LenDale White was a top 15 RB with 1100 yards and 7 TDs. LenDale's numbers may drop a bit this year, but if Forte put up those kind of numbers his owners should be doing back flips.You should be able to count on him for average production from a RB3, probably not far off from what a guy like Lendale White could provide.
I meant this year, and I don't expect him to approach those numbers. Titans anticipate 50-50 share in backfield Titans coach Jeff Fisher anticipates a near even split in touches between starter LenDale White and first-round pick Chris Johnson."I would assume it would be close to 50-50, maybe 60-40," he said. "We’re going to use them both depending on the game plans and it makes sense to take advantage of both of their abilities. I think we’ll have a better gauge once we get to the middle part of the season." The Titans could begin the year using White more, but eventually make it an even timeshare with Johnson. Aug. 27 - 2:06 am etLenDale White was a top 15 RB with 1100 yards and 7 TDs. LenDale's numbers may drop a bit this year, but if Forte put up those kind of numbers his owners should be doing back flips.You should be able to count on him for average production from a RB3, probably not far off from what a guy like Lendale White could provide.
I'd be jumping through rings of fire if he puts up numbers like that.LenDale White was a top 15 RB with 1100 yards and 7 TDs. LenDale's numbers may drop a bit this year, but if Forte put up those kind of numbers his owners should be doing back flips.You should be able to count on him for average production from a RB3, probably not far off from what a guy like Lendale White could provide.
I wouldn't mind this. Mendehall may end up taking over for Parker but that is doubtful. I have Grant and Gore starting and I am almost banking on one of the getting hurt or not living up to projections (i.e. Grant). Thanks for the insight guys.You should be able to count on him for average production from a RB3, probably not far off from what a guy like Lendale White could provide.
You must be a KJ owner.I woldnt want to count on Forte as a starter, but he should make an OK #3 RB. 1000 yards rushing might be pushing it, but with the lack of great WR options, he could catch enough passes to give him borderline #2 RB upside.I actually see Kevin Jones becoming the starter here by mid season if he can stay healthy. If he does become he starter I still expect a 60/40 share of the carries. Jones gives this weak offense and QB the ability to throw dump off passes as he is a better receiver out of the back field. Just my opinion, don't hate!
The Oline is a huge mess. I'm not sure any back can have sucess running back there. Although the Bears still play Detroit twice a yearIf the OL gets a little better he can provide some decent numbers.
I don't know if I would go as far as to compare him to Benson, but color me unimpressed with him thus far. I think a healthy Kevin Jones >>>> Forte.The few games I watched this preseason, just screams an above average back. To be honest he actually reminded me a little of Cedric Benson. I hope I am dead wrong but it could be the line, but the 3rd preseason game I watched nothing excited me about him.
That was one of the first things I thought when watching him tooTo be honest he actually reminded me a little of Cedric Benson.
I agree. From what I've seen of Forte this preseason, he seems just like another JJ Arrington. Some of it may have to do with that line, but I didn't seen anything from him that screams 3 down back. Bears would've been better off with Ray Rice or taken Chris Johnson earlier. I'm beginning to think that Benson's struggles last year were not all his fault. That line is atrocious.As soon as Kevin Jones is healthy Forte is in a RBBC, at best. Jones is a better back.
While I agree, can either of them show anything with the Chicago offense and it's porous OL & lame QB/WR group? Neither Forte or KJ will be a RB2 caliber fantasy value until they fix the overall offensive line problems. Marginal bye week filler/RB3 until the line solidifies or steps up a whole level of play.Forte had trouble early preseason picking up blocks, but it looks better now (not alot, but better).Forte ran hard, but had no room to get to open space.I would rather have KJ over Forte.KJ is the better back when 100% healthy (big if there)Forte will have significant trouble behind that line (as any rookie would)It will become RBBC as KJ returns to playing conditionForte will wear down quicker (longer season)KJ will get more Red Zone touchesKJ is the better receiverAs soon as Kevin Jones is healthy Forte is in a RBBC, at best. Jones is a better back.
