the "small back".
He will be fine however (Think of a certain Atl. RB ... Dunn
![]()
... But i took Maroney (2nd OA) and then followed with White (While Williams was still on the board)
Maroney: 5-11, 211
Dunn: 5-9, 180
Emmitt Smith: 5-10, 216
I think you just make stuff up.
So according to you Emmitt, Barry, Walter, LT, Priest all stink? Uh ok.Ummm yeah ... thats what I doper nfl.comWilliams: 5-9, 217The ONLY reason I did not draft Willaims was his size.
I have NEVER been a fan of the "small back".
He will be fine however (Think of a certain Atl. RB ... Dunn
![]()
... But i took Maroney (2nd OA) and then followed with White (While Williams was still on the board)
Maroney: 5-11, 211
Dunn: 5-9, 180
Emmitt Smith: 5-10, 216
I think you just make stuff up.![]()
I meant ... and I guess I should have explained more in detail ... obviously ..
Size, as far as height and weight ... not just weight.
I will take a 5' 11" 215 pounder, before I take a 5' 9" 215 pounder.
Do you think THAT had more to do with the selection than whether or not Foster is able to do the job?That pick, IMO, does not mean they are planning to run Foster into a 3DB role. IMO, they feel they got a gift RB to fall into their lap in round one - they obviously thought he'd be gone by the time they picked if he was the #2 RB on their board.If Car had drafted a guy like Drew and waited until round 2 to go RB, then I would fully agree with your stance here. They did not wait however and drafted the RB they had #2 on their board! Only Bush was ranked higher by Car.Anyone know what is Foster's contract sitch?I lost my link.If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams?
Drafting an RB In the first round is not ALWAYS an indicator that the team is disappointed or has no faith in existing RBs. They will certainly expect a return on their investment, but if Foster is ready to go inthe next year or two, drafting an RB in round one is not indicative of all that much.
Moreover, given Foster's injury history, that would appear the greater concern than lack of confidence that he can do the job - I think the guy has all the SKILL necessary to be the primary ball carrier, but skill alone is not a team's primary driving force behind taking an RB early.
Jacksonville took Drew in round two despite a glut of RBs - there is little to no chance Drew sees the field much in 2006.
2007 on, however . . .
NFLPA LinkFoster, DeShaunDo you think THAT had more to do with the selection than whether or not Foster is able to do the job?That pick, IMO, does not mean they are planning to run Foster into a 3DB role. IMO, they feel they got a gift RB to fall into their lap in round one - they obviously thought he'd be gone by the time they picked if he was the #2 RB on their board.If Car had drafted a guy like Drew and waited until round 2 to go RB, then I would fully agree with your stance here. They did not wait however and drafted the RB they had #2 on their board! Only Bush was ranked higher by Car.Anyone know what is Foster's contract sitch?I lost my link.If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams?
Drafting an RB In the first round is not ALWAYS an indicator that the team is disappointed or has no faith in existing RBs. They will certainly expect a return on their investment, but if Foster is ready to go inthe next year or two, drafting an RB in round one is not indicative of all that much.
Moreover, given Foster's injury history, that would appear the greater concern than lack of confidence that he can do the job - I think the guy has all the SKILL necessary to be the primary ball carrier, but skill alone is not a team's primary driving force behind taking an RB early.
Jacksonville took Drew in round two despite a glut of RBs - there is little to no chance Drew sees the field much in 2006.
2007 on, however . . .
Either way, can anyone help me out with Foster's K situation?
Let me comment on Foster's salary.He signed for $14.5M, for 3 years, so he's essentially getting $5.5M this year and $9M over the next two.NFLPA LinkFoster, DeShaunDo you think THAT had more to do with the selection than whether or not Foster is able to do the job?That pick, IMO, does not mean they are planning to run Foster into a 3DB role. IMO, they feel they got a gift RB to fall into their lap in round one - they obviously thought he'd be gone by the time they picked if he was the #2 RB on their board.If Car had drafted a guy like Drew and waited until round 2 to go RB, then I would fully agree with your stance here. They did not wait however and drafted the RB they had #2 on their board! Only Bush was ranked higher by Car.Anyone know what is Foster's contract sitch?I lost my link.If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams?
