LivingTheDream
Footballguy
he looks pretty money. making some nice cuts out there and he's got some burst.Does he look good or is the Colts run D just that bad? That's my question.
he looks pretty money. making some nice cuts out there and he's got some burst.Does he look good or is the Colts run D just that bad? That's my question.
from my dynasty perspective, I rarely give up on a guy after one game. he's shown me enough that with some qb and Oline improvements he could be a very serviceable rb#2, low rb#1 caliber player. seems to have shown real good footwork and decent vision and understanding of the line blocking scheme. after one "decent" game his value isn't high enough yet to get me to part with him. IMHOIf I owned Forte in any of my dynasty leagues I would be looking to sell high after tonight. I don't think he's a special talent and I think the Bears are going to struggle on offense this year, but after this game people will be willing to buy the idea that he's the next great back. I would capitalize on that while you can.
Read what you wrote. 216 is bad...but 222 is good? Seriously dude....any man in that weight range will vary 4-8 pounds in a given week, depending when he's eaten, had a dump, how hydrated he is, etc. This is why I just can't buy into the BMI stuff.Seriously...I've lost 3 pounds in ten minutes before (I go about 245)BMI is relevant, yes. But only in conjunction with weight. And for Forte the difference between gaining five pounds to 222 from his combine weight of 217, or losing a pound to 216 is pretty big.Doesnt matter, he has a low BMI, he should not succeed.I've got 50 cents for anyone who can link to a listed weight of 222 for Forte. NBC had him there, but everything I find anywhere is 216.
He has looked pretty friggin good tonight, great feet, good speed and runs with good power. Chicagos offense has not looked as bad as i thought they would either. Might just be the Colts D, but i dont think they are that bad with Sanders in the lineup. What do you think you could get for him that somebody would consider?If I owned Forte in any of my dynasty leagues I would be looking to sell high after tonight. I don't think he's a special talent and I think the Bears are going to struggle on offense this year, but after this game people will be willing to buy the idea that he's the next great back. I would capitalize on that while you can.
He's not horrible, but it takes a pretty special back to last as a starter in the NFL. Look at the current pro backs who have been starting for at least two consecutive seasons: LaDainian TomlinsonLarry JohnsonFrank GoreSteven JacksonEdgerrin JamesClinton PortisFred TaylorWillie ParkerJamal LewisWillis McGaheeThomas JonesA dose of realism.Good is not good enough in the NFL. The NFL is full of "good" backs. Ladell Betts is a good back. Sammy Morris is a good back. Mewelde Moore is a good back. Michael Bennett is a good back. There are guys like this rotting on the benches of NFL teams. They're capable of putting up respectable stats when given the opportunity, but they aren't dynamic enough to lock down a starting position. The reason I'm so hard on rookie backs is because I'm only looking for guys who are going to make the above list someday. In order to make that list, players have to perform at a very high level. They have to ward off inevitable challenges from draft picks and free agents. Over 300 new players enter the NFL each year looking for a job. Only the very best survive.I don't hate Matt Forte. If you go waaay back and read some of my early posts on him, you'll actually see that I was touting him as a legit draft prospect before he was widely considered a first day prospect. However, is there any reason to believe he's better than Chris Brown, Michael Bennett, Anthony Thomas, DeShaun Foster and Justin Fargas? I don't see one.After a nationally televised 100 yard game against a good team, you might find a buyer willing to overpay to play those odds.He has looked pretty friggin good tonight, great feet, good speed and runs with good power. Chicagos offense has not looked as bad as i thought they would either. Might just be the Colts D, but i dont think they are that bad with Sanders in the lineup. What do you think you could get for him that somebody would consider?If I owned Forte in any of my dynasty leagues I would be looking to sell high after tonight. I don't think he's a special talent and I think the Bears are going to struggle on offense this year, but after this game people will be willing to buy the idea that he's the next great back. I would capitalize on that while you can.
Who are you going to trade him for?He's not horrible, but it takes a pretty special back to last as a starter in the NFL. Look at the current pro backs who have been starting for at least two consecutive seasons: LaDainian TomlinsonHe has looked pretty friggin good tonight, great feet, good speed and runs with good power. Chicagos offense has not looked as bad as i thought they would either. Might just be the Colts D, but i dont think they are that bad with Sanders in the lineup. What do you think you could get for him that somebody would consider?If I owned Forte in any of my dynasty leagues I would be looking to sell high after tonight. I don't think he's a special talent and I think the Bears are going to struggle on offense this year, but after this game people will be willing to buy the idea that he's the next great back. I would capitalize on that while you can.
Larry Johnson
Frank Gore
Steven Jackson
Edgerrin James
Clinton Portis
Fred Taylor
Willie Parker
Jamal Lewis
Willis McGahee
Thomas Jones
A dose of realism.