I have to disagree with the folks who have been unimpressed with Forte. In fact, I think he's got the perfect mentality for being the lead back in an offense thats not going to maul opponents at the line of scrimmage or stretch defenses with a robust passing game. Here's what I've seen:- Top notch receiver out of the backfield who can make the first tackler miss on screens and dumpoffs- Efficient runner who doesn't waste energy dancing or trying to break runs outside- Instinctive getting small through the hole and rubbing off of contact- almost ALWAYS gets yards after contact, whether its falling forward, deflecting off of hits, or dragging tacklersForte is not a speed back, nor is a highlight reel back. He's a lunchpail guy who is going grind out yards and keep this offense in 2nd and 6/7, 3rd and 4, even when the O line isnt getting a push. I would say Forte is approximately a bigger Chester Taylor, or a little more physical Ladell Betts. Not a rousing endorsement, but with the holes on this team, I don't expect them to invest a lot of money or a high pick at RB in the next few years - I expect Forte to be the starting back in Chicago for at least the 2-3 years.just got him (reluctantly) in the rookie draft.. somebody convince me that this guy is the real deal....please
The two backs that come to mind when I see Forte is Eddie George and Marcus Allen. While I have no illusions he will match their careers I see traits and attributes of both in him. Nothing spectacular (like George) but before you know it he has fallen forward for a 5 yd gain. He also has a bit of slashing and elusiveness in him (like Allen), but I don't know if he has Allen's top end speed. Haven't really seen him open it up yet. As far as Kevin Jones I really see no legit. competition here. KJ has accumulated enough NFL history to make me wary of his injury history going forward. In addition didn't the Lions trade for Tater Bell because KJ had some problems getting the job done? Not a ringing endorsement. Give me a solid injury free year from KJ before I even begin to see him as a starting RB in the NFL.I have to disagree with the folks who have been unimpressed with Forte. In fact, I think he's got the perfect mentality for being the lead back in an offense thats not going to maul opponents at the line of scrimmage or stretch defenses with a robust passing game. Here's what I've seen:- Top notch receiver out of the backfield who can make the first tackler miss on screens and dumpoffs- Efficient runner who doesn't waste energy dancing or trying to break runs outside- Instinctive getting small through the hole and rubbing off of contact- almost ALWAYS gets yards after contact, whether its falling forward, deflecting off of hits, or dragging tacklersForte is not a speed back, nor is a highlight reel back. He's a lunchpail guy who is going grind out yards and keep this offense in 2nd and 6/7, 3rd and 4, even when the O line isnt getting a push. I would say Forte is approximately a bigger Chester Taylor, or a little more physical Ladell Betts. Not a rousing endorsement, but with the holes on this team, I don't expect them to invest a lot of money or a high pick at RB in the next few years - I expect Forte to be the starting back in Chicago for at least the 2-3 years.just got him (reluctantly) in the rookie draft.. somebody convince me that this guy is the real deal....please
The Lions traded for Bell only because Jones was not certain to play early in the year. It had nothing to do with how he played.As far as Kevin Jones I really see no legit. competition here. KJ has accumulated enough NFL history to make me wary of his injury history going forward. In addition didn't the Lions trade for Tater Bell because KJ had some problems getting the job done? Not a ringing endorsement. Give me a solid injury free year from KJ before I even begin to see him as a starting RB in the NFL.
I agree Sig, this is basically what I said earlier.I have to disagree with the folks who have been unimpressed with Forte. In fact, I think he's got the perfect mentality for being the lead back in an offense thats not going to maul opponents at the line of scrimmage or stretch defenses with a robust passing game. Here's what I've seen:- Top notch receiver out of the backfield who can make the first tackler miss on screens and dumpoffs- Efficient runner who doesn't waste energy dancing or trying to break runs outside- Instinctive getting small through the hole and rubbing off of contact- almost ALWAYS gets yards after contact, whether its falling forward, deflecting off of hits, or dragging tacklersForte is not a speed back, nor is a highlight reel back. He's a lunchpail guy who is going grind out yards and keep this offense in 2nd and 6/7, 3rd and 4, even when the O line isnt getting a push. I would say Forte is approximately a bigger Chester Taylor, or a little more physical Ladell Betts. Not a rousing endorsement, but with the holes on this team, I don't expect them to invest a lot of money or a high pick at RB in the next few years - I expect Forte to be the starting back in Chicago for at least the 2-3 years.just got him (reluctantly) in the rookie draft.. somebody convince me that this guy is the real deal....please
Um, my scoring system doesn't reward efficient running. If you are saying he will take a 1 yard gain rather than risk a stuff by dancing and trying to spring a longer run - that may have some merit a' la young Rudi Johnson.But unless he runs on batteries, I'm not sure that "not wasting energy" is much of a positive.I think he's purely at the mercy of his O-line. In that regard, I think a healthy K.Jones can do more than Forte with less.- Efficient runner who doesn't waste energy dancing or trying to break runs outside
If it were so easy, I don't think guys like Rashaan Salaam, Curtis Enis, Anthony Thomas, James Allen, and Cedric Benson would have been drafted so early.BoulderBob said:I think it's fairly easy to tell when a RB has the "it" that is needed to produce in the NFL, and Forte simply has the look/skills necessary. Compared to Rashaan Salaam, Curtis Enis, Anthony Thomas, James Allen, and Cedric Benson... Forte is clearly a breath of fresh air.
That's not a bad comparison, but if you want match up builds as well as talent level I think he's most similar to DeShaun Foster, Chris Brown and Lamar Gordon. Not horrible, will probably have a decent NFL career, but better suited as a backup.From what I've seen of Forte this preseason, he seems just like another JJ Arrington.