Drafting an RB In the first round is not ALWAYS an indicator that the team is disappointed or has no faith in existing RBs. They will certainly expect a return on their investment, but if Foster is ready to go inthe next year or two, drafting an RB in round one is not indicative of all that much.
Moreover, given Foster's injury history, that would appear the greater concern than lack of confidence that he can do the job - I think the guy has all the SKILL necessary to be the primary ball carrier, but skill alone is not a team's primary driving force behind taking an RB early.
Jacksonville took Drew in round two despite a glut of RBs - there is little to no chance Drew sees the field much in 2006.
2007 on, however . . .
Either way, can anyone help me out with Foster's K situation?
Salary History
2006 1000000.00
2007 4250000.00
2008 4750000.00
Marc, that is not what happened at all. I live in Memphis and have been a huge Deangelo fan for years. Carolina wanted him bad. It wasnt a "fall in the lap" deal where they just took BPA. It was in the papers in Memphis in the weeks leading up to the draft that Deangelo was their guy. period. they absolutely loved him, and my opinion is that CAR valued him closer to a top 10 talent. I thoguht he was a top 10 player all along. I don't know anyone who has actually seen Deangelo play 20 plus times that doesnt think he is a star in the making. Deangelo is far more talented that Maroney IMO.Do you think THAT had more to do with the selection than whether or not Foster is able to do the job?That pick, IMO, does not mean they are planning to run Foster into a 3DB role. IMO, they feel they got a gift RB to fall into their lap in round one - they obviously thought he'd be gone by the time they picked if he was the #2 RB on their board.If Car had drafted a guy like Drew and waited until round 2 to go RB, then I would fully agree with your stance here. They did not wait however and drafted the RB they had #2 on their board! Only Bush was ranked higher by Car.Anyone know what is Foster's contract sitch?I lost my link.If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams?
Drafting an RB In the first round is not ALWAYS an indicator that the team is disappointed or has no faith in existing RBs. They will certainly expect a return on their investment, but if Foster is ready to go inthe next year or two, drafting an RB in round one is not indicative of all that much.
Moreover, given Foster's injury history, that would appear the greater concern than lack of confidence that he can do the job - I think the guy has all the SKILL necessary to be the primary ball carrier, but skill alone is not a team's primary driving force behind taking an RB early.
Jacksonville took Drew in round two despite a glut of RBs - there is little to no chance Drew sees the field much in 2006.
2007 on, however . . .
Either way, can anyone help me out with Foster's K situation?
???you are making my point. They loved him as a top-10 talent - he was there when they had their first round pick - their faith in Foster as a starting RB (therefore) has nothing to do with them picking Williams in round one.Marc, that is not what happened at all. I live in Memphis and have been a huge Deangelo fan for years. Carolina wanted him bad. It wasnt a "fall in the lap" deal where they just took BPA. It was in the papers in Memphis in the weeks leading up to the draft that Deangelo was their guy. period. they absolutely loved him, and my opinion is that CAR valued him closer to a top 10 talent. I thoguht he was a top 10 player all along. I don't know anyone who has actually seen Deangelo play 20 plus times that doesnt think he is a star in the making. Deangelo is far more talented that Maroney IMO.Do you think THAT had more to do with the selection than whether or not Foster is able to do the job?That pick, IMO, does not mean they are planning to run Foster into a 3DB role. IMO, they feel they got a gift RB to fall into their lap in round one - they obviously thought he'd be gone by the time they picked if he was the #2 RB on their board.If Car had drafted a guy like Drew and waited until round 2 to go RB, then I would fully agree with your stance here. They did not wait however and drafted the RB they had #2 on their board! Only Bush was ranked higher by Car.Anyone know what is Foster's contract sitch?I lost my link.If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams?
Drafting an RB In the first round is not ALWAYS an indicator that the team is disappointed or has no faith in existing RBs. They will certainly expect a return on their investment, but if Foster is ready to go inthe next year or two, drafting an RB in round one is not indicative of all that much.
Moreover, given Foster's injury history, that would appear the greater concern than lack of confidence that he can do the job - I think the guy has all the SKILL necessary to be the primary ball carrier, but skill alone is not a team's primary driving force behind taking an RB early.