Good is not good enough in the NFL. The NFL is full of "good" backs. Ladell Betts is a good back. Sammy Morris is a good back. Mewelde Moore is a good back. Michael Bennett is a good back. There are guys like this rotting on the benches of NFL teams. They're capable of putting up respectable stats when given the opportunity, but they aren't dynamic enough to lock down a starting position.
The reason I'm so hard on rookie backs is because I'm only looking for guys who are going to make the above list someday. In order to make that list, players have to perform at a very high level. They have to ward off inevitable challenges from draft picks and free agents. Over 300 new players enter the NFL each year looking for a job. Only the very best survive.
I don't hate Matt Forte. If you go waaay back and read some of my early posts on him, you'll actually see that I was touting him as a legit draft prospect before he was widely considered a first day prospect. However, is there any reason to believe he's better than Chris Brown, Michael Bennett, Anthony Thomas, DeShaun Foster and Justin Fargas? I don't see one.
After a nationally televised 100 yard game against a good team, you might find a buyer willing to overpay to play those odds.
EBF...you're one of the most respected posters in here...but that list is terrible. Several notable names are missing from your list for one (how about Westbrook?)For another, most in here are still showing some caution on Forte, but the eyes don't lie. He hasn't run free through gaping holes. On many occasions, he's made the hole. He's showed terrific vision and better agility then I thought he had. He's shown quickness.Now, maybe it is just one game...but if I owned him (I don't)...it would take a pretty stout offer to tempt me to part with him after today!He's not horrible, but it takes a pretty special back to last as a starter in the NFL. Look at the current pro backs who have been starting for at least two consecutive seasons: LaDainian TomlinsonLarry JohnsonFrank GoreSteven JacksonEdgerrin JamesClinton PortisFred TaylorWillie ParkerJamal LewisWillis McGaheeThomas JonesA dose of realism.Good is not good enough in the NFL. The NFL is full of "good" backs. Ladell Betts is a good back. Sammy Morris is a good back. Mewelde Moore is a good back. Michael Bennett is a good back. There are guys like this rotting on the benches of NFL teams. They're capable of putting up respectable stats when given the opportunity, but they aren't dynamic enough to lock down a starting position. The reason I'm so hard on rookie backs is because I'm only looking for guys who are going to make the above list someday. In order to make that list, players have to perform at a very high level. They have to ward off inevitable challenges from draft picks and free agents. Over 300 new players enter the NFL each year looking for a job. Only the very best survive.I don't hate Matt Forte. If you go waaay back and read some of my early posts on him, you'll actually see that I was touting him as a legit draft prospect before he was widely considered a first day prospect. However, is there any reason to believe he's better than Chris Brown, Michael Bennett, Anthony Thomas, DeShaun Foster and Justin Fargas? I don't see one.After a nationally televised 100 yard game against a good team, you might find a buyer willing to overpay to play those odds.He has looked pretty friggin good tonight, great feet, good speed and runs with good power. Chicagos offense has not looked as bad as i thought they would either. Might just be the Colts D, but i dont think they are that bad with Sanders in the lineup. What do you think you could get for him that somebody would consider?If I owned Forte in any of my dynasty leagues I would be looking to sell high after tonight. I don't think he's a special talent and I think the Bears are going to struggle on offense this year, but after this game people will be willing to buy the idea that he's the next great back. I would capitalize on that while you can.
Trade him for the most value you can get. What that is depends on your league.Who are you going to trade him for?
Fact is it would take something people would not be willing to part with for me to give him up. I think he has just as good a chance as any rookie RB not named Mcfadden or Stewart to have a very good career, plus he has immediate value.EBF said:Trade him for the most value you can get. What that is depends on your league.Burning Sensation said:Who are you going to trade him for?
Redraft, maybe. Dynasty? Disagree big-time. In dynasty leagues, the best offer you'll likely get is for a player who may give you slightly better production this year, but with nowhere near the ceiling Forte has. Not the type of deal I'd be looking for if I did decide to move him.EBF said:Trade him for the most value you can get. What that is depends on your league.Burning Sensation said:Who are you going to trade him for?
This is exactly why I recommend selling with a player like this unless you're 100% convinced he's legit. The FF community always gives young players the benefit of the doubt. I've seen this reaction before with guys like Julius Jones, Chris Brown, Tatum Bell, and Quentin Griffin. Any young player who flashes talent will generate excitement from the FF community. The thing is, virtually any RB on an NFL roster could step in and look halfway decent. We've seen countless journeymen do just that (Betts, Dayne, Suggs, Bennett, Droughns). Only the elite players keep the job and sustain good production over multiple seasons. There's a chance that Forte is the real deal. However, there's also a chance that he'll be backing up Beanie Wells in 2009. How you want to play those odds is up to you. All I'm saying is that I'd be looking to sell him if I could find someone willing to overpay. The perceived value for young backs is often greater than the actual value. Relatively few of these guys will prove to be the real deal over the long haul.Now, maybe it is just one game...but if I owned him (I don't)...it would take a pretty stout offer to tempt me to part with him after today!