This sounds like you just described Eddie George, is that a similar comparison at all?I have to disagree with the folks who have been unimpressed with Forte. In fact, I think he's got the perfect mentality for being the lead back in an offense thats not going to maul opponents at the line of scrimmage or stretch defenses with a robust passing game. Here's what I've seen:- Top notch receiver out of the backfield who can make the first tackler miss on screens and dumpoffs- Efficient runner who doesn't waste energy dancing or trying to break runs outside- Instinctive getting small through the hole and rubbing off of contact- almost ALWAYS gets yards after contact, whether its falling forward, deflecting off of hits, or dragging tacklersForte is not a speed back, nor is a highlight reel back. He's a lunchpail guy who is going grind out yards and keep this offense in 2nd and 6/7, 3rd and 4, even when the O line isnt getting a push. I would say Forte is approximately a bigger Chester Taylor, or a little more physical Ladell Betts. Not a rousing endorsement, but with the holes on this team, I don't expect them to invest a lot of money or a high pick at RB in the next few years - I expect Forte to be the starting back in Chicago for at least the 2-3 years.just got him (reluctantly) in the rookie draft.. somebody convince me that this guy is the real deal....please
Anthony Thomas was a plodder without vision, Forte is neither...no worries mate! I hate using Madden terms, but Forte would have a high "awareness" rating if you could quantify such a thing. He has the "shiftyness" that Thomas lacked and that all good RB's need. Injury(torn acl in the past) and the rest of the Bears offense(outside of the TE position, no explanation necessary) are my only (fantasy) concerns with this RB.from what I'm reading here it sounds like I drafted the next Anthony ThomasThe A-Train has left and the F-Train is in the station ready to TAKE OFF
Which was part of my larger point. Regardless of whatever talent he may have his injuries have prevented him from producing. After Detroit traded for Bell I recall even in those moments he was healthy he had a hard time distinguishing himself from Bell. Could be wrong about that.Anthony Borbely said:The Lions traded for Bell only because Jones was not certain to play early in the year. It had nothing to do with how he played.Enraged Nerfball said:As far as Kevin Jones I really see no legit. competition here. KJ has accumulated enough NFL history to make me wary of his injury history going forward. In addition didn't the Lions trade for Tater Bell because KJ had some problems getting the job done? Not a ringing endorsement. Give me a solid injury free year from KJ before I even begin to see him as a starting RB in the NFL.
Interesting.. Going to see if I can catch some highlights on YouTubeAnthony Thomas was a plodder without vision, Forte is neither...no worries mate! I hate using Madden terms, but Forte would have a high "awareness" rating if you could quantify such a thing. He has the "shiftyness" that Thomas lacked and that all good RB's need. Injury(torn acl in the past) and the rest of the Bears offense(outside of the TE position, no explanation necessary) are my only (fantasy) concerns with this RB.from what I'm reading here it sounds like I drafted the next Anthony ThomasThe A-Train has left and the F-Train is in the station ready to TAKE OFF
Are we talking 12+ team leagues here? Who else are you looking at for RB#3 and how are they in such a better position than Forte?The guy looks to have a chance for a lot of carries on a team that will often suck. But is that worse than splitting carries, including not getting goaline looks on a team whose offense will be ok?Id feel very uneasy if I had Forte as an RB3 this year. The OL somehow looks even worse than last season. It is going to be an ugly season boys.
The OL is so bad, Bears are in talks with Fred Miller to come back...
Doesnt matter, he has a low BMI, he should not succeed.I've got 50 cents for anyone who can link to a listed weight of 222 for Forte. NBC had him there, but everything I find anywhere is 216.
BMI is relevant, yes. But only in conjunction with weight. And for Forte the difference between gaining five pounds to 222 from his combine weight of 217, or losing a pound to 216 is pretty big.Doesnt matter, he has a low BMI, he should not succeed.I've got 50 cents for anyone who can link to a listed weight of 222 for Forte. NBC had him there, but everything I find anywhere is 216.
I was being sarcastic. I do not think BMI has anything to do with a players success.BMI is relevant, yes. But only in conjunction with weight. And for Forte the difference between gaining five pounds to 222 from his combine weight of 217, or losing a pound to 216 is pretty big.Doesnt matter, he has a low BMI, he should not succeed.I've got 50 cents for anyone who can link to a listed weight of 222 for Forte. NBC had him there, but everything I find anywhere is 216.
I'll leave it for EBF to argue with you, but I disagree.I think you can do something that approximates a RB's "true weight" in the same way that the NBA uses things other than height to calculate "true height." And one of those things is BMI.I was being sarcastic. I do not think BMI has anything to do with a players success.BMI is relevant, yes. But only in conjunction with weight. And for Forte the difference between gaining five pounds to 222 from his combine weight of 217, or losing a pound to 216 is pretty big.Doesnt matter, he has a low BMI, he should not succeed.I've got 50 cents for anyone who can link to a listed weight of 222 for Forte. NBC had him there, but everything I find anywhere is 216.