Jacksonville took Drew in round two despite a glut of RBs - there is little to no chance Drew sees the field much in 2006.
2007 on, however . . .
Either way, can anyone help me out with Foster's K situation?
DeAngelo Williams ran an official 4.38 forty at his pro day.On a hard, slippery Memphis track, Williams ran a 4.42 into the wind and was timed as fast as 4.36. The former Tigers' star has been on the rise since a marvelous showing at the Senior Bowl and his fast forty time will only help his stock.This 5'9" 217 listing of Deangelo Williams is garbage. He measured in at the combine at 5'8 1/2" 207 lbs. And he has had a couple pretty serious injurys in college already. He doesnt have break away speed and has hands of stone. Not to mention the offense Memphis ran always had their RB in motion before taking hand offs, very weird and unlike anything in the NFL. Laurence Maroney is the best RB in this years class followed by LeDale White then Bush. Mark it down people.
Link?In any case this measurment seems to be in error unless you think NFL.com is wrong? Honestly I cannot think of a more official source.This 5'9" 217 listing of Deangelo Williams is garbage. He measured in at the combine at 5'8 1/2" 207 lbs.
Those injuries do not seem to have effected his ability at all when he came back just as strong or stronger after them. So what makes them so serious?And he has had a couple pretty serious injurys in college already.
He has been clocked in the 4.4 range. How fast does he need to be?He doesnt have break away speed
Link?I have read scouting reports that questioned his pass blocking technique but nothing but positives in regards to his ability to catch the ball. Perhaps you are confusing Williams with Maroney?and has hands of stone.
Thats interesting. Never heard that before.Not to mention the offense Memphis ran always had their RB in motion before taking hand offs, very weird and unlike anything in the NFL.
Noted.Laurence Maroney is the best RB in this years class followed by LeDale White then Bush. Mark it down people.
thank you - i didn't want to jump in without all the numbers, but I recall Williams' big thing was tearing off HUGE runs and BREAKING AWAY from the pack while scoring long TDs.Also, that thing abou tthe back in motion before the handoff? Don't ALL backs go in motion before the handoff? Like, towards the LOS????? Or does the QB run back and hand the ball to a stationary RB who then starts running??????DeAngelo Williams ran an official 4.38 forty at his pro day.On a hard, slippery Memphis track, Williams ran a 4.42 into the wind and was timed as fast as 4.36. The former Tigers' star has been on the rise since a marvelous showing at the Senior Bowl and his fast forty time will only help his stock.This 5'9" 217 listing of Deangelo Williams is garbage. He measured in at the combine at 5'8 1/2" 207 lbs. And he has had a couple pretty serious injurys in college already. He doesnt have break away speed and has hands of stone. Not to mention the offense Memphis ran always had their RB in motion before taking hand offs, very weird and unlike anything in the NFL. Laurence Maroney is the best RB in this years class followed by LeDale White then Bush. Mark it down people.
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...ort=NFL&id=3611
I don't know what you define as breakaway speed, but I think a 4.38 is fast enough to succeed in the NFL. I don't have the combine measurements so i'll take your word for it. But even if true, you think that half inch matters that much? And a broken leg was certainly a bad injury, but he seemed to be back to form last year and obviously did well at his pro day, combine, and senior bowl...Don't get me wrong, I love laurence maroney as a prospect too, i just don't get the DWill hate.
I see it as having just as much to do with a lack of faith in Foster as it does with Stephen Davis' soon to be retirement (if he hasn't already retired.) For 2 seasons in a row, Carolina has gotten all the way down to their 4th string RB due to injuries. In much of '04, and parts of '05 they had to start games with their backup FB(Goings)! There was little doubt they would be taking a RB in the draft with Davis now done.If Foster can stay healthy, I fear we'll see the RBBC like last year with Davis. Anything for Carolina to keep their backs healthy and their running game centered offense rolling.If Foster is so great then why did Car run up to the stand as fast as they could to draft Williams? It's getting a bit old hearing how Foster is going to finally light it up. I feel like he is the Vick of RBs.Neither will start this year barring injury to the guy's ahead of them.
For dynasty both are nice picks. But I would take Foster ahead of Williams because he is still young.
Redraft..mid round handcuff's if you feel you need to.
Foster is primed for a huge break out year, now that the job his is.