I dont totally disagree with this, I just like Forte more than you. There are some RB's from this class that should be traded before they lose some value, i just dont think Forte is one of them.This is exactly why I recommend selling with a player like this unless you're 100% convinced he's legit. The FF community always gives young players the benefit of the doubt. I've seen this reaction before with guys like Julius Jones, Chris Brown, Tatum Bell, and Quentin Griffin. Any young player who flashes talent will generate excitement from the FF community. The thing is, virtually any RB on an NFL roster could step in and look halfway decent. We've seen countless journeymen do just that (Betts, Dayne, Suggs, Bennett, Droughns). Only the elite players keep the job and sustain good production over multiple seasons. There's a chance that Forte is the real deal. However, there's also a chance that he'll be backing up Beanie Wells in 2009. How you want to play those odds is up to you. All I'm saying is that I'd be looking to sell him if I could find someone willing to overpay. The perceived value for young backs is often greater than the actual value. Relatively few of these guys will prove to be the real deal over the long haul.Now, maybe it is just one game...but if I owned him (I don't)...it would take a pretty stout offer to tempt me to part with him after today!
Just throwing some names out here for dynasty purposes:Holmes?Cotchery?Marshall?Bowe?Jennings?Welker?Boldin?I don't see many possibilities of Forte really being moved for a RB straight up and I don't think the WR value gets any greater than this. I'm not sure you could even haul all these guys. Depends on the circumstances I suppose.Fact is it would take something people would not be willing to part with for me to give him up. I think he has just as good a chance as any rookie RB not named Mcfadden or Stewart to have a very good career, plus he has immediate value.EBF said:Trade him for the most value you can get. What that is depends on your league.Burning Sensation said:Who are you going to trade him for?
Certainly did not sound like a rookie in his interview after the game. He seems to have a good head on his shoulders. Solid #2 RB.The thing I liked about Forte is that he ran with a lot of confidence and vision. Converted a lot of 3rd and shorts and I think his 50 yarder fired up a whole offense that was looking kind of listless at the time.I won't say superstar. But he won't be a bust either. He plays the game very smart.
Taylor is in another class as an athlete.IMO Forte is a poor man's Adrian Peterson. Tall runner with surprising agility. Forte isn't nearly the athlete ADP is though. I'm sticking with Chris Brown as the closest comparison.As far as comparisons go, Gregg Rosenthal of Rotoworld wrote that Forte reminded him of Fred Taylor.
This is exactly why I recommend selling with a player like this unless you're 100% convinced he's legit.
I couldn't agree more with that sentence. That is a great general philosophy, not just for Forte.I dont agree with it with Forte, but it is a good idea. Eddie Royal is a guy i like, but he might be a perfect example.This is exactly why I recommend selling with a player like this unless you're 100% convinced he's legit.I couldn't agree more with that sentence. That is a great general philosophy, not just for Forte.
I think that was a great trade on your part...I thought Forte and the Bears line looked VERY IMPRESSIVE against the colts....that being said...its just one game and they Bears were very interested in making a statement given their SuperBowl debacle...I will be very interested to see how they do against Carolina.....if I were betting man....I would take Carolina -2 1/2......but on Sunday I will be cheering for the Bears....I'm in the sell high category. One game does not a player make. I have my doubts about Orton and the OLine yet and I see this causing some trouble down the stretch. Now if you drafted Forte in the mid-rounds as many folks did, then chances are you have 2 decent RBs that started ahead of him and you should be able to move him for a better caliber player that will help your team overall. Chances are, his value now is the highest it'll be, unless he repeats the performance against a stout Carolina D that held LT under 100 yds.My bet is he doesn't repeat. I sold him with Lee Evans for Reggie Wayne/Lendale White. (Redraft league... Dynasty different story)
He did? He averaged 3.5 YPC, compared to Fortes 5.3.Kevin Jones also looked good the other night behind that line, which is why I'm tempering my expectations a bit before we see more of Forte.
I thought he had some nice runs, particularly for a guy just coming off a devastating knee injury.He did? He averaged 3.5 YPC, compared to Fortes 5.3.Kevin Jones also looked good the other night behind that line, which is why I'm tempering my expectations a bit before we see more of Forte.
i didn't see that (flipping around)...how long were the runs?...sometimes those holding calls don't have anything to do with the success of the play...it's good to know he could of had an even better gamelooked good again today. had 2 long runs taken back by holding calls ... i really like this kid