Everyone thinks he will get hurt again. Broken bones are bad luck....not injury prone nagging muscles injuires.
Foster is a stud when he plays.
He was in 15/16 regular season games last season and split with Davis.
You realize it's not hard to bulk up 10 lbs in a few months?Cadillac Williams did exactly that last offseason. He was 205 when he was drafted and 217 when camp opened.This 5'9" 217 listing of Deangelo Williams is garbage. He measured in at the combine at 5'8 1/2" 207 lbs. And he has had a couple pretty serious injurys in college already. He doesnt have break away speed and has hands of stone. Not to mention the offense Memphis ran always had their RB in motion before taking hand offs, very weird and unlike anything in the NFL. Laurence Maroney is the best RB in this years class followed by LeDale White then Bush. Mark it down people.
exactly what I was about to post.dunn may not be best comp for williams... i think dunn is about 180 lbs
williams about 5'9" 210 with tree trunk thighs... similar physique to emmit smith (only a lot faster... broke his state record in 100 m)
Williams isn't going to beat out Deshaun Foster. He's going to need Foster to get injured again in order to get his chance to take the reigns. If past injuries are any indication, there's a decent shot that might happen. But Foster is still relatively young, so who knows?Dillon is the starter in New England. They aren't in a rush to get Maroney going, and have the opportunity to develop his skill set throughout the year. He should get 5-6 carries per game on average, IMO.Time to bump this thread. Both of these guys have serious upside for 2006. Let the August analysis commence.
dillon may be slowing down, but considering how much the pats pass, maroney will be feeding off scraps unless dillon gets hurt (which is very possible)...Belechick plays his high draft picks. He does not draft projects or guys that he thinks need to be groomed that high. Bottomline. When you throw in the facts that the Patriots had other pretty prominent needs and could have gone in other directions at that draft spot and the concerns about Dillon slowing down, you can see that Maroney may not only have the best situation of all the rookie running backs, but possibly the most upside since he is viewed by New England as an every down back. I predict a big year, and career, for Maroney.
Good bump Routilla, as there is some pro analysis in this thread IMO.Still believe Foster is on the bench soon after the season starts, injury or not.Williams isn't going to beat out Deshaun Foster. He's going to need Foster to get injured again in order to get his chance to take the reigns. If past injuries are any indication, there's a decent shot that might happen. But Foster is still relatively young, so who knows?Dillon is the starter in New England. They aren't in a rush to get Maroney going, and have the opportunity to develop his skill set throughout the year. He should get 5-6 carries per game on average, IMO.Time to bump this thread. Both of these guys have serious upside for 2006. Let the August analysis commence.
In 2004, NE was the 5th highest team in rushing attempts with 524. Considering they went through a few RBs last year because of injuries, and also had to rotate some Olineman because of injury, they didn't have much of a choice but pass at times.Based on the past 5 years, NE has averaged 461 rushing attempts per year with an average rank of 14th. That includes last years low output and another banged up year in 2002, not to mention Antowain Smith being the primary ball carrier in three of those years.dillon may be slowing down, but considering how much the pats pass, maroney will be feeding off scraps unless dillon gets hurt (which is very possible)...Belechick plays his high draft picks. He does not draft projects or guys that he thinks need to be groomed that high. Bottomline. When you throw in the facts that the Patriots had other pretty prominent needs and could have gone in other directions at that draft spot and the concerns about Dillon slowing down, you can see that Maroney may not only have the best situation of all the rookie running backs, but possibly the most upside since he is viewed by New England as an every down back. I predict a big year, and career, for Maroney.
year r/att rank2001 473 82002 395 282003 473 122004 524 52005 439 18
Bottom line is you're going to get people telling you to Draft Maroney simply because they did, and others telling you to Draft Williams because that's what they did. I drafted both of these cats, and I'll give the slight edge to Maroney. Maroney probably has the best chance to see the field the quickest. That being next year, with Dillon getting up there in age.Edited: I dont think you can go wrong with either player, though.Staff rankings (dynasty) have Maroney ranked higher while rookie rankings have Williams with a slight advantage. I'd like to see some of the board's analysis/predictions for what these guys' futures - both for this season and beyond - have in store.
Wow... he looks VERY cuttable after this season.